Re: How to Overthrow the Illuminati
Posted: Fri Aug 30, 2013 11:34 am
lump away! AD creating a conspiracy of his own 
What you don't know can't hurt them.
https://www.rigorousintuition.ca/board2/
https://www.rigorousintuition.ca/board2/viewtopic.php?t=37074

You go ahead and wrestle with your chosen strawmen, slim. And good luck- I hope you win!slimmouse » Fri Aug 30, 2013 10:39 am wrote:It always amuses me when engaging in conversation with the products of the literary wares of the Michael Barkun types.
You suggest to them a few incontestable facts about say Tonkin Gulf, Or the Gliwic Border incident, or some hard facts about the official conspiracy theory of 9/11, and you can see the corners of their faces begin to turn up, accompanied by "oh you must be a conspiracy theorist", or some other pig ignorant rhetoric.
The more dedicated Barkun advocates go on to become Mr Bilderbergers, or similar myopic minds.
And there goes AD accusing people of being 'smarmy conspiracy theorists"
That video I posted has its flaws for sure, but it points out in no uncertain terms who "the illuminati" are, and what they believe in, their esoteric symbolism, their history, you name it.
Obviously not good enough for barking and co.
One is simply left thinking, quite literally , "whatever".
Heres how to overthrow the illuminati. It cuts very much to the quick. No zillion page deconstruction neccesary. Straight simple, and downright dangerous if civilisation could deprogramme itself for long enough to understand it. Barking will of course be doiing is best to set all your fears to rest however. What a first rate Tosser.
I cannot begin to imagine how many tomes of Marx and all the rest of these well meaning dudes I'd have to wade through to get to a truth as concise as the above.
This is the point at which we part company AD. You seem to believe that people are incapable of distinguishing between what is fundamentally right and wrong, and that subsequently everything that the likes of myself and others are saying needs to somehow be hammered out first.As to the solution, there is of course a need to unite broad numbers of people, though not particularly with extreme reactionaries and/or the severely deluded. The central question concerns what sorts of principles to unite around and what sort of plan of action to undertake.
So you're saying that all people need to do is feel the love?slimmouse » Fri Aug 30, 2013 12:17 pm wrote:This is the point at which we part company AD. You seem to believe that people are incapable of distinguishing between what is fundamentally right and wrong, and that subsequently everything that the likes of myself and others are saying needs to somehow be hammered out first.As to the solution, there is of course a need to unite broad numbers of people, though not particularly with extreme reactionaries and/or the severely deluded. The central question concerns what sorts of principles to unite around and what sort of plan of action to undertake.
Im afraid we're clearly seeing this from different angles. You may well be right actually. Im only leading with what my intuition tells me. Well perhaps Im being hard on myself there.
I know there is an "illuminati", Just like you and Barking do.
Non compliance is the action. Personally, locally, regionally, nationally et cetera. In any way you can possibly imagine, you dont comply. Its quite probably the only way. And of course it starts personally.American Dream » 30 Aug 2013 17:27 wrote:So you're saying that all people need to do is feel the love?slimmouse » Fri Aug 30, 2013 12:17 pm wrote:This is the point at which we part company AD. You seem to believe that people are incapable of distinguishing between what is fundamentally right and wrong, and that subsequently everything that the likes of myself and others are saying needs to somehow be hammered out first.As to the solution, there is of course a need to unite broad numbers of people, though not particularly with extreme reactionaries and/or the severely deluded. The central question concerns what sorts of principles to unite around and what sort of plan of action to undertake.
Im afraid we're clearly seeing this from different angles. You may well be right actually. Im only leading with what my intuition tells me. Well perhaps Im being hard on myself there.
I know there is an "illuminati", Just like you and Barking do.
No principles, no strategy, or maybe no action?
Turn On, Tune In, Drop Out???slimmouse » Fri Aug 30, 2013 12:34 pm wrote:Non compliance is the action. Personally, locally, regionally, nationally et cetera. In any way you can possibly imagine, you dont comply. Its quite probably the only way. And of course it starts personally.American Dream » 30 Aug 2013 17:27 wrote:So you're saying that all people need to do is feel the love?slimmouse » Fri Aug 30, 2013 12:17 pm wrote:This is the point at which we part company AD. You seem to believe that people are incapable of distinguishing between what is fundamentally right and wrong, and that subsequently everything that the likes of myself and others are saying needs to somehow be hammered out first.As to the solution, there is of course a need to unite broad numbers of people, though not particularly with extreme reactionaries and/or the severely deluded. The central question concerns what sorts of principles to unite around and what sort of plan of action to undertake.
