Page 6 of 20

Re: Paul McCartney as a rigorous intuition subject.

Posted: Mon Apr 12, 2010 1:00 pm
by IanEye
well, i agree with you there....

Mike looks kind of like a Kink....

Re: Paul McCartney as a rigorous intuition subject.

Posted: Mon Apr 12, 2010 1:11 pm
by Hugh Manatee Wins
Classic example of CIA misdirection through rumor.

J. Edgar Hoover memo-ed in 1960 that there were two people using Lee Harvey Oswald's passport.
Oops.

As critics of the Warren Commission started to discover that there was someone who looked like Oswald stomping around visibly patsy-ing him up for the Big Deed, it became necessary to deploy misdirection.
In 1966 Prof. Richard Popkin published 'The Two Oswalds.'
http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/JFKpopkin.htm

Enter the "two Pauls" nonsense.

Elvis was also used for rumor misdirection, besides his movies.
Lots of controversy and cover-up over live sightings of Americans still held prisoner in Southeast Asia.

Enter the eye-rolling "Elvis is alive" nonsense.
By remarkable coincidence, some of the unlisted POWs who came back were held in a secret isolated section of a Hanoi prison called...'the Heartbreak Hotel.' These returnees proved that there were LIVE prisoners not accounted for by the Pentagon.

Wouldn't be surprised if Elvis was bumped off just for this meme hijacking for national security justifications. Celebrities and the name-game are prime tools for psyops.

but eye'm not the only one...

Posted: Mon Apr 12, 2010 1:23 pm
by IanEye
When I was a child, ladies and gentlemen, I was a dreamer.
I read comic books, and I was the hero of the comic book.
I saw movies, and I was the hero in the movie.
So every dream that I've ever dreamed has come true a hundred times.


I'd like to say that I learned very early in life that,
without a song - the day would never end.
Without a song - a man ain't got a friend. 
Without a song - the road would never bend.
Without a song...

So I keep singing a song.
- Elvis Presley


.

Re: Paul McCartney as a rigorous intuition subject.

Posted: Mon Apr 12, 2010 3:31 pm
by vince
I'm sorry if I'm trying to steer the subject: I'm just saying, here's a guy who's made 80 of these things:
http://www.youtube.com/user/iamaphoney


Just a 'freak' with an editing machine?

Re: Paul McCartney as a rigorous intuition subject.

Posted: Mon Apr 12, 2010 4:00 pm
by whipstitch
vince wrote:I'm sorry if I'm trying to steer the subject: I'm just saying, here's a guy who's made 80 of these things:
http://www.youtube.com/user/iamaphoney

Just a 'freak' with an editing machine?
I'm still thinking it's an 'inside job' 8)

Re: Paul McCartney as a rigorous intuition subject.

Posted: Mon Apr 12, 2010 5:47 pm
by Hammer of Los
Bruce Dazzling wrote:As for McCartney, well, there's much more going on with him than meets the eye, but it's very new world orderesque in its denseness and complexity. Either he really was replaced, or they've spent a great deal of time and effort trying to get people to THINK that he was replaced. I'm not 100% certain which is the case, but I believe that the reason the clues were planted were to get people scouring the Beatles' work with a fine-toothed comb, because most of the Paul is Dead clues are wrapped up in mystery school type esoterica. Researching Paul is Dead soon leads to astrology, mythology, synchronicity, biblical study, Eastern religions, chakras, ancient Egypt, the Mayas, the Sumerians, etc. I believe that they saw themselves as modern day prophets, charged with waking people up to the reality beneath the reality.
Youre joking me, right?

I aint got no more time this year for rabbit hole jumping.

I've been through so many rabbit holes I don't know up from down any more.

The Paul stuff I am happy to believe is nonsense. It might well be distracting/discrediting nonsense deliberately peddled.

80 episodes? If I step in there I'll be falling for a while.

But thanks Bruce, you gave me a chuckle.

:lol:

Re: Paul McCartney as a rigorous intuition subject.

Posted: Mon Apr 12, 2010 6:53 pm
by whipstitch
Finally proof positive!

iamaphoney = Paul McCartney...

http://twitter.com/iamaphoney

Re: Paul McCartney as a rigorous intuition subject.

Posted: Mon Apr 12, 2010 7:09 pm
by bardobailey
How the fuck did Our Paulie turn into Mickey Roarke?

Re: Paul McCartney as a rigorous intuition subject.

Posted: Mon Apr 12, 2010 11:25 pm
by Bruce Dazzling
Hammer of Los wrote:
Bruce Dazzling wrote:As for McCartney, well, there's much more going on with him than meets the eye, but it's very new world orderesque in its denseness and complexity. Either he really was replaced, or they've spent a great deal of time and effort trying to get people to THINK that he was replaced. I'm not 100% certain which is the case, but I believe that the reason the clues were planted were to get people scouring the Beatles' work with a fine-toothed comb, because most of the Paul is Dead clues are wrapped up in mystery school type esoterica. Researching Paul is Dead soon leads to astrology, mythology, synchronicity, biblical study, Eastern religions, chakras, ancient Egypt, the Mayas, the Sumerians, etc. I believe that they saw themselves as modern day prophets, charged with waking people up to the reality beneath the reality.
Youre joking me, right?

I aint got no more time this year for rabbit hole jumping.

I've been through so many rabbit holes I don't know up from down any more.

The Paul stuff I am happy to believe is nonsense. It might well be distracting/discrediting nonsense deliberately peddled.

80 episodes? If I step in there I'll be falling for a while.

But thanks Bruce, you gave me a chuckle.

:lol:
Nope. I'm not joking you, Hammer of Los.

I've been investigating the Paul is Dead phenomenon since I was about 12, and that was a long time ago.

If you're "happy to believe it's nonsense", then It's not something I'm going to be able to convince you of, so I won't even try.

Suffice it to say, though, that it IS a rabbit hole that runs very deep. But trying to convince somebody who's not open to the idea is like trying to convince somebody that the world is run by a corporo-miltary-banking elite. It's so dense and far-reaching that the convincer just ends up looking crazy to the convincee.

Best,

Bruce

Re: Paul McCartney as a rigorous intuition subject.

Posted: Mon Apr 12, 2010 11:35 pm
by barracuda
Bruce Dazzling wrote:...most of the Paul is Dead clues are wrapped up in mystery school type esoterica. Researching Paul is Dead soon leads to astrology, mythology, synchronicity, biblical study, Eastern religions, chakras, ancient Egypt, the Mayas, the Sumerians, etc.
I find the whole Paulian mystery fascinating, Bruce. Lay out as much of it as you feel you'd like to, and you'll have at least one interested reader.

Re: Paul McCartney as a rigorous intuition subject.

Posted: Tue Apr 13, 2010 12:47 am
by Bruce Dazzling
barracuda wrote:
Bruce Dazzling wrote:...most of the Paul is Dead clues are wrapped up in mystery school type esoterica. Researching Paul is Dead soon leads to astrology, mythology, synchronicity, biblical study, Eastern religions, chakras, ancient Egypt, the Mayas, the Sumerians, etc.
I find the whole Paulian mystery fascinating, Bruce. Lay out as much of it as you feel you'd like to, and you'll have at least one interested reader.
Well, it's too much to lay out now, as it's late, and there are many different angles of approach.

The literal version is that Paul died in a car crash on 9/11/66, and that a replacement was groomed by Beatles roadie, and trusted inner circle member, Mal Evans, who happened to go on safari with Paul to Kenya during the Beatles longest break in years, in September of 1966 (also coinciding with their announcement that they were not going to play live shows any more). When they got back from Kenya, Paul fired his housekeeper, and Mal moved in with him.

Fast forward to January 5, 1976, when Mal died in a "suicide by cop" in LA. He was scheduled to deliver his book, Living The Beatles' Legend, on January 12, but his briefcase disappeared, and the book was never published.

Here are some very odd photos of Paul from that Kenya trip.

Image

Image

Image

Meanwhile, here's Paul on August 29, 1966, during the Beatles interview for their final show at Candlestick Park in San Francisco.

Image

On November 1, 1966, the first car crash rumors began to circulate.

On November 24, work began on Sgt. Pepper, which was a complete departure musically, and the cover of which is a funeral scene with a left handed bass made of flowers that spells Paul? (among all sorts of other very interesting imagery, including possibly a car crash below the Shirley Temple doll's left foot).

Image

If one holds a mirror up to the words LONELY HEARTS, one sees: I ONE IX HE<>DIE, with the diamond pointing up to Paul.

It spells out 11/9 He Die, which in European parlance is 9/11, or September 11th.

Image

The clues go on, and on, into their solo careers, right up to this day, and as I said before, it's way too much to document here.

And that's all just the literal "car crash" story, that happens to jibe with the lyric for A Day in the Life, among many others.

But, like I said earlier, I'm more interested in the idea that the clues were were wrapped up in mystery school esoterica, with the goal of "initiating" those who took the time to investigate.

That story will have to wait for another day, though.

I will leave you tonight with a series of videos that begin as a conversation between a skeptic and and a believer, and descend into a world of esoterica and synchronicities.

Enjoy.


Re: Paul McCartney as a rigorous intuition subject.

Posted: Tue Apr 13, 2010 1:13 am
by The Consul
"I don't believe in Beatles" - John Lennon

Re: Paul McCartney as a rigorous intuition subject.

Posted: Tue Apr 13, 2010 1:24 am
by Nordic
Here's that shot in the context of the video, showing that it's actually two different people, as opposed to just some studio trickery.
Uh .... in fact, in the video, it sure looks like "studio trickery" to me. Not even very well done. One of the faces is keyed in.

Re: Paul McCartney as a rigorous intuition subject.

Posted: Tue Apr 13, 2010 1:34 am
by justdrew
wait, was the crash on the 11th or the 18th?

loving "Paul is Dead at the End of the World" what a great find

the first 1:20 of part three is hilarious.

Here we see one Richard Starkey, dressed as Ringo Starr's temporary replacement...
Image

Does anyone know what event this is... Note the button... what is that from? Actually I think it may just be a sticker. looks like burning man maybe?
Image

Re: Paul McCartney as a rigorous intuition subject.

Posted: Tue Apr 13, 2010 2:07 am
by whipstitch
Image

Image

Image Image