RI blog parasite goes ballistic...

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

RI blog parasite goes ballistic...

Postby robert d reed » Thu Nov 09, 2006 6:38 am

....all my alarmist predictions about a hacked election, down in flames.

Mea Culpa.
robert d reed
 
Posts: 661
Joined: Wed Nov 08, 2006 7:14 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Career of nasty little disease halted by blog parasite?

Postby erosoplier » Thu Nov 09, 2006 8:09 am

Your in good company - and maybe by expressing your concerns you were instrumental in determining the result that was got.
User avatar
erosoplier
 
Posts: 1247
Joined: Mon Aug 28, 2006 3:38 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: RI blog parasite goes ballistic...

Postby slimmouse » Thu Nov 09, 2006 8:44 am

robert d reed wrote:....all my alarmist predictions about a hacked election, down in flames.

Mea Culpa.


Oh, I wouldnt be quite so hard on yerself Robert.

I mean look on the bright side;

With shining beacons of democratic liberalism such as Pelosi, and a list as long as yer arm of fellow victors, just imagine what benefits this will bring for society.

Im , we'll have an investigation of 9/11, the impeachment of Bush, Cheney, and the liars who took the U.S into Iraq. ( Ive heard that many of those Rats have hopped onto another vessel - But I wouldnt worry - The newly balance administration will catch them no doubt !)

This will doubtless be followed by a much need and complete descaling of the military, in order to put the U.S taxpayers money to much more valuable, Housing, educational, and healthcare programmes.

There will be a hard look at, and doubtless deconstruction of the viscious capitalist weaponry that is The federal reserve, Big Pharma and Oil, as the regenarated liberalism of the Democratic giant emerges from what has appeared like permanent slumber.

Free energy, Medicine that cures not kills, The federal reserve generating interest for their own citizens welfare as opposed to private concerns, Social programmes, investment in American manufacturing, no more wars, eradication of the Opium fields in Afghanistan.

Man, I dont know about you, but I can hardly wait !! :roll:
slimmouse
 
Posts: 6129
Joined: Fri May 20, 2005 7:41 am
Location: Just outside of you.
Blog: View Blog (3)

Postby Sounder » Thu Nov 09, 2006 8:56 am

Just checking- this is only a test.

The election was fixed, for the democrats. The "company" no doubt took offence at the White House thinking that they are running the game.

Silly politicians.
Sounder
 
Posts: 4054
Joined: Thu Nov 09, 2006 8:49 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby sunny » Thu Nov 09, 2006 10:15 am

Robert, I was utterly convinced as well.

While there may be problems with Dems doing what we would like them to do, this election does one thing that I am grateful for: It somewhat restores the reputation of the American People in the eyes of the world. After all, no one around the globe could understand why we approved of and kept validating Boosh, and thought of us as completely stupid and brutal Good little Germans. Now, that is somewhat mitigated. That is a good thing, imo.
Choose love
sunny
 
Posts: 5220
Joined: Mon May 16, 2005 10:18 pm
Location: Alabama
Blog: View Blog (1)

This election WAS hacked for this outcome.

Postby HughManateeWins » Thu Nov 09, 2006 12:48 pm

Sounder wrote:The election was fixed, for the democrats. The "company" no doubt took offence at the White House thinking that they are running the game.

Silly politicians.


Both Bob Woodward (lead media spook) and the Council on Foreign Relations sent out smoke signals indicating that The Crazies running the ship of state were to be checked with more Democratic ballast.

The Operation Mockingbird media prepared us for this outcome and it was made so.

Vietnam II is being addressed the same way Vietnam I was, with a pulling back to regroup the fascist forces to reduce social resistance after running the ball far down the field.
HughManateeWins
 
Posts: 25
Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2005 6:42 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby Gouda » Thu Nov 09, 2006 2:14 pm

Image
User avatar
Gouda
 
Posts: 3009
Joined: Tue Sep 13, 2005 1:53 am
Location: a circular mould
Blog: View Blog (0)

Oww. My eyes. TOO MUCH TRUTH.

Postby Hugh Manatee Wins » Thu Nov 09, 2006 3:26 pm

..this just saved me a thousand words.

Gouda wrote:Image
User avatar
Hugh Manatee Wins
 
Posts: 9869
Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2005 6:51 pm
Location: in context
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby orz » Thu Nov 09, 2006 4:37 pm

:shock: From now on, let's all agree to just post that picture as every reply in every thread... what more needs to be said!? :cry:
orz
 
Posts: 4107
Joined: Sun Oct 02, 2005 9:25 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: RI blog parasite goes ballistic...

Postby James Redford » Thu Nov 09, 2006 5:02 pm

robert d reed wrote:....all my alarmist predictions about a hacked election, down in flames.

Mea Culpa.


None of the elections have been "hacked." The black-box voting machines were designed from the start to enable those who control them to punch in any numbers they want. It's no more hacking than when you get on your computer, log on to the internet, and come post here. Your computer and the software on it were designed to facilitate that and make it as easy as possible.

Based upon the reports coming in, there was more election fraud in this election than in the 2004 and 2006 elections. The point of which would be to tip the results in favor of establishmentarian politicians. Whether said politicians are Democrats or Republicans is irrelevant, since those are simply a few of the different names for the same one-party system controlled by the ruling elite.

Below is some analysis of the recent election by Paul Joseph Watson and Alex Jones:

"Election Could Have Been Thrown, Says Fraud Expert: Harris considers token victory for Democrats fixed to quell dissent on mass voting fraud, liberal bloggers begin to attack anyone who doesn't jump on the Pelosi bandwagon," Paul Joseph Watson, Prison Planet, November 9, 2006 http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/no ... thrown.htm

"Meet The New Boss, Same As The Old Boss: Will Democrats repeal and impeach or salute and follow? Mobbed-up establishment sycophant Nancy Pelosi is nobody's savior, as sacrificial lamb Rumsfeld steps down," Paul Joseph Watson & Alex Jones, Prison Planet, November 8, 2006 http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/no ... ewboss.htm

The Democratic Party are every bit as bad as the Republican Party. They're just as much warmongers and pseudo-puritanical, just with a slightly different focus on issues.

The reality of the situation is that we have a one-party socialist system in the U.S., just with two ever so slightly different factional flavors to give people the idea that they have a choice. At core, these various different factions within this one-party system aren't actually different at all, and indeed aren't actually fighting against each other (at least when it comes to the top-tier of these various factions). They merely have slightly different window dressings, so to speak, to give the appearance of having some difference.

The top-tier of socialist faction A (i.e., the Republican Party) and socialist faction B (i.e., the Democratic Party) are all in bed with each other. Their public spats with each other are more staged and phoney than a WWE wrestling match.

For example, Bill Clinton calls the Bushes his surrogate family, and vacations with them regularly. Although the Clintons and the Bushes have been long-time close family friends going back even before their drug-running operation in Mena, Arkansas. Hillary Clinton has long had regular private dinners with Rupert Murdoch and she is now being politically supported by Murdoch, who is helping her raise funds.

John Kerry and Bushes Sr. and Jr. are all Bonesmen in the occult sociey of the Brotherhood of Death (a.k.a. the Order of Skull & Bones at Yale), of which occult society was instrumental in the funding of Hitler and the Nazis. Bonesman Prescott Bush (Bush, Sr.'s father) had one of his banks and a number of his companies seized in 1942 under the Trading with the Enemy Act for his financing of the Nazis even during wartime.

Below are some articles on the Clintons being exceedingly close family friends of the Bushes:

"Bill Clinton Talks Heart Surgery on 'Letterman,'" Associated Press, June 17, 2005 http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,159851,00.html

From the above article:

""
During a recent appearance together in Houston, Clinton noted that Barbara Bush had taken to calling Clinton "son."

"I told the Republicans in the audience not to worry, every family has one--you know, the black sheep, kind of drifts off," he said. "I told them, I said, 'This just shows you the lengths at which the Bushes would go to get another president in the family and I wish I could get them to adopt Hillary.' "
""

See also:

"Opposites attract," Julian Borger, Guardian (U.K.), July 1, 2005 http://www.guardian.co.uk/g2/story/0,,1518633,00.html

"Inside Politics," transcript, CNN, June 17, 2005 http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/ ... ip.01.html

"Verbatim," Time, June 20, 2005 http://www.time.com/time/asia/magazine/ ... 69,00.html

"Barbara Bush Calls Bill Clinton 'Son,'" Drudge Report, June 17, 2005 http://www.infowars.com/articles/us/cli ... on_son.htm , http://www.drudgereport.com/flash5.htm

Below are some articles on Rupert Murdoch's love for Hillary Clinton:

"Murdoch to host fundraiser for Hillary Clinton," Caroline Daniel, additional reporting by Aline Van Duyn, Financial Times, May 8, 2006 http://www.ft.com/cms/s/61faabde-deb8-1 ... e2340.html

"Hillary Clinton defends link with Murdoch," Holly Yeager and Caroline Daniel, Financial Times, May 10, 2006 http://www.ft.com/cms/s/577ecd2e-dfc2-1 ... 49a01.html

And the actual winner the 2004 U.S. Presidential election, Bonesman Kerry, was more than happy to roll over for his good buddies, the Bushes:

"Science proves that vote fraud is real!," Joseph Cannon, Cannonfire, April 2, 2005:

http://cannonfire.blogspot.com/2005/04/ ... -real.html

"Analysis of the 2004 Presidential Election Exit Poll Discrepancies," Josh Mitteldorf, Ph.D., Kathy Dopp, MS mathematics, Steven F. Freeman, Ph.D., Prof. Brian Joiner, Prof. Frank Stenger, Prof. Richard G. Sheehan, Paul F. Velleman, Ph.D. Associate Professor, Victoria Lovegren, Ph.D. Lecturer, Campbell B. Read, Ph.D. Professor Emeritus, Jonathan Simon, Ron Baiman, Bruce O'Dell, US Count Votes' National Election Data Archive Project, March 31, 2005, updated April 12, 2005:

http://uscountvotes.org/ucvAnalysis/US/ ... tofsky.pdf
http://www.electionarchive.org/ucvAnaly ... tofsky.pdf

"The 2004 Presidential Election: Exit Poll Error or Vote Miscount?," Ron Baiman, Ph.D, David Dodge, BSMME Engineer, and Kathy Dopp, MS mathematics, US Count Votes National Election Data Archive, September 8, 2005:

http://www.uscountvotes.org/ucvAnalysis ... alysis.pdf
http://www.electionarchive.org/ucvAnaly ... alysis.pdf

"The Unexplained Exit Poll Discrepancy," Steven F. Freeman, Ph.D., University of Pennsylvania, November 11, 2004:

http://www.buzzflash.com/alerts/04/11/U ... p_v00l.pdf

In "The Unexplained Exit Poll Discrepancy," Dr. Steven F. Freeman says:

"As much as we can say in social science that something is impossible, it is impossible that the discrepancies between predicted and actual vote counts in the three critical battleground states [Ohio, Florida, and Pennsylvania] of the 2004 election could have been due to chance or random error."

The odds of those exit poll statistical anomalies occurring by chance are, according to Dr. Freeman, "250,000,000 to one."

See also:

"Was the 2004 Election Stolen?: Republicans prevented more than 350,000 voters in Ohio from casting ballots or having their votes counted--enough to have put John Kerry in the White House," Robert F. Kennedy Jr., Rolling Stone, June 15, 2006 issue:

http://www.rollingstone.com/news/story/ ... n_stolen/1

"Was the 2004 Election Stolen? Sources and Commentary," Rolling Stone, June 1, 2006:

http://www.rollingstone.com/news/story/ ... commentary

"The stolen election of 2004," Michael Parenti, Columbus Free Press, July 11, 2006:

http://www.freepress.org/departments/di ... /2006/2073
Author of "Jesus Is an Anarchist", Social Science Research Network (SSRN), Dec. 4, 2011 (orig. pub. Dec. 19, 2001), doi:10.2139/ssrn.1337761, http://ssrn.com/abstract=1337761
User avatar
James Redford
 
Posts: 61
Joined: Sat May 28, 2005 9:11 pm
Location: USA
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: RI blog parasite goes ballistic...

Postby Wombaticus Rex » Thu Nov 09, 2006 9:07 pm

robert d reed wrote:....all my alarmist predictions about a hacked election, down in flames.

Mea Culpa.


Did you seriously expect Karl Rove to pull the same trick four times in a row?
User avatar
Wombaticus Rex
 
Posts: 10896
Joined: Wed Nov 08, 2006 6:33 pm
Location: Vermontistan
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: RI blog parasite goes ballistic...

Postby Hugh Manatee Wins » Thu Nov 09, 2006 9:47 pm

James Redford wrote:
token victory for Democrats fixed to quell dissent on mass voting fraud


Bingo. The calm before the Diebold storm of 2008.

This serves to maintain the status quo by ratcheting down resistance and thus awareness with the illusion of change.

The Nixon-to-Carter swap put the kids to sleep as intended with just some crankiness through Reagan and self-justification through the Clinton years.

STAY PISSED. Don't let up for a second. Pour it on even harder to the Dems so the next two years aren't just a new driver pulled over to the curb with the radio turned up.
User avatar
Hugh Manatee Wins
 
Posts: 9869
Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2005 6:51 pm
Location: in context
Blog: View Blog (0)

0 0

Postby AnnaLivia » Fri Nov 10, 2006 1:11 am

0 0 0
Last edited by AnnaLivia on Tue Jan 23, 2007 10:21 am, edited 1 time in total.
AnnaLivia
 
Posts: 747
Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2005 3:44 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby stickdog99 » Fri Nov 10, 2006 4:00 am

They cheated. It's just that they aren't allowed to cheat so much that what they are doing becomes perfectly obvious to the braindead.

See: http://www.democraticunderground.com/di ... id=2654934
stickdog99
 
Posts: 6705
Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2005 5:42 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

reiterating

Postby smiths » Fri Nov 10, 2006 4:53 am

reiterating my theme for the week, and i reckon that photo is not what it seems,
i reckon i could take a ten minute news coinference with any two pwople and find a grab that i could interpret my way,
i watched the whole clip on crooks and liars and i saw george the meekest ever, and the dems barely restraining theyre cheshire grins,
maybe i am wrong but i reckon you are adding 2 and 2 and getting 5 here
User avatar
smiths
 
Posts: 2205
Joined: Wed May 18, 2005 4:18 am
Location: perth, western australia
Blog: View Blog (0)

Next

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests