You have no legal rights

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

As I type this, I am breathing smoke...

Postby banned » Wed Nov 02, 2005 12:10 am

...from my next door neighbors'. <br><br>I can't shut it out, even with doors and windows closed, it gets in.<br><br>I could die of cancer because this spoiled little cocksucker is allowed to let HIS smoke out into the air instead of keeping it in HIS space that he pays rent for.<br><br>If I could go over and kill him stone cold dead, I would, without batting an eye. He's a murderer, but without even the guts to take the risks I would take if I shot him between the eyes next time I see him strolling to his car with a ciggie dangling from his lips.<br><br>Don't whinge about nicotine. There's been a notice on the package for what, THIRTY YEARS telling you it can kill you? <br><br>For the record, I have no sympathy for fat fucks who stuff on cheezyburgers and then keel over. If the insurance companies stopped tomorrow covering ANY "lifestyle illnesses"--diabetes from too much refined sugar and flour, obesity related illness, blocked arteries from too much trans fat, smoking related illnesses--people would either shape up or die fast.<br><br> <p></p><i></i>
banned
 
Posts: 912
Joined: Sun Oct 02, 2005 5:18 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

I have another opinion

Postby marykmusic » Wed Nov 02, 2005 1:01 am

My husband and I, as well as a couple of other psychics with whom we associate, strongly believe that tobacco, because there had to have been a good reason for it to have been known as a sacred herb, has another story entirely.<br><br>How about this scenario: Tobacco is sacred because it protects from alien interference. It was perverted by adding chemicals to it, over 200 at last count. The purest form of the plant, smoked only for sacred ceremonial reasons (and that means not all the time, not even every day) is NOT harmful; the additives are.<br><br>We have stories that people who smoke in this fashion are not subjected to abductions and other untoward activities, nor are they harrassed by other-dimensional beings. Reptilians especially cannot stand the vibrational fequency.<br><br>Okay, now back to the program in progress. --MaryK <p></p><i></i>
marykmusic
 
Posts: 1502
Joined: Fri May 20, 2005 12:23 am
Location: Central Arizona
Blog: View Blog (0)

maryk, good point.

Postby banned » Wed Nov 02, 2005 1:14 am

I have no problem with herbal smoke--I "smudge" myself with an herbal wand. I have a problem with CIGARETTE smoke because it's full of known poisonous and carcinogenic chemicals. I suppose if someone used organic tobacco with no additives, and some kind of pure paper that didn't have poisons, and no chemical filters, I might not object, though with asthma, you never know what's going to get you. I had to stop going to my favorite 'metaphysical' bookstore for awhile when my asthma was bad because even the incense, which I generally like, gave me immediate constriction and even the inhaler didn't help.<br><br>And I damn near died when someone threw one of those chemical logs on the fire. Worst asthma attack of my entire life.<br><br> <p></p><i></i>
banned
 
Posts: 912
Joined: Sun Oct 02, 2005 5:18 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

smokes

Postby Homeless Halo » Wed Nov 02, 2005 3:32 am

*lights cigarette* <br><br>well, I'm biased. The rain where I live is carcinogenic, so is the air. <br><br>tobacco has fewer carcinogens than the equivalent amount of marijuana. marijuana, while carcinogenic, has never been shown to cause cancer in a human, meaning, equivalent use of pure tobacco has no chance. A cigarette on the other hand, has more carcinogens per microgram than either, by more than a little.<br><br>They make them more addictive and more poisonous before they sell them.<br><br>Btw, Marijuana smoke shouldn't ever constrict your lungs. It is available by prescription here, if you have chronic asthma induced lung problems or emphysema, or lung cancer.<br><br>Depending on the incense, some would open your lungs, as opposed to constricting them. Certain incense varities have similar therapeutic values to the asthmatic. As do opiates. <br><br> <p></p><i></i>
Homeless Halo
 
Posts: 564
Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2005 1:51 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Which varieties of incense help asthma?

Postby banned » Wed Nov 02, 2005 5:42 am

Can't smoke marahoochie. Makes me hella paranoid.<br><br>Not to mention eating Cheez Korn by the pound.<br><br>Not that I've ever tried it, of course. <br><br>But I bet that's what would happen if I did.<br><br><!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :lol --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/laugh.gif ALT=":lol"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <p></p><i></i>
banned
 
Posts: 912
Joined: Sun Oct 02, 2005 5:18 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

banned.

Postby Homeless Halo » Wed Nov 02, 2005 6:07 am

indeed.<br><br>laudanum. mildly hallucinogenic.<br><br>myrrh. frankinscense. these are both mildly hallucinogenic too. make for an "interesting atmosphere" if inserted into the background of a christmas party.<br><br>don't inhale the smoke directly, get the second hand, mixed "contact buzz" variety. deep smoking might give you a headache or make you dizzy.<br><br> <p></p><i></i>
Homeless Halo
 
Posts: 564
Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2005 1:51 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Fresh Herring

Postby proldic » Wed Nov 02, 2005 3:09 pm

Gee, has anyone else noticed how similar the modern anti-tobacco-user stance aligns with LaRouche's Tough-Love-Anti-Pot-Bong-Smashing "meme"? <br> <p></p><i></i>
proldic
 
Posts: 989
Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 7:01 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

actually,

Postby robertdreed » Wed Nov 02, 2005 4:16 pm

yeah.<br><br>I recommend that users grow their own tobacco, incidentally. It takes some care, particularly the curing. But you'll know what you're getting. <br><br>I also think that it would be swell if tobacco smokers took to smoking small bowlfuls of it in the sort of pipes typically used for smoking cannabis. That would produce less sidestream smoke, as well as really throwing a spanner in the works of Control.<br><br>I would have allowed people to smoke in my cab, if they simply did one-hitters in pipes. <p></p><i></i>
robertdreed
 
Posts: 1560
Joined: Wed May 18, 2005 11:14 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

re: fresh herring

Postby Watchful Citizen » Wed Nov 02, 2005 5:54 pm

Proldic:<br>"Gee, has anyone else noticed how similar the modern anti-tobacco-user stance aligns with LaRouche's Tough-Love-Anti-Pot-Bong-Smashing "meme"?" <br><br>Ha ha ha ha ha...Ok, now you're just amusing, proldic. <br>So you are actually coming out FOR tobacco because I'm against it. Knee...jerk.<br><br><br>I'm a libertarian regarding personal ingestion but don't want drivers and pilots with my life in their hands to be on any drugs. So, yes, safety around other people is a moral issue. I've worked in construction zones where other people's condition affected my personal safety. Literally a matter of life or death.<br><br>Several studies have indicated that pot is not a cause of car accidents. I'm not surprised.<br>We know how bad alcohol is for driving. I don't like to drive on weekend nights because of all the drunks at the wheel.<br>I wonder how many wrecks are caused by smoking with one hand?<br>I was recently almost hit in a parking lot by a guy backing up with a cellphone in one hand and a cig in the other. <br>Brother. A little competence goes a long way.<br><br>Re: Marijuana.<br>I think if more people smoked pot, there'd be less violence and people would be better evolved animals for having better integration of left/right brain functions and a better perspective on their own emotionally-driven belief systems.<br>And the destruction of alcohol use would go down as people find the anti-stress medication that best suits them.<br><br>But we know that hemp was a threat to the profits of big industries and was outlawed with psy-ops media equating pot with 'undesirable and dangerous' social elements in the 1930s. Now it seems to be used not as a 'gateway drug' but more like a tripwire to determine who won't obey the government or go to war so they can be promptly jailed.<br><br>Re: Tobacco<br>Besides my personal experience being choked to death at home and workplace and public streets by other people's addiction to tobacco with hundreds(?) of carcinogenic toxins to the point of my chronic illness and loss of income (that's all), my biggest criticisms of Big Tobacco are:<br><br>1) Addiction is ampified chemically and precludes autonomy.<br>>Loss of autonomy for profit is a trait of fascism.<br><br>2) Decades of cultural saturation marketing campaigns directed at underage youth were confirmed by industry documents.<br>>That's called selling drugs to children.<br><br>3) Big tobacco and the US government have known of the cancer link for decades but hidden it for mega-profits.<br>>That's called Murder Inc.<br><br>4) Big tobacco has resisted making cigarettes that go out when unsmoked and the resulting housefires kill people, too.<br>>This is more negligent design to maintain profits and deny any culpability whatsoever. <br><br>The social and physical manifestations of tobacco are a perfect analog for the archetypal fascist mechanisms:<br>The individual is persuaded to live on corporate poison through psychological manipulation, as a choice to be addicted sold as empowerment , independence, and rebellion (just like the American Revolutionary Myth) and find you can't escape it so defend it as your own to the death (just like jingoistic wars) while paying the government to entrap the next generation of victims (just like sponsoring our own corporate oppression and feeding the military-industrial complex that holds us captive in a permanently militarized economy).<br><br>That's all. Or maybe this is all Larouchie cult mind-bending to get your bong with a baseball bat.<br>.<!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :rollin --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/roll.gif ALT=":rollin"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <br><br>(I never use emoticons but proldic inspired me.)) <p></p><i></i>
Watchful Citizen
 