Im afraid we're clearly seeing this from different angles. You may well be right actually. Im only leading with what my intuition tells me. Well perhaps Im being hard on myself there.
I know there is an "illuminati", Just like you and Barking do.
No principles, no strategy, or maybe no action?
American Dream » Fri Aug 30, 2013 12:48 pm wrote:Turn On, Tune In, Drop Out?slimmouse » Fri Aug 30, 2013 12:34 pm wrote:Non compliance is the action. Personally, locally, regionally, nationally et cetera. In any way you can possibly imagine, you dont comply. Its quite probably the only way. And of course it starts personally.American Dream » 30 Aug 2013 17:27 wrote:So you're saying that all people need to do is feel the love?slimmouse » Fri Aug 30, 2013 12:17 pm wrote:This is the point at which we part company AD. You seem to believe that people are incapable of distinguishing between what is fundamentally right and wrong, and that subsequently everything that the likes of myself and others are saying needs to somehow be hammered out first.As to the solution, there is of course a need to unite broad numbers of people, though not particularly with extreme reactionaries and/or the severely deluded. The central question concerns what sorts of principles to unite around and what sort of plan of action to undertake.
Im afraid we're clearly seeing this from different angles. You may well be right actually. Im only leading with what my intuition tells me. Well perhaps Im being hard on myself there.
I know there is an "illuminati", Just like you and Barking do.
No principles, no strategy, or maybe no action?
You really think that's enough?
I sometimes wonder if youre trying to provoke me into giving you a few routes of totally effective non compliance which would bring the house of cards down in a flash, were enough people truly adequately informed of "the apparently non existent illuminati"American Dream » 30 Aug 2013 17:48 wrote:Turn On, Tune In, Drop Out???slimmouse » Fri Aug 30, 2013 12:34 pm wrote:Non compliance is the action. Personally, locally, regionally, nationally et cetera. In any way you can possibly imagine, you dont comply. Its quite probably the only way. And of course it starts personally.American Dream » 30 Aug 2013 17:27 wrote:So you're saying that all people need to do is feel the love?slimmouse » Fri Aug 30, 2013 12:17 pm wrote:This is the point at which we part company AD. You seem to believe that people are incapable of distinguishing between what is fundamentally right and wrong, and that subsequently everything that the likes of myself and others are saying needs to somehow be hammered out first.As to the solution, there is of course a need to unite broad numbers of people, though not particularly with extreme reactionaries and/or the severely deluded. The central question concerns what sorts of principles to unite around and what sort of plan of action to undertake.
Im afraid we're clearly seeing this from different angles. You may well be right actually. Im only leading with what my intuition tells me. Well perhaps Im being hard on myself there.
I know there is an "illuminati", Just like you and Barking do.
No principles, no strategy, or maybe no action?
AD, thats a very good idea. You appear to have gone into schoolboy mode again.American Dream » 30 Aug 2013 18:02 wrote:So you've got a secret plan to save the planet but no one can know it?
Please, I've had enough!
Yes. Not with you at least.American Dream » 30 Aug 2013 18:15 wrote:I certainly could endorse the idea of a general strike but the devil is in the details. What do we think is wrong with the status quo? How shall we organize ourselves? What kind of economics will we practice? How will decisions be made? What sort of principles are central to what we are doing? What tactics shall we practice? What is our overall strategy?
Vague platitudes ain't gonna get it...
I'd like to see an evidence-based argument for that, meaning the contemporary version of course. I've had unfortunate contact with a number of folks on whom some would apply that label, but I never heard these people refer to themselves as such, but then again, I have no memory of a project Monarch being mentioned either, so maybe I've just got it all wrong.slimmouse wrote:
I actually interupted this myopic discussion originally, to inform people that "the illuminati" do very much exist, despite all denials of such.