rigorousintuition.ca

"It is our wealth, for crissakes!"

"our wealth!" LOL! And big graphics! And a pie chart!

I didn't know! I mean, if I knew! I want mine too!

And now, a brief musical interlude...

Now?

NOW!!!!!!

You seem to be a prisoner, minime, of your own mind. The world is mine already. I have more wealth than sufficient and the freedom to come and go anywhere as I please.

Yes, our taxes that pay for the military budget is indeed our wealth. You'd rather spend it on bombs and I'd rather spend it on education, infrastructure, and housing for folks like your sister.

Of course, you offer no discourse encouraging my further participation. Kick your sis to the curb and get over yourself, minime. Be the capitalist you truly desire to be.

Iamwhomiam » Mon May 07, 2018 7:21 pm wrote:You seem to be a prisoner, minime, of your own mind. The world is mine already. I have more wealth than sufficient and the freedom to come and go anywhere as I please.

Yes, our taxes that pay for the military budget is indeed our wealth. You'd rather spend it on bombs and I'd rather spend it on education, infrastructure, and housing for folks like your sister.

Of course, you offer no discourse encouraging my further participation. Kick your sis to the curb and get over yourself, minime. Be the capitalist you truly desire to be.

Yes, of course. Thank you, whom.

Iamwhomiam, everyone!

Now, where's JoJoCivil? He said he had something to offer.

minime » Sat May 05, 2018 6:17 pm wrote:The first choice is always to enter into mud slinging.

The second choice is to frame the conversation in such a way that the proposals submitted are not practicable.

The third, unacceptable, extremely distasteful, choice is to advocate solutions, possible or improbable, which are within the means and abilities of anyone reading the thread.

Basically both 'sides' are the same, acting as partners, witting or otherwise, to what is essentially a waste of everyone's time.

Kudos.

bump

Iamwhomiam wrote:Yes, our taxes that pay for the military budget is indeed our wealth.

minime » Mon May 07, 2018 10:54 am wrote:Here is a timely offering from an Internet space called qz.com...

https://qz.com/1269525/capitalism-is-unfolding-exactly-as-karl-marx-predicted/

Along with a superficial treatment of the state of Marxism in the world today, the article offers this bit of information...

“HUD [US department of housing and urban development] estimates there are roughly half a million homeless people in the United States on any given night, in a country that is estimated to have roughly 18 million empty homes in it,” says Wills.

I find that incongruous clash of facts disquieting. One possible practicable idea would be bringing the two groups together in whatever way possible. What can we, as individuals do to effect the scenario to maximum effect? endhomelessness.com anyone? First, we ask the question, then we answer it. Then we move on to the next scenario.

This I'd engage with you in discussing. Squatting is one method in use to house otherwise homeless persons. Many of those vacant home are inhabitable while others have been foreclosed upon and occupants evicted. Trying to get someone to reach deeper into their pocket is more reasonable to them than would be stealing their real property.

The landed gentry vs the landless peasants - it's quite an old story, made famous by our first kingly capitalists.

Many communities are now founding Land Banks and housing trusts and community loan funds reinvestment Friends founded this Community Loan Fund, this, the Albany Community Land Trust and this, the Albany County Land Bank, that's taken possession of hundreds of vacant tax-foreclosed, county owned, "zombie" properties and is rehabbing them for sale as affordable housing to low and moderate income families.

No reason you're not engaged in projects like these, aside your lack of motivation.

I do believe it is exceptionally kind of you to house your sister for a few summer months rent free. Sad to learn she had to spend any time at all time homeless.

Where there is the will, there is a way.

minime » Mon May 07, 2018 8:56 pm wrote:Now?

NOW!!!!!!

I quite happy to see the blink feature disabled, minime. Sorry, but your message is quite clear.

At 7am on the morning of March 25th , of this year, Aaron Kyle Huff walked back to the house in the Capitol Hill area of Seattle, where he had shortly before been “sharing a bowl” at a rave after-party.[1] He spray-painted NOW three times on the pavement, and shot two partygoers on the porch. He had a pistol-grip shotgun, a Ruger semiautomatic, and several clips of bullets (more than 300 rounds in all) which he had retrieved from his pick-up parked round the corner. More weapons were in the truck, including a base-ball bat and machete. He entered the house, shooting whomever he found, then reloaded and went back outside.

