Re: Mass shooting in Las Vegas, 2/10/2017
Posted: Fri Oct 20, 2017 8:47 am
???!0_0 » Fri Oct 20, 2017 7:38 am wrote:Remember he also had a preference for asian women.
What you don't know can't hurt them.
https://www.rigorousintuition.ca/board2/
https://www.rigorousintuition.ca/board2/viewtopic.php?t=40709
???!0_0 » Fri Oct 20, 2017 7:38 am wrote:Remember he also had a preference for asian women.
Area Man (64) Insists On Paying For Wife's Meal
In an act of unparalleled brutality that has left Las Vegas reeling, Stephen Paddock, 64, insisted on picking up the tab for both himself and his female companion Marilou Danley, 62.
"It just totally shocked me", said waiter Morrissey Smith, 20. "He, like, totally overrode her wishes. I thought that kind of thing had died out centuries ago, in, like, Hitler's time."
In a written statement to the world's press, Ms Danley described Mr Paddock as "a kind, gentle man" whom she had known for years and with whom she was hoping to share the rest of her life.
Despite repeated requests from The Onion, Mr Paddock himself refused to comment. His relatives cited sudden violent death as the reason.
I've witnessed the reaction to gunfire in a large outdoor crowd up close, and I'd say there was a window of up to maybe two minutes when that picture could have been taken just after the initial bolting of the crowd.stickdog99 » Thu Oct 19, 2017 10:49 pm wrote:Given all the reports of Good Samaritans springing into action that I just linked. when exactly could the above picture have been taken?
Silliness. Grow up.MacCruiskeen » Fri Oct 20, 2017 8:15 am wrote:No. You just devoutly wish that we were.Burnt Hill » Thu Oct 19, 2017 10:50 pm wrote:Sure this one instance doesn't mean much on its own, but are we starting to see a pattern of misanthropy with Paddock?km artlu wrote:Well of course. That's elementary logic because no person in the history of flight ever had a reason other than misanthropy to avoid controlled areas.
No, it is not.MacCruiskeen wrote:This claim that Stephen Paddock was a "misanthrope" is based mainly on a single statement
Yes, I agree with all of this.0_0 » Sat Oct 21, 2017 1:04 pm wrote:Yes we assume he murdered a lot of people, but his motive for doing so is currently a mystery. Shooters like that usually have a history of mental illness and/or have alleged ties to terrorist organisations. Saying, well he avoided controlled areas when flying and he liked asian women, doesn't do much in the way of explaining that mystery away imo. And that's just one of the many mysteries in all of this. We'll never know anyway. Seems like showing dominance over the people and letting them know in their gut what's up by the mysteries while denying it on the surface with the official 'normal' narrative.
Burnt Hill » Sat Oct 21, 2017 11:09 am wrote:No, it is not.MacCruiskeen wrote:This claim that Stephen Paddock was a "misanthrope" is based mainly on a single statement
It is based on the assumption that he murdered 50 some people.
Everything else would be supportive or dismissive evidence.
C'mon guys, think better.
Have we ever been told if Paddock spent time in the military?0_0 » Sat Oct 21, 2017 10:04 am wrote:Yes we assume he murdered a lot of people, but his motive for doing so is currently a mystery. Shooters like that usually have a history of mental illness and/or have alleged ties to terrorist organisations. Saying, well he avoided controlled areas when flying and he liked asian women, doesn't do much in the way of explaining that mystery away imo. And that's just one of the many mysteries in all of this. We'll never know anyway. Seems like showing dominance over the people and letting them know in their gut what's up by the mysteries while denying it on the surface with the official 'normal' narrative.
Not officially but it was revealed early that he worked for the notorious terrorist organization Lockheed Martin.PufPuf93 » Sat Oct 21, 2017 5:44 pm wrote:Have we ever been told if Paddock spent time in the military?0_0 » Sat Oct 21, 2017 10:04 am wrote:Yes we assume he murdered a lot of people, but his motive for doing so is currently a mystery. Shooters like that usually have a history of mental illness and/or have alleged ties to terrorist organisations. Saying, well he avoided controlled areas when flying and he liked asian women, doesn't do much in the way of explaining that mystery away imo. And that's just one of the many mysteries in all of this. We'll never know anyway. Seems like showing dominance over the people and letting them know in their gut what's up by the mysteries while denying it on the surface with the official 'normal' narrative.
Hey, it's Jack Riddler!JackRiddler » Sat Oct 21, 2017 6:12 pm wrote:Not officially but it was revealed early that he worked for the notorious terrorist organization Lockheed Martin.PufPuf93 » Sat Oct 21, 2017 5:44 pm wrote:Have we ever been told if Paddock spent time in the military?0_0 » Sat Oct 21, 2017 10:04 am wrote:Yes we assume he murdered a lot of people, but his motive for doing so is currently a mystery. Shooters like that usually have a history of mental illness and/or have alleged ties to terrorist organisations. Saying, well he avoided controlled areas when flying and he liked asian women, doesn't do much in the way of explaining that mystery away imo. And that's just one of the many mysteries in all of this. We'll never know anyway. Seems like showing dominance over the people and letting them know in their gut what's up by the mysteries while denying it on the surface with the official 'normal' narrative.
In reply to the bolded part. We certainly don't. Not all of us.0_0 » Sat Oct 21, 2017 12:04 pm wrote:Yes we assume he murdered a lot of people, but his motive for doing so is currently a mystery. Shooters like that usually have a history of mental illness and/or have alleged ties to terrorist organisations. Saying, well he avoided controlled areas when flying and he liked asian women, doesn't do much in the way of explaining that mystery away imo. And that's just one of the many mysteries in all of this. We'll never know anyway. Seems like showing dominance over the people and letting them know in their gut what's up by the mysteries while denying it on the surface with the official 'normal' narrative.
Indeed. In fact, what you're saying is a massive understatement. We have been offered precisely nothing in the way of explanation. Just the kind of posthumous defamation, flat-out character-assassination, tinpot psychologizing, and slimily suggestive innuendo that always forms the inscription on any Designated Culprit's gravestone.Saying, well he avoided controlled areas when flying and he liked asian women, doesn't do much in the way of explaining that mystery away imo.