A Dangerous Game, Cathy O'Brien video interview- Mind Contro

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

A Dangerous Game, Cathy O'Brien video interview- Mind Contro

Postby spyvsspy » Wed Apr 13, 2005 1:41 pm

<!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://old.guerrillanews.com/tmdg_trailer/">old.guerrillanews.com/tmdg_trailer/</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><br>MKULTRA - Mind Control<br><br>Don't know if anybody has seen this or referenced these videos on Rigourous. Evidently GNN was planning a full scale documetary on Cathy 0'Brien and Mark Phillips, but put it on the shelf since nobody would show it or fund it. This link has a two part interview with Mark Phillips, Cathy O'brien, and also scenes from a lecture at Berkley where Mark & Cathy spoke. The forum video is very powerful. In one of the trailers Cathy goes to a doctor and her ritualistic body carving is photographed and videotape for the documentary. They both come off as being very credible.<br> <p></p><i></i>
spyvsspy
 
Posts: 47
Joined: Wed Apr 13, 2005 1:41 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Worth watching.

Postby Say Tan » Wed Apr 13, 2005 3:51 pm

I just watched the trailer and I must say it's pretty intense. I read Trance Formation a few years ago and I was shocked. A short time later, I had made a funny picture of W as a lizard and sent it to David Icky who posted it on his site. I then emailed Mark and Cathy just to mention that I thought they might think it was funny and they should check it out. They did and emailed me back about their thoughts on this topic. I don't know if they were amused or not but they did explain that in their opinion, Icky had just seized upon the Lizard thing and in their minds it was just an illusion aimed at creating confusion in the mind of the victim. In other words, there are no 12 foot lizards. This is just another technique to subjugate the mind controlled person. They seemed like OK people as far as I could tell from the email. Cathy writes some interesting poetry which can be found on their web site.<!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :smokin --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/smokin.gif ALT=":smokin"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <p></p><i></i>
Say Tan
 
Posts: 5
Joined: Wed Apr 13, 2005 3:51 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Another location

Postby quioxte » Fri Jul 01, 2005 5:10 pm

The Old.gnn.tv seems to be down now<br><br>here's another location to view this, there are other videos they did as well<br><br>I would like to know what others think of the video, It was one of the first things I watched on the subject. <br><br><br>---<br><br>Originally created for executives at one of the largest and most respected US cable networks, GNN's trailer for The Most Dangerous Game developed into of cult hit all on its own. With its uncannily mysterious protagonists and controversial subject matter, the film looked like a good bet for a late night slot in the powerful documentary division. Especially after the network invested cash and sent some its top producers down to Tennessee to shoot the riveting medical examination that was to form the basis for the film's climax.<br><br>However, after reviewing the trailer and holding several discussions about the film's potential, GNN was told that the feature would not be financed . The reason? The subject matter was too marginal in interest for the network's core audience. Not an unrealistic conclusion. Ironically, after the network passed on the deal to develop the content into a feature film, the trailer began to circulate discreetly, among industry insiders, many of whom have commented on the high level of intrigue that is created by the trailer itself.<br><br>This page features most of the assets that were generated for the network pitch. Included among them are the original treatment written for the project as well as the interviews with both Cathy O'Brien and Mark Phillips, who authored TranceFormation of America, a cult hit amongst the conspiracy set. We recommend that viewers read the treatment before watching any of the video clips, as it will fill in much of what is not covered there. The interview with Dr. Colin Ross may also be of interest for those who want to delve deeper into the subject of Dissociative Identity Disorder and the viability of Cathy's claims. He is considered America's foremost expert in that realm.<br><br>GNN has put this project on hold for now. But regardless of whether the film project goes any further, it will be developed into a text-based story revolving around director Stephen Marshall's experiences researching the story and going on the road with Mark and Cathy.<br><br>Director: Stephen Marshall<br>Producer: Ian Inaba, Josh Shore<br>Production Company: Guerrilla News Network<br>Audio/Visual: sound, color<br><br>(Warning it contains some Graphic images)<br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.archive.org/download/tmdg_trailer/tmdg_trailer_bg.mov">www.archive.org/download/...ler_bg.mov</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><br>In these outtakes from the shoots for The Most Dangerous Game, Mark Phillips and Cathy O'Brien discuss the difficulties in publishing their book and the challenges they faced after it was in the public domain.<br><br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.archive.org/download/tmdg_broll/tmdg_broll_bb.mov">www.archive.org/download/...oll_bb.mov</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--> <p></p><i></i>
quioxte
 
