What you don't know can't hurt them.
https://www.rigorousintuition.ca/board2/
https://www.rigorousintuition.ca/board2/viewtopic.php?t=40193
Would you elucidate so there may be no further misunderstandings?minime wrote:You misunderstand me.
Sorry I am as dense as the sweet clouds I am indulging in.
Your proscriptions don't affect me. I'm sure that I misunderstand what you say, but I'm also sure that you said something. Sometimes it's better to just sit back and let things play out. At least for a minute.Burnt Hill » Sun May 06, 2018 6:48 pm wrote:Would you elucidate so there may be no further misunderstandings?minime wrote:You misunderstand me.
*And perhaps consider that you misunderstand me?
Well that part I fully get and appreciate, though the word proscription is a bit over the top.minime wrote:Your proscriptions don't affect me.
True enough, for at least a minute!minime wrote:I'm sure that I misunderstand what you say, but I'm also sure that you said something. Sometimes it's better to just sit back and let things play out. At least for a minute.
Me, announcing my coming out from cloaked aspersion! It's me! I'm Number One! Hi!Burnt Hill » Sun May 06, 2018 8:53 pm wrote:Sorry I am as dense as the sweet clouds I am indulging in.
Who is number one that you are tipping your hat and waving to Iam?
Those kinds of people are not hard to find. You can find at least three of them on this board alone.
bumpminime » Sat May 05, 2018 6:17 pm wrote:The first choice is always to enter into mud slinging.
The second choice is to frame the conversation in such a way that the proposals submitted are not practicable.
The third, unacceptable, extremely distasteful, choice is to advocate solutions, possible or improbable, which are within the means and abilities of anyone reading the thread.
JoJoCivil, so glad you could contribute. Please, give examples of the third kind which are "Socialist Responses". Time to get this show back on the road. And thanks.JojoCivil » Sun May 06, 2018 7:49 pm wrote:so my always going to three is why "people" find me so very distasteful... got it, avoid results!
Why, thank you, Elvis. (What was the answer to that other question I've been asking you. Oh, yes, "Why ask who?" Another time, eh?)Elvis » Sun May 06, 2018 8:20 pm wrote:Recycle. Boycott banks. Use credit unions. Form cooperatives. Run better candidates for public office. Run for public office. Let your hair grow. Give a hobo five bucks. Sell your car. Get a bike. Kill your television.
Choices? What choices?Iamwhomiam » Sun May 06, 2018 8:29 pm wrote:Nice of you to keep Luther's thread on topic, minime. I disagree with your choices, but they are yours, not mine.
I don't know if concerns about the environment can be separated from other social-political concerns.minime » Sun May 06, 2018 7:26 pm wrote:
Why, thank you, Elvis. (What was the answer to that other question I've been asking you. Oh, yes, "Why ask who?" Another time, eh?)
I almost brought that up when you wrote,
The who is behind the why, that's why.Mac makes a distinction between the American people and the powers that be, whoever they are.
Anyway, it sounds more like a 'green' response than a Socialist Response, NTTAWWT.
