Archer, Anglia and the DTI Inquiries

by **antiaristo** » Mon Jul 18, 2005 9:29 am

I promised to post more on my experiences. I've decided to open two threads. Here I will relate what happened with the DTI Inspectors. On a parallel thread I will post, in date order, the bulk of my correspondences since 1999. Please put any comments on THIS thread and please do not reply on the parallel thread until I have finished it. THE DTI INSPECTIONS There had been an inquiry into Archer's insider dealing which reported in March 1995. It was a whitewash. When challenged in the Commons by Dale Campbell-Savours MP, John Major the Prime Minister said "Lord Archer is my friend. Lord Archer has been my friend. Lord Archer will continue to be my friend" (March 1995. It's in Hansard.) That is when I began really kicking. Roger Kaye QC & Hugh Aldous FCA Inspectors appointed by the Secretary of State for Trade & Industry pursuant to s177 of the Financial Services Act 1986 10 August 1995 STRICTLY PRIVATE – ADRESSEE ONLY John Cleary Esq. 30 St Patricks Hill Cork Eire Dear Mr Cleary ANGLIA TELEVISION GROUP PLC – FINANCIAL SERVICES ACT 1986 ss 177-180 I am writing on behalf of Roger Kaye QC and Hugh Aldous FCA, inspectors appointed under section 177, Financial Services Act 1986 (“the Act”) to investigate possible insider dealing offences withrespect to the securities of Anglia Television Group PLC (“Anglia”). A copy of the minute of the Inspectors’ appointment is enclosed. The Inspectors believe that you may be able to assist them in connection with their investigation, and would like to ask you questions concerning certain alleged dealings in Anglia shares in the period to 18 January 1994, and other related matters. I would therefore be grateful if you would contact me by telephoning +44 171 865 2121 or by writing to me at Robson Rhodes, 186 City Road, London EC1V 2NU, to discuss a mutually convenient time for you to attend for interview at this address. No announcement has been made about this inspection. The Inspectors ask that you keep all communications with them, or on their behalf, strictly confidential and not to discuss these matters with any other individual, except any legal advisor, without the Inspectors’ prior written consent. Additionally, and for your information I enclose a copy of sections 177 to 180 of the Act, as amended, which governs the basis on which Inspectors are appointed and the conduct of their investigations. You will appreciate from those provisions that certain information is “restricted information” for the purposes of the Act. Disclosure of such information to any other person without the consent of the person from which it was obtained and, if different, the person to whom it relates, is a criminal offence and subject to criminal penalties unless that disclosure is permitted by virtue of sections 179 or 180 of the Act. This letter may contain, and the Inspectors may disclose to you during the course of your interview, information which is restricted information for these purposes. Should it prove possible for you to attend for interview, you may like to consider whether it would be in your interests to instruct a solicitor before attending. You may if you wish be accompanied by your legal advisor at the interview, but such an advisor may not answer questions on your behalf. If you do decide to instruct solicitors, please ask them to inform me as soon as possible that they are acting for you. Yours sincerely Nicholas Pardoe ______________________________________________ 30 St Patrick’s Hill Cork Nicholas Pardoe FCA Eire Secretary to Roger Kaye QC and Hugh Aldous FCA 24 August 1995 Dear Mr Pardoe, Thank you for your letter of 10 August 1995 to notify myself of the renewed Anglia inquiry being undertaken by Messrs. Kaye and Aldous. I cannot help but wish I had known about the original inquiry; had I known my life might not have lain in ruins. I can certainly tell you a great deal about what happened as a direct result of Lord Archer´s little jolly. About the deliberate damage and destruction done to the lives of hundreds of decent working people and their families. About blackmail and fraud, deceit and thieving, attempted abduction and the suspension of the rule of law across the Realm. And about the efforts to forcibly silence the only man willing to do anything about it. But herein I will restrict myself to the original blackmail and fraud. The directors of Anglia Television Group plc would have been notified about your original inquiry as a matter of course. Lord Hollick and two associates (Hickson and Laughton) joined the Anglia board on 14 April 1994 and would in turn have been formally notified at that time. Lord Hollick and MAI used the fact of your original (secret) inquiry as a weapon of blackmail against the entire Anglia board. One may discern the application of the squeeze from a reading of the notes of a meeting of directors held on 4 May 1994 (Exhibit A attached). What was proposed by MAI would have been a clear breach of promises issued with the offer documents through the Stock Exchange by the Anglia board. So the board could fight a clear wrong, and risk the exposure of Lord Archer. Or they could succumb and lay themselves open to legal attack by the employees of Anglia whose rights were being negated. It is at this point that Lord Archer himself became a party to the blackmail. He could have told his wife and the rest of the board the truth, that he had brought the inquiry on himself through his own acts. Instead he lied. (It was for this that he apologized to his wife at the end of August 1994. But only after he had been completely exposed.) The Anglia board were in a bind. Such a bind that the Chairman (Sir Peter Gibbings) refused to sign the notes (which is why they never became “minutes”.) Such a bind that the Chairman backdated the date of his own resignation from the board to 30 April (so the record would indicate he could not possibly have chaired the meeting of 4 May – see Exhibit B). Such a bind that later the truth had to be dragged from the company in a tortuous process akin to extracting wisdom teeth (Exhibit C) Then, in the best traditions of the Hard guy/Soft guy routine, Lord Hollick became the Anglia board’s best friend. “I know a way out of the dilemma. We will use a ghost Director to do the dirty work. You can break your word and deny your duty of care with no fear of comeback!” “Yes please” came the reply from the Anglia board. Thus was born Mr Malcolm Wall as high profile Managing Director. Except he was not a director at all, but a fraud. All of the administration and co-ordination and litigation was handled by Ashurst Morris Crisp, even though they had never been appointed by the company or its board. All of the dirty work – sackings, lockouts, cheating, contract breaking, threats and intimidation and so forth – was implemented by Malcolm Wall even though he had never been appointed by the board. Yet from behind the scenes a series of lies were being promulgated, as will be seen from the press release of 12 May 1994 and the Eastern Daily Press (then Chairman: T Colman) of 27 May 1994 (both Exhibit D attached). A close reading of the notes of the meeting of 4 May 1994 indicates a clear refusal to appoint Mr Wall just eight days prior to the issue of the “New Team” press release by Anglia Television Group plc. Throughout the intent is to shelter the Anglia board from the consequences of the actions undertaken by their two main agents – Malcolm Wall and Ashurst Morris Crisp. Everything done by Malcolm Wall prior to 21 July 1994 is unauthorised, unlawful and wholly invalid. But the only person both willing and able to prove it is John Cleary (Exhibit E). Mr Wall was appointed to the board of Anglia on 21 July 1994. The plan was that Section 285 of the Companies Act 1985 would be used to legitimise his prior acts ex-post whilst not at the same time implicating the rest of the Anglia board (Exhibit F). But Section 285 does not apply when there has been a total absence of appointment, and Mr Wall remains the lead player in a fraudulent misrepresentation which was perpetrated as a direct result of Lord Archer’s decision to place an order for Anglia shares a few days before the MAI bid was announced. The notes to the meeting of Directors of 4 May 1994 make it clear this fraud was perpetrated with the full knowledge and active connivance of the Anglia board. The payoffs for helping this famous friend of the Prime Minister were handsome and spread wide. For Sir Peter Gibbings, the Chair of the Radio Authority, a backdated resignation and about a million pounds; for David Puttnam a high profile role dispensing lottery money and the Knighthood so craved by his wife; for Dianne Nutting a post with the Millennium Commission; for Lady Archer a fragrant reputation; for Lord Hollick a quick and easy return on investment from mass sackings. In fact everyone won except for the oiks, and they don’t matter. Except to other oiks. Like me. So I’ve been cheerfully doing battle with the filth at Downing Street for fully this last year and more. I didn’t know it was him until the end of August 1994 when the truth about what triggered your inquiry emerged. And it was not until the end of March this year that my hopes of winning without confronting the Prime Minister direct were dashed. One other mystery was cleared up for me at the End of March – that of Lord Archer’s inexplicable car crash. Would your own mind not be preoccupied, not tend to wander, if you too had just signed the death warrant for an innocent man, in order to protect your guilty self? As you know, between 31 March and 4 July this year I have levied on the Prime Minister and his allies the strongest moral and intellectual attack I could muster. I have no doubt whatsoever that my agitation had been instrumental in prompting the re-opening of your own inquiry on 4 May. Yet you did not seek to make contact with me until 10 August. You may or may not know this, but assassins were despatched to my front door on four occasions between those two dates. I might never have known of the inquiry I had triggered. I confess I was completely bemused when first I received your letter – why had you chosen to make contact at this time, so long after being reappointed. Then earlier this week an excited friend called with his congratulations – he had read about the reopening in the press. And the penny dropped. Would I be right to assume you would never have made contact at all had you been able to maintain total secrecy? Possibly you are unaware that the unwanted callers began again yesterday. But even if they get me at least now you have the evidence to enforce the law. I am willing and able to provide all assistance, but only if yours is a serious inquiry. And please do not again ask me to further risk my life. Though oik I be, my value greatly exceeds that of all those mentioned herein up to now in aggregate. Beauty is Truth, Truth beauty. That’s all ye know on earth, and all ye need to know. Please kindly acknowledge receipt by return. Yours sincerely John Cleary Enc Exhibit A Notes of a meeting of Directors on 4 May 1994 Exhibit B Section 288 resignation return for Sir Peter Gibbings Exhibit C Letter from Anglia Company Secretary 13 June 1994 Exhibit D Anglia press release 12 May 1994 Eastern Daily Press headline and front page 27 May 1994 Exhibit E Anglia Company Secretary plus Register extract both 22 July 1994 Exhibit F Section 285 plus “The Nature of the Anglia Fraud” cc Lady Archer Mr Black Mr Blair Lord Blakenham Mr Bolger M Blum Lord Callaghan Mr Campbell Savours President Chirac Mr Clarke President Clinton Mr Coe Mr Cook Mr Darling Lord Deedes Mr Donovan Mr Eisner Mr Evans Sir Marcus Fox Mr Gingrich Mr Grade Mr Grant Mr Green Harvard University The Heir Lord Healey Mr Heseltine Mr Humphries Lord Jenkins Mr Keating Chancellor Kohl Mr Levin Mr Major Mr Morris Mr Murdoch Mrs Nutting Mr Packer Sir David Puttnam Mr Redwood Mr Rifkind President Robinson Mr Sedgemore Lord Tebbitt Lady Thatcher Lord Williams ______________________________________________ Roger Kaye QC & Hugh Aldous FCA Inspectors appointed by the Secretary of State for Trade & Industry pursuant to s177 of the Financial Services Act 1986 Our ref: NGFP/NJMT/jsh 30 August 1995 STRICTLY PRIVATE – ADRESSEE ONLY John Cleary Esq. 30 St Patricks Hill Cork Eire Dear Mr Cleary Thank you for your letter of 24 August. As I explained in my letter to you of 10 August the Inspectors do believe that you may be able to assist them, and you may be assured of the seriousness of their enquiries. Therefore, I would be most grateful if you could contact me again, as soon as possible, to try to identify a mutually convenient time for you to see the Inspectors. I look forward to hearing from you at your earliest convenience. Yours sincerely Nicholas Pardoe ______________________________________________ This was sent in August. When I did not reply it was sent a second time and pp'd by thr secretary. When the final report was submitted the announcement was simply "No action is to be taken against any of the parties" The report was never published, and remains a State secret to this day. Early this year the Guardian submitted a FOI request and got short shrift. NO CHANCE! Asked for his reaction in France, Hugh Aldous replied "Oh well! If they want to let him off that's up to them" And that is where matters stand today.

by **antiaristo** » Tue Jul 19, 2005 12:47 pm

There are two related threads The first covering 1999 to 2002 can be found here <a href="http://p097.ezboard.com/frigorousintuitionfrm7.showMessage?topicID=699.topic">p097.ezboard.com/frigorou...=699.topic</a> The second covering the years 2002 to 2004 can be found here <a href="http://p097.ezboard.com/frigorousintuitionfrm7.showMessageRange?topicID=712.topic&start=21&stop=38">p097.ezboard.com/frigorou...21&stop=38</a>

by **antiaristo** » Wed Jul 20, 2005 8:35 am

8am -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- RTL takes control of Five Jason Deans, broadcasting editor Wednesday July 20, 2005 RTL has taken full control of Five, buying United Business Media's 35.4% stake for £247.6m in cash. <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/story/0,3604,1532257,00.html">www.guardian.co.uk/busine...57,00.html</a> There is no mention of Lord Clive Hollick because he "retired" on 30 June, along with a pension fund amounting to 15 million pounds. He has gone to Kohlberg Kravis Roberts. He should be right at home there. =================================== C/ Eusebio Navarro, 12 Paul Braithwaite Esq 35003 Las Palmas de Gran Equitable Life Members Action Group Spain Canaria 15 January 2004 Dear Sir, “Misfeasance in public office” is what you have to demonstrate. Let me tell you a little story about the Independent Television Commission. In 1994 Richard Hooper was a director of Lord Clive Hollick’s MAI plc when it acquired Anglia Television and proceeded to savage the workforce and commit criminal fraud. The Chairman of the exclusively business friendly regulator was Sir George Russell (See Stevens to Cleary 17 November 1994). Ten years later Sir George Russell is now Deputy Chairman of Charles Allen’s Granada plc, which owns Anglia Television and continues to defraud the workforce (See Cleary to Allen et al 5 January 2004). The Deputy Chairman of the exclusively business friendly regulator is none other than Richard Hooper! But there is more. In 1999, before Lord Archer was forced to stand down, Stephen Byers asked his department chief to “have a look” at the Anglia/Archer insider trading inquiry. At that time the “Special Advisor to the Prime Minister at the Department of Trade and Industry” was none other than Lord Clive Hollick, the original architect of the fraud! These “regulators” are in fact the gatekeepers for what Mussolini called “Corporatism” – the fusion of corporate and state power in an alliance against the people. It is what the courts are there to prevent, unless the judges are themselves prevented from doing their job by our Most Gracious Lady the Queen. And unlike her mother, who used the Treason Felony Act to build a transcendental protection racket, she can’t do that because she has sworn the Coronation Oath. Yours faithfully, John Cleary Enc Stevens (ITC Deputy Chair) to Cleary 17 November 1994 Cleary to Allen et al 5 January 2004 Cleary to Pollock 6 January 2004

by **Dreams End** » Wed Jul 20, 2005 9:58 am

Have you posted a summary of what this is all about somewhere? All this source material is too much too wade through without knowing what the overall story is. Thanks.

