by slimmouse » Sat Sep 03, 2005 7:03 pm
<!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>This brings to mind someone's post here at RI, I think in one of the threads about Camp Casey. Had to do with a Mexican man whose son was killed in Iraq, and this father was sure it was because the son was ready to report the drug use and dealing that was going on there<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END-->. <br><br> Surely it isnt uncommon knowledge to my fellow posters who controls the drug trade ?<br><br> Under the Taliban, Opium production had virtually been eliminated, according to UN figures. Those same people - The UN - said that last year, with 30,000 American troops in place, that the opium crop was a record .<br> <br> coinkydink no doubt <!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :rollin --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/roll.gif ALT=":rollin"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <br><br> And to help you, look at the US, or should I say CIA involvement in the drugs trade, look no further than South America, the home of the Coca plant.<br><br> It really isnt rocket science to any poster on this forum to work out who are really running the "illegal" drugs business <!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :D --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/happy.gif ALT=":D"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <br><br> I posted a link on an alternative forum a while back, helped I have to say by Antiaristos mindblowing revelations, trying to explain why it was significant that the top British Judicial appointee, along with a fellow QC was appointed in a " groundbreaking trial" to convict an Afghan warlord for "crimes against humanity". <br><br> To sum it up, his real crime, was to OPPOSE the drug trade. So they bring in the BIG guns to deal with this guy, in order to send a message to those in the know, about what happens to those who oppose the drug trade . <p></p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://p216.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=slimmouse@rigorousintuition>slimmouse</A> at: 9/3/05 5:15 pm<br></i>