by Starman » Sat Jul 16, 2005 1:00 am
Argh Argh Argh, and Something about Rothschilds and Reptiles ...<br>Does anybody expect such a 'comment' to be read, let alone reasonably discussed?<br><br>Dream On, lak;<br><br>A Lot of people 'believe' in shape-shifting and a whole buncha other stuff, which in terms of High Strange have been surpassed on this board. It's been abundantly asserted that that's to be expected on this discussion board, it comes with the territory. There could be a perfectly sound, reasonable-according-to-the-principles of physics and psychology and chemistry explanation for things that we yet lack the proper vocabulary and mental models for. The Bible makes many claims that many otherwise intelligent people believe are outrageous -- including the many 'forms' Satan can and does take.<br><br>I don't know what the deal with Reptoids are, or if there's any compelling, rational explanation for 'em. I put such things in the 'interesting and bizarre, not proven (possibly, not proveable according to our 'modern' science', yet-of-ever); Like I don't esp. 'believe' in vast underground military bases where humans and aliens cooperate doing nefarious, wierd shit -- tho the existence of extensive US underground military complexes has been put into the public record. As far as that goes, there are a lot of things that 'fringe-thinkers' like many folks on this board who have established the truth of things to their high standards, which their neighbors and community members don't know anything about -- <br><br>To me, Rigorous Intuition means asking hard questions and looking hard for answers which meet demanding criteria, looking beneath the surface of conventional agenda-driven explanations to find facts and principles which more-comprehensively refer to the history and agenda of parapolitics according to such issues as Who Benefits and Following the Money, analyzing means, motive and opportunity, and how seemingly disparate events are associated.<br><br>Obviously, it's not inappropriate to call-somebody on a controversial issue of fact or something outrageous, but such can be much better done with respect and civil courtesy. That doesn't mean ya gave to agree with someone. There's quite a few beliefs here I don't share.<br><br>There's probably a wide range of contexts that the 'issue' of Reptile Humanoids can be discussed, similiar to discussion of Yeti and other 'fantastical' creatures, re: anthropology, mythico-beliefs, folktales, spirituality, enlightened states of 'seeing' ...<br><br>There was a quite fascinating discussion here (a coupla months ago) re: the kinds of trans-dimensional or alternative-world visions in many spiritual traditions including by such 'modern' visionary-seekers as Terrence McKenna -- The certain universality of certain 'insectoid' and reptile-like 'beings' possessed of great wisdom or other powerful force or aura, which in their way are every bit as wierd and unbelieveable as the existence of Reptile-humanoids.<br><br>So by all means, lets discuss and shed greater light and deconstruct and ask pointed questions, but Hey!, let's get-off the kick of telling people off for even suggesting strange stuff. Do I need to remind anybody what should be apparant, that among some circles even suggesting the 911, Madrid, Bologna, OKC, Bali and London bombings are anything BUT the evil bad-guy terrorist plots the officials swear they are, is the worst form of treason and heresy possible. <br><br>And too -- who's to say what aspects of Individual-created-reality might actually become 'visible' to some extent to passive observers? There's evidence for remote-viewing and people able to 'cause' things to happen which they are not directly a part of -- there's a LOT of things which can't be easily explained. That was the point of Dawkin's observation on another thread. UFO's seem to be this kind of phenomenon that we can't definitely explain -- part of it may be psychosocial manifestations -- that's hardly less-wierd than Reptile- Humanoids, eh?<br><br>One of the things I esp. like and value about this forum is the attitude of constriuctive engagement and tolerance, extending from participants' graciousness, mutually-supporting respect and civil courtesy. IMHO, that's the highest form of respecting this forum and the people here that I can imagine.<br><br>My two-cents, natch.<br>Regrdz;<br>Starman<br><!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :smokin --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/smokin.gif ALT=":smokin"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <p></p><i></i>