Posts: 164
Joined: Mon Aug 15, 2005 2:52 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: re: fresh herring

Postby OnoI812 » Wed Nov 02, 2005 6:21 pm

I like emoticons better than neocons<br><br>and stuff your own cigarettes better than the prepacked chemical delivery systems....the good thing about the stuffer is you can put just about any type of cured herb in the tube<!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :hat --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/pimp.gif ALT=":hat"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <p></p><i></i>
OnoI812
 
Posts: 528
Joined: Fri May 20, 2005 1:36 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Oh, I forgot an important comment...

Postby Watchful Citizen » Wed Nov 02, 2005 6:22 pm

<!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :smokin --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/smokin.gif ALT=":smokin"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <br><br>Ha.<!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :rollin --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/roll.gif ALT=":rollin"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <p></p><i></i>
Watchful Citizen
 
Posts: 164
Joined: Mon Aug 15, 2005 2:52 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: I'm For 'Big Tobacco' Because Watchful's Against It

Postby proldic » Wed Nov 02, 2005 8:10 pm

<!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr> The individual is persuaded to live on corporate poison through psychological manipulation, as a choice to be addicted sold as empowerment, independence, and rebellion <br><br>(<!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>just like the American Revolutionary Myth</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END-->)...<br><br>That's all. <!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>Or maybe this is all Larouchie cult mind-bending...</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--><hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--> <br><br>Thanks for clearing that up.<br><br> <p></p><i></i>
proldic
 
Posts: 989
Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 7:01 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

The finest high I've ever had...

Postby banned » Thu Nov 03, 2005 12:50 am

....was from paregoric, a liquid preparation made from morphine which used to be given to kids in the 1950s for tummy aches. A golden bottle with a slight anise flavor.<br><br>If I could get it by the 2 liter bottle, like Co-Cola, I would never come down. Heaven.<br><br>Nice vivid opium dreams too.<br><br>I don't think you can get it at all in the US any more...one of my docs said it wasn't in the Formulary. Maybe Canada or Mexico. Worth the drive, my friends.<br><br>My neurotransmitters are smiling just remembering.<br><br><!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :) --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/smile.gif ALT=":)"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :) --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/smile.gif ALT=":)"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :) --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/smile.gif ALT=":)"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :) --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/smile.gif ALT=":)"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :) --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/smile.gif ALT=":)"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :) --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/smile.gif ALT=":)"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :) --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/smile.gif ALT=":)"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :) --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/smile.gif ALT=":)"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <p></p><i></i>
banned
 
Posts: 912
Joined: Sun Oct 02, 2005 5:18 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

banned

Postby Homeless Halo » Thu Nov 03, 2005 6:44 am

methamphetamines. There is nothing like them. <br><br>Never ever going near them again, personally. It was too difficult to stop the first time. <p></p><i></i>
Homeless Halo
 
Posts: 564
Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2005 1:51 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Previous

Return to The "War on Terror"

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests