Re: Vaccine - Autism link
Posted: Wed May 11, 2016 5:28 pm
(See message at bottom of last page.)
What you don't know can't hurt them.
https://www.rigorousintuition.ca/board2/
https://www.rigorousintuition.ca/board2/viewtopic.php?t=38366
Increased diagnostics certainly account for the rise in Autism rates. Not so sure it is because it used to be dx'ed as mental retardation though, as there has been no correlating drop in MR diagnoses-Autism rates have gone up in part because of wider awareness, in part because they used to be diagnosed as mental retardation

Nobody wants to hear it? Then why does everybody talk about it endlessly as if it were gospel truth? Frankly, my opinion of that theory is it's a hideously destructive fantasy cooked up by brainwashed idiots, ie, Ivy League sociologists, to explain away something which they are incapable of looking at objectively.JackRiddler » Wed May 11, 2016 2:24 pm wrote:Nobody wants to hear it but the increase in autism and emergence of "the spectrum" is overwhelmingly a phenomenon of changes in diagnosis and categorization, very much also related to social changes
This study is done by and for ‘normative thinkers’, so no propaganda tags will stick.Results
Over the period 195,270 females received 528,913 doses of HPV vaccine. Of those receiving at least one dose, 192 reported one or more AEFI events (198 AEFI events), i.e., 37.4/100,000 doses administered (95% CI 32.5–43.0). None were consistent with VTE. Of the women who received HPV vaccine 958 were hospitalized and 19,351 had an ED visit within 42 days of immunization.
Conclusions
Rates of AEFI after HPV immunization in Alberta are low and consistent with types of events seen elsewhere.
From my perspective, and I know that it may be socially inappropriate to say so, many modern folk, liberal as well as conservative (though less so) have fallen for Social Darwinist gospel that being precedes consciousness.Natural and affordable cancer remedies seem to be continually ignored by the mainstream cancer industry as alternatives to chemo, radiation and designer drugs, because of one simple fact: cancer and cancer research is a huge industry. According to Bloomberg’s rankings, the highest paid chief corporate officer is Patrick Soon-Shiong, CEO of NantKwest Inc., a cancer research company, which delivered him a $147.6 million pay package in 2015. That’s more than the CEO of Google, who took home a whopping $100.5 million last year.
The Bloomberg Billionaires Index reveals that Soon-Shiong’s net worth is $9.8 billion. His company NantKwest went public in 2015, and now Soon-Shiong’s compensation is tied to reaching “strategic milestones.” Does that mean actually finding a cure? Maybe the company’s marketing team will tell you so, but typically, milestones for publicly traded companies are exclusively tied to revenue growth and profit.
Literally destroying the human being. You're not claiming a risk for developing autism, you're saying destroying the human being. So most people being vaccinated are destroyed? Me too. In what sense of destroyed? Are the unvaccinated smarter? More fertile/potent? Do they live longer? Will this take a few generations? How many? What's the destruction?Agent Orange Cooper » Wed May 11, 2016 4:59 pm wrote:What nobody wants to really hear is the idea that vaccines are anything other than the greatest single public health care invention of all human history, and certainly not that they are a mass-poisoning campaign aimed at literally destroying the human being from the inside out.
Or, mental retardation rates are going up at the same rate misdiagnosed autism is going down. It would explain so much.Burnt Hill » Wed May 11, 2016 11:50 pm wrote:Increased diagnostics certainly account for the rise in Autism rates. Not so sure it is because it used to be dx'ed as mental retardation though, as there has been no correlating drop in MR diagnoses-Autism rates have gone up in part because of wider awareness, in part because they used to be diagnosed as mental retardation
Every single vaccination damages the body/brain, so yes, everyone who receives vaccination is being harmed. I was harmed (though I consider myself lucky as I was born just before they upped the schedule in the late 80s). You have been harmed (if you've been vaccinated). It's a slow destruction. The more vaccinations one receives, the more the damage is compounded. So newborns receiving 6 or 7 shots at once... yeah, they're going to be destroyed. The elderly, same goes for them. I don't know if you've heard this but the USA is kind of in the midst of a national health crisis right now. Autism. Cancer. Diabetes. Depression. On and on. It's all skyrocketing. And not because of freakin' McDonald's.JackRiddler » Wed May 11, 2016 5:04 pm wrote:Literally destroying the human being. You're not claiming a risk for developing autism, you're saying destroying the human being. So most people being vaccinated are destroyed? Me too. In what sense of destroyed? Are the unvaccinated smarter? More fertile/potent? Do they live longer? Will this take a few generations? How many? What's the destruction?
Another Girl Dies After HPV Shot
May 9th, 2016
Here’s another one for your already hemorrhaging coincidence file folder.
Via: Manchester Evening News:
A teenage girl died just five days after having a cervical cancer jab.
Shazel Zaman, 13, was suffering with a severe headache, vomiting and dizziness after having the jab.
Her symptoms became so severe that her family took her to Bury’s Fairfield Hospital.
But the family claim that a doctor dismissed her condition was linked to the HPV vaccine jab and astonishingly even branded her a ‘lazy child’ before she was sent home.
She was found collapsed unconscious with no pulse an hour later at her home in Bury, and died in hospital about four hours later.
Doctors had told her family they believed she might have a stomach bug and told them to bring her back to hospital if her condition worsened.
Now Pennine Acute NHS Trust, which runs the hospital, has launched an investigation into the standard of care Shazel received at the hospital.
I was 'relieved' my children were born in the 1980's; 'relieved' because my youngest suffered a petit mal seizure after a DPT shot and was exempt from further Pertussis vaccinations. I know I couldn't stand holding a child and watching while a doctor administers the current vaccination regime; like medical Russian Roulette to be played then or at some future date--beyond frightening.Agent Orange Cooper » Thu May 12, 2016 12:34 am wrote:Every single vaccination damages the body/brain, so yes, everyone who receives vaccination is being harmed. I was harmed (though I consider myself lucky as I was born just before they upped the schedule in the late 80s). You have been harmed (if you've been vaccinated). It's a slow destruction. The more vaccinations one receives, the more the damage is compounded. So newborns receiving 6 or 7 shots at once... yeah, they're going to be destroyed. The elderly, same goes for them. I don't know if you've heard this but the USA is kind of in the midst of a national health crisis right now. Autism. Cancer. Diabetes. Depression. On and on. It's all skyrocketing. And not because of freakin' McDonald's.JackRiddler » Wed May 11, 2016 5:04 pm wrote:Literally destroying the human being. You're not claiming a risk for developing autism, you're saying destroying the human being. So most people being vaccinated are destroyed? Me too. In what sense of destroyed? Are the unvaccinated smarter? More fertile/potent? Do they live longer? Will this take a few generations? How many? What's the destruction?
The generation of children who are being born/growing up right now are going to be the sickest and most fucked up generation you or I have ever seen, mark my words. It's scary.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_smallpoxThe history of smallpox extends into pre-history; the disease likely emerged in human populations about 10,000 BC.[1] The earliest credible evidence of smallpox is found in the Egyptian mummies of people who died some 3000 years ago.[2] During the 18th century the disease killed an estimated 400,000 Europeans each year, including five reigning monarchs, and was responsible for a third of all blindness.[3] Between 20 and 60% of all those infected—and over 80% of infected children—died from the disease.[4]
During the 20th century, it is estimated that smallpox was responsible for 300–500 million deaths.[5][6][7] In the early 1950s an estimated 50 million cases of smallpox occurred in the world each year.[8] As recently as 1967, the World Health Organization estimated that 15 million people contracted the disease and that two million died in that year.[8] After successful vaccination campaigns throughout the 19th and 20th centuries, the WHO certified the global eradication of smallpox in December 1979.[8] Smallpox is one of two infectious diseases to have been eradicated, the other being rinderpest, which was declared eradicated in 2011.[9][10][11]
I should have added what I meant by "scaled back" -- I just meant not all at once for a tiny baby or child. Vaccinate away. I agree they have prevented a shit ton of shit. I presume this is because if you had to take a baby in once every two weeks for the next singular shot and then so on from there would scare one forever. I dunno.Booster shots at least need to be scaled back.