WikiLeaks to release over half a million 9/11 intercepts

by **Jeff** » Thu Nov 26, 2009 2:08 pm

tron wrote:im curious.....what was the chatter here at RI on 9/11?....it was a little before my time....any way to search for that specific day

No RI back then. Though it could be fun to fabricate an archive, if it wasn't so much senseless work. ("Who is Paying for Father Coughlin's Publicity Right Now?")

by **Nordic** » Thu Nov 26, 2009 4:45 pm

Uncle $cam wrote:2001-09-11 10:56:37 Skytel [005054523] C ALPHA I want some Bin Laden Ass!! Give me a call if you get a chance-1152143

2001-09-11 20:22:52 Skytel [0001336] C ALPHA ]!z00]"AR];0a]<2Sources indicate that people linked to Osama Bin Laden are responsible for the attacks... ]$ (85

It's funny, now, how clear it is that this conclusion was arrived at a LITTLE QUICKLY.

by **8bitagent** » Thu Nov 26, 2009 7:13 pm

tron wrote:im curious.....what was the chatter here at RI on 9/11?....it was a little before my time....any way to search for that specific day

I believe RI started in 2004...

But I did hear a 5 hour archive of the Alex Jones show from the morning of 9/11/2001 as well as archives of their website and affiliate websides like propagandamatrix.com....quite the trip to say the least.
(The controlled demolition, anthrax is next, "NWO was behind this!" and Illuminati symbolism theories were out in full force within moments of the attacks)

by **chiggerbit** » Tue Dec 01, 2009 1:16 pm

http://cityroom.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/ ... -messages/

Programmers are introducing tools to analyze the hundreds of thousands of pager messages, supposedly dating from Sept. 11, released last week by WikiLeaks, an organization that releases sensitive documents and materials.

More than half a million messages were released by WikiLeaks, which has not disclosed who turned over the messages. Jeff Clark, a data visualization research who is not involved in WikiLeaks, interpreted the data in the aggregate, creating a video that shows the most commonly used terms that day, like “complex has evacuated” or “possible terrorist act.” The words grow brightest when they hit their peak and are sized by how frequently there were used.

“I recognize the pager data was very much like Twitter data, because it’s basically a time stamp with a bit of text,” said Mr. Clark, who had done work with Twitter.

He also created small time lines showing when certain key phrases hit their peaks, and then ordered the phrases by the peak time to create a moving narrative of the day.

Over the weekend, another programmer, Colin Keigher, created a searchable database of the messages, which makes them much easier to parse than the original 40-megabyte file. “I made it in a format that was easier for everyone else,” he said.

There is no way to verify the authenticity of the messages, and the programmers say their data comes entirely from WikiLeaks.

Daniel Schmitt, a spokesman for WikiLeaks, said that the organization would not reveal the source of the intercepted messages, but that the messages represented the traffic on the top four pager services at the time. The pages were identified by message number, but it was not clear from most of the messages who was the sender and who was the recipient. The messages come from a program that was monitoring such messages before Sept. 11 attacks even took place, and Mr. Schmitt said the organization believed it had been given the information to raise awareness around issues of privacy and data retention.

The search tools allow people to find the individual messages, which are chilling — especially ones from the front lines of the emergency personnel and airline employees who were watching everything unfold in real time. Of the voluminous mass of messages, a few stood out. (The messages cited below are quoted verbatim, including errors in spelling, grammar and punctuation.)

After the first plane, American Airlines Flight 11, crashed at 8:46 a.m. into the World Trade Center’s north tower, the initial impression at 8:50 a.m. was that the explosion may have been a bomb:

1)BOMB DETINATED IN WORLD TRADE CTR. PLS GET BACK TO MIKE BRADY W/A QUICK ASSESSMENT OF YOUR AREAS AND CONTACT US IF ANYTHING IS NEEDED

The first, spartan message sent out by New York police officials was no more alarming than numerous emergencies that the police had dealt with before:

“NYPDOps Div” < |1 PCT WORLD TRADE CENTER|--- 1 PCT -- WORLD TRADE CENTER -- POSSIBLE EXPLOSION WORLD TRADE BUILDING

But it soon became clear that it was a plane crash, and news organizations from NBC to CNN began reporting the story — initially described by many as an accident involving a small plane. But a message sent at 8:58 a.m. — four minutes before the second plane, United Airlines Flight 175, hit the World Trade Center’s south tower — apparently revealed that someone understood that American Airlines 11 had been hijacked.

Initialreports indictate that AAL11, B767, after initial hijacking on flight from BOS-LAX, has crashed into the side of the World Trade Center in ATCSCC/bl

Another message at 9:02 a.m. showed that the news was traveling.

BREAKINGNEWS: PER OPB, IT APPEARS AA 757 HIJACKED AND RUN INTO THE WORLD TRADE CENTER. THIS IS NOT A JOKE AND JUST BREAKING RICK-Rick

Minutes later, at 9:04, one of the first reports of the second plane crash was sent, though many were watching on television at the time.

anotherexplosion wtc!!!.

At that point, terrorism started being raised as a possibility.

But one of the most chilling messages was one apparently sent at 9:12 a.m. as internal United Airlines communication:

AAL757 has crashed into the world trade center… were missing UAL 175.(767) and a 2nd aircraft has crasshed into the other twr of the World Trade Center. Barber

By 9:16 a.m., both airplanes had been identified:

EWRarpt clsd by PONYA: 2nd a/c has impacted WTC; ZNY ATC 0 due events; unable to confirm but believe aircraft were AAL11 BOS-LAX; and UAL175 NY ATCSCC/bl

Within a minute of the 9:37 a.m. plane crash into the Pentagon, pager messages trickled out, many from Defense Department employees or visitors: “Explosionat Pentagon too,” “anexplosion at the Pentagon Bldg. This bizzare!” “PENTAGONMAY HAVE HAD TROUBLE,” “Blast@ Pentagon|Just a few ago.”

At 10:01 a.m., reports of the south tower collapse appeared: “Southerntower collapse,” “Oneof the towers has now collapsed,” “heENTIRE Tower has collapsed. All 110 floors GONE!!!”

And by 10:02 a.m., the possibility of a fourth hijacked plane was raised: United Airlines 93, which crashed 80 miles southwest of Pittsburgh just seconds before the message below was sent.

ANOTHERPLANE INBOUND FROM PITTSBURGH HIJACKED NO OTHER DETAILS JOC

Within hours of the initial attacks, some messages raised the possibility that Osama bin Laden might be behind the attacks: “Ben Laden most likely responsible,” “Justchecking in. They don’t know who is responsible yet (they think Laden),” “Osama bin Laden top of suspect list for Robyn” and “OsamaBin Louden gave a report to an Arabic newspaper that the US was going to suffer attacks.”

The messages were also full of early misinformation. One message repeated a false report that the military had brought down United Airlines 93 in Somerset County, Pa., while others echoed reports of a fire on the Washington Mall.

by **chiggerbit** » Tue Dec 01, 2009 1:36 pm

2001-09-11 11:16:43 Arch [0916223] D ALPHA
At 1112hrs. Code Red is now in effect, Situation Room is now open. Northbound service estimated to resume in about 20 minutes.

2001-09-11 16:44:39 Skytel [004406474] C ALPHA
STOP! CONNIE RICE PULLED THE PLUG. CIA ADVICED. ASAP (74

by **Nordic** » Wed Dec 02, 2009 4:32 am

chiggerbit wrote:
2001-09-11 16:44:39 Skytel [004406474] C ALPHA
STOP! CONNIE RICE PULLED THE PLUG. CIA ADVICED. ASAP (74

by **Uncle $cam** » Wed Dec 02, 2009 5:19 am

Can anyone access this search? I am trying to run terms such as Ken Lay, Enron, Rudy Giuliani, Mario Cuomo William Rodríguez, Hermina Jones, and a few more but I keep getting the following

Forbidden

You don't have permission to access /search.php on this server.

It may have something to do with my connection of late, which has been ass, but everytime I try these certain terms, especially Ken Lay, Enron, and Rudy Giuliani,Bernard Kerik I get a time out or the above.

http://911pages.info/index.php

by **elfismiles** » Wed Dec 02, 2009 4:11 pm

Congress May Probe WikiLeaks Over 9/11 Pages

The senior Republican on the House Homeland Security committee has begun an investigation into how the WikiLeaks.org Web site obtained thousands of pager messages from September 11, 2001.

Rep. Peter King, who represents a congressional district east of New York City on Long Island, has directed his staff to look into last week's release of about 573,000 lines of messages sent to pagers on that day. The logs included Secret Service, FEMA, FBI, and private sector messages.

"The staff is in a preliminary investigation period," Kevin Fogarty, an aide to King, told CBSNews.com on Tuesday. He said that his office was currently focused on the White House party crashing, and would return to the WikiLeaks disclosure after a hearing on the White House breach scheduled for Thursday.

WikiLeaks did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Some of the disclosed pager messages appear to show a less-than organized response from federal agencies. The Secret Service was deluged with alerts both true and false. One internal FEMA message at 12:37 p.m. ET, four hours after the attacks, says: "We have no mission statements yet."

It's not clear how far a congressional investigation into WikiLeaks, even if it becomes formalized, can go. Although the organization's domain name is registered through a San Mateo, Calif.-based company, the Web site is hosted in Sweden at an Internet provider known for once providing a home to The Pirate Bay.

In addition, the principals of WikiLeaks remain anonymous, and were not unmasked during the admittedly-brief lawsuit filed last year by a Swiss bank upset that some of its internal documents had been leaked. If congressional investigators can secure international cooperation, they could try to unearth which people are linked with WikiLeaks postal addresses at the University of Melbourne and Nairobi, Kenya. (One person affiliated with WikiLeaks who has gone public is programmer-activist Julian Assange, listed as a member of the group's advisory board who acts as an occasional spokesman.)

To be sure, there's some embarrassment for the U.S. government after the logs apparently revealed that the Secret Service's presidential protective detail used unencrypted pagers for sensitive communications about the location of Air Force One and threats against President Bush -- even though news reports four years earlier had revealed that a hacker intercepted the unencrypted pager messages of President Clinton's entourage.

But there's also a federal law, 18 USC 2511(c), that criminally punishes anyone who "intentionally discloses, or endeavors to disclose, to any other person the contents of any wire, oral, or electronic communication, knowing or having reason to know that the information was obtained through the interception of a wire, oral, or electronic communication in violation of this subsection." (Emphasis added.) Violators are punished with fines and up to five years in prison.

Marc Rotenberg of the Electronic Privacy Information Center in Washington, D.C. points out that a 2001 Supreme Court case called Bartnicki v. Vopper dealt with illegally intercepted broadcasts and found that their disclosure by a third party was permissible. The majority opinion said that the third party "played no part in the illegal interception. Rather, they found out about the interception only after it occurred... their access to the information on the tapes was obtained lawfully, even though the information itself was intercepted unlawfully by someone else."

"Wikileaks would have a good First Amendment defense," Rotenberg says.

To point out the obvious: A congressional investigation is one thing; there are no reports of a criminal investigation of WikiLeaks. Its armor of anonymity has survived other legal assaults in the past. Then again, it has never irked certain federal law enforcement agencies and members of Congress so thoroughly either.

Update 7:09 p.m. ET: I should have mentioned the visualizations of the 9/11 logs that have started to appear, including a frequency chart, a keyword graph, and a remarkable visualization.

http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2009/12/01 ... 4554.shtml

by **elfismiles** » Wed Dec 02, 2009 4:26 pm

9-11frequencychart_v1

A quick view of the frequency of pager messages sent on 9/11. more detailed diagram and chart to follow.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/48231866@N00/4136402565

Keyword frequency in 9/11 pager transcripts

Nothing shocking here. Every alpha-numeric page was parsed for occurances of 'fire', 'smoke', 'terrorist', 'love', 'safe', 'fuck' or 'shit', 'god' or 'omg'. Because there is no data from the day before to compare it with, It is hard to say anything definitive. 'Terrorist' is the only one that stands out. Not surprisingly, 'terrorist' didnt start making the rounds until after the 2nd tower was hit.

People said 'safe' and 'love' a bit, but no way to know if that increase post catastrophe isn't just reflecting more people being awake.

'Fire' was used a bit before either tower was struck. But its not an ideal word search because words like 'firewall' or 'fireplace' also trigger a TRUE.

http://www.flickr.com/photos/flight404/4136524615/

Pager Data from 9/11 - Phrase Cloud Visualization
http://vimeo.com/7860125

This is a visualization of text phrases taken from pager data during September 11th, 2001 from 8am until 8pm. The larger the text the more frequently it was used during the 12 hour period. Text appears bright during the times of high usage and fades away otherwise. Color hues are cosmetic.

by **Code Unknown** » Thu Dec 03, 2009 4:29 am

8bitagent wrote:But I did hear a 5 hour archive of the Alex Jones show from the morning of 9/11/2001 as well as archives of their website and affiliate websides like propagandamatrix.com....quite the trip to say the least.
(The controlled demolition, anthrax is next, "NWO was behind this!" and Illuminati symbolism theories were out in full force within moments of the attacks)

This is actually quite interesting. Could you pull out some specific key excerpts so the rest of us don't have to listen to it?

by **8bitagent** » Thu Dec 03, 2009 5:04 am

Code Unknown wrote:
8bitagent wrote:But I did hear a 5 hour archive of the Alex Jones show from the morning of 9/11/2001 as well as archives of their website and affiliate websides like propagandamatrix.com....quite the trip to say the least.
(The controlled demolition, anthrax is next, "NWO was behind this!" and Illuminati symbolism theories were out in full force within moments of the attacks)

This is actually quite interesting. Could you pull out some specific key excerpts so the rest of us don't have to listen to it?

