Quite so.
I specified publicized Ufologists as an effort to distinguish them from most experiencers who tend to internalize the aftermath of contact and instigate a more personal and protectively private quest for understanding. When a contactee goes public, especially with articles, books and lectures on the saucer circuit, there is likely an ego-driven desire to become the Oracle of the Other. Often that ambition becomes the crusade and, in a competitive and acrimonious field of wannabe wunderkind, creative sensationalism is added for recruitment and commercial profit positioning. That also tends to leave the true cosmic learning in the lurch.
What results is what we have had for years in the seven decades of modern UFO reporting, the publicized and pilloried pile of profit-seeking, in-fighting prophets that simply add to the phenomenon's incredulity, and the more silent of our species who have been touched but are not talking. My experience in private forums with the latter has been more revelatory than the open reading of the tabloid accounts. The experience itself is far more upsettingly alien and ambiguous than self-promoted interpreters portray. The dramatic deviations and distortions designed to draw attention actually disparage and dilute the direct experience detail. The real deal leaves its target more dumbstruck than developed and deigned for divinity.