rigorousintuition.ca

It also damages the cochlear nerve and cranial nerves. It will fuck you up really bad. You will never be the same. It will fuck you up so bad that you cannot imagine the wreckage that results from prolonged exposure to this.

Its ok though. I am living peacefully. I am left alone. My career is a little bit different than most. But i'm ok right now. I have birds and deer. I'm doing good.

the whole left side of my face is totally paralyzed from this. My left ear is fried. Yall...this is not a joke. You can get smoked by this and trust me it is not funny at all. I mean that. You can get fried by this and your cochlear nerves and cranial nerves will never be the same if it doesn't kill you. You might rather be dead actually. Because this shit ain't funny at all. Not a little bit. It will smoke you down to a little bitty person so fast that you cannot imagine how bad it is.

This shit will fuck you up so bad that you just cannot even imagine it. They will smoke you like a cigarette butt with this and I can not even attempt to explain it to you. They will smoke you like a dust parasite with this. If you want to get smoked, you can get smoked. They ain't playing around. It absolutely can happen....just sayin......it absolutely can. And buddy, if they smoke you with it, you will fucking know....

A shield and an antenna — turns out they're not the same thing!

Why is the government hiding this shocking information from us?!

http://www.digikey.com/en/articles/techzone/2013/jan/rf-shielding-the-art-and-science-of-eliminating-interference

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electromagnetic_shielding

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antenna_%28radio%29

backtoiam » Sat Dec 19, 2015 10:02 am wrote:Retail marketers attempted to use that technology in public places but it freaked people out so bad I think they stopped doing it.

They didn't drop it, the technologies like Audio Spotlight have just gotten (and will continue to get) more insidious: https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/te ... ht-be-real

Very sad story, backtoiam and I'm very sorry you had such an awful experience. I'm glad you've found a peaceful place to be.

I conducted a search looking for a comment I had made some long time ago, but I could not locate it. I mentioned my chaperone at Burning Man just the year before, in 2005, had been targeted by this technology, too, though he was unharmed.

They, whoever "they" were, had a jolly time broadcasting via microwaves directly into people's heads by using their skull as a resonator, one individual at a time, and only the target could hear whatever was being broadcast. My friend said the experience freaked him out quite a bit, especially when he asked his friends if they were hearing what he was and they, hearing nothing, thought he was losing it.

OMG! "Another Man Loses Mind at Burning Man!"

Then they began experiencing the same. Not so funny any more.

It's first commercial use was planned for signage in NYC's Times Square. Instead of Joe Camel blowing smoke rings, they planned on entering the heads of passers-by to suggest certain urgent shopping and dining needs, which they would believe to be their own original thoughts. "Needs."

That plan got squashed soon after being publicly promoted. Should be some sort of paper trail, re permits, etc. on file in NYC. Might have read about the silent talking sign proposal in the NYT ages ago.

DARPA's Sonic Projectors

http://www.thelivingmoon.com/45jack_files/03files/Sonic_Projection.html

The hyper sonic sound tech is still in use in museums and I've seen no news items talking of outlawing it for commercial / advertising purposes. And videos of its inventor featured him showing how much he enjoyed using it to mess with people.

But as bad as that is ... that's nothing compared to the microwave tech described...

Interesting, Smiles. He certainly had fun doing just that at BM. What I didn't share is that it could also record distant conversations. He broadcast over a loudspeaker a private personal conversation between a young woman and her male partner. I can't share the conversation - it's a bit raw. Suffice to say that due to a certain circumstance preventing his 'normal' approach, he wanted to try a new avenue, and she most vehemently insisted he was most assuredly not going to take that route.

I don't think their relationship went anywhere after that.

And then he looped it on & off over the next few days.