How the fuck does an RI member, 2 years into this madness, still operate under the premise of, "there's no way this is real -- clearly it's FAKE!", when presented with examples of sheer hypocrisy like this?
To be clear: of course we should scrutinize everything, and not merely accept anything by default.
But mentalgongfu's reply -- questioning the authenticity of an image that could have been verified online within minutes -- suggests a continued trust in the benevolence of these actors. These photos barely scratch the surface of the vile acts being committed.
I've seen no ACKNOWLEDGEMENT from him -- or any of the others that swallowed the narratives whole over the last ~2 years -- that they've been MISLED, that current actions against children and against citizens are ethically wrong and should be rebuked at all turns. ALL MANDATES were ineffective, unethical, and counter to human rights.
Anyone disagree with the last sentence?
(Here's another example of the hypocrisy, in case previously missed):
Re: Coronavirus Crisis: Main Thread
Posted: Fri Feb 18, 2022 1:50 pm
by mentalgongfu2
Oh the pearl clutching. Hypocrisy isn't surprising, fool. But I don't know who those people are, and there was no context in the original post, so no, I couldn't verify it online.
What's so goddamn offensive to you about asking for people to identify the source of content they're posting?
I shouldn't even have to ask the question.
Re: Coronavirus Crisis: Main Thread
Posted: Fri Feb 18, 2022 2:35 pm
by alloneword
As I said, you're welcome.
Re: Coronavirus Crisis: Main Thread
Posted: Fri Feb 18, 2022 3:31 pm
by alloneword
Public Health Scotland Discontinues Vaccine Efficacy Statistics: "COMPARISON OF CASE RATES IS INAPPROPRIATE"
A spokesperson complains that "anti-vaxxers" are misrepresenting the numbers, so they have to go.
You can bet the UKHSA won't be far behind them on this. For months now their own figures have been clearly showing negative efficacy against 'infection' and 'transmission' and falling efficacy against 'hospitalisations' and 'deaths', but they've pretty much run out of ways to obfuscate the data (omitting the graphs, making the figures fade to grey, dropping the double-vaxxed figures or writing pleading blog posts about how we should disregard the data in favour of their 'models', etc). It's all too much for them. This data was supposed to demonstrate efficacy, dammit! Now too many people are noticing. The only option left to them is to discontinue it's publication.
It suggests that 'There are three explanations for the lack of protection from vaccines after a certain period:'
1. The official narrative – that vaccines provided protection that wanes over time
2. Vaccines provided some protection but the virus mutated to evade the immune response
3. Vaccines did not provide the protection that was claimed but the way data was presented led to the illusion that they did
(Spoiler: It's number 3).
Re: Coronavirus Crisis: Main Thread
Posted: Fri Feb 18, 2022 5:27 pm
by stickdog99
Re: Coronavirus Crisis: Main Thread
Posted: Fri Feb 18, 2022 5:48 pm
by stickdog99
Re: Coronavirus Crisis: Main Thread
Posted: Fri Feb 18, 2022 6:05 pm
by Belligerent Savant
.
@backtolife_2022
Bill Gates: "Sadly the virus itself particularly the variant called Omicron is a type of vaccine, creates both B cell and T cell immunity and it's done better job of getting out to the world population than we have with vaccines..."
Bill Gates: "Sadly the virus itself particularly the variant called Omicron is a type of vaccine, creates both B cell and T cell immunity and it's done better job of getting out to the world population than we have with vaccines..."
Come on man we both know he is saying "Sadly the virus is doing a better job vaccinating people than we are."
Not "Sadly the virus is being a vaccine."
However that is his fault. His institute - GAVI - blocked the off label emergency manufacture of mRNA vaccines for third world countries by refusing to enable a waiver on international drug patents because it would cost big pharma money. They blocked theTRIPS waiver at every opportunity for at least a year and may still be working to block it.
And before you start saying "Joe being Joe bullshit bullshit bullshit" I'm pointing out that Gates' own international vaccine institution, dedicated to vaccinating the people in worlds poorer nations, worked against vaccinating the world's poor for a year because it would cost large corporations money.
And yeah I know mRNA vaccines = Bad so they dodged a bullet there etc etc etc.
