by antiaristo » Sun Jun 19, 2005 11:53 am
anon,<br>That's what I mean about Clinton being "shy". I have a few stories from 2001 about how Blair wanted to honour his friend Clinton. Testing the water for something that had already come to pass. The sensitivity is massive.<br>There is only one reason you go to the Palace with your family.<br><br>The part about "honorary" knighthoods is the BIG LIE, promoted by the powers that be.<br>It's like saying someone is an "honorary Freemason".<br>It just does not exist. You are either in or out.<br>If you accept a knighthood you swear the same oath of allegiance to Queen Elizabeth - whether or not you are already a subject.<br>If you are not already a subject, you become one under your new name. Sir William Clinton holds a British passport. So does Sir George Bush. Both have sworn allegiance to the same person. They are in the same gang. <p></p><i></i>