Posts: 21
Joined: Thu May 05, 2005 5:42 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

another link

Postby quioxte » Fri Jul 01, 2005 5:42 pm

<!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.archive.org/details/tmdg_trailer">www.archive.org/details/tmdg_trailer</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><br>for the main page<br><br><br>        <br><br>THE MOST DANGEROUS GAME<br><br>Film Treatment<br>Premise<br><br>The Most Dangerous Game documents the life story of Cathy O’Brien, the alleged survivor of a multi-generation incest-abusive family. Throughout her childhood in Muskegon, Michigan, (she was born in 1957) Cathy claims, she was subjected to the sexual abuse not only of her father and uncles but also by local politicians, law enforcement officers and Catholic priests from the St. Francis de Sales Church. Even more horrific are Cathy’s accounts of being used in pornographic films that, at times, included the use of animals or ‘bestial’ exploitations.<br><br>Furthermore, Cathy contends, when her father was busted for selling child pornography (specifically, a bestiality film involving Cathy and a family dog), he was approached by a high level politician who offered him immunity in exchange for ‘selling’ his daughter into a top secret mind control program that actively sought children who were victims of sexual abuse. The reason she was ‘chosen’, Cathy explains, is because these victims of abuse would already be perfect candidates for creating ‘split’ personalities, a now proven aspect of the covert mind control programs run by the CIA and its various off-shoots. This aspect of her story is a complex, yet vital component of our film, and thus deserves a brief explanation:<br><br>The condition that Cathy speaks of in her book refers to the neural compartmentalization that occurs in the mind when it is subjected to “trauma too horrible to comprehend.” In other words, the mind creates a form of bio-electrical barrier between its functioning elements and those which contain the memory of the abuse. This condition, formally known as Multiple Personality Disorder, is now referred to as ‘Dissociative Identity Disorder’ (DID) by the American Psychiatric Association.<br><br>Dr. Colin Ross is one of the foremost experts in the realm of DID. In his definitive 1997 textbook Dissociative Identity Disorder: Diagnosis, Clinical Features, and Treatment of Multiple Personality, Dr. Ross explains that there are four pathways to DID. Primary among those are cases that arise as:<br><br>“a natural response to severe, chronic childhood abuse, which may include any combination of physical, sexual, emotional and verbal abuse.”<br><br>Historical documentation - specifically those gathered from FOIA requests - of CIA mind control experiments also bear out the fact that a complex apparatus of secret agencies were created in order to conduct unsanctioned testing on unwitting human subjects. Many of these so-called MK-ULTRA operations were investigated and further substantiated as fact during the 1977 Congressional Church Committee hearings.<br><br>With this historical and clinical context as a framework, we return to the story of Cathy O’Brien.<br><br>Trance Formation of America<br><br>Cathy O’Brien claims to have been sold by her father, around 1964, into a top-secret mind control operation named Project Monarch. In Monarch, Cathy alleges, her life became devoted entirely to a hi-tech form of trauma-based mind control programming, or the creation of multiple personalities, for the purposes of espionage, message delivery and prostitution. She claims that the local Michigan politician who initially brought her into the program was “Jerry” Ford and that primary among her abusers was Dick Cheney, who was to become President Ford’s Chief of Staff. Furthermore, Cathy alleges that as she progressed in the program, taking on increasingly sensitive missions, she was also exposed to the abuse and sexual exploitation of a succession of political leaders, including Robert C. Byrd, George Bush Sr. and Ronald Reagan.<br><br>It was not until 1988 that, Cathy claims, she was ‘rescued’ by a former intelligence insider, Mark Phillips. According to their account of the story, Phillips risked his personal security and financial stability to save Cathy and her daughter from the conditions of their mind control existence.<br><br>In 1995 Cathy O’Brien and Mark Phillips, self-published a book entitled Trance Formation of America that documents, in complex detail, the abuse she allegedly suffered while under the jurisdiction of Project Monarch. While, at first, the book represented yet another installation on the sub-cultural ‘conspiracy’ fringe, it has now entered its 11th printing as has been distributed to over 50 countries via homegrown booksellers and such heavily trafficked on-line retailers as Amazon and Barnes and Noble.com.<br><br>Though the immediate reaction of most people to Cathy’s story is one of revulsion and disbelief, those instinctual responses are consistently challenged once they have come face-to-face with her. Whether she is speaking from the lit podium of a conference hall or in the serene tranquility of nature, Cathy comes across as a supremely honest and integral soul.<br><br>As any person who has attempted to deconstruct the ‘myth’ of her ‘delusions’ will confirm, meeting Cathy O’Brien is an uncannily beautiful and unsettlingly normal experience. Even the most hard-edged skeptic is suddenly left without the sharp dagger of critical enthusiasm that they brought with them. Instead of finding a delusional, attention-seeking con artist, they discover an enlightened spirit who does not crave anything but the innate beauty of human contact.<br><br>She is a total mystery.<br><br>An enigma of such epic proportion that one cannot help but clamor for either the complete validation of her claims or the absolute dismissal of them.<br><br>And in this we find the premise and intention behind our production of The Most Dangerous Game. <br><br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://66.102.7.104/search?q=cache:F4HRjBgT7WEJ<!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :o --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/embarassed.gif ALT=":o"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> ld.guerrillanews.com/tmdg_trailer/treat_2.html+cathy+o%27brien+gnn+dangerous+game&hl=en">66.102.7.104/search?q=cac...game&hl=en</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><br> <p></p><i></i>
quioxte
 
