Page 27 of 39

Re: Your Take On The ISIS Phenomenon

Posted: Sun Mar 08, 2015 2:50 pm
by solace
82_28 » Sun Mar 08, 2015 1:49 pm wrote:You know, I'm not going to argue with you. I don't believe it is "easy as pie". I have long studied religious extremism for I guess probably going on 25 years. I understand the aspect of extremists and the sects and the cults and the political reasons/ramifications, old hatreds etc.

What I don't understand is this. I would like to know for the edification of all of us what the motives are, not the ones we are given by the media. I would like to understand what the future has in store. Personally, I think that the explanation of religious extremism is a ruse, thus I would like to know why it is I think that. Easy as pie. Really that's it. Also, if you have a source or link to where you get your magic wand of wisdom, I would love it if you would share it.

PM me with the link if you don't want it to be found far and wide.
"Also, if you have a source or link to where you get your magic wand of wisdom, I would love it if you would share it."

Magic wand of wisdom? How be you go fuck yourself smartass.? I think I'll put that smartass on ignore as well. :mad2

Re: Your Take On The ISIS Phenomenon

Posted: Sun Mar 08, 2015 2:54 pm
by Searcher08
solace » Sun Mar 08, 2015 6:50 pm wrote:
82_28 » Sun Mar 08, 2015 1:49 pm wrote:You know, I'm not going to argue with you. I don't believe it is "easy as pie". I have long studied religious extremism for I guess probably going on 25 years. I understand the aspect of extremists and the sects and the cults and the political reasons/ramifications, old hatreds etc.

What I don't understand is this. I would like to know for the edification of all of us what the motives are, not the ones we are given by the media. I would like to understand what the future has in store. Personally, I think that the explanation of religious extremism is a ruse, thus I would like to know why it is I think that. Easy as pie. Really that's it. Also, if you have a source or link to where you get your magic wand of wisdom, I would love it if you would share it.

PM me with the link if you don't want it to be found far and wide.
"Also, if you have a source or link to where you get your magic wand of wisdom, I would love it if you would share it."

Magic wand of wisdom? How be you go fuck yourself smartass.? I think I'll put that smartass on ignore as well. :mad2
Captured

Re: Your Take On The ISIS Phenomenon

Posted: Sun Mar 08, 2015 3:12 pm
by 82_28
Hahaha! Ignore me bro. I ain't being a fucking "smartass". I'm just laying it down as I see it with a disagreement. Seriously, I really am laughing because that is stupid. Not calling you stupid at all just that that is stupid. I am just coming from a different perspective of how to look at this -- as in -- I do not know what is happening.

Comments on the Internet are comments and it is well known that I care about this place, here and IRL. So whatever. Plus don't call me a smartass. I wouldn't call you a damn thing.

Whether or not I disagreed with you, you said your piece and I said mine. Yet it is totally extraneous.

INSTANT IGNORE!!!! Can't blame you for not liking others' words on the screen, but they still have a thought or an idea or two. Not a big deal holmes.

(Also, condescending people don't like smartasses I have found lo these years)

Re: Your Take On The ISIS Phenomenon

Posted: Sun Mar 08, 2015 3:30 pm
by Wombaticus Rex
solace » Sun Mar 08, 2015 1:50 pm wrote:
"Also, if you have a source or link to where you get your magic wand of wisdom, I would love it if you would share it."

Magic wand of wisdom? How be you go fuck yourself smartass.? I think I'll put that smartass on ignore as well. :mad2
For what it's worth --

(SPOILER: NOTHING)

-- I agree with Solace that y'all are obfuscating this for yourselves and the core question is pretty straightforward. Iconoclastic movements have been around longer than the movement that inspired the term Iconoclast, yeah? Multiple strains of mono/poly/non-theism have given rise to this precise strain of virulent symptoms, yeah? This is something that's been clearly stated repeatedly by the culprits, yeah?

But, shit, conduct matters as much as content, probably more in the face of whatever we're trying to preserve here.

Enjoy a week off.

Re: Your Take On The ISIS Phenomenon

Posted: Mon Mar 09, 2015 2:36 am
by 8bitagent
It is weird how every time Syrian government forces bomb from the air or attack ground positions of ISIS, Israel shoots them down or blows them up. And then the many reports of IDF treating wounded Syrian jihadis. You'll also notice ISIS is focused on attacking Lebanon/Hezbollah, Iran, Syria, etc..pretty much all of Israel's main enemies. And ISIS seems to always talk about how they hate Shiite Muslims, Yazidis, etc but never seem to go after Israel. Just saying. Im normally against Israeli conpiracy theories, but I guess enemy of my enemy is my friend applies here.

I'm usually not one for Israeli conspiracy theories, but it's odd how even al Qaeda loving oil rich Arab gulf states are being attacked and threatened by ISIS...yet Israel doesn't seem to be all too concerned.

Image

Re: Your Take On The ISIS Phenomenon

Posted: Mon Mar 09, 2015 5:13 am
by semper occultus
Iran seems to be making most of the strategic gains from this situation

Re: Your Take On The ISIS Phenomenon

Posted: Mon Mar 09, 2015 8:06 am
by 82_28
Sorry you got suspended, Solace. If you are still reading though, what do you make of this? I'll look forward to your answer upon your return.

http://www.cnn.com/2015/03/07/us/terror ... interview/

I can't make heads or tails of it honestly. Seems pretty damned janky to me. Kid's only 20. Again, where is this mind control coming from?
Cornell is accused of plotting to attack the U.S. Capitol. The 20-year-old -- who claims in the interview that he is affiliated with ISIS -- was arrested on January 14, months after his social media habits and talk of jihad put him on the FBI's radar, according to court documents obtained by CNN at the time of his arrest.

Two days after his arrest, a court order was issued barring public contact with Cornell, who is being held at the Boone County Jail across the river in Kentucky.

Last week, Cornell made a collect call to CNN affiliate WXIX, said news director Kevin Roach. That phone call initiated what ended up being an hourlong interview, Roach said.

Cornell's attorney, Richard Smith-Monahan, argued that WXIX was in contempt of court for violating a January order "directing the detention facility holding the Defendant not to permit outside contact by anyone with the Defendant without [defense counsel's] express approval."

Cornell spoke with reporter Tricia Macke. In that interview, he refuses to tell Macke how or when he first came in contact with ISIS, but he did give the reporter details on a plot to kill President Barack Obama, members of Congress, as well as an attack on the Israeli Embassy in Washington.

"I would have took my gun," he said. "I would have put it to Obama's head. I would have pulled the trigger. Then I would unleash more bullets on the Senate and House of Representative members. And I would have attacked the Israeli Embassy and various other buildings full of Kafir who want to wage war against us Muslims."
You can't tell me that shit isn't fucked up as far as the message. This is what I am most curious about. That american kid ain't no fucking muslim dude steeped in the long and ancient history of whatever it is we're talking about and has felt the pain of oppression. Fuck, the kid was four or five when the US bombarded and occupied Iraq. When I was 20 I was a firebrand myself but was anti-war. So maybe it's a "thing" now. I have no fucking clue.

Re: Your Take On The ISIS Phenomenon

Posted: Mon Mar 09, 2015 9:48 am
by zangtang
everybody wants to be a freedom fighter

- even the catastrophically naive and the criminally stupid insane.

no MKUltra narco-hypno-wizard behind the curtain required.

Re: Your Take On The ISIS Phenomenon

Posted: Mon Mar 09, 2015 3:56 pm
by AlicetheKurious
solace » Sun Mar 08, 2015 2:15 pm wrote:
AlicetheKurious » Sun Mar 08, 2015 3:55 am wrote:And I've yet to seen any of the "experts" try to explain how and why all these monuments, artifacts and documents were preserved intact for nearly one and a half millenia under Muslim rule, including very turbulent periods, only to be destroyed after their sovereignty was violated by US-led forces.
Not like it hasn't happened before.
Destruction of heritage
See also: Destruction of early Islamic heritage sites in Saudi Arabia

Saudi Wahhabism is hostile to any reverence given to historical or religious places of significance for fear that it may give rise to 'shirk' (that is, idolatry). As a consequence, under Saudi rule, Medina has suffered from considerable destruction of its physical heritage including the loss of many buildings over a thousand years old.[42] Critics have described this as "Saudi vandalism" and claim that in Medina and Mecca over the last 50 years 300 historic sites linked to Muhammad, his family or companions have been lost.[43] In Medina, examples of historic sites which have been destroyed include the Salman al-Farsi Mosque, the Raj'at ash-Shams Mosque, the Jannat al-Baqi cemetery, and the house of Muhammed.[44]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medina

Yes, Virginia. Some crazy Muslims do bad shit too.
I wish solace were around for me to tell him/her that his post illustrates the truth of the saying, "A little knowledge is a dangerous thing." I know it's incredible, but sometimes you can form more valuable opinions if you take the trouble to learn something first, preferably not by spending 3 minutes on a Wikipedia page. I know, who has time to read? Let alone read entire books and stuff. So here's some background, as briefly as I can make it.

