Posted: Thu Nov 05, 2009 7:52 am
How so? Are you suggesting the WHO is promoting the spread of the virus?
What you don't know can't hurt them.
https://www.rigorousintuition.ca/board2/
https://www.rigorousintuition.ca/board2/viewtopic.php?t=23673
I remember a mathematics lecturer being asked finally by a dismayedI've seen this written in several places now with no further explanation, as if it's obvious. Is it?
Well, I wouldn't use the word "test", but if they aren't "studying" this process, they have rocks in their collective heads. If Katrina didn't teach us anything else, it should have taught us that our welfare is woefully dependent on inadequate--and incompetent--responses to crises. I have to admit that that's half of what attracted me to watching this bug--studying the process of the response. The other half was learning about the science of the bug. And frankly, I think the response has been pretty good, so far. I'm impressed. Of course, we're lucky it wasn't a very deadly one.I really think this whole 'swine flu emergency" is being used as a test. I think that the US govt and international health organizations are using this fairly innocuous virus (whether natural or manufactured) as an opportunity to test their systems: the health care response system, the government health emergency system, the vaccine manufacture distribution system, the media propaganda and public manipulation system, etc.
They are gathering data see how the public responds, how a virus spreads, who wants vaccinations, who refuses vaccinations so when something much more virulent evolves (or gets released in a bio warfare action), they will be more prepared.
I'd like to massage this finding of yours, if I may.chiggerbit wrote:~ Finding #1: xx% will see any and all crises as a government conspiracy, and as a result, will respond in an oppostional manner.
Yeah, we're watching them and they're watching us.chiggerbit wrote:Well, I wouldn't use the word "test", but if they aren't "studying" this process, they have rocks in their collective heads. If Katrina didn't teach us anything else, it should have taught us that our welfare is woefully dependent on inadequate--and incompetent--responses to crises. I have to admit that that's half of what attracted me to watching this bug--studying the process of the response.
I think the motivation is mostly just money and the power to direct the flow of it. We're all just pawns on their grand chessboard.Sounder wrote:I think you are calling it well whipstitch. It seems the whole reason for being for some folk is to design and control false narratives.
Maybe to stymie natural growth in consciousness?
I don't know. I guess it's easy for ust to sit in front of our computers and jaw about whether or not the state of emergency was needed. But I have a feeling that if either of us had been a nurse on the front lines lately, say for instance, working double shifts and dealing with people with swine flu on respirators in your hospital, and you just watched the last of your hospital's respirators go into use, you might have a different outlook on the need for the declaration that would facilitate the sharing across the country of those limited machines, transporting equipment from one area not hit yet to your area where the flu was spreading like wildfire. Or prepared to transport personnel, if needed. I was kind of surprised the emergency wasn't declared a week or two earlier than it was. Why wait until the peak has arrived? Well, I'm assuming the peak is almost here.Yeah, we're watching them and they're watching us.
The reason I say 'test' is because I think they are pushing the 'state of emergency' meme as much as possible in order to provoke a more intense response from all levels (families, activists, health care workers, etc) and then studying that response.
And let me add that it isn't just our healthcare system that's being run this way--our food supplies are also run on a jit model. There's very little storage nowadays.And let me say, seriously, that one of the weaknesses of our emergency healthcare system in this country is depending on the business model used by service providers such as hospitals on a "just enough" or "just in time" model such as Walmart uses to stock little kiddie swimming pools only at the beginning of the summer.
-...An article in the Washington Post suggests that the closer the nation comes to pandemic status, the more taxed the Internet becomes.
Parents staying home with sick kids, and the sick kids themselves, are all using the Internet from home, pressuring local area networks, and that could tax the telecommunications system as a whole.
The Post cites a Government Accountability Office report that maintains “if the flu reaches a pandemic, a surge in telecommuting and children accessing video files and games at home could bog down local networks.
According to the Post, the Department of Homeland Security it “doesn’t have a strategy to deal with overloaded Internet networks — an essential resource to keep the economy humming, and residents informed and connected during a pandemic, the GAO said.”
Officials at Arvig Communications did not return calls seeking information as to whether local network usage has been up, correlating with massive local school absences....