guruilla » Tue Dec 01, 2015 5:06 am wrote:slimmouse » Mon Nov 30, 2015 4:24 pm wrote:[
you obviously didnt listen to the podcast yet
this is just one of the reasons i posted it.
If you mean the one-minute one, I have now. I still don't see the difference, a leader is still a leader, voting is still voting. McKenna was still backed by Laurence Rockeller. Which doesn't mean TM was an asset, only that he was considered to be an asset (if there's a difference).
After twenty years of doing them and knowing people who have, I haven't seen any substantial evidence that repeat entheogen use leads to anything but a cosmically inflated ego and a fucked up liver.
Still trying to find that audio.
Your timestamp is off (?) I have seen these accusations about McKenna - the one where he refers to the shroom overmind and it is twisted into being about the CIA or whatever...and about Wasson...But I never hear any real proof as their supposed usefulness. I guess the argument about Wasson and then Leary is that the great '60s revolution was really derailed by acid - even though the real politicos had mostly moved beyond tripping. And the most radical expression in the '60s, Paris '68 had nothing to do with acid, one way or the other (neither benefit or detriment). And Mckenna? Is the damage supposed to be that it just neutralizes people so they are not active politically? Mckenna wasn't really about microdosing but rather the opposite, as in occasional heroic doses, and was somewhat elitist too: let's give DMT to the architects, scientists, intellectuals...The RS article is full of lots of holes and suppositions. Entheogens have been proven to help with opiate addiction, alcoholism, PTSD...Once they are dropped to Schedule II and research can be conducted with much less restrictions, I am sure that even more positive research will be forthcoming