rigorousintuition.ca

uncanny !

wonder if the (mighty similar to) fasces in the background count as subliminal programming?.....Hugh?

zangtang » Tue Oct 20, 2015 9:51 am wrote:uncanny !

wonder if the (mighty similar to) fasces in the background count as subliminal programming?.....Hugh?

Good Catch. I do hope with Gilliam deep subliminal symbolism is more apt. I have been unpacking the background of that movie for 2 decades now ever since my kid made me watch it a thousand times in the early years of his life. I had never noticed that before, thanks. I wouldn't be surprised if that detail was intentional,

Mea culpa, I misquoted.

Oh, We cater for all sorts here....you'd be surprised.

yeah, but

I still REALLY want that mission patch all over a tshirt !

alternately beautiful & creepy as hell.

Plus, I know plaster of paris when i see it !

Joao » Thu Oct 29, 2015 12:27 pm wrote:[Images]

zangtang » Thu Oct 29, 2015 2:00 pm wrote:alternately beautiful & creepy as hell.

Plus, I know plaster of paris when i see it !

Goddamn it, now the first one totally looks like plaster to me. Perhaps we're all programs on a microchip. Or perhaps I am, anyway.



"Inside the (Crisis) Actors Studio"

momentary glimpse of clarity? - F-inging Priceless!!!!!!!

alas, not funny. - still,
there's worse to come.

Stargate's gone downhill a bit.................

parel » Mon Dec 07, 2015 2:29 pm wrote:

smoking since 1879 » Thu Dec 17, 2015 10:41 am wrote:

Thank you, smoking. That MGM photo was somewhat traumatizing--I'm relieved to realize it's 'shopped (rather obviously, I see now).

Joao » Thu Dec 17, 2015 11:51 pm wrote:

parel » Mon Dec 07, 2015 2:29 pm wrote:

smoking since 1879 » Thu Dec 17, 2015 10:41 am wrote:

Thank you, smoking. That MGM photo was somewhat traumatizing--I'm relieved to realize it's 'shopped (rather obviously, I see now).

yup, was relieved to find the original

Regarding this image

All unfiltered radar images captured in one hour, 3:15pm to 4:15pm September 5, 2015.

This begs for a caption!

"No. Not even that one."

"This is what you're getting, dude. You can't afford that."

Iamwhomiam » Tue Feb 02, 2016 4:53 am wrote:This begs for a caption!

"No. Not even that one."

"This is what you're getting, dude. You can't afford that."

Do I get a discount if i buy in bulk?

Regarding 4 CHILDREN FOR SALE photograph by Dorothea Lange:
http://rigorousintuition.ca/board2/view ... 40#p596840

Sold-off siblings shown in old photo tell their stories
http://www.nwitimes.com/news/local/lake ... e2082.html

CHILDREN FOR SALE CHICAGO 1948
The Story Behind The Picture
https://iloveoldphotos.wordpress.com/20 ... cago-1948/

black pawn to queen's mishap 4.......