by JackRiddler » Mon Jun 02, 2014 9:50 pm
Catherine Austin Fitts, who is older and smarter than me, "served as managing director and member of the board of directors of the Wall Street investment bank Dillon, Read & Co. Inc., as Assistant Secretary of Housing and Federal Housing[2] Commissioner at the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development in the first Bush Administration."
That is to say, C.A. Fitts worked in the principle criminal industry of the country, Wall Street, and then took a job in the administration of one of the biggest villains in U.S. history, Bush the father. Then the Bush mob screwed her, and she was shocked to find out the obvious, that bad guys are in control. Why didn't she figure this out back when the same gangster state (under earlier management) was murdering millions of people in Indochina?
Since I am actually charitable in my explanations, my explanation is that she had been naive, as millions of loyal servants to the system have always been naive. She believed all the America bullshit and capitalist system bullshit into which we almost all have been brainwashed as children. She still does, in different form. For whatever reason -- again, she is older and smarter than me -- I had ceased to believe the bullshit at a much earlier age, thus precluding my own potential career as a naive system apparatchik reaching for the brass ring, exactly as society trained me to do.
9/11 as inside job (which is to say: a remote-orchestrated event, not necessarily fully produced by a Hollywood studio working for the CIA) has never seemed exotic or unthinkable to me, because it makes eminent sense, and because it's got so much precedent. It would have had a function -- many obvious functions. It would have allowed exactly the revolution in the security state and global imperialist policy that the (election stealing) Bush regime and its neocon allies intended to enact.
In the same way the Gulf of Tonkin had a function, and the Moscow 9/99 apartment bombings that brought Putin to power had a function, and the "Strategy of Tension" as applied around the world has a function. It's the kind of thing you see over and over in banana republics, translated to the grander scale of a banana empire. Americans do not generally think such plots are "conspiracy theory" if only they are claimed to happen in Russia, or Iran, or Iraq.
9/11 had a function, and if done right, it was low risk to the masterminds. This is why there's no doubt it would have been done via assisted LIHOP, without a cast of thousands of fake victims or all the other insane and superfluous add-ons that the Untruthers have imagined, like "Harley guy."
Of course "Harley guy" was not a plant. What he said is exactly what many millions of people were thinking at that moment, exactly what I was also thinking: that there was some kind of structural reason for collapse caused by the plane impacts and subsequent fires. Even if a demolition had been done, arranging a fake "Harley guy" would have been incredibly stupid and superfluous. It has no function. It serves no purpose, nefarious or otherwise. It just adds another guy who knows shit that he shouldn't, saying shit that someone else will also say.
It doesn't matter how much evil "they" are capable of doing, blah blah blah. "They" need to have a motive. You can't just devise any scenario that seems evil to you (even though it makes absolutely no sense!) and attribute it to "them" on the basis of your belief that "they" must have done it because they're evil and you thought of it and now you can't unthink it.
If there was a propaganda plant in this, then it might have been whoever was the first to suggest that "Harley guy" was a plant. That makes a lot more sense. Because, unlike "Harley guy," this would have had a function: to make 9/11 truth look really, really stupid, as well as to take the focus off any trail that could expose the coverup (such as the 9/11 commission documents that Kevin Fenton eventually used to expose what actually happened, not that Untruthers care or even have a clue that Kevin Fenton did this). Pointing to "Harley guy" is occupying our time with utter trivia. It's also a very low risk strategy for disrupting a movement.
Same idea with this random civilian lady who is now being targeted by you. You can't come up with a reason why whatever "They" you think was behind the Boston bombing would ever bother to engage in this. If the Boston attack was a false-flag, then all it needed was a real bomb and a patsy -- preferably a patsy actually set up to do the bombing! The best patsy believes he acted on his own. Then there are no loose ends. Such a conspiracy is compact, effective, safe, deniable, insulated, and simple relative to what is being claimed here.
You can't come up with any reason why they need an actor to serve as a fake witness to a real bomb set off in a place with thousands of people, or why they would deploy this actor again during the subsequent police manhunt that covered a neighborhood. Why aren't the real bystanders to a real bomb and a real manhunt good enough? Why on earth would masterminds recruit unnecessary conspirators?
With thousands of people watching the marathon, and then thousands of people living in the area of the manhunt, and with hundreds of media crews all over both events, it means absolutely nothing that the same woman might have been present and interviewed at both events. You, Nordic, may be smart about film technology but you apparently do not understand probability, in this case the (very high) likelihood that a search after the fact will eventually find usable correlations, allowing such scenarios to be constructed, assuming someone wants to construct such scenarios in the first place.
I also wonder if you have an empathic deficit of some kind, for failing to see how most people are likely to react when they see that some random lady on the street is being accused of being part of the Boston bombing plot. If they were ever open to the idea of a false flag, they will stop when they see this, and say: these people (the "conspiracy theorists") are heartless bastards harrassing some random traumatized lady, a victim, as if she was a criminal.
That is one reason it is far more suspicious that some helpful Untruther found video footage of this woman from the two film crews at the two events, and fashioned this video for the naive. I don't actually think that the video maker is a plant, because it's already been many years since a cult-like culture of post-reality took hold among the Untruthers, originally finding its classic form with Nico Haupt and the "no-planes" theory.
But again, if someone is a plant, it's not the lady, it's the video maker, because the latter would actually be serving a function for "them". He's contributing to the general state of confusionism that makes all statements suspect, that casts doubt on the validity of all evidence, and thus makes it impossible to expose genuine criminal activity by the government, corporations, or establishment (because every such assertion comes to smell like bullshit).
I can think of only one idea that's almost as absurd as the "crisis actors" theory as applied to "Harley Guy" and the poor Boston lady, or the poor Newtown families. It's not quite as ridiculous, but it shows a similar pattern of thought. It was promoted by a once-prolific RI poster, Hugh Manatee Wins, whom many people here decided must be an intentional disinfo artist muddying the waters. He has a name for his schtick, he called it Keyword Hijacking.
We meet at the borders of our being, we dream something of each others reality. - Harvey of R.I.
To Justice my maker from on high did incline:
I am by virtue of its might divine,
The highest Wisdom and the first Love.
TopSecret WallSt. Iraq &
more
