Posted: Sat Jul 04, 2009 2:59 pm
I think all candidates are vetted by the CIA and marginalized if they aren't on the same page as intel. The US isn't a true democracy.
What you don't know can't hurt them.
https://www.rigorousintuition.ca/board2/
https://www.rigorousintuition.ca/board2/viewtopic.php?t=24299
Exactly. If Ventura with his limited ability to affect real change, got the treatment, what might Obama have gotten if he wasn't bought and paid for or thoroughly unnerved by the potential for dirty tricks, already?Sweejak wrote:Oh, that reminds me of Jesse Ventura's experience with the CIA after his first (I think) election.
Here's a viddy:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K30siX8-9sU
No doubt about it. "CIA" is probably not exactly the right shorthand for it, although "NWO" certainly is not. You might call it the consensus of the cryptocracy within the national security state. It also works easily enough through the familiar, sociologically-analyzable means of ideology. If you're describing any part of the empire for what it is, you will be winnowed out of contention automatically by the big campaign-money flows and the institutions of the corporate media, who are programmed to marginalize any open subversiveness. Example: You can say Iraq was the wrong idea for defending America, or was done the wrong way by incompetents. Roughly the Obama-to-Franken position. But you can't say it was a long-planned war of imperialism for the purpose of redrawing the map in the oil-rich part of the world, and a crime against humanity initiated on conscious, outrageous lies. If you do, there will be no need for the CIA to vet you; NBC and CNN and WaPo will take care of you many months in advance of an election.agitprop wrote:I think all candidates are vetted by the CIA and marginalized if they aren't on the same page as intel. The US isn't a true democracy.
The Strawberry Statement is a non-fiction book by James Simon Kunen, written when he was 19, which chronicled his experiences at Columbia University from 1966–1968, particularly the April 1968 protests and takeover of the office of the dean of Columbia by student protesters. [1]
Contents
(SNIP)
The title comes from a statement made by Herbert Deane, a Columbia administrator, who deprecated student opinions about university administrative decisions as having no more importance than if the students had said they liked the taste of strawberries.
The comment on Cannonfire cites the passage from "The Strawberry Statement":In his book The Strawberry Statement, former student protester James Kunen reports a description of Business International by an unnamed Students for a Democratic Society conference attendee in 1968. The attendee, referred to by Kunen as 'the kid', claimed the company offered to finance SDS demonstrations in Chicago. Business International is described as 'the left wing of the ruling class' and as desiring a Gene McCarthy presidency.[1]
(SNIP)
The company has been identified as cover organization for the Central Intelligence Agency, e.g. see Lobster Magazine, issue 14 in 1987. According to a lengthy article in the New York Times in 1977, the co-founder of the company told the newspaper that "Eldridge Haynes [the other founder] had provided cover for four CIA employees in various countries between 1955 and 1960".[3]
.glennmcgahee wrote:Note the following description from the book 'The Strawberry Statement'. Business International is described as the 'the left wing of the ruling class' and as financing radical organizations. This was published in 1970:
"Also at the convention, men from Business International Roundtables - the meetings sponsored by Business International for their client groups and heads of government - tried to buy up a few radicals. These men are the world's leading industrialists and they convene to decide how our lives are going to go. These are the boys who wrote the Alliance for Progress. They're the left wing of the ruling class.
"They agreed with us on black control and student control. They were for kicking out Kirk. Only thing they disagree with us on was imperialism. They figure we've got the technology the world needs, and we ought to have some control over where it goes and for what.
"They want [Gene] McCarthy in. They see fascism as the threat, see it coming from Wallace. The only way McCarthy could win is if the crazies and young radicals act up and make Gene look more reasonable. They offered to finance our demonstrations in Chicago.
"We were also offered Esso (Rockefeller) money. They want us to make a lot of radical commotion so they can look more in the center as they move to the left."
I think you have it the wrong way around.Hugh Manatee Wins wrote:Obama's passport has the evidence of his trip for CIA in the 80s.
That's why there's a decoy hubbub focusing on his birth certificate. Besides the obvious value of stirring up racist nationalists.
Keyword hijacking of "document cover-up."