In a nutshell: Saudi Wahhabism was a very tiny, fringe movement that arose from the late 18th century alliance between an illiterate bandit, Mohamed bin Saud and his gang, and a self-styled preacher of a strange, heretic cult that was even rejected by the preacher's own family, and pretty much everybody else. In fact, it seemed this preacher, Mohamed Ibn Abdel-Wahhab, could rarely stay in a place for long, before being denounced by the local Muslim scholars and chased out by the inhabitants. But when these two hooked up, it was a marriage made in hell, because the illiterate bandit made it possible for the preacher to spread his "message" at sword-point. At the same time, the bandit got to cloak his thievery and mayhem in religious mumbo-jumbo. Within a few years, the armed gang spreading Wahhabi terrorism had allowed them to take over a few towns, but had also prompted the beleaguered Muslim scholars to unite and appeal to the Egyptian Khedive to send troops to rescue the Arabs. He did, headed by his own son, Ibrahim Pasha, and by the mid-19th century, the Wahhabists had been pretty much decimated. The tattered remnants retreated to an isolated town in Arabia, where they were set to die out.

Until...the British intervened, with advanced weapons for the time, and military training, and financial support to the defeated Wahhabists. Over the second half of the 19th century, the Wahhabists, backed by the British, rapidly advanced in Arabia, one region at a time, terrorizing the people, vandalizing and destroying everything in their path, and warring against the established Hashemite families. This time, Egypt couldn't help, itself being under British military occupation.

During WWI, the French Empire and the British Crown, in the person of another intelligence agent, "Lawrence of Arabia", had persuaded the established Hashemite families to join the Allies in defeating the Ottoman Empire in Arabia by promising that once the Ottomans were defeated, the Arabs would be granted their independence by the victorious British (the Anglo-French Declaration of 1918). Meanwhile, what the Hashemites didn't know was that the British and French empires had already divided up and distributed the Arab nation among themselves (and the Zionists) and had no intention of allowing the Arabs to achieve independence (the secret Sykes-Picot Agreement). Furthermore, the British were not interested in backing the Hashemites, who were widely respected and enjoyed widespread legitimacy as Arab leaders. They preferred the thug who was on their payroll, and never made a move without consulting his British "advisor", one St. John Philby, a British intelligence agent who reportedly converted to Islam and went by the name Sheikh "Abdullah". Interestingly, before going to Arabia, St. John Philby had been recommended for a job in the British civil administration of Palestine by none other than Chaim Weizmann in 1920. Later, he was one of the extremely select group that met in Britain in 1922 to plan the "Palestine question", along with King George, his mentor, Chaim Weizmann, the Baron Rothschild, and Winston Churchill. No Arabs were invited.

The next few years witnessed the total, extremely violent takeover of Arabia (within the borders drawn by the British) by the Saud gang, executed by the armed militias of the fanatic "Ikhwan" ("Brothers"), with the backing of the British. The Ikhwan committed many horrific atrocities, and ruthlessly destroyed ancient artifacts and monuments dating back centuries and even millenia. By 1932, the Hashemites had been totally defeated and expelled from the territories that the British had carved out of Arabia. The head of the Sauds, Abdelaziz, declared himself king and was recognized as such by the British Crown, who kept him on their payroll for years afterward, until he no longer needed their money.

Interestingly, the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood, which is called in Arabic the Ikhwan Muslimeen (a more accurate translation of the Arabic is "the Muslim Brothers"), was also founded with a financial donation by Egypt's British occupiers, of 500 Egyptian pounds (a fortune at the time). Its founder, Hassan el-Banna, viewed the Wahhabi takeover of Arabia (with Saud's Ikhwan militia) as a model to be emulated. All the current "Islamist" groups, militias and gangs, including Al-Qaeda and ISIS are offshoots of the Muslim Brotherhood, or Ikhwan, and are headed by men who were trained and indoctrinated by this secretive, now global network. Among many constants over the years has been the backing of Western imperialist intelligence agencies, led, as always, by the British, with the Zionists in the shadow of their shadow.

So, you see, solace. Far from disproving my thesis, you have, in fact supported it.

Re: Your Take On The ISIS Phenomenon

Posted: Mon Mar 09, 2015 4:28 pm
by PufPuf93
8bitagent » Sun Mar 08, 2015 11:36 pm wrote:It is weird how every time Syrian government forces bomb from the air or attack ground positions of ISIS, Israel shoots them down or blows them up. And then the many reports of IDF treating wounded Syrian jihadis. You'll also notice ISIS is focused on attacking Lebanon/Hezbollah, Iran, Syria, etc..pretty much all of Israel's main enemies. And ISIS seems to always talk about how they hate Shiite Muslims, Yazidis, etc but never seem to go after Israel. Just saying. Im normally against Israeli conpiracy theories, but I guess enemy of my enemy is my friend applies here.

I'm usually not one for Israeli conspiracy theories, but it's odd how even al Qaeda loving oil rich Arab gulf states are being attacked and threatened by ISIS...yet Israel doesn't seem to be all too concerned.
I have wondered about why Dubai and Abu Dahbi, specifically the new high rises, have not been targeted.

Please forgive the wiki source.

Dubai, the largest city in the United Arab Emirates, is home to 911 completed high-rises,[1] 88 of which stand taller than 180 metres (591 ft). The tallest building in Dubai is the Burj Khalifa, which rises 828 metres (2,717 ft) and contains 163 floors.[2] The tower has stood as both the tallest building in the world and the tallest man-made structure of any kind in the world since its completion in January 2010. The second-tallest building in Dubai is the 414-metre (1,358 ft) Princess Tower, which also stands as the world's tallest residential skyscraper.[3] The skyscrapers of Dubai are, for the most part, clustered in three different locations. The land along Sheikh Zayed Road was the first to develop, followed by the Dubai Marina neighborhood and the Business Bay district. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_ta ... s_in_Dubai

Note: there are 911 of them even, oh boy geez.

The list ranks Abu Dhabi skyscrapers that stand at least 100 metres (328 ft) tall, based on standard height measurement. This includes architectural details and spires, but does not include antenna masts. Although not falling into the category of buildings, Abu Dhabi also claimed the world record for the highest free-standing flagpole in the world between 2001 and 2003. The flagpole stands at a height of 122 metres (400 ft).[1][2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_ta ... _Abu_Dhabi

Re: Your Take On The ISIS Phenomenon

Posted: Mon Mar 09, 2015 4:36 pm
by Elvis
Alice wrote
some background, as briefly as I can make it.
Also, the Taliban were Muslims destroying artifacts of the "alien" Buddhist culture; the ISIS goons are, we are told, Muslims destroying artifacts of Muslim culture. Given what we can piece together about the current situation, including the fact that the people who could stop it are doing nothing, I'd say the comparison is facile.

Pere Ubu is #1!

Posted: Mon Mar 09, 2015 4:47 pm
by IanEye
"After Stephane Mallarme, after Paul Verlaine, after Gustave Moreau, after Puvis de Chavannes,
after our own verse, after all our subtle colour and nervous rhythm,
after the faint mixed tints of Conder, what more is possible?
After us the Savage God.”

- Yeats



Re: Your Take On The ISIS Phenomenon

Posted: Mon Mar 09, 2015 4:58 pm
by AlicetheKurious
Elvis wrote:Also, the Taliban were Muslims destroying artifacts of the "alien" Buddhist culture; the ISIS goons are, we are told, Muslims destroying artifacts of Muslim culture. Given what we can piece together about the current situation, including the fact that the people who could stop it are doing nothing, I'd say the comparison is facile.
Even if that were true (ISIS is destroying all history, all artifacts and ancient monuments, including some several thousand years old, which predate Islam), it would still not address my question about how and why the Baniyan statues in Afghanistan were preserved intact for over a thousand years after the spread of Islam in Afghanistan, only to be destroyed after the US military/intelligence intervened in that country. It's the same pattern, over and over.

Re: Your Take On The ISIS Phenomenon

Posted: Mon Mar 09, 2015 5:01 pm
by AlicetheKurious
Elvis wrote:Also, the Taliban were Muslims destroying artifacts of the "alien" Buddhist culture; the ISIS goons are, we are told, Muslims destroying artifacts of Muslim culture. Given what we can piece together about the current situation, including the fact that the people who could stop it are doing nothing, I'd say the comparison is facile.
Even if that were true (ISIS is destroying all history, all artifacts and ancient monuments, including some several thousand years old, which predate Islam), it would still not address my question about how and why the Baniyan statues in Afghanistan were preserved intact for over a thousand years after the spread of Islam in Afghanistan, only to be destroyed after the US military/intelligence intervened in that country. It's the same pattern, over and over.

On Edit: I keep thinking of that scene from Roots: "My name is Kunta Kinte!" Whack! "Your name is Toby!" "My name is Kunta Kinte!" Whack! "Your name is Toby!" Etc.

Re: Your Take On The ISIS Phenomenon

Posted: Mon Mar 09, 2015 5:16 pm
by Elvis
Good points. For a moment I'd forgotten that the US helped install the Taliban as a "stabilizing" regime. But they just wouldn't wear button-down shirts, not like the nice Afghanis in those 1970s pictures.