What you don't know can't hurt them.
https://www.rigorousintuition.ca/board2/
https://www.rigorousintuition.ca/board2/viewtopic.php?t=33901
I must admit, I was a little bummed (no pun intended) when my fella informed me when we first got together that that was his no-fly zone...compared2what? wrote: But I'd say that while there are probably a few straight boys who regularly make a point out of letting the ladies know that they'd totally strangle anyone who tried to go there
slomo wrote:That seems to me to be consistent with my conjecture about optimal locations for pressure/force/friction/torsion and whatever else can be modeled using tensor calculus within the divine cavity.Nordic wrote:I hereby declare that I have strong anecdotal evidence for the G spot. However, where the search for it may be going wrong is that I believe it's not an issue of nerve endings in that particular part of the vagina, but instead is an area where certain types of pressure, combined with other stimulation elsewhere, can cause a particularly quick and intense orgasm.
They might want to look at what's directly behind the spot inside the vagina where the G-spot supposedly is.
You just combined wit, maths and sex in one sentence. 
JackRiddler wrote:Can one see this picture online? Not easily ga-gagulled.elfismiles wrote:I also have a framed print of her "Two Views of Woman" picture. These were originally my grandfather's. He was a sex researcher whom I believe knew Betty before his death.
.
I have no use for men who bar the door katie to alternative sexual experience, and the men I've hooked up with tend to sooner or later make excellent fodder for studies... or movies.compared2what? wrote:I'm extrapolating from a very small body of anecdotal data here. But I'd say that while there are probably a few straight boys who regularly make a point out of letting the ladies know that they'd totally strangle anyone who tried to go there, there are also probably a few who practically can't get through an entire first date without making sure they won't be buying a woman who doesn't know that they simply can't get off any other way dinner twice.slomo wrote:I could tell you there are male correlates, but if go into too much detail here it will wig the straight boys out...
But....Honestly, I really have absolutely no idea whether most straight boys have any very strong feelings about being heterosexual while having sexually responsive male correlates. One way or the other. All I really know is that the issue rarely arises. I have no clue why. And no reason to inquire, either.
Maybe somebody impartial should do a survey or something.
According to a recent study (although it had a terribly small sample size) 50% of women do have a developed homologous prostrate gland structure wrapping around the distal end of the urethra, and it is theorized that a portion of these women are able to ejaculate.Avalon wrote:My own experience has been that the G spot stimulation is a very different sensation from the usual clitoral sensation, and it's the only thing that has been associated with ejaculation (which is a very different fluid from the usual vaginal lubrication).
Skene's glands have highly variable anatomy, and in some extreme cases they appear to be absent entirely. If Skene's glands are the cause of female ejaculation and G-Spot-orgasms, this may explain the absence in many women.
The Female Ejaculation Controversyhttp://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1 ... x/abstract
The Human Female Prostate—Immunohistochemical Study with Prostate-Specific Antigen, Prostate-Specific Alkaline Phosphatase, and Androgen Receptor and 3-D Remodeling
...
Results. Fourteen of 25 patients had glandular structures encircling the urethra. Twelve of 14 showed positive staining for PSA, PSAP, and AR in gland acini, while the excretory ducts, the urethra, and the surrounding stroma did not express those proteins. ["The other 11 specimens showed only gland-like structures"] The strongest PSA and PSAP expression was found in apical cytoplasm of the glandular cells, and AR was confined to cell nuclei. Prostatic glands were located laterally [to the side] to the distal [outer] half of the urethra. ["One of both urethras, which underwent a total serial immunohistochemical work-up, showed developed secretory glandular structures."
Conclusions. A female prostate was found in every second woman in this study and can be discriminated from other urethral caverns and immature paraurethral ducts. Possible neoplasms of this source tissue expressing the prostate-specific markers may therefore be denominated as female prostate tumors.
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1 ... x/abstract
Introduction. The existence of female ejaculation and the female prostate is controversial; however, most scientists are not aware that historians of medicine and psychology described the phenomenon of female ejaculation approximately 2,000 years ago.
You never really knew me at all...http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1 ... x/abstract
Results. In this case report, we provided new biochemical evidences demonstrating that the clear and abundant fluid that is ejected in gushes (squirting) is different from the real female ejaculation. While the first has the features of diluted urines (density: 1,001.67 ± 2.89; urea: 417.0 ± 42.88 mg/dL; creatinine: 21.37 ± 4.16 mg/dL; uric acid: 10.37 ± 1.48 mg/dL), the second is biochemically comparable to some components of male semen (prostate-specific antigen: 3.99 ± 0.60 × 103 ng/mL).
Conclusions. Female ejaculation and squirting/gushing are two different phenomena. The organs and the mechanisms that produce them are bona fide different. The real female ejaculation is the release of a very scanty, thick, and whitish fluid from the female prostate, while the squirting is the expulsion of a diluted fluid from the urinary bladder.
Only I didn't send you any P:M. You made that up.Project Willow wrote:I think it must be a joke, either that or he was joking in the pm he just sent me.
If the post is a joke, it's actually kinda funny in a refreshingly self-deprecating way.