Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous
Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff
- seemslikeadream
- Posts: 32090
- Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
- Location: into the black
Re: Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous
Gaga dressed like Michael Jackson as an FU to Trump.....from what I've read
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
- PufPuf93
- Posts: 1886
- Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2010 12:29 am
- spambot: no
Re: Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous
Hillary Clinton has that Mao thing going as well.RocketMan » Tue Nov 08, 2016 5:22 am wrote:I don't know if it's much of a consolation that it's a coat that used to belong to Michael Jackson.
There's just something very iffy about Lady Gaga, our erstwhile host's affection for her notwithstanding... Love her voice but she's just... iffy.
People think that Lady Gaga dressed as a Nazi for the last Hillary Clinton rally
http://www.nme.com/news/people-think-la ... r1gAEUl.99
- JackRiddler
- Posts: 16007
- Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2008 2:59 pm
- Location: New York City
Re: Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous
.
If only the Mao outfit had been the worst of his contributions to the world. Because it's pretty snazzy, if you ask me.
Of course, no outfit can equal the cumulative murder done by men in expensive suits and ties.
Every man in a suit and tie is sending a message of approval for holocausts planned and carried out by men sitting at desks, right?
.
If only the Mao outfit had been the worst of his contributions to the world. Because it's pretty snazzy, if you ask me.
Of course, no outfit can equal the cumulative murder done by men in expensive suits and ties.
Every man in a suit and tie is sending a message of approval for holocausts planned and carried out by men sitting at desks, right?
.
- Spiro C. Thiery
- Posts: 553
- Joined: Fri Apr 08, 2011 2:58 am
- spambot: no
Re: Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous
Anyone who'd wear a body bag cinched at the neck to be "serious in business" has got to be sociopathic. Or sycophantic towards sociopaths.JackRiddler » 5 minutes ago wrote:If only the Mao outfit had been the worst of his contributions to the world. Because it's pretty snazzy, if you ask me.
Of course, no outfit can equal the cumulative murder done by men in expensive suits and ties.
Every man in a suit and tie is sending a message of approval for holocausts planned and carried out by men sitting at desks, right?
Seeing the world through rose-colored latex.
- PufPuf93
- Posts: 1886
- Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2010 12:29 am
- spambot: no
Re: Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous
I don't know where to put this and this thread is as good as any at RI.
I am sort of embarrassed but I think this says something about how alarmed I am by this election cycle.
I only tend to recall my dreams when very stressed out and not very often at all
I had two dreams that were whoppers this past week.
Last night Sarah Palin came to me in sleep in what in hindsight was as a succubus but in the dream was very hot sex with Sarah Palin.
No thought of politics in the dream, just realistic sex that happened to be with Sarah Palin.
I woke up and thought that was one hot dream but Sarah Palin OMG. I haven’t had that sexual a dream for years.
Three nights ago I had a similarly intense dream located in a school cafeteria style lunchroom with POTUS Obama and an old friend from the 1970s I haven’t seen nor hardly ever thought of in more than 30 years.
POTUS Obama was giving a speech only Kirk and I were the only audience perched across from him on the integrated bench style seats.
Kirk was intent and just sat there and paid me no attention.
I was really sleepy and kept nodding off to the point I started getting up and walking around the cafeteria room and bussing trays and other trite activities just to stay awake and moving which was of utmost importance.
POTUS Obama was doing his basic stump speech but it was boring and irritating and I was motivated not to just nod off.
I have no thought to meaning just that these were two intense and memorable dreams for me and it is unusual for me to recall dreams except when very stressed (or ill and aside from ravages of age I am well for my age and general condition).
I voted mail in two weeks ago, a write in for Bernie Sanders.
If forced to choose between Trump and Hillary Clinton, I would vote Clinton who I have assumed a given as next POTUS prior to the primaries.
In any case I want Hillary Clinton to have a fast and weak time as POTUS. Clinton may well be especially if a 2nd term, the last POTUS of my life. Alas.
I am sort of embarrassed but I think this says something about how alarmed I am by this election cycle.
I only tend to recall my dreams when very stressed out and not very often at all
I had two dreams that were whoppers this past week.
Last night Sarah Palin came to me in sleep in what in hindsight was as a succubus but in the dream was very hot sex with Sarah Palin.
No thought of politics in the dream, just realistic sex that happened to be with Sarah Palin.
I woke up and thought that was one hot dream but Sarah Palin OMG. I haven’t had that sexual a dream for years.
Three nights ago I had a similarly intense dream located in a school cafeteria style lunchroom with POTUS Obama and an old friend from the 1970s I haven’t seen nor hardly ever thought of in more than 30 years.
POTUS Obama was giving a speech only Kirk and I were the only audience perched across from him on the integrated bench style seats.
Kirk was intent and just sat there and paid me no attention.
I was really sleepy and kept nodding off to the point I started getting up and walking around the cafeteria room and bussing trays and other trite activities just to stay awake and moving which was of utmost importance.
POTUS Obama was doing his basic stump speech but it was boring and irritating and I was motivated not to just nod off.
I have no thought to meaning just that these were two intense and memorable dreams for me and it is unusual for me to recall dreams except when very stressed (or ill and aside from ravages of age I am well for my age and general condition).
I voted mail in two weeks ago, a write in for Bernie Sanders.
If forced to choose between Trump and Hillary Clinton, I would vote Clinton who I have assumed a given as next POTUS prior to the primaries.
In any case I want Hillary Clinton to have a fast and weak time as POTUS. Clinton may well be especially if a 2nd term, the last POTUS of my life. Alas.
- JackRiddler
- Posts: 16007
- Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2008 2:59 pm
- Location: New York City
Re: Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous
Confession: I wouldn't mind. Dreams are the best.PufPuf93 » Tue Nov 08, 2016 1:52 pm wrote:Last night Sarah Palin came to me in sleep in what in hindsight was as a succubus but in the dream was very hot sex with Sarah Palin.
No thought of politics in the dream, just realistic sex that happened to be with Sarah Palin.
I woke up and thought that was one hot dream but Sarah Palin OMG. I haven’t had that sexual a dream for years.
.
- JackRiddler
- Posts: 16007
- Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2008 2:59 pm
- Location: New York City
Re: Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous
Arrest the Zombie march! Ban the Day of the Dead!Spiro C. Thiery » Tue Nov 08, 2016 1:44 pm wrote:Anyone who'd wear a body bag cinched at the neck to be "serious in business" has got to be sociopathic. Or sycophantic towards sociopaths.JackRiddler » 5 minutes ago wrote:If only the Mao outfit had been the worst of his contributions to the world. Because it's pretty snazzy, if you ask me.
Of course, no outfit can equal the cumulative murder done by men in expensive suits and ties.
Every man in a suit and tie is sending a message of approval for holocausts planned and carried out by men sitting at desks, right?
You live in a country in which majorities watch sexualized murders or gladiatorial combats with literal victims over take-out dinners delivered in styrofoam packages. It's not even clear what does more brain damage, the content of these entertainments or the stupid chatter of the accompanying dialogues. Yet you think Lady Gaga is a more important and pernicious influence than the "CSI" and NFL franchises. Perhaps, like Plato, you'd like to see the theater banished from the city? Fine, but show some consistency and sense of perspective, okay?
Anyone who would cause large numbers of real people to be put in body bags is your problem.
.
- PufPuf93
- Posts: 1886
- Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2010 12:29 am
- spambot: no
Re: Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous
The weird thing is that while Palin may be attractive in a general sense, Palin has zero sex appeal to me as a woman in specific and is a horrid human, mother, and politician in my opinion. I would add Christian as well but do not have the right to make the judgement as not a "believer".JackRiddler » Tue Nov 08, 2016 1:08 pm wrote:Confession: I wouldn't mind. Dreams are the best.PufPuf93 » Tue Nov 08, 2016 1:52 pm wrote:Last night Sarah Palin came to me in sleep in what in hindsight was as a succubus but in the dream was very hot sex with Sarah Palin.
No thought of politics in the dream, just realistic sex that happened to be with Sarah Palin.
I woke up and thought that was one hot dream but Sarah Palin OMG. I haven’t had that sexual a dream for years.
.
Should have mentioned that as context to my weirdo post about a way out of ordinary and, the more I dwell, disturbing dream.
If there should be a replay, hopefully my dream self will have the composure to send the succubus to JackRiddler.
The non-choice of POTUS election 2016 sucks.
- JackRiddler
- Posts: 16007
- Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2008 2:59 pm
- Location: New York City
Re: Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous
The post was about a dream. The dream person is always you.
- PufPuf93
- Posts: 1886
- Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2010 12:29 am
- spambot: no
Re: Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous
Wish I could have voted Samantha Bee for POTUS.
- seemslikeadream
- Posts: 32090
- Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
- Location: into the black
Re: Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous
should have married a relative like every one else in Arkansas 
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
- Luther Blissett
- Posts: 4994
- Joined: Fri Jan 02, 2009 1:31 pm
- Location: Philadelphia
Re: Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous
Samantha Bee has been quite aggressive to the left this election season, people who care about the environment, mass incarceration, immigrants, peace, etc. It's been disappointing.
I'm feeling sad today. Real Hugh Manatee Loses sense.
I'm feeling sad today. Real Hugh Manatee Loses sense.
The Rich and the Corporate remain in their hundred-year fever visions of Bolsheviks taking their stuff - JackRiddler
- General Patton
- Posts: 959
- Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 11:57 am
Re: Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous
Part of failing DNC fragmentation. It will take several years until a counter is ready that can rival what altright/etc did to GOP, but it's inevitable.Luther Blissett » Tue Nov 08, 2016 6:40 pm wrote:Samantha Bee has been quite aggressive to the left this election season, people who care about the environment, mass incarceration, immigrants, peace, etc. It's been disappointing.
I'm feeling sad today. Real Hugh Manatee Loses sense.
Brightside: Green Party becoming slightly relevant this election, something to build on.
штрафбат вперед
- Luther Blissett
- Posts: 4994
- Joined: Fri Jan 02, 2009 1:31 pm
- Location: Philadelphia
Re: Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous
I have a feeling that the left is going to build a different coalition outside of the Green Party moving forward. The word on the street seems much more focused on community-building and maybe party-building as a side effect of that.
The Rich and the Corporate remain in their hundred-year fever visions of Bolsheviks taking their stuff - JackRiddler
- General Patton
- Posts: 959
- Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 11:57 am
Re: Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous
Anything like this?Luther Blissett » Tue Nov 08, 2016 7:22 pm wrote:I have a feeling that the left is going to build a different coalition outside of the Green Party moving forward. The word on the street seems much more focused on community-building and maybe party-building as a side effect of that.

штрафбат вперед
