Re: Journalist Michael Hastings is dead at 33
Posted: Fri Jun 21, 2013 9:37 am
I saw Larisa's "loon" comments on facebook as well. I only know her (besides having previously known OF her thru her writing) because of my friendship with her husband Scott. So I don't feel I can really speak to this exactly, other than to say... on the one hand, she and most journalists are just sick and tired of the worst of the conspiracy community spamming them with what often ARE loony theories. On the other hand, with her husband at least, I know him well enough to try and talk out / talk through some of his own knee-jerk criticisms of the conspiracy community. I love and respect them both and thankfully have never felt shut-down by there skepticism when talking with them face to face. On yet the other hand, it does seem that Larisa has seen enough to know that, yes, sometimes it seems like whistleblowers ARE seemingly killed in America, but than possibility does not seem to extend to journalists in her view:
'Karl Rove's IT guru' Mike Connell dies in plane crash
RAW STORY
Published: Saturday December 20, 2008
"...I have reason to believe that the alternate accounts were used to communicate with US Attorneys involved in political prosecutions, like that of Don Siegelman," said RAW STORY's Investigative News Editor, Larisa Alexandrovna, on her personal blog Saturday morning. "This is what I have been working on to prove for over a year. In fact, it was through following the Siegelman-Rove trail that I found evidence leading to Connell. That is how I became aware of him. Mike was getting ready to talk. He was frightened.
"He has flown his private plane for years without incident. I know he was going to DC last night, but I don't know why. He apparently ran out of gas, something I find hard to believe. I am not saying that this was a hit nor am I resigned to this being simply an accident either. I am no expert on aviation and cannot provide an opinion on the matter. What I am saying, however, is that given the context, this event needs to be examined carefully."
"Mr. Connell has confided that he was being threatened, something that his attorneys also told the judge in the Ohio election fraud case," concluded Alexandrovna.
http://rawstory.com/news/2008/Karl_Rove ... _1220.html
GOP consultant killed in plane crash was warned of sabotage: report
John Byrne, David Edwards and Stephen Webster
Published: Monday December 22, 2008
RAW STORY Investigative Editor Larisa Alexandrovna said Connell's death should be examined carefully in a blog post Sunday, but stopped short of alleging foul play. She reported on Arnebeck's lawsuit and Connell's enjoined testimony earlier this year.
http://rawstory.com/news/2008/Killed_GO ... _1222.html
8bitagent » 21 Jun 2013 08:57 wrote:Larisa's tone is not one of someone spooked by this incident. It's the same smug Bill Maher-esque tone liberal gatekeepers use in their chestpumping. If someone believes they are in danger for their line of work or inquiry,justdrew » Thu Jun 20, 2013 5:34 pm wrote:what you don't know is how spooked a given person may or may not be, it's easy to be brave when it's all an abstract unlikely possibility and/or you have no life at stake but ones own.stillrobertpaulsen » 20 Jun 2013 15:21 wrote:I'm extremely disappointed in that development. Larisa Alexandrovna Horton, who while working at The Raw Story was bold enough to write pieces documenting attempts by Task Force 20 in Iraq to have WMDs planted for them to find, recently responded to the death of Michael Hastings on Facebook demanding "Internet loons" stop emailing theories of his death to her. She followed that up by stating, "In the U.S. journalists are not killed. They are discredited." Right. I'm sure that Jim Koethe and Bill Hunter, as well as Dorothy Kilgallen might beg to differ. Oh, but that was so long ago, that sort of thing can't happen in 21st century America, right?!8bitagent » Wed Jun 19, 2013 11:40 pm wrote:I notice that even amongst the alternative to the mainstream left(your Greenwalds, Cenks, Scahills, etc) that even hinting at foul play in accidents/suicides/etc is taboo.
they wouldn't address it at all and especially not in such a smug manner. (Phoenix mayor circa 1997 notwithstanding) I understand the gatekeepers attacking the eye rolling theorist stuff, but there's a lot of reason to
at least give pause with this situation. It's bizarre to see the same righteous anger given to people questioning the details and timing of Hastings death as one might with the Sandy/Boston hoaxer trolls.