Paul McCartney as a rigorous intuition subject.

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

Post Reply
User avatar
IanEye
Posts: 4866
Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2006 10:33 pm

Re: Paul McCartney as a rigorous intuition subject.

Post by IanEye »

well, i agree with you there....

Mike looks kind of like a Kink....
User avatar
Hugh Manatee Wins
Posts: 9869
Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2005 6:51 pm
Location: in context

Re: Paul McCartney as a rigorous intuition subject.

Post by Hugh Manatee Wins »

Classic example of CIA misdirection through rumor.

J. Edgar Hoover memo-ed in 1960 that there were two people using Lee Harvey Oswald's passport.
Oops.

As critics of the Warren Commission started to discover that there was someone who looked like Oswald stomping around visibly patsy-ing him up for the Big Deed, it became necessary to deploy misdirection.
In 1966 Prof. Richard Popkin published 'The Two Oswalds.'
http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/JFKpopkin.htm

Enter the "two Pauls" nonsense.

Elvis was also used for rumor misdirection, besides his movies.
Lots of controversy and cover-up over live sightings of Americans still held prisoner in Southeast Asia.

Enter the eye-rolling "Elvis is alive" nonsense.
By remarkable coincidence, some of the unlisted POWs who came back were held in a secret isolated section of a Hanoi prison called...'the Heartbreak Hotel.' These returnees proved that there were LIVE prisoners not accounted for by the Pentagon.

Wouldn't be surprised if Elvis was bumped off just for this meme hijacking for national security justifications. Celebrities and the name-game are prime tools for psyops.
CIA runs mainstream media since WWII:
news rooms, movies/TV, publishing
...
Disney is CIA for kidz!
User avatar
IanEye
Posts: 4866
Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2006 10:33 pm

but eye'm not the only one...

Post by IanEye »

When I was a child, ladies and gentlemen, I was a dreamer.
I read comic books, and I was the hero of the comic book.
I saw movies, and I was the hero in the movie.
So every dream that I've ever dreamed has come true a hundred times.


I'd like to say that I learned very early in life that,
without a song - the day would never end.
Without a song - a man ain't got a friend. 
Without a song - the road would never bend.
Without a song...

So I keep singing a song.
- Elvis Presley


.
vince
Posts: 509
Joined: Fri Feb 29, 2008 11:19 pm

Re: Paul McCartney as a rigorous intuition subject.

Post by vince »

I'm sorry if I'm trying to steer the subject: I'm just saying, here's a guy who's made 80 of these things:
http://www.youtube.com/user/iamaphoney


Just a 'freak' with an editing machine?
User avatar
whipstitch
Posts: 415
Joined: Mon Sep 05, 2005 12:28 am

Re: Paul McCartney as a rigorous intuition subject.

Post by whipstitch »

vince wrote:I'm sorry if I'm trying to steer the subject: I'm just saying, here's a guy who's made 80 of these things:
http://www.youtube.com/user/iamaphoney

Just a 'freak' with an editing machine?
I'm still thinking it's an 'inside job' 8)
Hammer of Los
Posts: 3309
Joined: Sat Dec 23, 2006 4:48 pm

Re: Paul McCartney as a rigorous intuition subject.

Post by Hammer of Los »

Bruce Dazzling wrote:As for McCartney, well, there's much more going on with him than meets the eye, but it's very new world orderesque in its denseness and complexity. Either he really was replaced, or they've spent a great deal of time and effort trying to get people to THINK that he was replaced. I'm not 100% certain which is the case, but I believe that the reason the clues were planted were to get people scouring the Beatles' work with a fine-toothed comb, because most of the Paul is Dead clues are wrapped up in mystery school type esoterica. Researching Paul is Dead soon leads to astrology, mythology, synchronicity, biblical study, Eastern religions, chakras, ancient Egypt, the Mayas, the Sumerians, etc. I believe that they saw themselves as modern day prophets, charged with waking people up to the reality beneath the reality.
Youre joking me, right?

I aint got no more time this year for rabbit hole jumping.

I've been through so many rabbit holes I don't know up from down any more.

The Paul stuff I am happy to believe is nonsense. It might well be distracting/discrediting nonsense deliberately peddled.

80 episodes? If I step in there I'll be falling for a while.

But thanks Bruce, you gave me a chuckle.

:lol:
User avatar
whipstitch
Posts: 415
Joined: Mon Sep 05, 2005 12:28 am

Re: Paul McCartney as a rigorous intuition subject.

Post by whipstitch »

Finally proof positive!

iamaphoney = Paul McCartney...

http://twitter.com/iamaphoney
bardobailey
Posts: 175
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 2:35 pm
Location: Hard to say

Re: Paul McCartney as a rigorous intuition subject.

Post by bardobailey »

How the fuck did Our Paulie turn into Mickey Roarke?
User avatar
Bruce Dazzling
Posts: 2306
Joined: Wed Dec 26, 2007 2:25 pm
spambot: no
Location: Yes

Re: Paul McCartney as a rigorous intuition subject.

Post by Bruce Dazzling »

Hammer of Los wrote:
Bruce Dazzling wrote:As for McCartney, well, there's much more going on with him than meets the eye, but it's very new world orderesque in its denseness and complexity. Either he really was replaced, or they've spent a great deal of time and effort trying to get people to THINK that he was replaced. I'm not 100% certain which is the case, but I believe that the reason the clues were planted were to get people scouring the Beatles' work with a fine-toothed comb, because most of the Paul is Dead clues are wrapped up in mystery school type esoterica. Researching Paul is Dead soon leads to astrology, mythology, synchronicity, biblical study, Eastern religions, chakras, ancient Egypt, the Mayas, the Sumerians, etc. I believe that they saw themselves as modern day prophets, charged with waking people up to the reality beneath the reality.
Youre joking me, right?

I aint got no more time this year for rabbit hole jumping.

I've been through so many rabbit holes I don't know up from down any more.

The Paul stuff I am happy to believe is nonsense. It might well be distracting/discrediting nonsense deliberately peddled.

80 episodes? If I step in there I'll be falling for a while.

But thanks Bruce, you gave me a chuckle.

:lol:
Nope. I'm not joking you, Hammer of Los.

I've been investigating the Paul is Dead phenomenon since I was about 12, and that was a long time ago.

If you're "happy to believe it's nonsense", then It's not something I'm going to be able to convince you of, so I won't even try.

Suffice it to say, though, that it IS a rabbit hole that runs very deep. But trying to convince somebody who's not open to the idea is like trying to convince somebody that the world is run by a corporo-miltary-banking elite. It's so dense and far-reaching that the convincer just ends up looking crazy to the convincee.

Best,

Bruce
"Arrogance is experiential and environmental in cause. Human experience can make and unmake arrogance. Ours is about to get unmade."

~ Joe Bageant R.I.P.

OWS Photo Essay

OWS Photo Essay - Part 2
User avatar
barracuda
Posts: 12890
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 5:58 pm
Location: Niles, California

Re: Paul McCartney as a rigorous intuition subject.

Post by barracuda »

Bruce Dazzling wrote:...most of the Paul is Dead clues are wrapped up in mystery school type esoterica. Researching Paul is Dead soon leads to astrology, mythology, synchronicity, biblical study, Eastern religions, chakras, ancient Egypt, the Mayas, the Sumerians, etc.
I find the whole Paulian mystery fascinating, Bruce. Lay out as much of it as you feel you'd like to, and you'll have at least one interested reader.
The most dangerous traps are the ones you set for yourself. - [i]Phillip Marlowe[/i]
User avatar
Bruce Dazzling
Posts: 2306
Joined: Wed Dec 26, 2007 2:25 pm
spambot: no
Location: Yes

Re: Paul McCartney as a rigorous intuition subject.

Post by Bruce Dazzling »

barracuda wrote:
Bruce Dazzling wrote:...most of the Paul is Dead clues are wrapped up in mystery school type esoterica. Researching Paul is Dead soon leads to astrology, mythology, synchronicity, biblical study, Eastern religions, chakras, ancient Egypt, the Mayas, the Sumerians, etc.
I find the whole Paulian mystery fascinating, Bruce. Lay out as much of it as you feel you'd like to, and you'll have at least one interested reader.
Well, it's too much to lay out now, as it's late, and there are many different angles of approach.

The literal version is that Paul died in a car crash on 9/11/66, and that a replacement was groomed by Beatles roadie, and trusted inner circle member, Mal Evans, who happened to go on safari with Paul to Kenya during the Beatles longest break in years, in September of 1966 (also coinciding with their announcement that they were not going to play live shows any more). When they got back from Kenya, Paul fired his housekeeper, and Mal moved in with him.

Fast forward to January 5, 1976, when Mal died in a "suicide by cop" in LA. He was scheduled to deliver his book, Living The Beatles' Legend, on January 12, but his briefcase disappeared, and the book was never published.

Here are some very odd photos of Paul from that Kenya trip.

Image

Image

Image

Meanwhile, here's Paul on August 29, 1966, during the Beatles interview for their final show at Candlestick Park in San Francisco.

Image

On November 1, 1966, the first car crash rumors began to circulate.

On November 24, work began on Sgt. Pepper, which was a complete departure musically, and the cover of which is a funeral scene with a left handed bass made of flowers that spells Paul? (among all sorts of other very interesting imagery, including possibly a car crash below the Shirley Temple doll's left foot).

Image

If one holds a mirror up to the words LONELY HEARTS, one sees: I ONE IX HE<>DIE, with the diamond pointing up to Paul.

It spells out 11/9 He Die, which in European parlance is 9/11, or September 11th.

Image

The clues go on, and on, into their solo careers, right up to this day, and as I said before, it's way too much to document here.

And that's all just the literal "car crash" story, that happens to jibe with the lyric for A Day in the Life, among many others.

But, like I said earlier, I'm more interested in the idea that the clues were were wrapped up in mystery school esoterica, with the goal of "initiating" those who took the time to investigate.

That story will have to wait for another day, though.

I will leave you tonight with a series of videos that begin as a conversation between a skeptic and and a believer, and descend into a world of esoterica and synchronicities.

Enjoy.

"Arrogance is experiential and environmental in cause. Human experience can make and unmake arrogance. Ours is about to get unmade."

~ Joe Bageant R.I.P.

OWS Photo Essay

OWS Photo Essay - Part 2
User avatar
The Consul
Posts: 1247
Joined: Fri Mar 26, 2010 2:41 am
spambot: no
Location: Ompholos, Disambiguation

Re: Paul McCartney as a rigorous intuition subject.

Post by The Consul »

"I don't believe in Beatles" - John Lennon
" Morals is the butter for those who have no bread."
— B. Traven
Nordic
Posts: 14230
Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2006 3:36 am
Location: California USA

Re: Paul McCartney as a rigorous intuition subject.

Post by Nordic »

Here's that shot in the context of the video, showing that it's actually two different people, as opposed to just some studio trickery.
Uh .... in fact, in the video, it sure looks like "studio trickery" to me. Not even very well done. One of the faces is keyed in.
"He who wounds the ecosphere literally wounds God" -- Philip K. Dick
User avatar
justdrew
Posts: 11966
Joined: Tue May 24, 2005 7:57 pm
spambot: no
Location: unknown
Contact:

Re: Paul McCartney as a rigorous intuition subject.

Post by justdrew »

wait, was the crash on the 11th or the 18th?

loving "Paul is Dead at the End of the World" what a great find

the first 1:20 of part three is hilarious.

Here we see one Richard Starkey, dressed as Ringo Starr's temporary replacement...
Image

Does anyone know what event this is... Note the button... what is that from? Actually I think it may just be a sticker. looks like burning man maybe?
Image
By 1964 there were 1.5 million mobile phone users in the US
User avatar
whipstitch
Posts: 415
Joined: Mon Sep 05, 2005 12:28 am

Re: Paul McCartney as a rigorous intuition subject.

Post by whipstitch »

Image

Image

Image Image
Post Reply