rigorousintuition.ca

Rasmussen Reports Official Youtube Channel: 12 MILLION PEOPLE! - Vaxxed Americans Report Major Side Effects, and Question Efficacy

Harvard to the Big House Substack

...

And so as the Wuhan Strain of Coronavirus emerged in the winter of 2019, humanity was in for a very bad time. Because the decisions, those decisions would very much be made by cowards, and no fighting would happen at all because of those fools. America would decide to lay back, spread wide open like a Kardashian at Cannes, and let a reverting live-attenuated vaccine designed and distributed by China’s PLA infect nearly every citizen alive.

Because Tony Fauci and Jeremy Farrar, the latter being the WHO’s new Chief Scientist, consulted with Ron Fouchier and decided to perpetuate the cover-up that began with HIV, and occlude the origins of yet another live-attenuated vaccine (LAV) that reverted unexpectedly.

After all, as the worst war criminals humanity will ever know are well aware, live-attenuated vaccines can revert without too much trouble, as Ron Fouchier himself would explain in July 2019:

“That’s what happened in the 70s, people were trying to do live-attenuated vaccines and do human challenge studies and that might be the way the H1 re-emerged in the 70s. Some people say it was a lab accident. I don’t believe that. I think it was actually human challenge studies and live-attenuated vaccines that reverted that are the likely candidates of the 1970 reemergence of H1. And we need to make sure that doesn’t happen again.”

However, H1N1 is the highly-pathogenic state of human influenza, it is not an alien virus - it is completely and entirely adapted to our genome and has been with us for thousands of years. H1N1 doesn’t create a pandemic by simply by existing in a population, it is the strain that wins out and emerges once there’s enough crowding and transmission events to trick human influenza into thinking that its host population is about to die off completely, and so it goes into a highly-pathogenic state in an attempt to jump into a new host species, in its case from humans and into pigs.

So it’s almost certainly the past reversions of H1N1 LAVs in 1977 and 2009 that seemed to eventually just melt away, which sociopaths like Richard Ebright and the rest of his sweaty socially-retarded buddies at JASON are using to assure everyone that SARS-CoV-2, another LAV that’s reverting, will just melt away in just a few more months - just like H1N1 seems to have done twice. And since SARS and MERS, artificial coronavirus chimeras that got out before deattenuation all the way down into LAVs, went away on their own - they think all signs point to that happening again.

Unfortunately, unlike their mythical buddy: Each and everyone one of these arrogant old hacks was drawn into the siren song of multi-billion dollar defense and pharmaceutical contracts long ago, and they’re going to remain pushing for a fascist and entirely ineffective vaccination program because they’re rotten, filthy, diseased whores, and that is exactly what they are being paid to do.

Our novel coronavirus is not a naturally spreading and evolving virus, and it has not become endogenous to human populations after thousands of years of coevolution - it is reverting back towards a highly-pathogenic SARS-like chimera that our immune systems will be entirely helpless against, and is going through the same unexpected epistatic gatekeeping mutations that oral polio vaccine does on its way back to full virulence as a vaccine-derived poliovirus, which vaccines are also entirely helpless against.

In the case of SARS-CoV-2, this gatekeeping results in the sudden emergence of new strains that appear evolutionarily impossible - like Omicron. And so long as transmission is ongoing, there is nothing that is going to stop this pandemic except more death, because transmission means more gatekeeping, and gatekeeping means continued steps closer to the original strongest version of this artificial highly-pathogenic virus.

Being completely and entirely acclimated to the human genome is not at all the case with oral polio vaccine (OPV), a live attenuated vaccine (LAV) against the Polio virus that’s reverting into vaccine-derived poliovirus (VDPV) all across the third world and bringing back Polio’s terrible paralytic poliomyelitis. So OPV serves as a much more accurate analogy for SARS-CoV-2 than the H1N1 LAVs.

Our novel coronavirus is a live attenuated vaccine (LAV) derived from the work being done at UNC, the only place on earth trying to make a LAV for SARS-like viruses, which are also obviously not going to be fully acclimated to the human genome like the human influenza virus, which seems to have been with us at least since the Trojan War thousands of years ago.

Until SARS-CoV-2 is understood as a LAV that’s deattenuating towards a highly-pathogenic chimeric coronavirus that’s going through gatekeeping mutations and has no intention whatsoever of following the assumptions drawn from observing natural evolution or even the paths of the H1N1 LAVs which melted back into their original endogenous human hosts - humanity is going to continue to be standing on its head as it attempts to battle this pandemic, and misunderstanding the basic fundamental nature of what its up against.

And the absolute worst part, is that all of this was totally avoidable and exposed just about in real time as it happened. Because what happened just two days after the absurdly flawed Proximal Origins paper came out back in February 2020? I responded with a takedown that entirely dissembled their paper, mostly using serial passage to poke holes.

Then just a couple months later in April, with my dad’s help to polish the science, we submitted the paper that would pass peer-review and then get published in August 2020, outlining in very specific terms why serial passage could explain all of the anomalies.

...

So it must’ve been pretty baffling for these pretentious boffins as they watched my reply to their absurd Proximal Origins paper go up just 48 hours later, since I’d already ferreted out that serial passage explained all of this virus’s mysteries. And as the time’s passed I’ve really started to wonder why in the world I’m still alive, for at least the past year I’ve been explaining in very great detail how serial passage explained all of this, and why this technique was being suppressed since it unravels the entire conspiracy.

Luckily for me, Nicholas Wade is a pretentious twat who doesn’t know the first thing about opsec, since he dropped a very unusual nugget in his featured paper, while he was crediting someone else with being the first to outline why this virus looked engineered, and not mentioning our two peer-reviewed papers nor the fact me and my dad had been writing about this since January at all:

The first person to take a serious look at the origins of the SARS2 virus was Yuri Deigin, a biotech entrepreneur in Russia and Canada. In a long and brilliant essay, he dissected the molecular biology of the SARS2 virus and raised, without endorsing, the possibility that it had been manipulated. The essay, published on April 22, 2020, provided a roadmap for anyone seeking to understand the virus’s origins. Deigin packed so much information and analysis into his essay that some have doubted it could be the work of a single individual and suggested some intelligence agency must have authored it.

Bolded emphasis added since that essay, published months after I was writing about serial passage and being carried on Zero Hedge multiple times, only mentions serial passage once in passing. And it doesn’t echo with anything that’s mentioned in the newly FOIAed emails at all, he explores reverse genetics and waves his hands around as much as possible to distract from serial passage. Wade then goes on to mention a half-dozen other people as pioneering the exploration of a lab-engineered virus, none of them me or my father.

Now why would that be?

Because like Alina Chan before him, Nicholas Wade was happy to watch tens of millions of innocent strangers die terribly if it meant he got time in front of the cameras. And job number one was to make sure no discussion of serial passage ever surfaced at all, since it’s the hallmark of live-attenuated vaccines, and additionally points very directly back to the 2012 gain-of-function experiments with ferrets and influenza.



...

Because this pandemic is very much just beginning, as I outlined in the whitepaper below, which was sent to every single government entity I’ve been in contact with since this started, and ignored by each and every one of them, from David Asher to the Chamber of Commerce.

I am so very sorry to everyone that’s had to say goodbye, but I got buried a few years ago without even realizing it, by a community that decided that I no longer deserved any sort of a voice at all.

...

WEAPONIZING THE SWARM:

The Threat Posed by the Intentional Release of Targeted SARS-CoV-2 Variants

...

Another even more puzzling aspect of the genesis of this pandemic is the discrepancy between when the measurement of genetic change seems to indicate it started, roughly October 2020, and the fact that there was a happening around the WIV in December 2020. These two competing timelines are anchored by their assumed starting points, with the official reports from the data first released by China which is centered around the WIV and wetmarket representing December 2020 as the start of the outbreak.

However there is a second timeline, which is hinted at by the phylogenetic analysis which indicates that the outbreak actually started several months before, which meshes with the observation that the first patients actually appear to be at military hospitals farther north, and all anchoring on a subway line and the concomitant dense commercial setting.[iii] This timeline is also supported by evidence released by the State Department indicting a mysterious illness in and around Wuhan several months before December 2020.

