rigorousintuition.ca

solace » Tue Aug 05, 2014 2:56 pm wrote:

BrandonD » Tue Aug 05, 2014 1:26 am wrote:

Elvis » Tue Aug 05, 2014 12:16 am wrote: Yeah what's all the fuss? "Jew" is just a word.

Please answer this: If the poster who made that disparaging Jewish joke is in fact racist and a negative influence on this forum, then why have the moderators not banned him or her?

Are the moderators incompetent?

Or, perhaps have you guys taken one too many rides on the McCarthy rollercoaster?

People get pissed off and say things they do not necessarily mean ALL the time.

I am making a plea for a little sanity here.

Yeah, he probably just forgot to say Zionist by mistake. Does happen, right?

And what would you like to have happen?

have solace AD become an official mod

then stuff like this would be given an official pass. ...oh wait a minute it already has

does this sound personal?

brainpanhandler

For the record: I definitely directed that at you. I don't have to be a psychoanalyst to see that. Canadian Watcher was another example of a deeply neurotic type. Paranoid, persecution complex, probably ptsd, character disorder riddled, nut job. Pin that on your chest.

jackal...drama queen.......fucking anti-semite....no I do not feel persecuted here ....by anyone except two people

Yes, there has been a lot of personal venom in the past ten pages.



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Temporary_Autonomous_Zone

Have a Night of the Long Knives, it's all just words...this thread will get locked inevitably.

Meanwhile, a few points:

1) Adding subforums. I don't appear to be able to do that

2) Adding new moderators. Same

3) Adding new rules. That I can do, but who wants that?

There are many excellent ideas contained here, but I'm not clear on who has the latitude to actually implement them. As I have stated before, we may be in the classic sci-fi position of "operating" a spaceship none of us can actually control.

What does it take to add more moderators?

you know there used to be a moderation where someone would be given some non-elective time-off. why the kid gloves with the dream? the democratic sentiment seems obvious to me if we go by the numbers...

Elihu » Tue Aug 05, 2014 10:35 am wrote:you know there used to be a moderation where someone would be given some non-elective time-off. why the kid gloves with the dream? the democratic sentiment seems obvious to me if we go by the numbers...

An Ostracon, hooray!

i'll take the holiday with him since i suggested it.

at least this thread has proven one fact

Paranoid, persecution complex, probably ptsd, character disorder riddled, nut job seemslikeadream is the ONLY one and personally responsible for all the negative remarks and bickering hurled at AD.

Don't lock this thread ....finally more people are feeling it's OK speaking up about how AD's fascists/anti-semite threads and his "McCarthy ban people witchhunting" are hurting this board

why not let it go on so people can speak their mind here instead of all over the board...an anything goes complaint thread.... let it all get hashed out here

@WR

Three questions:

Software options
I know that some other Forum software like Invision used to have a 'Hardcore ignore' feature, which rendered all activity from people you put on it as invisible.
It operated a bit like a Facebook 'Block'. I have been in a Facebook group with 120 people from a forum, 3 of whom I really didn't like, blocked them on joining and have never had a problem. It is a really great feature. Searched all over for a phpBB one, but nothing found so far.
Action: Is there a Facebook type 'Block' feature for phpBB?

The Usergroups setting in the User Control Panel
Could users be given the right to create their own groups?
So that all the people who want to join that group can do so?
I do not know whether this is in Admin territory or in Mod territory
Action: Has anyone here any experience of using the Usergroups feature?

Surviving an Unexpected Zombie Apocalypse (RI Forum Risk Management)
The question - can we please have a dump of the board has been asked many times (by JR, by 4B, by myself) but is always left unanswered. Given that a textual dump to a .SQL text file can be done very easily from phpMyAdmin -
Action: Can we have an answer here please?

Justice or "Just Us"?

Rigorous Intuition should not become a place where aggressive white men with messed up thinking around Racism, Sexism, Homophobia, etc,, rule...

We will surely end up sanctioning reactionary tendencies that should not be sanctioned:

What about making this a place that is more welcoming to gender queer people, women, jews, muslims, immigrants, LGBTQI folks, black people, Asians, Indigenous, etc., not less?

The reactionaries here are not going to be a very positive influence if they take over. That should be obvious.

They're not taking over, are they?

American Dream » Tue Aug 05, 2014 11:35 am wrote:
Rigorous Intuition should not become a place where aggressive white men with messed up thinking around Racism, Sexism, Homophobia, etc,, rule...

What about making this a place that is more welcoming to gender queer people, women, jews, muslims, immigrants, LGBTQI folks, black people, Asians, Indigenous, etc., not less?

Yes and yes. Especially #2. But at the same time, the core issues have to remain. My view is this is a place for examining the Weird and developing fundamental skepticism toward official stories and dominant ideologies and paradigms, without preremptory attacks, especially from those who would seek to dismiss as "conspiracy theory" all talk of hidden power structures, deception and malfeasance in public, political and economic life. This must remain a place for evidence- and logic-based discussions of these issues without the James Randi-style sophistry or naive repetitions of liberal faith blocking discourse and inquiry.

stefano » Tue Aug 05, 2014 11:46 am wrote:They're not taking over, are they?

No- I'm just reacting to Elihu's comments, which seem oriented in that direction.

seemslikeadream » Tue Aug 05, 2014 4:26 pm wrote:
Don't lock this thread ....finally more people are feeling it's OK speaking up about how AD's fascists/anti-semite threads and his "McCarthy ban people witchhunting" are hurting this board

why not let it go on so people can speak their mind here instead of all over the board...an anything goes complaint thread.... let it all get hashed out here

The only 'hurt' I can really see is having it them all constantly in GD, especially as crossposting is rife. It's obviously pissing a number of people off.

Stick them in their subforum and a lot of that irritation and heat should vanish. surely the mods here have the ability to perform this.

What the fuck is wrong with this anti-AD faction who are now posing as the True RI Majority?

You will tolerate "The Jew cries out in pain as he strikes you," no problem, oh don't ban precious bluenose, that would be hysterical, let's all get along and never say mean things to each other on a message board as some of us advocate exterminating the Jews in special UK Council concentration camps.

But AD re-posting articles on anti-fascism is intolerable to this same group!

Strange, I never thought the anti-fascist articles were meant to indicate I have sympathies for fascists. Why do you feel targeted? Some of you feel remotely targeted, like the mere presence of AD somewhere is an accusation to YOU.

Have you ever figured out there is an ignore function here? You need never scroll through AD's posts ever again.

FIGURE IT OUT. The annoying poster who takes up "too much space" can be ignored, like I do with SLAD, who starts about 14 times as many threads as AD - I will call that a "scientific measurement" without "hyperbole," since she's going to decide that is how I meant it, and will therefore post 10,000 thread links to prove that the ratio of her thread proliferation flooding this board compared to AD's is not 14:1.

So, SMILE! This is going to be a SLAD Screen Shot!

Do you want to ignore the approving promoter of racist calls for the extermination of "Jews" per se as the problem in the world? I need to know now.

Because hey, if that's what we have to offer, we can just call it the Youtube comments section and make it a day.

.