HuffPo doesn't even pay people, how could they terminate him? He's just trying to get a name off the fact HuffPo deleted his blog. I recognize his kin when I see it; worked for so many media narcissists over the years.
Today's video goes into the past and future; why do Bitcoin, gold, cannabis legalization, and decentralization matter so much? You'll find out in today's extended videocast. Get the newsletter- https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr... (The popular weekly scoop on reality and currency technology, don't get left behind!)
Get real gold: http://Goldmoney.com/r/FbRhf9 (Recommended site for buying gold with a credit card or bank account transfer; they also accept Bitcoin, Ether, and Litecoin)
Here is the full vid free of charge. I have not watched it but I may watch it tonight. I already know more about this than this vid might teach me but who knows. One thing I do know is that just like the Rothschilds the amount of cash some of these people are worth is and can be mega times larger than what is estimated. Hell the richest people on the planet are not even listed on the Forbes list, and the people that are listed on Forbes might be powerful but not nearly as powerful as the people that are not listed. Bill and Hill made at least a cool two billion just on Mena Arkansas and the Contra deal. Trucks loaded with cash were leaving that place on a regular basis.
her facial expressions during the balloon drop at the convention, kid parts coming out, her extended coughing fits due to closed throat anti-interrogation conditioning.
The balloon drop incident actually is the most disturbing. It physically disturbs me. She looks ... Completely out of her mind, or like some kind of badly designed android, or some combination. Just inhuman.
Re: Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous
Posted: Mon Aug 29, 2016 8:24 pm
by backtoiam
She might have too much "smart dust" in her brain. That stuff is a mother fucker and it communicates.
Re: Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous
Posted: Tue Aug 30, 2016 1:28 pm
by NeonLX
backtoiam » Mon Aug 29, 2016 7:24 pm wrote:She might have too much "smart dust" in her brain. That stuff is a mother fucker and it communicates.
This grabbed my attention. What is "smart dust", and how does it communicate?
Man, Cannonfire lost it long ago, and repeatedly. Such a caricature, this guy. And as such, an occasional drop-in never fails to entertain.
He currently has as his banner graphic a photoshop of Trump cuddling the Russian bear while a big Putin winks. He forgot the hammer and sickle! Would even David Brock top that? I hope Cannon is getting some kind of payday out of his decade-plus Internet job pimping the Clintons.
He considers the mystery of how such a great Hillary Clinton could be so unpopular with the voters, and hopes she will counter it with a series of weekly half-hour addresses:
The purpose of her address, at least the first one, would be to expose the lies.
Exposing the lies. That's how to frame it.
Begin with a precis of some of the most ridiculous fabrications told about the Clintons over the years. Ask the viewer: "Why have so many people lied about us? Why have they told lies about us that go way beyond the things said about other candidates? There's only one possible answer: Because I am the only one who truly threatens the entrenched power structure."
Emphasis his. Because a good punch line is hard to come by, and everyone should know it.
And then she needs to take a stark, direct, no-bullshit look at the many current lies told about her emails and about the Clinton Foundation.
She needs to explain that Trump is hardly in a position to complain about national security, since his ties to Putin are obvious.
She needs to explain that the Clinton Foundation is a charity, from which she derives not one dollar of profit. She needs to explain that the Foundation is not a slush fund, and that the many people who have called it a slush fund are damned liars.
(I am suggesting that she use the phrase "damned liars." A minor profanity will make the point stick.)
She needs to explain that the Foundation saves lives. She needs to explain that the Foundation is certified as honest and above-board by Charity Watch and other organizations.
Re: Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous
Posted: Thu Sep 01, 2016 2:50 pm
by Cordelia
Any new Hillary election news?
When If she is handed wins the presidency, will it mean anything to her if the Nobel Peace Prize isn't misappropriated also awarded to her?
(The tulip, especially, was unmerited, imho)
In 1994, a special variety of tulip was cultivated and named for her in The Netherlands; it was still being grown as of the late 2000s.
Source on that? They made millions, much it in CIA cash, but 2b is insane, bud. I don't think you're taking into account how many pigs were at that trough -- and the fact the Clintons didn't run it.
Hell, I'm betting Seth Ward did better off Centaur Rose than either of the Clintons did - they were still small time players back then.
Re: Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous
Posted: Thu Sep 01, 2016 3:50 pm
by Rory
She was paid the $2bil in smart dust. Wisely invested
backtoiam » Mon Aug 29, 2016 7:24 pm wrote:She might have too much "smart dust" in her brain. That stuff is a mother fucker and it communicates.
This grabbed my attention. What is "smart dust", and how does it communicate?
Smart dust is microscopic sensors, basically a dust cloud of sensors, hence the name. It doesn't actually exist though. In various scifi they sprinkle it around and use it to build a 3D image of a room before busting in, guns blazing.
There are some prototypes of nanomachines that can be injected into a human body, but they get flushed out pretty fast, and you need heavy-duty equipment and a technician or two just to read anything off them, and their functionality is very basic.
The "dust" doesn't communicate. No room for a power source, which is why you need the equipment to read them. Works like rfid chips which gets just enough power to reply when you poke them with a signal, but the range is not very good.
Source on that? They made millions, much it in CIA cash, but 2b is insane, bud. I don't think you're taking into account how many pigs were at that trough -- and the fact the Clintons didn't run it.
Hell, I'm betting Seth Ward did better off Centaur Rose than either of the Clintons did - they were still small time players back then.
From two people that were directly involved. Both flew planes for the operation. One died in a plane crash years ago. The other guy is still alive and a friend of mine.
edit
The guy that got killed was Buzz Sawyer, the other is still alive so no name on him.
Re: Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous
Posted: Thu Sep 01, 2016 4:08 pm
by backtoiam
The "dust" doesn't communicate. No room for a power source, which is why you need the equipment to read them. Works like rfid chips which gets just enough power to reply when you poke them with a signal, but the range is not very good.
That is what I call communicating. I also suspect it is much more advanced than we know about. DARPA usually stays many years ahead of what people know about.
And I was joking about her head being full of smart dust, mostly anyway.
Re: Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous
Posted: Thu Sep 01, 2016 4:09 pm
by Wombaticus Rex
backtoiam » Thu Sep 01, 2016 3:05 pm wrote:
From two people that were directly involved. Both flew planes for the operation. One died in a plane crash years ago. The other guy is still alive and a friend of mine.
Was that Omaha, Nebraska, Idaho or Tulsa?
Re: Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous
Posted: Thu Sep 01, 2016 4:13 pm
by backtoiam
Both of these guys were from Arkansas. Both pilots. One is dead and the guy that is still alive does not live in Arkansas anymore.