Iamwhomiam » Mon May 07, 2018 8:17 pm wrote:

minime » Mon May 07, 2018 8:56 pm wrote:Now?

NOW!!!!!!

I quite happy to see the blink feature disabled, minime. Sorry, but your message is quite clear.

At 7am on the morning of March 25th , of this year, Aaron Kyle Huff walked back to the house in the Capitol Hill area of Seattle, where he had shortly before been “sharing a bowl” at a rave after-party.[1] He spray-painted NOW three times on the pavement, and shot two partygoers on the porch. He had a pistol-grip shotgun, a Ruger semiautomatic, and several clips of bullets (more than 300 rounds in all) which he had retrieved from his pick-up parked round the corner. More weapons were in the truck, including a base-ball bat and machete. He entered the house, shooting whomever he found, then reloaded and went back outside.

You believe that I was referencing that obscure event, when my post is immediately following a Youtube video snippet of Jim Morrison singing the very words I posted, in a thread about taking control of the world..

Thank you, Iamwhomiam. Brilliant!

Ladies and gentlemen, Iamwhomiam.

[quote="[url=http://www.rigorousintuition.ca/board2/viewtopic.php?p=657332#p657332]
I do believe it is exceptionally kind of you to house your sister for a few summer months rent free. Sad to learn she had to spend any time at all time homeless. [/quote]

March 15 through October 31 saves her $3000 for rent/deposit/utilities and $1500 left over, God willing. Thank you for your compassion.

minime » Mon May 07, 2018 11:04 pm wrote:

Iamwhomiam » Mon May 07, 2018 8:17 pm wrote:

minime » Mon May 07, 2018 8:56 pm wrote:Now?

NOW!!!!!!

I quite happy to see the blink feature disabled, minime. Sorry, but your message is quite clear.

At 7am on the morning of March 25th , of this year, Aaron Kyle Huff walked back to the house in the Capitol Hill area of Seattle, where he had shortly before been “sharing a bowl” at a rave after-party.[1] He spray-painted NOW three times on the pavement, and shot two partygoers on the porch. He had a pistol-grip shotgun, a Ruger semiautomatic, and several clips of bullets (more than 300 rounds in all) which he had retrieved from his pick-up parked round the corner. More weapons were in the truck, including a base-ball bat and machete. He entered the house, shooting whomever he found, then reloaded and went back outside.

You believe that I was referencing that obscure event, when my post is immediately following a Youtube video snippet of Jim Morrison singing the very words I posted, in a thread about taking control of the world..

Thank you, Iamwhomiam. Brilliant!

Ladies and gentlemen, Iamwhomiam.

You may be correct, is it worth being callous?

Burnt Hill » Mon May 07, 2018 9:37 pm wrote:

You believe that I was referencing that obscure event, when my post is immediately following a Youtube video snippet of Jim Morrison singing the very words I posted, in a thread about taking control of the world..

Thank you, Iamwhomiam. Brilliant!

Ladies and gentlemen, Iamwhomiam.

You may be correct, is it worth being callous?

I may be correct about what? About a possible paranoid delusion? Was I being callous? I've been callous before, and this was not it. I was going for ironic.

In any case, I entertain the notion, at least I hope, that whom was yanking my chain in an effort to change the focus of the thread from number 3 (practicable solutions) back to number 1 (mudslinging). The alternative is too unpleasant to contemplate.

Will you stop the bullshit?
You were right that Iam jumped to a conclusion.
Considering the circumstances it is quite understandable.
Coming back the "Brilliant" remark was in hu fucking mane.

It does not matter what you are going for, you are coming off as a complete gender neutral dick.

I simply pointed out your frivolous response in posting a reference to the video had a much different effect than you could have imagined. It was very powerful snark.

I doubt you're so very evil that you would do that to intentionally cause me discomfort.

Jackass, yeah, but not wicked.