robert d reed wrote:....all my alarmist predictions about a hacked election, down in flames.
Mea Culpa.
None of the elections have been "hacked." The black-box voting machines were designed from the start to enable those who control them to punch in any numbers they want. It's no more hacking than when you get on your computer, log on to the internet, and come post here. Your computer and the software on it were designed to facilitate that and make it as easy as possible.
Based upon the reports coming in, there was more election fraud in this election than in the 2004 and 2006 elections. The point of which would be to tip the results in favor of establishmentarian politicians. Whether said politicians are Democrats or Republicans is irrelevant, since those are simply a few of the different names for the same one-party system controlled by the ruling elite.
Below is some analysis of the recent election by Paul Joseph Watson and Alex Jones:
"Election Could Have Been Thrown, Says Fraud Expert: Harris considers token victory for Democrats fixed to quell dissent on mass voting fraud, liberal bloggers begin to attack anyone who doesn't jump on the Pelosi bandwagon," Paul Joseph Watson, Prison Planet, November 9, 2006
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/no ... thrown.htm
"Meet The New Boss, Same As The Old Boss: Will Democrats repeal and impeach or salute and follow? Mobbed-up establishment sycophant Nancy Pelosi is nobody's savior, as sacrificial lamb Rumsfeld steps down," Paul Joseph Watson & Alex Jones, Prison Planet, November 8, 2006
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/no ... ewboss.htm
The Democratic Party are every bit as bad as the Republican Party. They're just as much warmongers and pseudo-puritanical, just with a slightly different focus on issues.
The reality of the situation is that we have a one-party socialist system in the U.S., just with two ever so slightly different factional flavors to give people the idea that they have a choice. At core, these various different factions within this one-party system aren't actually different at all, and indeed aren't actually fighting against each other (at least when it comes to the top-tier of these various factions). They merely have slightly different window dressings, so to speak, to give the appearance of having some difference.
The top-tier of socialist faction A (i.e., the Republican Party) and socialist faction B (i.e., the Democratic Party) are all in bed with each other. Their public spats with each other are more staged and phoney than a WWE wrestling match.
For example, Bill Clinton calls the Bushes his surrogate family, and vacations with them regularly. Although the Clintons and the Bushes have been long-time close family friends going back even before their drug-running operation in Mena, Arkansas. Hillary Clinton has long had regular private dinners with Rupert Murdoch and she is now being politically supported by Murdoch, who is helping her raise funds.
John Kerry and Bushes Sr. and Jr. are all Bonesmen in the occult sociey of the Brotherhood of Death (a.k.a. the Order of Skull & Bones at Yale), of which occult society was instrumental in the funding of Hitler and the Nazis. Bonesman Prescott Bush (Bush, Sr.'s father) had one of his banks and a number of his companies seized in 1942 under the Trading with the Enemy Act for his financing of the Nazis even during wartime.
Below are some articles on the Clintons being exceedingly close family friends of the Bushes:
"Bill Clinton Talks Heart Surgery on 'Letterman,'" Associated Press, June 17, 2005
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,159851,00.html
From the above article:
""
During a recent appearance together in Houston, Clinton noted that Barbara Bush had taken to calling Clinton "son."
"I told the Republicans in the audience not to worry, every family has one--you know, the black sheep, kind of drifts off," he said. "I told them, I said, 'This just shows you the lengths at which the Bushes would go to get another president in the family and I wish I could get them to adopt Hillary.' "
""
See also:
"Opposites attract," Julian Borger, Guardian (U.K.), July 1, 2005
http://www.guardian.co.uk/g2/story/0,,1518633,00.html
"Inside Politics," transcript, CNN, June 17, 2005
http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/ ... ip.01.html
"Verbatim," Time, June 20, 2005
http://www.time.com/time/asia/magazine/ ... 69,00.html
"Barbara Bush Calls Bill Clinton 'Son,'" Drudge Report, June 17, 2005
http://www.infowars.com/articles/us/cli ... on_son.htm ,
http://www.drudgereport.com/flash5.htm
Below are some articles on Rupert Murdoch's love for Hillary Clinton:
"Murdoch to host fundraiser for Hillary Clinton," Caroline Daniel, additional reporting by Aline Van Duyn, Financial Times, May 8, 2006
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/61faabde-deb8-1 ... e2340.html
"Hillary Clinton defends link with Murdoch," Holly Yeager and Caroline Daniel, Financial Times, May 10, 2006
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/577ecd2e-dfc2-1 ... 49a01.html
And the actual winner the 2004 U.S. Presidential election, Bonesman Kerry, was more than happy to roll over for his good buddies, the Bushes:
"Science proves that vote fraud is real!," Joseph Cannon, Cannonfire, April 2, 2005:
http://cannonfire.blogspot.com/2005/04/ ... -real.html
"Analysis of the 2004 Presidential Election Exit Poll Discrepancies," Josh Mitteldorf, Ph.D., Kathy Dopp, MS mathematics, Steven F. Freeman, Ph.D., Prof. Brian Joiner, Prof. Frank Stenger, Prof. Richard G. Sheehan, Paul F. Velleman, Ph.D. Associate Professor, Victoria Lovegren, Ph.D. Lecturer, Campbell B. Read, Ph.D. Professor Emeritus, Jonathan Simon, Ron Baiman, Bruce O'Dell, US Count Votes' National Election Data Archive Project, March 31, 2005, updated April 12, 2005:
http://uscountvotes.org/ucvAnalysis/US/ ... tofsky.pdf
http://www.electionarchive.org/ucvAnaly ... tofsky.pdf
"The 2004 Presidential Election: Exit Poll Error or Vote Miscount?," Ron Baiman, Ph.D, David Dodge, BSMME Engineer, and Kathy Dopp, MS mathematics, US Count Votes National Election Data Archive, September 8, 2005:
http://www.uscountvotes.org/ucvAnalysis ... alysis.pdf
http://www.electionarchive.org/ucvAnaly ... alysis.pdf
"The Unexplained Exit Poll Discrepancy," Steven F. Freeman, Ph.D., University of Pennsylvania, November 11, 2004:
http://www.buzzflash.com/alerts/04/11/U ... p_v00l.pdf
In "The Unexplained Exit Poll Discrepancy," Dr. Steven F. Freeman says:
"As much as we can say in social science that something is impossible, it is impossible that the discrepancies between predicted and actual vote counts in the three critical battleground states [Ohio, Florida, and Pennsylvania] of the 2004 election could have been due to chance or random error."
The odds of those exit poll statistical anomalies occurring by chance are, according to Dr. Freeman, "250,000,000 to one."
See also:
"Was the 2004 Election Stolen?: Republicans prevented more than 350,000 voters in Ohio from casting ballots or having their votes counted--enough to have put John Kerry in the White House," Robert F. Kennedy Jr., Rolling Stone, June 15, 2006 issue:
http://www.rollingstone.com/news/story/ ... n_stolen/1
"Was the 2004 Election Stolen? Sources and Commentary," Rolling Stone, June 1, 2006:
http://www.rollingstone.com/news/story/ ... commentary
"The stolen election of 2004," Michael Parenti, Columbus Free Press, July 11, 2006:
http://www.freepress.org/departments/di ... /2006/2073