Is discussing an article's source threadjacking?

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

Locked

Is discussing an article's source threadjacking?

1) Sources are irrelevant to a story and should be ignored.
0
No votes
2) Sources tell lots about a story and should be discussed.
1
50%
3) Sources are not the whole story but important enough to discuss.
1
50%
4) Sources are not the whole story and should be ignored.
0
No votes
 
Total votes: 2
User avatar
Hugh Manatee Wins
Posts: 9869
Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2005 6:51 pm
Location: in context

Is discussing an article's source threadjacking?

Post by Hugh Manatee Wins »

Is discussing an article's source threadjacking?
Top
User avatar
barracuda
Posts: 12890
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 5:58 pm
Location: Niles, California

Post by barracuda »

Somewhat pedantic.
The most dangerous traps are the ones you set for yourself. - [i]Phillip Marlowe[/i]
Top
User avatar
Occult Means Hidden
Posts: 1403
Joined: Mon Nov 06, 2006 1:34 am

Post by Occult Means Hidden »

Discussing sources are the story. You're right. But - I feel Jeff would probably want this closed for now. Can we keep the discussion in the original thread?
Rage against the ever vicious downward spiral.
Time to get back to basics. [url=http://zmag.org/zmi/readlabor.htm]Worker Control of Industry![/url]
Top
Locked

Return to “FIRE PIT”