Page 56 of 296

Re: TRUMP is seriously dangerous

Posted: Fri Apr 15, 2016 11:35 pm
by 82_28
Join us in the lounge! I think it's basically me right now unloading my chamber of pranks.

Re: TRUMP is seriously dangerous

Posted: Sat Apr 16, 2016 1:00 am
by Freitag
Nordic » Fri Apr 15, 2016 10:59 am wrote:Not sure you know many immigrants. Where do you live? I live in a city of immigrants, and there's nothing wrong with "national honor" considering they're all very happy to be in America and either are already Americans or are in the process of becoming Americans.

Some of the most "patriotic" people I know are immigrants, actually.


I wasn't talking about immigrants, it's Americans who are devaluing our own culture.

(And, to defend my street cred, I'm in CA. Speak good Spanish, grew up around Mexicans, Hmongs, Sikhs, everybody. To contrast my childhood with my mother's, though, who grew up in lily-white Kansas in the 60s, I asked her the other day if she ever felt culturally deprived as a child. I was surprised that she didn't. She felt she grew up in the greatest country on Earth and loved her little hometown. Somehow the lawns got mowed, dishes got washed, roads and buildings got constructed, despite these being jobs that I've been told Americans won't do.)

Re: TRUMP is seriously dangerous

Posted: Sat Apr 16, 2016 5:30 am
by Nordic
Is it me, or has the "news" media quit talking about Trump 24/7 like they were?

Re: TRUMP is seriously dangerous

Posted: Sat Apr 16, 2016 10:30 am
by 82_28
Yeah. His novelty seems to have worn off. I've noticed it too. Seems like Cruz THE MOST DANGEROUS one there is is overtaking the cycles. Say what you want about the comedy shows and whatnot, but they have done a good job so far of derailing Trump. I think they are setting their sights on Cruz now. Not sure, but it seems like it.

Re: TRUMP is seriously dangerous

Posted: Sat Apr 16, 2016 1:18 pm
by Freitag
Well there haven't been any primaries since Colorado. There's not much to talk about.

Re: TRUMP is seriously dangerous

Posted: Sat Apr 16, 2016 1:58 pm
by Burnt Hill
Freitag » Sat Apr 16, 2016 1:18 pm wrote:Well there haven't been any primaries since Colorado. There's not much to talk about.

Right, and that was a primary in which not one citizen voted, and Cruz got all the delegates.
This will be the impetus in Trumps campaign moving forward.

Re: TRUMP is seriously dangerous

Posted: Sat Apr 16, 2016 6:21 pm
by Freitag
Burnt Hill » Sat Apr 16, 2016 6:58 am wrote:
Freitag » Sat Apr 16, 2016 1:18 pm wrote:Well there haven't been any primaries since Colorado. There's not much to talk about.

Right, and that was a primary in which not one citizen voted, and Cruz got all the delegates.
This will be the impetus in Trumps campaign moving forward.


I agree. The more hysterical the opposition to Trump gets, the more it makes me want him to win. I think Colorado fired up his supporters. The latest poll shows Trump at record highs, while Cruz has plummeted.

Re: TRUMP is seriously dangerous

Posted: Sat Apr 16, 2016 6:48 pm
by Burnt Hill
Freitag » Sat Apr 16, 2016 6:21 pm wrote:
Burnt Hill » Sat Apr 16, 2016 6:58 am wrote:
Freitag » Sat Apr 16, 2016 1:18 pm wrote:Well there haven't been any primaries since Colorado. There's not much to talk about.

Right, and that was a primary in which not one citizen voted, and Cruz got all the delegates.
This will be the impetus in Trumps campaign moving forward.


I agree. The more hysterical the opposition to Trump gets, the more it makes me want him to win. I think Colorado fired up his supporters. The latest poll shows Trump at record highs, while Cruz has plummeted.


Me too, that and wanting the destruction of the modern republican party.

