Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff
seemslikeadream » Fri Jan 31, 2014 4:57 pm wrote:@searcher ...I see one post ...one person is that right? That's a whole lot of trouble
1/2 million posts ...10 years.....1 person 1 post? that's a big problem? that has 1 person here with his pants in a bunch looking over his shoulder 24/7?
and how many members here?
I guess we need a super duper full time mod to handle all the trouble in this one area alone we could even give him a special name with super secret special duties
I'm not trying to be obtuse ...I just don't see a big problem here at RI that we are in need of a special centurion
Searcher08 » Fri Jan 31, 2014 5:32 pm wrote:@AD
Currently, there is a large amount of posting activity toward acting as an immune system against potential far right infiltration.
I have posted evidence that this completely ignores the more important factor of hasbara infiltration.
I am bored with how things are around here - interminable front page shitfights- and think we should design a better way forward in a way that helps everyone get their needs met. This appears to be a good time to do it. Self-organising systems and all that. It's the way of the future.
I wrote:OK. So if one were a supporter of National Anarchism and/or related ideologies and wished to insinuate oneself into boards such as ours here for the purposes of surreptitiously finding support and/or recruits what would that look like? How would that person go about that, assuming they were savvy enough (had lurked and studied long enough) to realize a frontal approach would not work?
brainpanhandler » Fri Jan 31, 2014 5:45 pm wrote:@slad,
I asked Jakell eariler in the thread:I wrote:OK. So if one were a supporter of National Anarchism and/or related ideologies and wished to insinuate oneself into boards such as ours here for the purposes of surreptitiously finding support and/or recruits what would that look like? How would that person go about that, assuming they were savvy enough (had lurked and studied long enough) to realize a frontal approach would not work?
brainpanhandler » Fri Jan 31, 2014 5:45 pm wrote:
Here's another "daft" thought experiment for you-
what would the board look like if you never responded to AD?
Would it really be so horrible?
Rory » 31 Jan 2014 18:03 wrote:brainpanhandler » Fri Jan 31, 2014 5:45 pm wrote:
Here's another "daft" thought experiment for you-
what would the board look like if you never responded to AD?
Would it really be so horrible?
The host might be able to retire a server or two. The carbon savings could offset a small towns energy use
seemslikeadream » Fri Jan 31, 2014 6:06 pm wrote:yea blame it on me I'm not the one with 50 separate threads on anti-semitism here
jakell » Fri Jan 31, 2014 5:54 pm wrote:brainpanhandler » Fri Jan 31, 2014 5:45 pm wrote:@slad,
I asked Jakell eariler in the thread:I wrote:OK. So if one were a supporter of National Anarchism and/or related ideologies and wished to insinuate oneself into boards such as ours here for the purposes of surreptitiously finding support and/or recruits what would that look like? How would that person go about that, assuming they were savvy enough (had lurked and studied long enough) to realize a frontal approach would not work?
Actually, now that Mighty Mouse has stopped sqeaking at me, I was thinking of getting around to answering that .
Just give me a mo....
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests