Page 5 of 23
Re: The peoples voice.
Posted: Thu Jun 06, 2013 1:56 am
by JackRiddler
Wombaticus Rex » Wed Jun 05, 2013 9:17 pm wrote:I would definitely love to see this thread continue to breathe, too.
I'm interested in the broader question of
What The Fuck, Really, Is The Point of Another Website, At This Point?
What, he already raised 50K sterling.
HAARP is an abundantly detailed reality but I still feel fucking absurd talking about it. Cheney wasn't really doing anything in secret, per se. Like the explosions, like remarkably coincidental drill on September 11th. It's a huge tell to any rival intelligence agency, but hiding their activities from other intelligence agencies has never been the point. I don't really think "hiding it from the American people" is the point either, I differ with Marchetti there. I think it's just the simple fact they can deny it, deny the obvious truth, and remain in power.
I'm with you on all of that! Sing it, brother.
Perhaps our pounds & bucks are better spent on seeds and soil, or shit -- even beer.
I'm hopeless. Beer all the way.
Re: The peoples voice.
Posted: Thu Jun 06, 2013 1:57 am
by conniption
John Swinton (1829-1901)
Wiki
constitution dot org
John Swinton on the independence of the press
Variations on the quote below have been misattributed as a response to a toast, by John Swinton, as "the former Chief of Staff at the New York Times", before the New York Press Club in 1953. However, research reveals that Swinton (1829-1901), after moving to New York, wrote an occasional article for the New York Times and was hired on a regular basis in 1860 as head of the editorial staff. Afterward holding this position throughout the Civil War, he left the paper in 1870 and became active in the labor struggles of the day. He later served eight years in the same position on the New York Sun and later published a weekly labor sheet, John Swinton's Paper.
The remarks were apparently made by Swinton, then the preeminent New York journalist, probably one night in 1880. Swinton was the guest of honour at a banquet given him by the leaders of his craft. Someone who knew neither the press nor Swinton offered a toast to the independent press. Swinton outraged his colleagues by replying:
There is no such thing, at this date of the world's history, in America, as an independent press. You know it and I know it.
There is not one of you who dares to write your honest opinions, and if you did, you know beforehand that it would never appear in print. I am paid weekly for keeping my honest opinion out of the paper I am connected with. Others of you are paid similar salaries for similar things, and any of you who would be so foolish as to write honest opinions would be out on the streets looking for another job. If I allowed my honest opinions to appear in one issue of my paper, before twenty-four hours my occupation would be gone.
The business of the journalists is to destroy the truth, to lie outright, to pervert, to vilify, to fawn at the feet of mammon, and to sell his country and his race for his daily bread. You know it and I know it, and what folly is this toasting an independent press?
We are the tools and vassals of rich men behind the scenes. We are the jumping jacks, they pull the strings and we dance. Our talents, our possibilities and our lives are all the property of other men. We are intellectual prostitutes.
(Source: Labor's Untold Story, by Richard O. Boyer and Herbert M. Morais, published by United Electrical, Radio & Machine Workers of America, NY, 1955/1979.)
Despite the misattribution, the quote raises the issue of whether there is not continuing truth in Swinton's remarks, and whether some candid journalist might not be able to fairly say similar things today. Anyone who has associated closely with journalists can hardly avoid finding a ring of truth in such words, and the best evidence lies in the actual product of journalists and how well, or how poorly, it both agrees with and covers what actually happens, especially involving such things as corruption and abuse of power.
Re: The peoples voice.
Posted: Thu Jun 06, 2013 3:54 am
by slimmouse
JackRiddler wrote:
"Icke bomb" = slimmouse
Jack, you humble me, Unfortuneately for me you're wrong. I don't have anything approaching the courage required to fill that kind of role. But I'm working on it.
Me and you do have at least one thing in common though, whilst im confessing to my failings. Im a beer all the way man too!
And speaking of "play"
HOL. That song has always resonated with me, possibly because I am myself an aquarian (by modern astological interpretion at least.)
Born on the 23rd on a date that also coincidentally/synchromystically add up to 23. (23011961)
It seems I was born out of this earth to play,Nothing about my life actually indicates anything else
In my own opinion that should be one of major requisites of our mortal existence for everyone.The way that particular thread of our nature has been for most people almost completely derailed ,would probably go a long way to explaining why Im angry about the way the world works, because I believe I understand how and why all that went wrong.
And speaking of derailed threads.
SLAD. You didn't derail the thread. Any blame anyone cares to attribute for that lies elsewhere, in my own honest opinion. But hey, its all part of the journey, as Neil Kramer might say.
Re: The peoples voice.
Posted: Thu Jun 06, 2013 4:48 am
by Hammer of Los
...
God loves ya Slim.
You da best Slim.
Take it easy man.
But Icke gets too much wrong.
Ananda right about dat.
...
Re: The peoples voice.
Posted: Thu Jun 06, 2013 5:00 am
by Hammer of Los
Re: The peoples voice.
Posted: Thu Jun 06, 2013 9:08 am
by Wombaticus Rex
The Marchetti reference I was making was Victor:
http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/JFKmarchetti.htm
The CIA is a master at distorting history - even creating its own version of history to suit its institutional and operational purposes. It can do this largely because of two great advantages it possesses. One is the excessively secret environment in which it operates, and the other is that it is essentially a private instrument of the presidency.
The real reason for the official secrecy, in most instances, is not to keep the opposition (the CIA's euphemistic term for the enemy) from knowing what is going on; the enemy usually does know. The basic reason for governmental secrecy is to keep you, the American public, from knowing - for you, too, are considered the opposition, or enemy - so that you cannot interfere. When the public does not know what the government or the CIA is doing, it cannot voice its approval or disapproval of their actions. In fact, they can even lie to your about what they are doing or have done, and you will not know it.
As for the second advantage, despite frequent suggestion that the CIA is a rogue elephant, the truth is that the agency functions at the direction of and in response to the office of the president. All of its major clandestine operations are carried out with the direct approval of or on direct orders from the White House. The CIA is a secret tool of the president - every president. And every president since Truman has lied to the American people in order to protect the agency. When lies have failed, it has been the duty of the CIA to take the blame for the president, thus protecting him. This is known in the business as "plausible denial"...
Re: The peoples voice.
Posted: Thu Jun 06, 2013 10:30 am
by seemslikeadream
on edit
I'm out of here
Re: The peoples voice.
Posted: Fri Jun 07, 2013 2:37 pm
by slimmouse
Well, it looks like "The peoples voice " is going to get out there. Funding target surpassed within a week. Watching their presentation video again, I reckon that the project is in the hands of pretty dedicated team.
For anyone interested who might have missed the latest news, theres a link to the campaign home here.
http://www.indiegogo.com/projects/the-p ... ice?c=home
Meanwhile, Im wondering what their advertising policy will be? Having not watched the hitherto mentioned Russia Today, which appears to be about the only similar alternative, what kind of stuff doies their station try to sell their listeners?
Or am I being hopelessly optimistic in imagining that they have a choice?
This whole crowdfunded project should be interesting, to put it mildly. Its a fucking stroke of genius if you ask me.
Re: The peoples voice.
Posted: Fri Jun 07, 2013 2:58 pm
by NeonLX
Hopefully you're talking about this thread only, not the RI forum in general.
Re: The peoples voice.
Posted: Fri Jun 07, 2013 3:51 pm
by American Dream
Re: The peoples voice.
Posted: Fri Jun 07, 2013 4:38 pm
by Canadian_watcher
I think AD has crackpot ideas.
I know that saying so does not qualify as a personal attack, since that very saying has been tested and moderator approved and I know for sure that there are no double standards at work on this board.
So, yeah.
AD, you have crackpot ideas.
Re: The peoples voice.
Posted: Fri Jun 07, 2013 5:17 pm
by American Dream
Canadian_watcher » Fri Jun 07, 2013 3:38 pm wrote:I think AD has crackpot ideas.
I know that saying so does not qualify as a personal attack, since that very saying has been tested and moderator approved and I know for sure that there are no double standards at work on this board.
So, yeah.
AD, you have crackpot ideas.
Hmmm- I never, ever, thought of radical subjectivism! David Icke might not be "wrong" at all!
Revelations every day...
Now let's think- where's the good evidence: that shape-shifting celebrity reptoid blood-suckers actually rule us through a monolithic world conspiracy of which all other conspiracies are a part- as the Protocols of the Elders of Zion described with essential accuracy for us...Helpful people telling the truth about mind control- people like Cathy O'Brien, Mark Phillips and Arizona Wilder have worked with this mighty Messiah to tell us the Truth! Oh and if anyone doubts this then their sense of reality has just been manipulated by the Conspiracy's matrix of false reality, being broadcast from an inter-dimensional portal/spacecraft broadcasting from the Moon!
Um, so where was the evidence for all this again???
.
Re: The peoples voice.
Posted: Fri Jun 07, 2013 6:10 pm
by seemslikeadream
Island of Shame
another day.....another Holocaust.....another Genocide..... another example of an Anti-Human Being crime...another crime against Humanity...another crime committed by Anti-Human Beings
Re: The peoples voice.
Posted: Fri Jun 07, 2013 6:29 pm
by American Dream
I still think you seem like one of those people who has no firm position on Icke...but does...
Re: The peoples voice.
Posted: Fri Jun 07, 2013 6:41 pm
by seemslikeadream
some people deny any other holocausts have happened... some people are are just ignorers
another day.....another Holocaust.....another Genocide..... another example of an Anti-Human Being crime...another crime against Humanity...another crime committed by Anti-Human Beings