by **antiaristo** » Wed Jul 20, 2005 11:14 am

Dreams End, I am reluctant to write a summary. There are two actions outstanding - Queens Bench 1994 - c - 2024 John Cleary v Anglia Television; and Wandsworth Council v John Cleary. Anything I write now could come back to hurt me. Having said that there is something that may be of assistance, written in July/August 2001 just after Jeffrey Archer had been covicted for perjury and perverting the course of justice. This was circulated to Conservative Party women and hairdressers. ===================================== I ACCUSE: LADY MARY ARCHER, FELLOW OF NEWNHAM COLLEGE CAMBRIDGE AND FORMER DIRECTOR OF ANGLIA TELEVISION GROUP plc. THAT you did provide insider information to Jeffrey Archer about the agreed takeover of Anglia Television by MAI PLC; THAT you did conspire to conceal the crimes then committed by Jeffrey Archer in using that insider information for profit; THAT you then conspired to defraud John Cleary and one hundred and seventy six other employees of Anglia Television Group plc; THAT you then conspired to murder John Cleary by a variety of means on at least six occasions between January 1995 and April 2000; THAT you then conspired to steal the only home and last remaining asset of John Cleary between May 1999 and the present day; THAT far from the wounded victim you portray so well, you are in fact the regular partner in crime with Jeffrey Archer, your joint paths strewn with the wreckage of innocent lives. …. and THAT is why you stay with him. INSERT SCAN LETTER FROM MARY ARCHER TO JOHN CLEARY DATED 7 June 1994 INSERT SCAN OF HIGH COURT ORDER 9 February 1995 INSERT SCAN OF LETTER FROM CEO COURT SERVICE TO SIR TEDDY TAYLOR MP DATED 9 OCTOBER 1995 "I am told by the High Court that the order to which you refer was sealed by the Coury on 9 February 1995, and IS THEREFORE AUTHENTIC. The order was actually made by His Honour Judge John Baker and not Sir John Baker" This document is a forgery. There can be no doubt about this fact because the document was issued under a false and fictitious name. Any document issued under a false and fictitious name is a forgery, irrespective of the true identity and eminence of its author. MARY ARCHER, Director of Anglia Television Group plc, lay behind this forgery. MARY ARCHER ruined my life with this forged court order, as her husband ruined poor Monica with his forged diary. Sir Teddy Taylor MP asked Lord Mackay of Clashfern a point blank question. Is this a forgery? The Lord Chancellor knows full well that his court runs no writ in the Republic of Ireland, and there is no Sir John Baker at The Strand. So he passed this Commons written question to an underling to lie on his behalf. The Conservative Party line that there was never any hard evidence against the man sits ill with the fraud, perjury, forgery, perversion and worse that are a way of life for this despicable Archer family. You know from experience that you cannot trust much of what you read in the newspapers. So treat yourself to what the bigwigs don’t want you to find out. The inside story behind Archer’s climb down in November 1999, his expulsion from the Party in February 2000, and finally his prosecution in September 2000. INSERT SCAN OF FORGED COUNTY COURT JUDGEMENT COMMENTARY *The "judge" making this decision is not a real judge but a lay deputy. There is no record of this person at the Wandsworth County Court. *There was no real hearing because the "costs" include nothing for court fees. There is no record of this hearing at the Wandsworth County Court. *The "Legibly signed statement of truth" is yet another Walker rubber stamp (by LEG of Wandsworth Council). * 242.25 of costs assessed. 242.24 of costs released. One penny outstanding. *Still holding my money on the basis of this one-penny "virtual reality" judgment. This nightmare is happening to me because I worked for Anglia Television. When MARY ARCHER tried to cheat me I not only caught her fraud but also compiled the evidence to prove it in court. The Conservative Party line that there was never any hard evidence against Archer is a complete lie. So for more than seven years MARY ARCHER has been attempting to kill me bodily and financially. I will never prove that the murder attempts took place, for it is her practice to isolate the victim so no witnesses exist. But her financial machinations in attempting to eliminate John Cleary have left a paper trail. The forged Court Order of 9 February 1995 ended my professional career. It cannot be other than a forgery because it was issued under a false and fictitious name. Yet the English Court behaves as though it carries legal force, and have never heard my claim for wrongful dismissal. This is not the England I knew, and I have not worked since. The forged Wandsworth Court/Council papers stole my only wealth. They cannot be other than forgeries because that case number had been heard already on 5 November 1999. Yet the English Court and Wandsworth Council behave as though these papers carry legal force, and continue to withhold (steal) my money. This is not the England I knew. Both are evidence of MARY Archer’s conspiracies to kill me by financial means. She has this much power because she remains a favourite in certain circles. And her husband was a "Blue Chip" in the 1960´s alongside Major, Patten, Clarke (the author of the infamous Cabinet "suicide pact" which kept John Major at the top of the heap throughout 1995) and others. John Major and Tony Blair buried the Anglia Television fraud in 1995. MARY ARCHER will stop at nothing to bury John Cleary, who is the last remaining victim/witness to her capital crimes. From the very outset the existence of the Anglia inquiry was a State secret of the Major Government. It is for this reason that fraud by the Directors against the employees of Anglia Television was possible in May 1994. The inquiry became public knowledge only in July 1994 when Archer was tricked by an enterprising journalist into that famous confession "You’re not supposed to know about that". When questioned about the Anglia inquiry from the floor of the Commons by Dale Campbell-Savours MP, John Major famously replied in March 1995 "Lord Archer is my friend. Lord Archer has been my friend. Lord Archer will continue to be my friend" (Hansard) INSERT SCAN OF LETTER FROM DTI INSPECTORS DATED 30 AUGUST 1995 INSERT SCAN FROM THE ECONOMIST 21 NOVEMBER 1998 "LORD ARCHER YOURS SINCERELY" The official report was never published. The British people were told only "No further action is to be taken against any of the parties". Including MARY ARCHER, who was the Director of Anglia Television Group plc, and hence the guilty party. And she got away with far worse than her partner-in-crime.