One parsimonious explanation for this discrepancy would be if SARS-CoV-2 did in fact emerge in a diffuse manner throughout the commercial heart of Wuhan and not from any acute contact at all. Especially given how stealthily SARS-CoV-2 still spreads throughout new populations, largely asymptomatically and highly airborne, it seems reasonable to imagine that its initial emergence mirrored this diffuse and largely silent spread.

And so discovering a novel airborne RNA virus, the CCP may have applied some of the lessons learned attempting to vaccinate against another airborne coronavirus, Feline Infection Peritonitis Virus (FIPV), and attempted design a vaccine by removing select groups of genes. The authors of the paper explaining the approach observed that it “may allow the development of vaccines against infections with other pathogenic coronaviruses, including that causing severe acute respiratory syndrome in humans.”[iv]

However, the delicacy of vaccinating against airborne RNA viruses is also borne out by FIPV, since attempts to use vaccines only targeting the spike-protein can lead to early death syndrome in kittens. In fact, researchers have warned that:

“Since ADE in vitro has recently been described for human immunodeficiency virus type 1, current vaccination trials, particularly those aimed at raising an immune response against the [spike]-protein, should be reconsidered until more is known about the role of ADE in vivo.”[v]

So to avoid this phenomenon, instead of designing a vaccine that only targets the spike-protein, by deleting entire genes researchers hoped to created vaccines without any possible chance of increasing the virulence of an infection. However even here: “The accelerated development of disease in some of the animals suggested that the vaccination with this attenuated virus was detrimental rather than protective.” [vi]

Both of these well-established vaccination phenomena represent scenarios where the purported December 2020 outbreak localized around the WIV was not the start of China’s pandemic, but only the result of a vaccination trial with one of the two above strategies which backfired, resulting in the drastic measures taken by the CCP across Wuhan to enforce an extraordinary lockdown eventually encompassing tens of millions of its citizens.

If this is the case, then the emergence of the COVID-19 pandemic deep within Wuhan’s metropolis may not in fact have been natural, and may have been the result of the deattenuation of an experimental vaccine. In this scenario, the CCP knows exactly where SARS-CoV-2’s ongoing mutations are headed, which theoretically allows them to design attenuated variants that would mimic the unintentionally-lethal vaccine trials gone wrong.

And since America is only using nasal swabs to test and is not utilizing anal swabs, it would be impossible to detect the intentional release of these strains, designed to look natural but actually leading to increased-community wide lethality and death. Only anal swabs reveal the full extent of the variants within a population, and would allow for the detection of mathematically impossible mutations that these variants would have. And as Executive Orders warned: It is exceedingly easy to hide disguised aerosol dispersal devices in high-traffic commercial buildings, and now with WiFi ubiquitous the ability for targeted dispersal is even higher.

Without anal swab data from some cross-section of the American population, it will be completely impossible to detect the release of such a weapon in an American urban center. And so long as policymakers are pushing for blanket vaccination programs which are not complimented by the data provided by anal swabs, our vaccination programs are at risk of eventually backfiring and leading to nearly instant death across wide swaths of the American population:

“The postmortem examination showed that the vFS-immunized kittens had suffered from a form of FIP much more severe than naturally occurring FIP, even though no gross changes were observed. The presence of multiple lesions in several organs is atypical of naturally occurring FIP and indicates a rapid dissemination. The relatively small size of the lesions is probably due to the short incubation period.” [vii]

COVID Vaccines Do Not Prevent Hospitalizations in the UK

Hold the Front Page! The World Wakes Up to What Sceptics Knew All Along

In case you weren’t aware of it, Professor Norman Fenton recently extracted an interesting response from the Office for National Statistics. His request and the response can be seen here. It covers the number of Covid deaths, where only Covid was mentioned on the death certificate, from the start of the pandemic to the end of December 2021. The answer was just under 3.5% of the total. To many this has been a revelation.

Here are the ONS data as a chart with the number of deaths by age and sex in the data table below the chart.



If you’re the parent of a healthy child who found yourself persuaded or coerced into getting your child vaccinated against the risk of dying from Covid you may be interested to know that there were only three deaths in children and young people under 20 who didn’t have an underlying health condition, throughout this period. A week or so ago, three under 20s were stabbed to death in London on a single day. Tragic for the victims but it puts in perspective how small the risk to healthy young people Covid has been.