I totally would with cool edit pro, but I dont even have the mp3s. I honestly was surprised to see an Alex Jones archive from that morning, tho I realized his show had gone way back. But in that 5 hours, man...it was surreal. Someone was calling from where the madness was going on, saying it had to be a controlled demo, that the "numerology" pointed toward occult European elites, and Alex Jones kept saying "just wait, just wait this is the beginning...in two weeks we'll see anthrax" he also said wed see a total fascist dictatorship and martial law which never happened, but it was odd.

So as 9/11 was happening(or at least, after the towers fell) AJ and company are on the radio pretty much talking about exactly what theyre still talking about today. "9/11 is part of the nwo lucerferian scheme to bring about endless chaos".
Even CRAZIER was the 9/19/2001 David Icke interview I heard, hoo boy.

Anyways, I wish I could find the mp3s. I found them originally on
http://nw0.info/ but the site is no more. I wonder if they are on archive.org?

Have you heard the June 2001 William Cooper show where he talks about bin Laden being the scapegoat by the elite about to stage a massive terror event in America?

by **elfismiles** » Thu Dec 03, 2009 12:17 pm

by **chiggerbit** » Mon Dec 21, 2009 10:49 am

Interesting question about the reason for the wikileaks being released here:

http://www.planet-flipside.com/vboard/s ... php?t=5675

This is serious stuff - for many reasons. Wikileaks in conjunction with Twitter are publishing over half a million intercepted pager messages covering the period from a few hours before the 9/11 attacks until the end of the day.

There are so many questions which arise from this - 1) Who intercepted them and why? Who is recording all of our pager messages?

2) Who released them?

3) Are we supposed to glean anything from them?

Those are just a few questions to begin with.

I ask them because it begs the question 'Are our pager messages routinely intercepted by the Intelligence Services'?

Also, who released them, would indicate in some ways 'why' they were released. What I mean by this is - simply releasing them proves that they were recorded (which is a HUGE issue in itself) - but it also begs the question 'Are we supposed to learn anything new from them? Are there hidden/coded messages in there which have relevance to 9/11? Maybe, maybe not - but when I read one of the half million and it says for example 'Holly is in my truck. Back Door is open. World Trade Center' - it seems not to chime with any real context readily identifiable...so what does that one 'really mean?'

If the mole who released them simply did so to prove they existed then it's job done - but Wikipedia and Twitter wouldn't have had to endure the mammoth task of uploading half a million entries - it would be absurd to think that - All they had to do was produce a representative sample and we would have believed them - I think the Mole has released them because there's something we're supposed to be looking for, something that he or she can't divulge as it would identify who they are - it's down to you and I to scan them and find the 'real' reason these intercepts have been released.

It will take months, possibly years to go through them all - but in that time the first question that should be demanding a response now, is, who recorded them?

They can be found here - some of them of course make distressing reading - apologies for that - http://911.wikileaks.org/files/index.html

Ben

by **Uncle $cam** » Tue Dec 22, 2009 1:38 am

chiggerbit wrote:

"Interesting question about the reason for the wikileaks being released..."

Any possibility that this pager leak has anything to do with the hacked neo-Nazi membership lists?

by **compared2what?** » Tue Dec 22, 2009 3:31 am

Uncle $cam wrote:chiggerbit wrote:

"Interesting question about the reason for the wikileaks being released..."

Any possibility that this pager leak has anything to do with the hacked neo-Nazi membership lists?

I don't actually see any real insufficiency in the wikileaks explanation. I mean about motive, not culprit, obviously. I can't really see how the spookiest spooks in the world could have been running a set-up that retained such enormous volumes of data for that many years without eventually ending up with quite a few people who became aware of and/or had access to it as they came and went about their business. I can easily see how some young and prosperous mid-level corporate type with a conscience might crack and go Ellsberg eventually. And Wikileaks is a much more reliable protector of anonymity than The New York Times or The Washingtons Post ever were. And many times more than they presently are.

Though it certainly could be an op. The two propositions aren't necessarily mutually exclusive, in fact. But if it were, I don't see how you could possibly deduce anything about who was behind it and why, at this point. Because apart from (possibly) wikileaks, who's gained anything by it that's advantageous enough to infer responsibility from it?

WikiLeaks to release over half a million 9/11 intercepts

Who is online