Bush 'unhinged' according to 'consrvtv writer'

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

Post Reply
pepsified thinker
Posts: 1025
Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2006 11:15 pm

Bush 'unhinged' according to 'consrvtv writer'

Post by pepsified thinker »

Here's the <!--EZCODE LINK START--><a href="http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1003347326">story</a><!--EZCODE LINK END-->. <br><br>So what do we know about Sullivan? <p></p><i></i>
PeterofLoneTree
Posts: 343
Joined: Fri May 20, 2005 12:10 pm

Re: Bush 'unhinged' according to 'consrvtv writer'

Post by PeterofLoneTree »

The first thing I thought when I read the thread "Dick is Shredding <!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://p216.ezboard.com/frigorousintuitionfrm10.showMessage?topicID=6771.topic">p216.ezboard.com/frigorou...6771.topic</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--> was that Cheney might be getting ready to move. To newer quarters?<br> <p></p><i></i>
chiggerbit
Posts: 8594
Joined: Tue May 10, 2005 12:23 pm

Re: Bush 'unhinged' according to 'consrvtv writer'

Post by chiggerbit »

<!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>was that Cheney might be getting ready to move. To newer quarters?</em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END--><br><br>Like his casket?<br> <p></p><i></i>
JerkyLeBoeuf
Posts: 146
Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2006 6:49 am

Re: Bush 'unhinged' according to 'consrvtv writer'

Post by JerkyLeBoeuf »

It'd be sad if he had to move so soon after completing construction on that massive underground Tunnel to Hell (for easy commuting to his Hidden Masters's headquarters) he had installed beneath his home at the taxpayer's expense.<br><br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.rense.com/general50/quake.htm">www.rense.com/general50/quake.htm</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--> <p></p><i></i>
chiggerbit
Posts: 8594
Joined: Tue May 10, 2005 12:23 pm

Re: Bush 'unhinged' according to 'consrvtv writer'

Post by chiggerbit »

Andy Sullivan is a well-meaning conservative who can't admit yet that the Iraq invasion was a screwed up idea from the beginning which never had a chance to work because the underlying premise was W rong. A good guy, with good intentions, who just hasn't quite got it yet. And no, his guy Kerry wouldn't have been much better, sorry to say. But, if I had to choose between Bush being wrong and Kerry being wrong, I'll choose the nut-case Bush, thank you very much. Makes the case for the other party so much stronger. Sometimes, I think the Dems need to lose one more time, just to cement their case. I'm afraid that if the Dems win one house of Congress this time, it will just be temporary. So, let the ones who put this nut in place in the first place take some responsibility for their lack of common sense. They deserve what they get. <p></p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://p216.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=chiggerbit@rigorousintuition>chiggerbit</A> at: 11/2/06 12:38 am<br></i>
User avatar
jingofever
Posts: 2814
Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2005 6:24 pm

forget sully

Post by jingofever »

I find it more notable that the same article mentions Richard Perle, all around good guy, called the administration 'dysfunctional'. Probably looking to butter up the democrats for his special brand of foreign policy. <p></p><i></i>
Post Reply