Comments On Images Only Thread

Iamwhomiam · Post by **Iamwhomiam** » Sun Dec 21, 2014 10:41 pm

How serenely succinct! Thanks for the pic conniption

More can be learned about the fellow in this photo here.

I thought about placing it in the coulda been the onion thread but decided not to. Then I thought about posting it in a thread of its own, with only this to say, "So tell me again how hard your life has been."

conniption · Post by **conniption** » Mon Dec 22, 2014 6:27 am

Iamwhomiam » Sun Dec 21, 2014 7:41 pm wrote:How serenely succinct! Thanks for the pic conniption

Notice you can click on the picture to find the article or source? I get a little frustrated at times with the images thread when there are no words or links..

"So tell me again how hard your life has been."

but please don't think I'm complaining. Nope. Not me. Not ever again. tyvm

^^^click on me.

Iamwhomiam · Post by **Iamwhomiam** » Tue Dec 23, 2014 12:29 am

So how did you embed the link into the photo? I know that long ago when we could upload photos directly from our own libraries, I would also embed a link to my source into the photo. It seemed to me that feature was no longer possible when we moved to the system now in place; something to do with the link corrupting the img tags.

Please explain!

justdrew · Post by **justdrew** » Tue Dec 23, 2014 12:45 am

Iamwhomiam » 22 Dec 2014 20:29 wrote:So how did you embed the link into the photo? I know that long ago when we could upload photos directly from our own libraries, I would also embed a link to my source into the photo. It seemed to me that feature was no longer possible when we moved to the system now in place; something to do with the link corrupting the img tags.

Please explain!

just quote the message and you'll see how the bbcode works to have the img be a link

it's just that the body of the link is the img tag.

Code: Select all

[url=whatever]<body of url>[/url]
<body of url> can = [img]pictureURL[/img]

Iamwhomiam · Post by **Iamwhomiam** » Tue Dec 23, 2014 12:49 am

Feeling pretty dumb right about now, thanks Drew. It's how I paste all the photos into news stories I post.

justdrew · Post by **justdrew** » Tue Dec 23, 2014 2:22 am

Iamwhomiam » 22 Dec 2014 20:49 wrote:Feeling pretty dumb right about now, thanks Drew. It's how I paste all the photos into news stories I post.

I know the feeling, sort of thing happens to me all the time

Joe Hillshoist · Post by **Joe Hillshoist** » Fri Jan 16, 2015 1:20 am

This was funny, but is that the silhouette of a kkk member in the background?

Iamwhomiam · Post by **Iamwhomiam** » Fri Jan 23, 2015 3:48 pm

^^^^ Indeed! Obviously he passed their quality control with flying colors! Prompts me to write a letter to the editor.
~~~~~~~~

Regarding these photos ~ Bjork ~ Great article here: http://tmagazine.blogs.nytimes.com/2015/01/23/the-peculiar-genius-of-bjork-vulnicura-moma/?_r=0

Iamwhomiam · Post by **Iamwhomiam** » Mon Mar 02, 2015 5:45 pm

Regarding this photo: http://www.nytimes.com/2015/03/03/business/dealbook/a-century-old-tax-break-for-the-rich-and-mobile-in-britain.html

Iamwhomiam · Post by **Iamwhomiam** » Wed Mar 04, 2015 10:41 pm

Schmazo, Very cool photo! Doesn't look like his first ride, but perhaps the woodpecker's first passenger.

Elvis · Post by **Elvis** » Thu Mar 05, 2015 3:56 am

yeah, what's the story behind that?!

conniption · Post by **conniption** » Thu Mar 05, 2015 5:44 pm

Elvis » Thu Mar 05, 2015 12:56 am wrote:yeah, what's the story behind that?!

The Guardian

Weasel-riding-woodpecker picture prompts weighty Twitter debate
Mark Smith and agencies
Tuesday 3 March 2015

&

Metro

Photographer explains how he got THAT pic of a weasel riding a woodpecker

Rob Waugh for Metro.co.uk
Tuesday 3 Mar 2015

zangtang · Post by **zangtang** » Mon Apr 20, 2015 2:33 pm

My, that eco-fashionism is so uncompromising

Iamwhomiam · Post by **Iamwhomiam** » Mon Apr 20, 2015 6:41 pm

Regarding these photos:

http://archaeologynewsnetwork.blogspot.com/2015/04/600-year-old-geoglyph-destroyed-in.html

Iamwhomiam · Post by **Iamwhomiam** » Thu May 07, 2015 9:58 am

Regarding this photo

An appropriate setting for displaying Snowden's head appropriately upon an appropriate pole.

http://www.timesunion.com/news/article/Snowden-artists-get-tickets-statute-6247670.php

rigorousintuition.ca

Comments On Images Only Thread

Re: Comments On Images Only Thread

Re: Comments On Images Only Thread

Re: Comments On Images Only Thread

Re: Comments On Images Only Thread

Re: Comments On Images Only Thread

Re: Comments On Images Only Thread

Re: Comments On Images Only Thread

Re: Comments On Images Only Thread

Re: Comments On Images Only Thread

Re: Comments On Images Only Thread

Re: Comments On Images Only Thread

Re: Comments On Images Only Thread

Re: Comments On Images Only Thread

Re: Comments On Images Only Thread

Re: Comments On Images Only Thread