rigorousintuition.ca

Canadian_watcher wrote:I could go on.. and on .. and on...

We know.

Canadian_watcher wrote:Lying about Benghazi

GTFO

Did she actually just benghazi the fuck outta this thread?

justdrew wrote:

MacCruiskeen wrote:Two questions:

1) Was there or was there not a drill at the Boston Marathon finishing-line?

University of Mobile's Cross Country Coach, who was near the finish line of the Boston Marathon when a series of explosions went off, said he thought it was odd there were bomb sniffing dogs at the start and finish lines.

"They kept making announcements on the loud speaker that it was just a drill and there was nothing to worry about," Coach Ali Stevenson told Local 15. "It seemed like there was some sort of threat, but they kept telling us it was just a drill."

http://www.sott.net/article/260912-Coin ... on-bombing

2) If there was, did that drill employ crisis actors?

There is nothing absurd or offensive about either of those questions. They are perfectly reasonable questions, indeed (one would think) essential ones. Because it would be terrible if terrorists used drills as cover, right? Worth knowing about for the future. And it would also be terrible if people started seeing public safety drills as something dangerous in themselves.

And those questions should be easy enough for any concerned US citizen to find answers to. After all, the USA is not a fascist state, right? Such information is perfectly easy to come by. Why should anyone hide it?

No need to ban anyone. Just find quick answers to those two simple and perfectly reasonable questions, and you can nip the offending thread in the bud.

A quick phone call should suffice.

Off you go, US citizens. Nothing to fear.

There are probably "anti-terror" "drills" at any and every soft target potential mass casualty event. one, to have a chance to practice in the real world, and two, to have people prepositioned to help should something actually happen, without freaking people out too much. There would certainly be reluctance to talk too much about it, since they don't really want to tell potential bombers ANYTHING about what little defense can be put up in such situations.

Thanks for having the courtesy to reply, drew, and to reply courteously. No one else has.

But this has nothing conceivable to do with "putting up defense" against "potential bombers", or with endangering any such defence. The question is simply whether any drill was taking place and, if so, whether any crisis actors were involved in it. None of this information is of any conceivable use to any "potential bombers", who already managed to become actual in Boston only last month.

Besides, if University of Mobile Cross Country Coach Ali Stevenson's memory is at least as reliable as the traumatised yet unimpeachable Jeff Bauman's (and I'll beat the shit out of anyone who says it isn't, goddammit), then we already know that such a drill was taking place, and was being announced to the public via loudspeakers. So, no terrorist will be helped by making that already-public information public once again, always presuming Ali Stevenson was not suffering auditory hallucinations. Once his story is confirmed (if it is), all we will need to know is whether crisis actors were involved in that drill. Simple.

Who's going to make that phone call?

justdrew wrote:

Canadian_watcher wrote:Lying about Benghazi

GTFO

I do not know that acronym, but I'm thinking it translates into:
NO NO NO! That's what REPUBLICANS SAY, so it cannot be true!

what has happened to adulthood in the USA? is it gone? seriously, IS IT? From the outside I gotta tell you you guys live in a nation of absolute fucking morons.

Canadian_watcher wrote:

justdrew wrote:

Canadian_watcher wrote:Lying about Benghazi

GTFO

I do not know that acronym, but I'm thinking it translates into:
NO NO NO! That's what REPUBLICANS SAY, so it cannot be true!

what has happened to adulthood in the USA? is it gone? seriously, IS IT? From the outside I gotta tell you you guys live in a nation of absolute fucking morons.

at least we're not governed by harper

or I could take your stance and just assume everything is a lie except for those things I want to believe.

Canadian_watcher wrote:

justdrew wrote:

Canadian_watcher wrote:Lying about Benghazi

GTFO

I do not know that acronym, but I'm thinking it translates into:
NO NO NO! That's what REPUBLICANS SAY, so it cannot be true!

Nope. If you'd have consulted the Urban Dictionary, you'd know that GFTO translates roughly this way:

GET THE FUCK OUT

An easy to use acronymn [sic] when dealing with moronic incompetents in the online world.

Since you say you didn't know.

justdrew wrote:
or I could take your stance and just assume everything is a lie except for those things I want to believe.

that's exactly what you are doing, JD. That's exactly what you are doing.

Canadian_watcher wrote:

justdrew wrote:
or I could take your stance and just assume everything is a lie except for those things I want to believe.

that's exactly what you are doing, JD. That's exactly what you are doing.

nope, I'm making a sound tactical belief choice. based on my own model of the situation as I understand it despite our greatly limited ability to know every detail of actions occurring on the far side of the planet.

PW wrote:and that may be in play in the recent tragedy

I thought that was fairly unambiguous. But what do I know, I've never been hurt directly by a government lie, not to mention any other sort of malfeasance.

Project Willow wrote:

PW wrote:and that may be in play in the recent tragedy

I thought that was fairly unambiguous. But what do I know, I've never been hurt directly by a government lie, not to mention any other sort of malfeasance.

fabricating evidence .. that's universal in deceit.

not to mention that hey, maybe there are new, more advanced tricks. you know, ones that are handy for the digital age.

but what do I know? I don't claim to be a survivor so I guess that means my opinions are worth-less. We're all on this planet, PW, and you ain't got any market cornered on the truth no matter what your background.

justdrew wrote:

Canadian_watcher wrote:

justdrew wrote:
or I could take your stance and just assume everything is a lie except for those things I want to believe.

that's exactly what you are doing, JD. That's exactly what you are doing.

nope, I'm making a sound tactical belief choice. based on my own model of the situation as I understand it despite our greatly limited ability to know every detail of actions occurring on the far side of the planet.

me too - except I'm not attached to my beliefs.. as someone said, "belief is a placeholder for knowledge."

Given that this thread is about "crisis actors," the resemblance of Alex Jones and Benny Hill is unmistakable, even though the "lame-stream media" has never acknowledged this; also noteworthy is the fact that shortly after Benny Hill (purportedly) died, Alex Jones began to ascend to prominence.

This can be no coincidence.

[/sarcasm]

Canadian_watcher wrote: but what do I know? I don't claim to be a survivor so I guess that means my opinions are worth-less. We're all on this planet, PW, and you ain't got any market cornered on the truth no matter what your background.

The point was C_W, you just insulted not just me, but practically everyone on this board, with this ridiculous over-generalization that has nothing to do with the specific point at hand:

Canadian_watcher wrote: could go on.. and on .. and on... and for any of you to feign ignorance about the MYRIAD times your government has viciously lied to its people leading them into war and recession, division amongst the people, countless deaths and suicides and experiments on all kinds of unsuspecting citizens, lied and deceived for nothing more than money at times, let alone the international power games now afoot - and excuse me but YES it does appear that fascism is knocking on the US's door. If you can't see it, then that's your prerogative, but WHY on earth are any of you so fucking uptight about the mere MENTION of it???

I thinks it's wrong to explore at length the idea the whole event was faked, I think it's harmful, I think it plays into the perps' hands. IOW, I disagree with you. Why is it that your response to disagreement is insult?

Project Willow wrote:To go from false flag to fake event is so wrong on so many levels. This could be an 11 page thread on the techniques we actually know that the state uses and that may be in play in the recent tragedy, one of which is creating diversionary inoculation memes...

Quoted for truth.