Of the 7,244,015 people in England aged 20-29, only 20 without a comorbidity died of Covid up to the end of 2021. About one twentieth (5%) of those killed on the roads. Indeed, the data show that of the 177,547 Covid deaths of all ages that had occurred to the end of December 2021, only 6,183 or 3.5% of them were people without a comorbidity.

Year 1 AD (After Death)

From 12/17/2021:

I wonder if that is a promise or a threat. Hmmmmm.

A new Cleveland Clinic pre-print study posted Monday, titled “Effectiveness of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Bivalent Vaccine.” Let me spoil it for you: They found the bivalent vaccine was NOT very effective. But guess what else they found?

The study observed over 50,000 Cleveland Clinic employees from the beginning of the pandemic. Let’s start with how the study ended, with this amazing concession of scientific ambiguity:

We still have a lot to learn about protection from COVID-19 vaccination, and in addition to a vaccine’s effectiveness it is important to examine whether multiple vaccine doses given over time may not be having the beneficial effect that is generally assumed.

Still have a lot to learn, eh? And here I thought the “science was settled.” Shows what I know, I’m just a lawyer. But why’d the Cleveland Clinic researchers admit that ambiguity? Because of the study’s most important finding:

Risk of COVID-19 increased with time since the most recent prior COVID-19 episode and with the number of vaccine doses previously received.

Holy jab juice, Batman. In other words, the more jabs, the more and faster the covid infections. The researchers weren’t prepared for that finding, or for the fact that the increased risk of catching covid was seen, not in decrepit, nearly-dead old people in care homes, but in young, healthy healthcare workers without co-morbidities:

The association of increased risk of COVID-19 with higher numbers of prior vaccine doses in our study, was unexpected. A simplistic explanation might be that those who received more doses were more likely to be individuals at higher risk of COVID-19. A small proportion of individuals may have fit this description. However, the majority of subjects in this study were generally young individuals and all were eligible to have received at least 3 doses of vaccine by the study start date[.]

Take a close look at the researcher’s chart, below. The Y-axis is the proportionate risk, based on the number of times people caught covid, and how often. The x-axis is the number of days from their first dose. The colored lines represent the number of doses received.



Over a 90-day period, participants with three or more doses faced a risk of catching covid up to SIX TIMES higher than the baseline. Six times higher, over just the first 90 days! But drop down to the zero doses line — the “unvaccinated” — and discover those lucky souls enjoyed the LOWEST risk of infection.

Weird. Seems backwards somehow.

Remarkably, every single dose of the “vaccine” proportionately INCREASED the risk of infections. That strongly suggests some kind of correlation. And it’s not how traditional vaccines work, not at all.

The Cleveland Clinic researchers mused about the unvaccinated and unboosted, which — amazingly — included almost HALF of the healthcare workers in the study. The researchers figured unvaccinated and low-vaccinated people were the ones most likely to NOT wear masks, isolate, or otherwise mitigate their risks but, despite being covid “risk takers,” they were STILL catching covid less often than their boosted co-workers:

[T]hose who received fewer than 3 doses (>45% of individuals in the study) were not those ineligible to receive the vaccine, but those who chose not to follow the CDC’s recommendations on remaining updated with COVID-19 vaccination, and one could reasonably expect these individuals to have been more likely to have exhibited higher risk-taking behavior.

Despite this, their risk of acquiring COVID-19 was lower than those who received a larger number of prior vaccine doses. This is not the only study to find a possible association with more prior vaccine doses and higher risk of COVID-19. A large study found that those who had an Omicron variant infection after previously receiving three doses of vaccine had a higher risk of reinfection than those who had an Omicron variant infection after previously receiving two doses of vaccine.

Another study found that receipt of two or three doses of a mRNA vaccine following prior COVID-19 was associated with a higher risk of reinfection than receipt of a single dose. We still have a lot to learn about protection from COVID-19 vaccination, and in addition to a vaccine’s effectiveness it is important to examine whether multiple vaccine doses given over time may not be having the beneficial effect that is generally assumed.

Alert commenters noted that, during animal trials for earlier failed coronavirus vaccines, the poor mice’s immune systems were completely destroyed. A strange coincidence. It makes you wonder. What do they call doing the same thing over and over again and expecting a different result? It’s called … what’s the word … I can’t think of it right now. But it’s not good.

Pfizer didn’t conduct any animal trials this time, unless you count those eight mice, now deceased.

The study’s authors worked diligently to find SOME effectiveness of the new bivalent vaccine — which is critical for getting past journal editors — and managed to scrape up a “modest” 30% effectiveness rate. Thirty percent. Back in the day, two years ago, vaccines with less than 50% effectiveness could not get FDA approval.

But, times change, especially when you’re moving at the speed of science.

Dr. Kerryn Phelps, former head of the AMA, comes out against COVID vaccines after months after both she and her wife got severe side effects on the Australian Today show.

Dr. Kerryn Phelps, former AMA President, reveals ‘devastating’ Covid vaccine injury, says doctors have been ‘censored’

Dr Kerryn Phelps has broken her silence about a “devastating” Covid vaccine injury, slamming regulators for “censoring” public discussion with “threats” to doctors.

Former federal MP Dr Kerryn Phelps has revealed she and her wife both suffered serious and ongoing injures from Covid vaccines, while suggesting the true rate of adverse events is far higher than acknowledged due to underreporting and “threats” from medical regulators.

In an explosive submission to Parliament’s Long Covid inquiry, the former Australian Medical Association (AMA) president has broken her silence about the “devastating” experience — emerging as the most prominent public health figure in the country to speak up about the taboo subject.

“This is an issue that I have witnessed first-hand with my wife who suffered a severe neurological reaction to her first Pfizer vaccine within minutes, including burning face and gums, paraesethesiae, and numb hands and feet, while under observation by myself, another doctor and a registered nurse at the time of immunisation,” the 65-year-old said.

“I continue to observe the devastating effects a year-and-a-half later with the addition of fatigue and additional neurological symptoms including nerve pains, altered sense of smell, visual disturbance and musculoskeletal inflammation. The diagnosis and causation has been confirmed by several specialists who have told me that they have seen ‘a lot’ of patients in a similar situation.” Dr Phelps married former primary school teacher Jackie Stricker-Phelps in 1998.

“Jackie asked me to include her story to raise awareness for others,” she said.

“We did a lot of homework before having the vaccine, particularly about choice of vaccine at the time. In asking about adverse side effects, we were told that ‘the worst thing that could happen would be anaphylaxis’ and that severe reactions such as myocarditis and pericarditis were ‘rare’.”

Dr Phelps revealed she was also diagnosed with a vaccine injury from her second dose of Pfizer in July 2021, “with the diagnosis and causation confirmed by specialist colleagues”.

“I have had CT pulmonary angiogram, ECG, blood tests, cardiac echogram, transthoracic cardiac stress echo, Holter monitor, blood pressure monitoring and autonomic testing,” she wrote.

“In my case the injury resulted in dysautonomia with intermittent fevers and cardiovascular implications including breathlessness, inappropriate sinus tachycardia and blood pressure fluctuations.”

Dr Phelps said both reactions were reported to the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) “but never followed up”.

She revealed she had spoken with other doctors “who have themselves experienced a serious and persistent adverse event” but that “vaccine injury is a subject that few in the medical profession have wanted to talk about”.

“Regulators of the medical profession have censored public discussion about adverse events following immunisation, with threats to doctors not to make any public statements about anything that ‘might undermine the government’s vaccine rollout’ or risk suspension or loss of their registration,” she wrote.

...

Yeah, these recent news about the RNA vaccines are really not looking good at all.
The Heidelberg autopsy study especially, just read the whole original study paper.

I am certainly convinced enough of their dangers that I will not be getting any shots in the future, and have started talking to family members about them as well. It is good that now there are serious studies that I can point to - because many people will automatically think you are an "anti-vaccine nut" or something if you discuss the downsides. My father for one, discussed the findings of that German autopsy study at length.

I got two doses of the Pfizer one when they originally became available, had no perceivable adverse effects, but decided to call it quits before getting a third one, because the data on their damaging effects started to become widely available then. Also had Covid exactly a year ago, as did my partner. For myself it was certainly one of the worst infections I have ever had - including the swine flu back in the days. Had almost 40 C temperature for close to a week, coughed up foam with some blood in it, had heart palpitations and arrhythmia - continuing up to a month afterward. Partner had a very mild case.

If I get it again, I will only be using cannabidiol oil for treatment. It has no downsides and has been shown to hamper viral replication once inside cells. I have stocked up on lab tested CBD oil so I have plenty of it in the freezer for when it may be needed.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33758843/
Cannabidiol Inhibits SARS-CoV-2 Replication and Promotes the Host Innate Immune Response

https://covid19.nih.gov/news-and-storie ... nt-covid19

In a series of studies supported by the National Institute of General Medical Sciences, the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, the National Cancer Institute (NCI), and the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, researchers tested the effects of CBD and other cannabis compounds on SARS-CoV-2. They looked at interactions between CBD and the virus in human lung cells and in mice. They also analyzed data from the National COVID Cohort Collaborative’s health records of volunteers who had been prescribed the CBD-based medication to help prevent seizures.

What did they learn?

In both the laboratory studies and the health records analyses, CBD seemed to have a protective effect against SARS-CoV-2. When the virus was introduced to human lung cells treated with CBD, it could not replicate and take hold as it usually does. Mice that were given therapeutic doses of CBD before being exposed to the virus were much less likely to develop COVID-19 than mice in the control group. And human patients who took the CBD-based medication were less likely to report a COVID-19 diagnosis than others, including people who had the same seizure disorders but had not been prescribed that medication.

Interestingly, out of more than 100 compounds in cannabis, only CBD showed this protective effect. In fact, when CBD was combined with THC, its ability to protect decreased.

.

https://www.thefp.com/p/how-twitter-rig ... vid-debate

How Twitter Rigged the Covid Debate

The platform suppressed true information from doctors and public-health experts that was at odds with U.S. government policy.

By David Zweig

Monday, Dec 26, 2022

By the time reporter David Zweig got to the 10th floor conference room at Twitter Headquarters on Market Street in San Francisco, the story of the Twitter Files was already international news. Matt Taibbi, Michael Shellenberger, Leighton Woodhouse, Abigail Shrier, Lee Fang and I had revealed evidence of hidden blacklists of Twitter users; the way Twitter acted as a kind of FBI subsidiary; and how company executives rewrote the platform’s policies on the fly to accommodate political bias and pressure.

What we had yet to crack was the story of Covid.

David has spent three years reporting on Covid—specifically the underlying science, or lack thereof, behind many of our nation’s policies. For years he had noticed and criticized a bias not only in the mainstream media’s coverage of the pandemic, but also in the way it was presented on platforms like Twitter.

David has spent three years reporting on Covid—specifically the underlying science, or lack thereof, behind many of our nation’s policies. For years he had noticed and criticized a bias not only in the mainstream media’s coverage of the pandemic, but also in the way it was presented on platforms like Twitter.

We couldn’t think of anyone better to tackle this story. — BW


*****************

I had always thought a primary job of the press was to be skeptical of power—especially the power of the government. But during the Covid-19 pandemic, I and so many others found that the legacy media had shown itself to largely operate as a messaging platform for our public health institutions. Those institutions operated in near total lockstep, in part by purging internal dissidents and discrediting outside experts.

Twitter became an essential alternative. It was a place where those with public health expertise and perspectives at odds with official policy could air their views—and where curious citizens could find such information. This often included other countries’ responses to Covid that differed dramatically from our own.

But it quickly became clear that Twitter also seemed to promote content that reinforced the establishment narrative, and to suppress views and even scientific evidence that ran to the contrary.

....

Continued at link.

Musk and the 'new' Twitter -- and wherever these 'reveals' may lead in the months ahead -- are likely/potential limited hangouts, perhaps part of a larger agenda that includes a 'controlled' and incremental systemic collapse, which in turn opens the door for a new system, etc.

There is value in these disclosures to the discerning mind, regardless of motive.

Nothing is known for certain, or guaranteed to occur.
There is cause for optimism.