WikiLeaks Email: Bin Laden’s Corpse Not Dumped at Sea

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

WikiLeaks Email: Bin Laden’s Corpse Not Dumped at Sea

Postby seemslikeadream » Mon Mar 05, 2012 4:23 pm

WikiLeaks Email: Bin Laden’s Corpse Not Dumped at Sea
Stratfor Claims Osama's Body Brought to US
by Jason Ditz, March 04, 2012

In May of last year, the US killing of Osama bin Laden was immediately followed by debate over the disposal of his corpse. The Obama Administration claimed bin Laden was put in a bag and hurled into the sea, which it insisted was “in keeping with Islamic practices,” whereas some were calling for his body to be kept around so it could be overtly desecrated.

WikiLeaks’s release of Stratfor emails, however, shows that the company’s Vice President Fred Burton did not believe that was the case, and told members of the company’s mailing list that bin Laden’s corpse was “Dover bound,” referring to the Dover Air Force Base which is also the site to which US soldiers slain overseas are brought.

Another email from Burton said bin Laden’s body was “bound for Dover, DE on CIA plane” and “onward to the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology in Bethesda.” Technically this would have meant the Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, since the AFIP operations were folded into Walter Reed as part of a consolidation plan.

If confirmed, this revelation would be significant for a number of reasons, including the Obama Administration’s repeated claims to the American public that the body was disposed of at sea. It would add yet more intrigue to Dover Air Force Base, already under enormous scrutiny for its mishandling of corpses and disposal of remains at a Virginia landfill.
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

Re: WikiLeaks Email: Bin Laden’s Corpse Not Dumped at Sea

Postby Bruce Dazzling » Mon Mar 05, 2012 5:21 pm

The ever changing goalposts of psyops never get old, do they?

Burial at sea is the "no planes" of the alleged Bin Laden kinetic operation.

Or some such shit.

:eeyaa
"Arrogance is experiential and environmental in cause. Human experience can make and unmake arrogance. Ours is about to get unmade."

~ Joe Bageant R.I.P.

OWS Photo Essay

OWS Photo Essay - Part 2
User avatar
Bruce Dazzling
 
Posts: 2306
Joined: Wed Dec 26, 2007 2:25 pm
Location: Yes
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: WikiLeaks Email: Bin Laden’s Corpse Not Dumped at Sea

Postby Searcher08 » Mon Mar 05, 2012 5:35 pm

Bruce Dazzling wrote:The ever changing goalposts of psyops never get old, do they?

Burial at sea is the "no planes" of the alleged Bin Laden kinetic operation.

Or some such shit.

:eeyaa


Soon sandals with human feet will be wasing up on the EAST coast... or there may be a Hollywood tie-in with a Bin Laden z o m b i e franchise... :whisper:
User avatar
Searcher08
 
Posts: 5887
Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2007 10:21 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: WikiLeaks Email: Bin Laden’s Corpse Not Dumped at Sea

Postby StarmanSkye » Mon Mar 05, 2012 5:37 pm

Whoa ... So Obama's not-corpse was not-buried?

I think this mayhaps be a disinfo psyops demonstrating media-savvy counterintel to confuse & muddle the record, further legitimizing the unquestioned premise-'fact' of Osama's killing as per US anti-terrorist reprisal.

Utter rot and rubbish.

As Bruce suggests, a 'no-planer' variation of the BL kinetic op.
StarmanSkye
 
Posts: 2670
Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2005 11:32 pm
Location: State of Jefferson
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: WikiLeaks Email: Bin Laden’s Corpse Not Dumped at Sea

Postby DoYouEverWonder » Mon Mar 05, 2012 5:44 pm

Now they can claim he ended up in a landfill. Oops...
Image
User avatar
DoYouEverWonder
 
Posts: 962
Joined: Sun Nov 04, 2007 9:24 am
Location: Within you and without you
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: WikiLeaks Email: Bin Laden’s Corpse Not Dumped at Sea

Postby 82_28 » Mon Mar 05, 2012 6:06 pm

We get the WSJ at work and would have totally missed this story I read the other day, were I not bored at one point in the day.

Bin Laden's House Demolished by Pakistan Authorities

Pakistan authorities on Saturday night demolished the three-story house in Abbottabad where Osama bin Laden lived for years and died last May during a raid by U.S. Navy SEALs in an apparent bid to stop it becoming a tourist site or shrine for al Qaeda supporters.

An Abbottabad resident said Sunday that diggers were removing rubble.

After the raid that killed bin Laden, Pakistan was left with a choice of whether to demolish the house or to manage it as a tourist attraction.

By deciding to demolish it, Pakistan authorities have followed a course taken by Germany, which for years didn't mark Adolf Hitler's bunker after his death to avoid it attracting neo-Nazis.

Immediately after the midnight raid that killed bin Laden, hundreds of local tourists came to look at the house in Abbottabad, a pleasant town ringed by Himalayan foothills about 30 miles northeast of Islamabad, and to collect parts of the downed U.S. Black Hawk that crashed during the sortie.

But soon afterward, Pakistan's military intelligence posted operatives in the area around the clock to stop journalists and tourists from getting close to the house.

During the U.S. raid, Navy SEALs carried off boxes of material from the house, including al Qaeda files. A U.S. official said Pakistan didn't consult Washington about its decision to demolish the house. Relations between the two countries have reached breaking point since a U.S. helicopter raid in November that mistakenly killed 24 Pakistani soldiers on the Afghan border. Pakistani officials have not commented on their reason to knock down the complex.

The compound, which was largely hidden behind a large perimeter wall, was an embarrassment for the Pakistan government. It was located in an area of similar houses, bounded by fields of rice and other crops, only a few miles from Pakistan's premier military academy and in a garrison town thick with retired military personnel.

The location of the house raised questions among U.S. officials about how bin Laden was able to live there for five years without raising suspicions. Until now, however, the U.S. has stated it has found no evidence that Pakistan's military or government helped shelter the former al Qaeda leader.

Pakistan's military was humiliated by the unilateral U.S. raid on its territory, of which it was given no forewarning. The army's leaders perhaps also saw the house as an unwanted reminder of an event which hurt its image with many Pakistanis.

Immediately after the raid, local officials were split on what to do with the house. Some local government officials said they hoped it would become a permanent attraction and help bring more tourists through the town, which relies largely on a large military presence to drive its economy. Other locals at the time said it should be destroyed to end any association between Abbottabad and bin Laden.

While opinion polls show most Pakistanis are now opposed to al Qaeda, which in recent years has launched a number of strikes against Pakistan government, military and civilian targets, some people in Pakistan still admire bin Laden for his role in fighting Soviet troops in Afghanistan in the 1980s and for attacking the U.S. on Sept. 11, 2001.

In the end, the decision to demolish the house was likely taken by Pakistan's powerful Inter-Services Intelligence directorate military spy agency.

The house legally belonged to a Pakistani man who worked as bin Laden's courier and was killed along with his brother in the raid.

Local land records showed a man believed to be the courier purchased land for the house from four sellers for a total of around $50,000 in 2004 and 2005.

Local property dealers valued the compound, which included a three-story whitewashed house with a garden and a large connected area for grazing animals, at around $300,000.

Perhaps in the future, Pakistan officials will mark the site of the house with a plaque so it is not lost to history.

For more than 60 years, German authorities kept the exact location of the bunker in Berlin where Hitler committed suicide in 1945 concealed from the public. But in 2006, before an influx of tourists for the soccer World Cup, authorities erected a plaque marking the spot of the bunker.


http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000142 ... 51284.html

In'trestin' timing. . .
There is no me. There is no you. There is all. There is no you. There is no me. And that is all. A profound acceptance of an enormous pageantry. A haunting certainty that the unifying principle of this universe is love. -- Propagandhi
User avatar
82_28
 
Posts: 11194
Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2007 4:34 am
Location: North of Queen Anne
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: WikiLeaks Email: Bin Laden’s Corpse Not Dumped at Sea

Postby Jeff » Mon Mar 05, 2012 7:07 pm

I don't doubt it. But it makes me wonder what they would want with it.
User avatar
Jeff
Site Admin
 
Posts: 11134
Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2000 8:01 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: WikiLeaks Email: Bin Laden’s Corpse Not Dumped at Sea

Postby seemslikeadream » Mon Mar 05, 2012 7:37 pm

Jeff wrote:I don't doubt it. But it makes me wonder what they would want with it.

Image
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

Re: WikiLeaks Email: Bin Laden’s Corpse Not Dumped at Sea

Postby Searcher08 » Mon Mar 05, 2012 7:54 pm

seemslikeadream wrote:
Jeff wrote:I don't doubt it. But it makes me wonder what they would want with it.

Image


:mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen:
slad, that was awful but very funny :)
User avatar
Searcher08
 
Posts: 5887
Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2007 10:21 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: WikiLeaks Email: Bin Laden’s Corpse Not Dumped at Sea

Postby JackRiddler » Mon Mar 05, 2012 9:06 pm

Ha! Skull and Bones.

Jeff wrote:I don't doubt it. But it makes me wonder what they would want with it.


Seventeen-way ass coverage and mutual blackmail (that can never, will never be used) by arrangement, a ritual reassurance for all those in on whatever the real story is, e.g. who know it was (or was not) the real (or one of the real) OBL (s).

Anyway, "buried at sea" was a laughable crock from the start. And I literally mean laugh: The radio woke me up and cracked me up with it that morning. Oh, wait for it: "In keeping with Muslim practice" such as doesn't actually exist. Whether he was "buried at sea" or not, it's hilarity. There's only one message there: not for you to know.
We meet at the borders of our being, we dream something of each others reality. - Harvey of R.I.

To Justice my maker from on high did incline:
I am by virtue of its might divine,
The highest Wisdom and the first Love.

TopSecret WallSt. Iraq & more
User avatar
JackRiddler
 
Posts: 16007
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2008 2:59 pm
Location: New York City
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: WikiLeaks Email: Bin Laden’s Corpse Not Dumped at Sea

Postby Simulist » Mon Mar 05, 2012 10:37 pm

StarmanSkye wrote:Whoa ... So Obama's not-corpse was not-buried?

Freudian? ;)
"The most strongly enforced of all known taboos is the taboo against knowing who or what you really are behind the mask of your apparently separate, independent, and isolated ego."
    — Alan Watts
User avatar
Simulist
 
Posts: 4713
Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 10:13 pm
Location: Here, and now.
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: WikiLeaks Email: Bin Laden’s Corpse Not Dumped at Sea

Postby StarmanSkye » Tue Mar 06, 2012 12:14 am

I wrote:
"Whoa ... So Obama's not-corpse was not-buried?

Simulist quipped:

"Freudian?"

*****
Ha! Good eye!

Actually, there may be something to that, at least the subconscious blurring or melding of America's 'foes' given we're only talking about a simple S-substitute-B typo, and that they BOTH are precisely-deliberate PR constructs of the US Deep State serving long-range covert Unconventional Warfare agendas.

HOW many times did the 'official' story change, anyway? I hardly bothered to dig into the evident fable too-deeply -- I found the contradictory first-hand testimony and ancilliary evidence of inconsistencies and outright fraud far more compelling than the pathetic White House and subsequent stories, the tellers of which showed little knowledge of let alone cooperation between to tell a cohesive, believeable narrative. I doubt more than 1 out of 5 Pakistanis trust the 'US killed Osama in daring Helicopter Special Forces raid' report anyway.
StarmanSkye
 
Posts: 2670
Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2005 11:32 pm
Location: State of Jefferson
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: WikiLeaks Email: Bin Laden’s Corpse Not Dumped at Sea

Postby Simulist » Tue Mar 06, 2012 12:53 am

I think that about the blurring too, Starman.

Cheers.
"The most strongly enforced of all known taboos is the taboo against knowing who or what you really are behind the mask of your apparently separate, independent, and isolated ego."
    — Alan Watts
User avatar
Simulist
 
Posts: 4713
Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 10:13 pm
Location: Here, and now.
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: WikiLeaks Email: Bin Laden’s Corpse Not Dumped at Sea

Postby Stephen Morgan » Tue Mar 06, 2012 5:44 am

When they demolished his house they found a couple of Bibles in it.
Those who dream by night in the dusty recesses of their minds wake in the day to find that all was vanity; but the dreamers of the day are dangerous men, for they may act their dream with open eyes, and make it possible. -- Lawrence of Arabia
User avatar
Stephen Morgan
 
Posts: 3736
Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2007 6:37 am
Location: England
Blog: View Blog (9)

Re: WikiLeaks Email: Bin Laden’s Corpse Not Dumped at Sea

Postby semper occultus » Tue Mar 06, 2012 6:41 am

seemslikeadream wrote:
Jeff wrote:I don't doubt it. But it makes me wonder what they would want with it.

Image


...hence OBL's Geronimo codename one may be forgiven for surmising....
User avatar
semper occultus
 
Posts: 2974
Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 2:01 pm
Location: London,England
Blog: View Blog (0)

Next

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 156 guests