Grizzly » Mon Apr 09, 2018 4:28 pm wrote:RCMP Security Service? CSIS? Or something less innocuous likely, to keep it out of Alphabets data scrapping ?
Grizzly » Mon Apr 09, 2018 5:04 pm wrote:Canadian Security Intelligence Service
mentalgongfu2 » Tue Apr 10, 2018 4:53 am wrote:I still like Data Dump.
Cordelia » Wed Apr 11, 2018 1:17 pm wrote: Have the moderators conducted spiritual due diligence on this name change?
American Dream » Thu Apr 19, 2018 6:56 am wrote:"Be careful what you ask for, you just might get it". I cite this truism of New Age thought in sober recognition of the reality that various opinions I hold do create sparks here.
My strategy of adaptation has included posting mostly article, trying not to add any commentary and to emphasize focused threads which no one has to read if they don't want to. I think it's the best I can do, considering.
It seems that the reality that it's often the content (in an ideological sense)- not the question of it violating any R.I. agreements- which makes some people unhappy is very rarely mentioned.
This is a key point and one that deserves far greater acknowledgment as I don't think it's fundamentally a question of obeying any particular rules, be they new or old.
I think it's much more about my view of the world, that I see some confusions and conspiracies within the conspiracy world- where others may find some of the beliefs they are most deeply attached to.
MacCruiskeen » Thu Aug 09, 2007 1:08 pm wrote:Jamey Hecht:THE TERM ‘CONSPIRACY THEORY’
This phrase is among the tireless workhorses of establishment discourse. Without it, disinformation would be much harder than it is. “Conspiracy theory” is a trigger phrase, saturated with intellectual contempt and deeply anti-intellectual resentment. It makes little sense on its own, and while it’s a priceless tool of propaganda, it is worse than useless as an explanatory category.
Users browsing this forum: Google Feedfetcher, Majestic-12 [Bot] and 19 guests