(John Major stood down from the Commons at the last Election and has left public life, accepting a sinecure with the Carlyle Group. He has not been offered the peerage that should be his by right). Time passed before Archer reverted to type and told us all another enormous lie. He claimed he had been "exonerated" by the unpublished report. And he stood for public office. Archer was trapped when I sent 200 copies of my appeal to the Prince of Wales to interested and significant third parties in London. He could not answer my charges, as he could not take the stand at the Old Bailey. He could not hide behind MARY ARCHER, for she was guiltier than he, and I held her reply of 7 June 1994. So he was forced to stand down. But how? The British people had been told he was a “man of probity and integrity”, with “The vision energy and commitment to be an outstanding mayor”. The entire political Establishment was behind him. How to stand down, just days after winning the nomination of the Conservative Party? He had no choice but to admit wrongdoing, but not Anglia Television, which was an enormous scandal for Major and Blair. So instead he confessed to a fake alibi, and poor old Ted Francis got dragged into it one more time (the Old Bailey jury seemed to sense this). Still Sir Paul Condon and the Metropolitan Police did nothing, even though Archer had confessed to stealing 500,000 from the Daily Star. (And recall the words of Hugh Aldous when told in France of the official pronouncement....."Oh well! If they want to let him off that’s up to them." And he wrote the report!). These give some idea of the powerful connections that this despicable Archer family enjoys to this day. I circulated copies of the younger Archers letter from 27 March 2000, and purchased a return ticket to Gatwick. The despicable Archer family set their trap with Wandsworth Council/Court and awaited my appearance. But I did not return, and they were caught in a trap of their own making. After ten weeks gestation they were forced to send the forged documents to the address cited. Into Spain, into Spanish jurisdiction: thereby did they commit a crime in Spain. I swore my affidavit on 29 July 2000 and sent copies all over Europe. To all EU member States, but more importantly to many Harvard Business School graduates. High-level Europeans with commercial skills and flawless English. (If anyone wants to check me out I am in the European Directory up to 1995) INSERT SCAN CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SPAIN JUDGEMENT 3414/98 - M dated 27 July 1998 I had lodged already an appeal for protection against the Archer family and their organized crime connections under Article 162.1.(b) of the Spanish Constitution. I had been rejected by three Magistrates of the Constitutional Court (appeals for protection are heard only by the highest court in the land) on the grounds that I had insufficient evidence. Now such evidence was being thrust beneath their noses in a very public way. The only way for the Spanish to avoid investigation and prosecution was for the British to prosecute in their stead. The British were forced to act against Archer, and that is the only reason he has passed pro tem out of the ranks of the untouchables. So out of the blue in September 2000 the Met made its dramatic, theatrical move. Apparently it took a ten-month worldwide inquiry for PC Plod to find Angie Peppiatt and nail Archer for the crime he had admitted back in November 1999! That is the reason we have had to endure another Old Bailey farce at huge public expense. Archer must be seen to be put on trial for crimes carrying a life sentence (equal to the crimes committed in Spain). Poor old Ted Francis did not shop Archer and commit hare-kiri. Francis was shopped by Archer. Archer could not take the stand because his whole criminal past would become fair game. The only way they could stage this theatre for foreign consumption was for MARY ARCHER to take the stand as lone defender of her partner-in-crime. And play the role as victim one more time. But the true victims in this whole sordid mess are two little girls who lost their Daddy. Victoria was five years old when MARY ARCHER pulled her fraud against the employees of Anglia Television. Victoria is now verging on young womanhood. Georgia was just three years old and is now ten. All those years without their father, with all the terrible consequences. Economic hardship. Emotional damage. Stunted development. And God knows what else in all these long years apart. Will they still be paying this price when the Nation celebrates the Golden Jubilee next year? With a little help from her friends MARY ARCHER is destroying my children. MARY ARCHER has been destroying my children. MARY ARCHER will continue to destroy my children. MARY ARCHER is one mean, cold-blooded, nasty, tough-as-nails bitch to paint herself as the poor victim in all this. INSERT SCAN OF VICTORIA AND GEORGIA IN 1994 AGED SIX YEARS AND THREE YEARS RESPECTIVELY

by **jenz** » Wed Jul 20, 2005 5:01 pm

could you describe the murder attempts and elaborate on connections with organised crime?

by **antiaristo** » Wed Jul 20, 2005 5:32 pm

Jenz, Look here <a href="http://p097.ezboard.com/frigorousintuitionfrm9.showMessage?topicID=7.topic">p097.ezboard.com/frigorou...ID=7.topic</a> <a href="http://p097.ezboard.com/frigorousintuitionfrm9.showMessage?topicID=6.topic">p097.ezboard.com/frigorou...ID=6.topic</a>

Archer, Anglia and the DTI Inquiries

Archer, Anglia and the DTI Inquiries

Related Threads

Latest Developments

Summary?

Summary

archers

Elaboration

Who is online