Simulist wrote:Stephen, are you on any prescription medications?
Would you consider them?
Because what you're saying here is just plain nuts.
Oh, no, I wouldn't taint my precious bodily fluids with the happy pills. I possess a book, in fact, by a self proclaimed member of the psychiatric inmates liberation movement, I'm convinced of the lack of utility in psychiatric medication.
justdrew wrote:it's just a hypothetical, no different than speculating "what if" the Native Americans had destroyed all European ships on sight. it certainly would have changed a lot.
I don't think they had the technological ability to destroy clinker built oceanic shipping. Dug out canoes, no real siege engines, stone tipped arrows the only ranged weapons, apart from atl atls.
norton ash wrote:We shoulda killed off those first babies with opposable thumbs, too.
Makes sense, man! We weren't around back then. Not unless you've perfected time travel without telling us. Perfected. I saw a woman in a tee shirt the other day and the shirt said "parfait", which had me staring at her breasts trying to work out what it was saying. Then I realised, it's French for perfect. And it was on a Polish girl, so I don't know where she got it.
Peregrine wrote:Moral dilema or not, that's a batshit crazy thing to say. It isn't so much the "what if" question that is troubling, but how it's worded. Having the "courage" to finnish the job but "chickened out". That's fucked up.
It takes a great level of courage to overcome ones own reluctance to do something abominable, especially if it would be both diplomatically and politically unpopular. It was a lack of political will which allowed Israel to be formed.
But I'll play along with the fanasy of going back in time... Although it's off topic. Would I kill a baby that grows into a tyranical dictatorial leader? No. But I might take him & put him in a completely different environment. But that begs the question, is evil passed on genetically? Are people born bad?... I ramble now... I have to think on that for a while. And I lack sleep, I'm off for a nap...

I don't believe in biological determinism. Hitler was damaged, he could have been redeemed.
JackRiddler wrote:Notwithstanding that the reponsible English authorities hadn't gone back in time, that they didn't know what would happen in the future,
Not the future, the present. They should have known that a massive influx of Jews bent on founding a nation of their own on land already occupied by Arabs, to whom they had promised territorial integrity, was a bad idea. And, like I say, I'm normally a fan of Clement Attlee. He kept his word to free India, so the Palestinians can consider themselves unlucky that he broke the Balfour declaration.
and that their successors have supported Israel at most times since, seeing what it has become and basically finding it good.
That's not much of an excuse.
But that's more thought than the comment deserves. It is, as beeline says, very crazy stuff.
Yet I don't usually mind Morgan because he takes effort to lay out his (imho crazy) views in his own words, gives answers to what others say, and does not engage in the hit-and-run no-content ridicule that is the trademark of trolls. Also, it's not like he's aligning with The Power, even if his stuff sometimes supports ideologies I find barbaric. It's all over the place. Morgan's more like the naked madman tolerated in a town square I once saw in Assiut, and not like a cheerleader at a lynching.
Im equally baffled by your failure to see the sense of my position and come to agree with me. Still, live and let live. And I prefer hermit to madman. More traditional.
Jeff wrote:I would add only that the position's filled, and we're not accepting applicants.
Right, good. You mean by me, right?
Now stop with the compliments, they'll be going to my head.
Laodicean wrote:A new
Avatar recommendation for Mr. Morgan, as he thinks about his Hot Oven Time Machine...
Great Scott, man...

It's a good one, but I've already got some I chose not to use which I'll go to in the unlikely event that I abandon this one. Not sure how much obscenity the board would allow in avatar format, though. This place is for families, right?
semper occultus wrote:stephen morgan wrote:I'm a member of the Socialist Worker's Party.
Morgan – that’s worth a bit more detail – I’d be interested in hearing about life at the vanguard of revolutionary struggle – ( or standing around outside Boot’s trying to sell newspapers ) ( Vanessa Redgrave was in the other one wasn’t she ? )
Who she? Outside my frame of cultural reference, dearie. Paul Foot was in it. Before he was dead. Back when it was the International Socialists, for that matter. Mark Steel, too. Or possibly Mark Thomas, not sure which. The Party recently stormed the executive offices at BA, which didn't go down too well with either side of the negotiations then taking place. They also spend a lot of effort fighting the BNP, often literally. And the EDL. TO be honest I think ignoring them would be a strategically superior position.
Around these parts they stand on the steps of Nottingham Town Hall to sell their papers. One day a week. Never actually done it myself, and I generally don't go to the meetings because I'm anti social. Anti-social Socialist. I approve of society, but it's not for me. I approve of the NHS too, but nothing would get me to a doctors' surgery short of amputation, bones jutting through my skin or the loss of at least two pints of blood. I am a blood donor, however. Also there's only one other member in my constituency, which is the semi-safe Tory seat Newark, in fact I know someone who works at the Conservative club who says all the local Tory MPs are a bunch of ill mannered little shits, except the one for here who has a cancerous wife and used to be an infantryman.
YEs, just one member of the party in my constituency, and I've never met him and don't intend to. The Nottingham branch is the local branch, which is about five pounds by train. I've been thinking of defecting to the Socialist Labour Party, if I'm honest. Scargillites. Given the history between Nottinghamshire miners and Scargill I'm assuming there won't be a large local party here for them. I notice a hefty feminist inclination in the spam they send me, too. Women's day courses and that sort of thing. No doubt if I attended meetings I'd be speedily ejected from the party, with radical left wingers being less tolerant than this place. I'd expect the Scargillites to be slightly more in sympathy with my preferred priorities.
Trouble is I'm too lazy to go and cancel my direct debit.
Such is life in the trenches of the class war.
Answer your questions, sempsy?