Re: TRUMP is seriously dangerous

Posted: Sat Apr 16, 2016 6:49 pm
by Luther Blissett
Both parties could be destroyed this election cycle, but we probably won't.

Re: TRUMP is seriously dangerous

Posted: Sat Apr 16, 2016 7:01 pm
by Burnt Hill
» Sat Apr 16, 2016 6:49 pm wrote:Both parties should be destroyed this election cycle, but we probably won't.

ftfy :wink
*fixed that for you!

Re: TRUMP is seriously dangerous

Posted: Tue Apr 19, 2016 4:48 pm
by MacCruiskeen
Image

Re: TRUMP is seriously dangerous

Posted: Tue Apr 19, 2016 4:50 pm
by 82_28
What's the image, Mac? It's not loading.

Re: TRUMP is seriously dangerous

Posted: Tue Apr 19, 2016 5:01 pm
by MacCruiskeen
Sorry, 82. Here's the same story from various sources:

Trump mistakenly refers to 9/11 as 7-Eleven

https://www.google.de/webhp?sourceid=ch ... +says+7-11

Re: TRUMP is seriously dangerous

Posted: Tue Apr 19, 2016 6:10 pm
by 82_28
Oh, no problem, Mac. Yeah I read about that.

This however, is a great read written by Rick Perlstein:

I've been studying the history of American conservatism full time since 1997-almost 20 years now. I've read almost every major book on the subject. I thought I knew what I was talking about. Then along comes Donald Trump to scramble the whole goddamned script.

Now, historians must begin to consider alternate genealogies of the American right: lineages for the orange-haired monster that no one saw coming. Our received narrative of the movement encompassed by Barry Goldwater and William F. Buckley and Strom Thurmond and Milton Friedman and Ronald Reagan just doesn't cut it any longer. I've done my best to begin the work-thinking through, for instance, Trumpism's connection to fascism, a political tradition not heretofore considered all that relevant in the American context. Other bodies, however, are buried closer to home.

No history of modern conservatism I'm aware of finds much significance in the 22,000 Nazi sympathizers who rallied for Hitler at Madison Square Garden in February 1939, presided over by a giant banner of General George Washington that stretched almost all the way to the second deck, capped off by a menacing eagle insignia. Nor the now-infamous Ku Klux Klan march through the streets of Queens in 1927, when The New York Times reported "1,000 Klansmen and 100 policemen staged a free-for-all," in which according to one contemporary news report all the individuals arrested were wearing Klan attire, and that one of those arrestees was Donald Trump's own father.

In the specter of the son's likely ascension as Republican nominee, however, such events gather significance. Consider the subsequent history of Fred Trump's career as a developer of middle-class housing in the outer boroughs of New York City. We now know Fred Trump was notorious enough a racist to draw the attention of Woody Guthrie, who wrote a song about him in the 1950s: "I suppose/ Old Man Trump knows/ Just how much/ Racial Hate/ he stirred up/ In the bloodpot of human hearts/ When he drawed/ That color line/ Here at his/ Eighteen hundred family project."


Read the rest here:

http://crooksandliars.com/2016/04/avenging-angels

Also, as far as 7/11, I immediately flashed on the irony of the Mumbai attacks/bombings and calling it a "prank" at the time. Tried looking for that thread, but it's all in the janky pre migration format.

Totally no proof he was involved, but TRUMP was in negotiations at the time to build this:

http://www.trump.com/real-estate-portfo ... er-mumbai/

He could have gotten his dates wrong, but were actually right because he actually still thinks about it due to fascist and racist significance and conflates the two dates. :shrug:

And also why would he even refer to 7-Eleven since I am sure he has never been in one? (unless he wasn't in on it).

Totally take that idea with uuuuge grains of salt. Just an idea. . .

Re: TRUMP is seriously dangerous

Posted: Wed Apr 20, 2016 6:29 am
by 8bitagent
Kind of makes sense that Trump created the "fascist" Trump as a sort of Andy Kauffman troll to easily steamroll the tea party/idiot GOP base, but essentially
it is not him.