rigorousintuition.ca

The Consul wrote:It is all a fantasy. Personally I believe you could compete with Hollywood now by simply gathering people in comfortable places with vibrating furniture with dynamic lighting and mood music where they would pop the endless patches of bubblewrap they buy at the door for $10 sq yard for hours and hours and hours.

well, I could have said, "LET'S HOPE SO! " and I have to admit there is a sliver of me that does. Still, the odds are stacked pretty high on collapse. I think we are being conditioned to become zombies. We will just become these fat pustules though which commerce passes on its way to profit. On lighter days it could be differently phrased but Patrick Henry's "The greatest preoccupation of mankind is to indulge in the illusion of hope" remains a deep tatoo on my consciousness. All other forms of madness are co opted by banal marketing.

Pilger is a prize we must strive harder to attain.

ianeye wrote: i will do what i always do, add a bed of music to the images in my mind to give it a sense of order & cohesion.

Novem5er wrote:I fully admit, and kind of suspect, other members of the conspiracy in the crowd or behind the scene. I don't think these two guys did this all on their own. I can't imagine that they just got together over a game of beer-pong one night and said, "You know, bro... I have this crazy idea. You in?"

barracuda wrote:This is Ri, where suppression means you can say anything you want, and bullying is when someone doesn't post a little hug emoticon after you say it.

FourthBase wrote:If the next post you make isn't quotes that back up your claim...
Then I'm reporting you to the mods for whatever serious violation you're doing.
(And since we both know your claims are bullshit, prepare to be suspended.)

Canadian_watcher wrote:there are some people who cannot deal with information if it isn't presented to them on a specific type of china from a specific side of the table

drew wrote:you know, it's incredibly hard to know what the fuck is ever going on about anything. and that's an understatement.

c2w? wrote:You're dealing with civil servants. So think like a bureaucrat, sting like a bee.

Joe Hillshoist wrote:Are you trying to psychologically manipulate me so I won't be psychologically manipulated?

FourthBase wrote:

Joe Hillshoist wrote:Are you trying to psychologically manipulate me so I won't be psychologically manipulated?

Myself right now wrote:My mistake. It's a superb question, hilarious, embodies the very thing it suspects, and what it suspects is a noble ambition, in my opinion. Indoctrinate others so that they cannot be indoctrinated by anyone. Etc. There is not only nothing wrong with that kind of reverse-manipulation, but it is in fact anti-manipulation, non-manipulation. It is a cure. It might even be: Our salvation.

FourthBase wrote:

Myself right now wrote:My mistake. It's a superb question, hilarious, embodies the very thing it suspects, and what it suspects is a noble ambition, in my opinion. Indoctrinate others so that they cannot be indoctrinated by anyone. Etc. There is not only nothing wrong with that kind of reverse-manipulation, but it is in fact anti-manipulation, non-manipulation. It is a cure. It might even be: Our salvation.

Canadian_watcher wrote:The AP is more of a primary resource as opposed to almost every single 'news' outlet currently in operation in the US, which I agree are already in place to divide the public - half the truth comes out of the 'left media' and the other half comes out of the 'right media' and they laugh because the US population will NOT look at both sides - ever - and therefore they'll never see that the whole truth is right before them.