Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff
Russia arrests 8 hijackers of Arctic Sea vessel
12:0518/08/2009
Russian navy detains eight people over hijacking of Arctic Sea cargo vessel - defense minister
MOSCOW, August 18 (RIA Novosti) - The Russian frigate Ladny has freed the Arctic Sea cargo ship in the Atlantic without firing a single shot and arrested eight alleged hijackers, Russia's defense minister said on Tuesday.
"The hijackers boarded the Arctic Sea, threatened the crew with weapons and demanded that their orders be followed. The Arctic Sea was following a route toward the African continent with all communications and navigation equipment shut down, as ordered by the hijackers," Anatoly Serdyukov reported to Russian President Dmitry Medvedev.
The eight detainees are from Estonia, Latvia and Russia. None of the crew was injured in the operation, the Russian minister said.
Then there’s version No. 3: the special services. The Arctic Sea was carrying something, not timber and not from Finland, that necessitated some major work on the ship. Something that required dismantling the bulkhead, complete with gas cutting torches, during two weeks of “repair work” in Kaliningrad before the voyage, and something so large that it couldn’t be loaded for delivery onto just any little boat. To put it plainly: The Arctic Sea was carrying some sort of anti-aircraft or nuclear contraption intended for a nice, peaceful country like Syria, and they were caught with it. And this wasn’t a one-time delivery. I’m not a believer in the omniscience of the CIA or Mossad, who might have somehow found out that on a certain date a certain old vessel would be delivering a certain little something. Most likely, it was a tried and true route that had been used successfully for quite some time. And now they’ve been caught.
On Saturday, Aug. 15, the Arctic Sea’s AIS again worked briefly in the Bay of Biscay. Shortly thereafter, France announced that there was no cargo ship in the area and that the signal was coming from one of the three Russian Navy ships there.
It’s tough to say why a Russian military ship would suddenly decide to send out the Arctic Sea’s signal (they removed the AIS transponder, took it with them and then somehow clumsily bumped into it and turned it on?), but, by the looks of it, that’s when Russia found itself backed into a corner. And now instead of a possible tragedy we’ll see a cover-up operation.
Moscow's envoy to NATO, Dmitry Rogozin, told Russian TV channels "this was a brilliant operation with disinformation used intentionally in order not to hamper the work of the military".
"NATO didn't take part in the operation but it helped locate the whereabouts of the ship," he said without elaborating.
EU officials said police of 22 countries had been involved in the investigation and it could be two weeks before full details emerged.
Police spokeswoman Ylva Voxby said they had received pictures of the crew's injuries from the Arctic Sea's operator, which had received the pictures from the ship by e-mail.
Voxby also said Swedish police still haven't received any witness reports confirming that an inflatable boat approached the freighter in the Baltic Sea. However, police have confirmed through radar pictures and other vessels in the area that the Arctic Sea made strange movements at the time of the alleged hijacking.
Anatoly Serdyukov announced the arrests and is quoted as saying: “"These people, after claiming that their boat was not working, boarded the Arctic Sea and using the threat of arms, demanded that the crew follow all of their orders without condition." The suspects reportedly include four Estonian, two Latvians and two Russians.
http://www.timesofmalta.com/articles/view/20090819/local/ships-hijacking-deliberate-misinformation-helped-the-military
Gee. Nothing much here. What disinfo and where?
Speaking with someone who should know, he says that the operation really was "very professional". He also says that as far as he knows Russia is bound by a confidentiality agreement to "at least 3 EU member" states on this operation.
"The Arctic Sea was carrying something, not timber and not from Finland, that necessitated some major work on the ship," she wrote in the Moscow Times newspaper on Wednesday.
During two weeks of repair works in the Russian port of Kaliningrad just before the voyage, the ship's bulkhead was dismantled so something very large could be loaded, she wrote.
"To put it plainly: The Arctic Sea was carrying some sort of anti-aircraft or nuclear contraption intended for a nice, peaceful country like Syria, and they were caught with it," she said.
President Peres, who will be returning to Israel later today, summarized his visit to Russia and stated that "It was an extremely positive visit from Israel's point of view. I welcome President Medvedev's announcement of his intention to upgrade the level of the strategic relationship between Israel and Russia to the same level as the Russian relationship with Germany, France and Italy. This is an exceptionally meaningful decision for Israel in regard of its relationship with Russia on all planes." President Peres added that "The Russian president opposes the existence of nuclear weapons in Iran, and has made an unambiguous promise that Russia will not sell weapons that may harm the balance of power in the Middle East."
It should be noted that an additional outcome of the visit was the significant increase in cooperation between Israeli and Russian companies in the technological, agricultural, biotechnology and medical fields.
It takes serious skill to screw up a hydro plant. The only energy is water falling in ready built channels.
My apprenticeship was in a large electrical machine plant. Amongst other things we built hydrosets. I later did insulation design for hydro (and also nuclear) generating sets. A 30 year old turbine is not old. The parts that might age are the insulation and the bearings, both easy to maintain. This was not an insulation failure. The bearings can be monitored automatically for vibration and temperature rise (UK practice since before my apprenticeship began in 1970). It is easy to predict failure and replace months before any real problems begin. Poor maintenance is not strong enough a term for this. It would require acts of serious criminal negligence to put a hydroset in the way of danger. The same goes for the ability to open
a sluice gate so quickly that there was a serious overpressure of water. The motors opening the sluice gate wouldn't be able to run fast enough. It takes over 12 hours to run a big hydroset up to full speed. (Pumped storage schemes use different, less efficient channel designs and water channels). If it was possible to open the gates with simple gravity then the design was appalling in the first place. ....
... Three heavy-lift air force jets, reportedly carrying 11 crew members, the alleged hijackers and other investigators, arrived at a Moscow region military base after flying from Cape Verde, the West African island nation where a Russian frigate stopped the ship four days ago.
... State television channel Rossiya said the suspects claimed to be were ecologists who had been arrested by mistake.
... It was unclear why three planes were needed to fly such a small group of people to Moscow, nor why Il-76s — among Russia's largest planes — were used for the operation.
... Federal investigators said in a statement that crew members told them that, while the Arctic Sea was in Swedish waters, the ship was boarded by eight men who wore uniforms that read "POLICE" on the back and who threatened the crew.
... Russian TV channels showed footage of what it said were air force planes arriving at the Chkalovsky base near Moscow, and men believed to be the hijackers being escorted roughly by special forces troops.
... Rossiya said the alleged pirates identified themselves as ecologists when they were arrested. But in footage from the hold of one of the planes, a suspect identified as Andrei Lunev was asked what ecological organization he was connected with.
"I don't know," the man said. He also denied that he or the other suspects were armed and said they went aboard the Arctic Sea to ask for gasoline for their inflatable vessel.
... Russian and European maritime experts have cast doubt on the ransom reports and speculation has grown that the freighter was carrying contraband cargo, possibly weapons or drugs — suspicions fueled by dearth of information from the Russian government.
16:27 GMT, Aug 20, 2009 Latest Headlines...
MOSCOW. Aug 20 (Interfax) - The men who hijacked the Arctic Sea cargo ship claimed to be members of environmental organizations and that they used no weapons while boarding the vessel in the Baltic waters. In an exclusive report shown by the Rossiya television channel on Thursday, one of the detained hijackers, named as Andrei Lunev, said that they boarded the vessel to ask for petrol, because their motor boat had run out of it. He claimed that the no one threatened the crew and that weapons were not used. He also said they were on good terms with the crew.
The images broadcast by Rossiya clearly show heavily tattooed bodies of the detained pirates, which according to the channel correspondent is a testimony of their rich criminal past.
kk bc
(Our editorial staff can be reached at eng.editors@interfax.ru)
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 165 guests