Posts: 21
Joined: Thu May 05, 2005 5:42 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

colin ross interview transcript

Postby quioxte » Fri Jul 01, 2005 5:52 pm

<!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://web.archive.org/web/20040405154250/www.guerrillanews.com/tmdg_trailer/ross.html">web.archive.org/web/20040.../ross.html</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><br>Dr. Colin A. Ross<br>Author, Clinician, Founder<br>Ross Institute for Psychological Trauma<br><br>Stephen Marshall: Dr. Ross when did you first become involved in the research and study of mind control?<br><br>Dr. Colin. A. Ross: I was involved in Multiple Personality Disorder for 13 years before I became interested in mind control. I diagnosed my first case of MPD while a medical school student in 1979. I saw one more case as I was training to be a psychiatrist. Then I started seeing cases in late 1985 into 1986 and became a regional and then national expert in Canada, I was based in Winnipeg at a medical school. I published my first book on MPD in 1989 and by the time I moved to Dallas in late 1991 I had published quite a few papers and had done lots of consultations. But I had no experience with mind control, no real interest in it, and hadn’t heard or read about it.<br><br>Early in 1992, patients started telling me stories about, basically, either on military bases, in hospitals, or in laboratory-like settings, having experiments done on them which involved EEG equipment, various types of equipment, and people in white lab coats and so on. The purpose of the experiments was to create new personalities, basically to create Manchurian candidates. So of course I wondered whether some of this was real or most of it or none of it or all of it. What I did was decide to split two things into two, how to do treatment and an investigation into mind control. My study of mind control hasn’t really affected the principles by which I do treatment, kind of a separate track of investigation and interest.<br><br>Marshall: So, as you moved forward with your own research and investigation and your own approach to methods of treatment, what was the reaction of the mainstream medical profession to this research? Did they believe that this phenomenon was occurring? ‘Cause there has been this whole question as to whether there was suddenly an outbreak of MPD or, if it’s something that has always been latent in the human mind…<br><br>Dr. Ross: Well that’s a big area of controversy and there are people who take extreme positions on basically everything in psychiatry, including multiple personalities. Some people think it’s a fad that broke out in the 80’s and that it’s extremely rare and non-existent. And other people think that it has been common throughout human history, just taking different forms.<br><br>So multiple personalities, which is the group I belong to, then is just another form of various kinds of ‘possession states’. Being inhabited by various spirits, demons, and it’s a general capacity of the human mind to, all of a sudden, begin behaving as if some other entity or being is in charge of your body. Then later on you come back and may have no memory or partial memory or full memory of what went on. Human beings have been doing that behavior throughout all cultures throughout history. And it seems that the phenomenon of multiple personalities is harnessing that ability of the mind to cope with trauma. There is good evidence now from increasing number of studies in countries that MPD exists worldwide and it’s sometimes over-diagnosed but most often it is under-diagnosed, by far.<br><br>Marshall: Interestingly, the first book I came in contact with as far as your work is concerned was Blue Bird: The Deliberate Creation of Multiple Personality by Psychiatrists. I have to admit the first time I saw the title, I was like… I mean, the title itself speaks volumes about the nature of the work you have undertaken for yourself. The idea that someone might actually deliberately create a multiple personality is so intense. Could you talk about that for a second, I mean, when did you come across the notion that this might be occurring and can you elaborate or describe the kind of medical mind-set that would inspire people to begin this type of work?<br><br>Dr. Ross: In 4 years of medical school, 4 years of psychiatry training, I basically had no instructions on child sexual abuse or its consequences. Absolutely zero. No seminars, no lectures, no exam questions, no handouts, no case conferences, absolutely no training of any kind. It was just not a subject. In fact, the main textbook of psychiatry used in North America at that time is still the comprehensive textbook of psychiatry. So I used a 1983 edition and it’s basically the bible of North American Psychiatry and it’s 3000 and something pages long. In there, is half a paragraph talking about how uncommon incest is in North America and there is a reference to a 1955 study saying that it is one family out of a million. That was basically the status of psychiatry, incest is so incredibly rare you’re never going to see it and you don’t need to talk about it, let’s move on to things more relevant.<br><br>That was 1980 and, of course, what is actually true is that incest, child sexual abuse, and child physical abuse are very common. Incest does not occur in one out of a million, it’s more than one family out of a hundred. So psychiatry was out by a factor literally of 10,000. So that was a big lesson… that world psychiatry could take a position on something and say its non-existent when actually it’s very common. And that’s a lesson I learned from that, then in the second half of the 1980’s, again I was not interested in cults, Satanism, or sacrifice or things like that particularly. Then all of a sudden therapists in North America working with multiple personalities started hearing all these stories about involvement in satanic cults and human sacrifice. With no kind of context or background, no training or guidelines, on how to think about it or do about it, so I wrote a book which was published in 1995 called Satanic Ritual Abuse: Principles of Treatment. To write this book I pretty much read everything there is to read on satanic rituals abuse, which is not that much. That included investigative reports, all kinds of different articles, books, and so on. The more energy I put into it and more I looked into it, the more I was just chasing shadows. So you could never come up with concrete specific evidence that there was human sacrifice going on anywhere. And it was just this kind of stumbling through the fog grasping at shadows, never getting any substance or reality. That taught me that you can be hearing a whole lot of stories from patients but you can never verify any of it, which is kind of the opposite lesson that I had learned about incest.<br><br>Then, in 1992, all of a sudden I start hearing these stories about what sounded like military intelligence mind control. And I’m trying to figure out: ‘Now is this going to be like incest?’ Where there was a whole lot of it going on and has to be brought out of the closet or is it going to be like satanic ritual abuse where you end up with no proof?’<br><br>The thing I found was the more books I read (and I got 15,000 pages of documents from the CIA through the Freedom of Information Act), the more I looked into it, the more reality there was. Then I basically started a process of getting the references from one book and going to the library and finding those references and then looking at their references and tracking reference to reference to reference. Also going to the medical journals from the 1950’s and 1960’s and taking out the lead medical journals and looking through every issue to see either whom the author was or what the subject of the paper was. Because I was tracking certain authors and looking for studies on LSD, studies on sensory deprivation and so on. I just basically built up this huge network of facts and interconnections between mind control experimentation doctors’ which equals psychiatrists, neurosurgeons, and psychologists. It became a vast web of documented facts involving all the major medical schools and most of the leading figures in psychiatry.<br><br>Marshall: From what I understand and I hope you will correct me and elaborate this perspective, the idea is that multiple personality is a mind’s protection against events or memories that are very traumatic for it. In fact it is a survival mechanism in which the mind, or brain, erects a bio-electrical barrier to protect itself from the memory of the trauma. Is that a correct way of thinking about it and could you explain to us a little more about how that occurs, because it sounds fascinating?<br><br>Dr. Ross: Like everything in the mind and the brain, the amount we understand is about .00-something percent of what there is to understand. And, basically, I’d say that for everything that is going on in the mind, there is simultaneously something going on in the electro-magnetic field of the brain.<br><br>That’s kind of obvious, there has to be.<br><br>So when there is amnesia, there is going to be some sort of electro-magnetic correlation to that. Exactly what that is I don’t know but I’ve watched EEG’s being run on people where there is a main person, then they switch to a child, then they switch to an adolescent personality with different characteristics. And the EEG print out is tremendously different; it’s obvious at a glance how dramatically different it is.<br><br>That’s an area of research that needs a lot more tightening and a lot more documentation. But I would say, with the evidence we have so far, it’s pretty much for certain, not totally locked down, that when people with multiple personalities switch from one personality to another, there is a change in the electro-magnetic field in the brain that, say, an actor can not make happen. Obviously, if you watch Hollywood movies you can tell actors can do very good jobs of providing a picture of multiple personalities that looks very real. But when you do an EEG on those people it doesn’t change as it would with a real patient. There are a few papers like that and a lot more research is needed… but I think we have enough evidence to pretty well conclude that’s the case. There is something internally real about it even though it’s not literally ‘real’.<br><br>Which is something that occurs with auditory hallucinations - when you hear voices - whether if it’s with schizophrenia or multiple personalities. All of these scanning studies that have been done now on people who are hearing voices, its clear that the brain is behaving as if it’s actually hearing a voice.<br><br>So it’s not just a fantasy.<br><br>There is actually, in the reality, of the brain, the voice that is ‘heard’ . But it is also a hallucination, and it is as real as the voice of a real person, it terms of the part of the brain lighting up. So we have to get away from this question of: Is it real or not real?’.<br><br>I have a term I call the Central Paradoxes of Multiple Personality Disorder, which is now called Dissociative Identity Disorder. The Central Paradox is it’s both real and not real at the same time. So you have to not get hung up on, I don’t believe in that: ‘it’s not possible, it can’t be real’, because it isn’t in fact literally real. There aren’t a whole bunch of little men running around in somebody’s brain, but it is very internally subjectively real.<br><br>Marshall: So let’s get to Blue Bird and the research, there is so much in this book… people just need to read it for themselves. First of all what was it like when you first, talking as a doctor, what was it like when you first came across it? What was your reaction to the idea that there were actually people deliberately creating multiple personalities? Then describe some of the actual experiments and the methodology they enacted to create these types of medical and psychological states.<br><br>Dr. Ross: I kind of got prepared for it with satanic cult phenomenon, because I had already spent 3 or 4 years everyday of my professional life going: ‘Could this be real, could any of it be real? How’s it possible?’ Because the people that described cult experiences were describing members of the cult deliberately creating personalities. So I already had obsessed, thought, and ruminated about this for a number of years in the context of satanic cults before the mind control came up. I certainly had lots of experience with documented cases of pretty extreme sexual abuse of patients by very disturbed out of control doctors, psychiatrists, and therapists. It didn’t really surprise me that doctors and therapists could be doing something even more extreme than I had heard about. I put it into the context also of Nazi Germany and human atrocities throughout history. The craziness and the destructiveness of the things I was finding out about, when you put them in the context of Nazi Germany, wars, domestic violence, physical and sexual abuse, it’s not that far out of the range of a lot of things that have gone on in history. That helped me drop down my incredulity factor.<br><br>But the most amazing thing about it intellectually was… the more I looked into it, the more connections I found. Here is this doctor and I go to read a paper and low and behold he is the co-author of this doctor who I found about by some other line of investigation. Then I would find that these two other doctors are together, then I’d find that the second doctor was also at the same university as this other doctor. And just building up all these connections and seeing how it wasn’t just a couple of rogue scientists or mad scientists in a basement or a couple of deviant people here and there. It was a whole network of interconnected academics mostly who were editors of leading journals, chairman of departments of psychiatry at Yale, Harvard, and UCLA and people who are presidents of the American Psychiatry Association, getting lifetime awards from the American Psychiatric Association. The grandfathers of psychiatry all involved in this, all- knowledgeable about it, some with and without top secret clearance levels. But it was something that was known in the profession, it was generally known yet there was not a word about it. It’s kind of like sexual abuse in the Catholic Church. As we are finding out today, all these leaders in the Catholic Church knew perfectly well that all this sexual abuse was going on, but did they ever mention it, talk about it, or do anything about it, no. Same with mind control experimentation, which is wildly in violation of the Geneva Convention and all ethical codes. Highly harmful, no informed consent, and no follow up, it was just business as usual within psychiatry.<br><br>Marshall: Could you describe a couple of examples of experiments that were done to create multiples, maybe some of the more successful or extreme ones?<br><br>Dr. Ross: Well, part of the problem is that when you get to the most sophisticated Manchurian candidate experiments, they are described somewhat vaguely. This whole thing is in a pyramid shaped hierarchy. Where creation of the Manchurian candidate is up at the summit and at the lower levels of the pyramid there are all kinds of investigations, of all kinds of things, which are all pieces of the jigsaw puzzle on how to create a Manchurian candidate; which is an artificial multiple personality for use in missions and operations. So you will see one person working on use of LSD in interrogation, another person working on hypnosis, and another person working on sensory deprivation. Some of these people are just regular academics that were doing grants and then some have top secret clearance and know that it is either CIA or military intelligence experimentation. Then the people on the next layer up are taking some of the pieces and putting them together in the same experiment.<br><br>So an example at that level would be a man named Amadeo Maratzi who worked at Edgeware Arsenal for a period of time in Maryland. Which is a big biological, chemical, and psychological warfare weapons development center. He was at the University of Minnesota later where he had a grant from the Air Force Office of Scientific Research, which is published in the medical literature. You can just go to the medical school library and photocopy it and the paper includes the acknowledgment that it was funded by the Air Force Office of Scientific Research. What he did, basically, he got subjects and put them in an Ames Leaf room. An Ames Leaf room was a room first built by a guy named Ames who was funded by the Office of Naval Research. Basically it’s an 8 by 12 cubicle box open at one end. The subject sits just inside the box so that he can’t see outside and all he can see is the walls, the walls are all lined with leaves, leaves that have been pasted all over the walls. The subject wears goggles with a special kind of lens called Nisaconic lenses, which was also developed by Ames and related researchers. What these lenses do is distort all the angles. One side of the room the leaves are all big and sticking out, on the other side of the room they seem small and flat. The floor will be sloping up on them at a crazy angle, and the angle of the walls doesn’t fit with the angles of the floor and so on. Then what you do is you see a photograph of the person from behind and they have two little knobs they can turn which adjusts a white bar at the far end of the leaf room. The subject has the bar adjusted where it looks horizontal to him, but it’s actually tilted at quite an angle.<br><br>So he’s in the Ames leaf room wearing nisaconic lenses and he’s on LSD. The LSD was supplied by the Air Force. The purpose of this has two aspects. One is – I mean, it’s unbelievable that anyone would ever had done that, but there it is sitting on the shelves of the medical school library. On one hand it’s clever and it’s a part of trying to figure out the uses of LSD in interrogation, mind control, and brainwashing. Then on the other side it’s kind of really stupid because the net conclusion of the research basically was, if you sit in an Ames leaf room wearing nisaconic lenses stoned on LSD, you can’t see straight. I mean it’s all kind of colossally dumb in one sense but these are all pieces of the puzzle when you get to the actual creation of a Manchurian Candidate for use in operations. All those elements are being used but the exact formula basically is still classified.<br><br>But it’s really a combination of selecting subjects who are really susceptible. That is, they’re good hypnotic subjects, either highly dissociative, highly trance-prone, and maybe with a trauma history. So you go through some sort of selection/screening procedure to get people who are good for mind control experimentation. Then it’s a combination of good cop/bad cop techniques used on them. Having control of their life space so that they’re either in the military, in a prison, in a mental hospital or they are in some sort camp of some kind… so you have really solid control of who they talk to, who they know, and what they do. A lot of hypnosis, sensory deprivation and isolation, some forms of drugs, which would be either hallucinogens usually, amphetamines, or barbiturates, etc. Then basically you create a new identity, which is not that hard to do in a good hypnotic subject. You create an amnesia barrier between the main part of the person and the hidden identity. Then you insert access codes, which can be either verbal signals, tones over the telephone, hand gestures, or – basically - any kind of signal. This is described very clearly and in great detail in these documents. Then what you do is, say the person is in the Navy and you want to use him as a hypnotic courier. What you do is you bring him into the office and you give him some sort of cover assignment, which is to take some non-classified documents from point A to point B. Then you say to him “the moon is clear” which is the programmed hypnotic signal that switches him to his programmed personality. So now you give the programmed personality classified information.<br><br>Marshall: Verbally?<br><br>Dr. Ross: Yeah, verbally or you would give them documents to carry, but usually you would give it verbally. Then you switch personalities using another code back to their regular self. He’s amnesic of all that information. He goes to point B and somebody on the receiving end says “ the moon is clear”. He flips to his Manchurian Candidate personality, he delivers the message or information and then you just run it back and reverse again. And these kinds of people can be used for courier assignments, penetration/infiltration assignments or assassination assignments. <br><br>pg2<br><br>not available (oh well..)<br> <p></p><i></i>
quioxte
 
Posts: 21
Joined: Thu May 05, 2005 5:42 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

film treatment pg3

Postby quioxte » Fri Jul 01, 2005 6:00 pm

THE MOST DANGEROUS GAME<br><br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://web.archive.org/web/20040408110026/www.guerrillanews.com/tmdg_trailer/treat_3.html">web.archive.org/web/20040...eat_3.html</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><br>Film Treatment<br>Approach: Wide-Angle<br><br>Through the deployment of a new approach to documentary film-making, simply called X-Doc, The Most Dangerous Game seeks to embark on a journey that defies the traditional modus operandi of investigative journalism. Because we, as film-makers, understand from the outset that we may never come across a so-called smoking gun that validates Cathy’s story, it is imperative that we endeavor to create an experience that takes viewers into a realm beyond that of mere factual analysis.<br><br>Somewhere in between the halls of justice and the doors of perception…<br><br>So that after each side of the argument has been presented, our audience has come one step closer to understanding that we are all, in some way, by some means, under a form of ‘mind control’. Whether it is imposed on us from an external source or by our own need to protect ourselves from the reality of a world that has seemingly become totally unglued. And that, whether or not they buy into Cathy’s depiction of a secret global dictatorship, administrated by a drug-abusive, pedophiliac core of politicians and handlers, they will have been offered a glimpse of the ways in which power exercises its will on the public-at-large.<br><br>Approach: Close-Up<br><br>The Most Dangerous Game will aspire to be, in some way, a form of homage to the complexity of the mind and all its myriad versions of ‘reality’. Just as we follow Mark and Cathy through the mezzanine layers of their story and all the characters who have assembled to corroborate its veracity, so too will our cameras lead us to those who not only doubt the validity of Trance Formation of America, but believe that its authors are involved in a major form of ‘disinformation’ campaign. The following is an abridged list of potential interview subjects :<br><br>Friends of Cathy O’Brien<br><br>Cathy O’Brien has been telling her story in the public domain since 1994. Over the course of that period, she has amassed a relatively strong group of believers and ardent supporters. While we will film interviews with some attendees to her lectures, the main focus of our documentary will center on those who have played an active role in her mission to spread the message contained in Trance Formation of America.<br><br>Mark Phillips – former intelligence operative and Cathy O’Brien’s husband. Mark was involved in a business partnership with Cathy’s alleged handler/husband Alex Houston. It was after a tip-off from Chinese intelligence, he claims, that he was made aware of Cathy’s condition and attempted to rescue her.<br><br>Scott Rosenburg – the former Tennessee state prosecutor (and current juvenile court judge) who, upon seeing the level of suspicion surrounding her case, reversed his personal position on Cathy’s story and came to her aid.<br><br>Larry Becraft – Alabama-based federal attorney who has acted as consultant and advisor to Cathy and Mark since 1995.<br><br>Mind Control Experts<br><br>The field of mind control research is one of the most complex in the realm of clinical science. Not only are there a vast array of competing perspectives, but it has also been ascertained that some authors are actually CIA plants, working to obscure certain aspects of the Agency’s mind control operation. For the purposes of The Most Dangerous Game, we have condensed our list of expert interviewees to some of the most prolific and/or highly recommended sources. Tapping their knowledge base, we will shed some light on the medical validity of Cathy’s alleged condition as well as the history of CIA mind control experimentation.<br><br>Dr. Colin Ross - Dissociative Identity Disorder: Diagnosis, Clinical Features, and Treatment of Multiple Personality Dr. Harvey Weinstein - Psychiatry and the CIA: Victims of Mind Control Christopher Simpson - The Science of Coercion Alan W. Scheflin and Edward M. Opton Jr - The Mind Manipulators John Marks – The Search for the Manchurian Candidate Linda Hunt - Secret Agenda: The U.S. Government, Nazi Scientists and Project Paperclip Adam Parfrey – Publisher: Feral House John Grinder, Richard Bandler - Tranceformations<br><br>Alleged Abusers<br><br>While the list of Cathy’s alleged abusers is long and incredibly detailed, we have chosen to limit the pursuit of on-camera interviews to: members of her immediate family (parents, 2 sisters and 4 brothers), her two alleged CIA handler/husbands and their families, and certain individuals whom she has accused of complicity in or knowledge about her abuse who are no longer in the military or political office. This list is long but of foremost interest will be former Department of Defense Lt. Col. (and founder of the Satanic Temple of Set) Michael Aquino and former Sandanista leader, Daniel Ortega.<br><br>Critics of Mark and Cathy<br><br>Even though Trance Formation of America has remained off the radar of mainstream media publications, there are several authors who have written extensive reports on what they consider to be lies and distortions perpetrated by the book’s existence. Most prolific among them is:<br><br>Martin Cannon - Project Monarch: The Tangled Web<br><br>Robert Sterling – founder of Konformist.com<br><br>We will also pursue interviews with representatives of the False Memory Syndrome Foundation (specifically Martin T. Orn and Ralph Underwager PhD ) and, obviously, any person named in the book who wants to comment on the story.<br><br>Official Corroboration<br><br>Finally, we will seek to procure interviews with public and private investigators who have unearthed evidence that corroborates Cathy O’Brien’s story. Of those who we have ascertained as credible sources, the following three are most noteworthy:<br><br>John DeCamp – former Nebraska State Senator and currently a federal attorney. DeCamp investigated the widespread allegations of pedophilia and Satanic trauma inflicted on children in the Omaha, Nebraska region. His book, The Franklin Cover-Up, documents the testimonies of over ten children who named major political figures as abusers.<br><br>Ted Gunderson – former FBI officer and investigator of the Franklin Cover-Up who has amassed riveting documentation of U.S. intelligence agency and law enforcement complicity in the broader child abuse and trauma-based mind control networks.<br><br>Valerie Wolf – a New Orleans therapist who testified with her patients (in 1995) that they had “been part of an extensive CIA brainwashing program as young children their brainwashing included torture, rape, electroshock, drugs, hypnosis and death threats.” They further testified that the CIA then induced amnesia to prevent their recalling anything that really happened.<br><br>Echelon – a wealthy businessman who, through his own personal exposure to the program, spent seven years of his life researching and tracking a similar operation to that of Monarch. His testimony has been filmed “in shadow”.<br><br>Kelly O’Brien - Cathy’s only child, Kelly, was allegedly born into a world of brutal sexual abuse and high-level mind control programming. In 1989, a year after Mark Phillips brought the Cathy and Kelly to Alaska in order to recover from the abuse of their ‘handlers,’ Kelly had to be institutionalized due to a resurfacing of programming that caused deep psychological trauma as well as a form of respiratory failure. She was subsequently never released from state care. After being moved back to Tennessee, the alleged site of some of the most horrific mind control operations, Cathy fought to regain custody of her but were blocked by a judge who, they claim, stated that laws did not apply in their case “due to reasons of national security”.<br><br>Kelly is now living outside of the institutional environment but can still be ‘triggered’ into a medical crisis at the very mention of Cathy’s name or through direct questioning about her alleged abusers. We have spoken to Cathy about interviewing Kelly for the documentary and while she is hesitant to bring about any further pain for Kelly, she remains open to the potential of allowing us to see her.<br><br>On the Road with Mark and Cathy<br><br>Though The Most Dangerous Game will be feature a series of well-spoken interview subjects, the spine of the film will be a hands-on investigation of Cathy’s claims by the documentary film crew itself. As we follow the duo through the country roads of the southern states that were home to Cathy during her alleged mind control existence, we will visit sites documented in Trance Formation of America as high-level covert drug distribution hubs, trauma-based mind control centers and the local communities where she and her daughter Kelly were ‘kept’.<br><br>And yet, even as we journey across America with them in their ominous black sedan, we will also be treading deep into the neural landscape of Cathy O’Brien, herself. In fact, for the average viewer who tunes into this intrinsically unfathomable story, the only point of entry for them will be through Cathy and her recounting of what she remembers. For most, they will only be able to believe her story to the extent that it remains within their own ‘belief threshold. Thus, The Most Dangerous Game will seek to perish the boundaries of what we have come to understand as ‘truth’ and ‘delusion’ by building a visual fabric unlike anything presented by a documentary film in the history of the genre. <p></p><i></i>
quioxte
 
Posts: 21
Joined: Thu May 05, 2005 5:42 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

thought's on the video's

Postby quioxte » Mon Jul 04, 2005 3:23 am

just wondering if anyone has any thoughts?<br><br>I know Cathy O'Brien has been written off for awhile now, but I am wondering why? <p></p><i></i>
quioxte
 
Posts: 21
Joined: Thu May 05, 2005 5:42 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Cathy O'Brian and Mark Phillips

Postby Peachtree Pam » Mon Jul 04, 2005 5:11 am

Quixote,<br>There are some suspicions concerning both Cathy and Mark. Kathleen Sullivan and Bryce Taylor have had unpleasant experiences with them and do not trust them, particularly Mark.<br><br>In my opinion, once CIA, always CIA. This does not mean that everything Cathy has said is untrue, but it seems that Phillips is a "containment agent" trying to limit the credibility of survivors:<br><br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://educate-yourself.org/lte/sirmarkphillips26dec03.shtml">educate-yourself.org/lte/...ec03.shtml</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--> <p></p><i></i>
Peachtree Pam
 
Posts: 950
Joined: Sat Jul 02, 2005 9:46 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

I've read them..

Postby quioxte » Tue Jul 05, 2005 5:25 am

I can see how, someone could reach those conclusions.<br><br>I have only spent s little time on the info, but I do not see why what information they have given out has not been given more study. From what has been studied, some has been corroborated (murder victims locations, legal suits)<br><br>It is more of a slander that is given... don't believe them Mark Phillips is a Handler, I don't know but from watching the videos, he does not come across as having Mental control over Cathy O'Brien (I may be wrong). <br><br>I do not see showing off her vaginal mutilation as a way of containing the information. Cathy O'Brien seems to have had the most success in getting the story out. Of all the wild alien claims Trance Formation made in '95, such as Bush and Clinton being 'secret' buddies, who were involved in drug smuggling etc...<br><br>Once CIA is probably true, I'm sure there is much more to be told. <br><br>I'm not sure if I linked it but<br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://web.archive.org/web/20040324023818/http://www.guerrillanews.com/tmdg_trailer/">web.archive.org/web/20040...g_trailer/</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><br>has all the video's and interviews GNN did on the subject.<br><br>If they are disinfo, then there is money being made<br><br>How much money can really be made off of it? Trance Formation is self published, how much can be made that way? They made public lectures, normally to 'conspiracy nutters' (who stereotypically don't have much cash)<br> <p></p><i></i>
quioxte
 
Posts: 21
Joined: Thu May 05, 2005 5:42 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

O'Brien

Postby veritas366 » Wed Jul 06, 2005 11:40 am

Well, I wrote Cathy once. They live here in Nashville, where I live and I had read that her daughter was forcibly being held in a psychiatric hospital in Knoxville. I wrote and asked if there was anything I could do: sign a petition, demonstrate, whatever. She wrote me back and said that what I needed to do was buy her newest book. Gee, glad you are so concerned about her.<br><br>Also, Phillips story has changed a lot. And anyone who just happens to know how to program people and then claims to be "deprogramming" Cathy, well, I don't trust it.<br><br>I wonder, in general terms, how if this stuff is so sophisticated that victims are now writing detailed books. How did they overcome the amnesia and programming? <p></p><i></i>
veritas366
 
Posts: 1
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 11:40 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

re: Thoughts ...

Postby Starman » Wed Jul 06, 2005 2:09 pm

I agree with Peachtree Pam (BTW: What a neato-handle! : ) --<br>Once CIA Always CIA, not necessarily by choice -- That's a goddang chilly, freaky thought.<br><br>Definitely, a lot of damage control. I thought the Good Doctor's interview was a lot of soft-peddling with Kid Gloves.<br>I can't comment on the vids -- my c'mputer is too primitive to run 'em (I know, I know, I need to upgrade).<br>But from other sources of my reading, I think the information on past --let alone ongoing-- mind-control experiments and programs has only scratched the surface of how widespread and dangerous and truly awful it is, being managed by Gov. didinfo agents in damage control and to discredit whistleblowers. I suspect a fair bit of what Cathy O'Brien and Mark have disclosed is distorted, but which parts and why, I dunno. <br><br>That victims HAVE been jolted into 'discovering' degrees of what has been done to themselves shows that there are/have been flaws and inherant problems in the technology and techniques (system), as could reasonably be expected since the mind is such a complex system that isn't well-understood -- but who knows if some systems/techniques are more effective in keeping DID victims dissociated, with near-failsafe hypnotic/subconscious suggestions to prevent breakdown of the programmed security-features -- that is, how many victims/survivors might there actually be?<br><br>esuggested the only way to 'help' her daughter was by buying her book, ???!!!!<br><br>That's almost too screwed-up odd and even tragic for words -- why ISN'T there an organized public campaign which could increase public awareness of these issues by publicizing the awful tragedy of Cathy's daughter's treatment, perversely and incredibly 'excused' by reversion to that old standby catchall 'National Security'. If that isn't a major red-flag reality-check slap-in-the-face I dunno what is. And of course, the horrors of C's daughter's treatment as a ward of the state reflects the tragedy of untold numbers of children being abused and abominably injured, which reality is carefully kept hidden. Its a goddamn outrage that is representative of a deep sickness that pervades our ocial and political institutions.<br><br>As far as Mark's actual role and relationship with Cathy --if he was 'handling' her, I don't think there'd be any outward, evident indications of it -- this kind of control via deeply-buried, systemic psychological conditioning is far too sophisticated to be readily observed or easily detected. It's not unreasonable to suspect there's a lot more going on than we can imagine or even hope to know without a lot more patient digging and putting the pieces together.<br><br>This whole issue provokes and sustains a deeply-held outrage within me -- it's just so reflective of what is seriously wrong about gov.-sanctioned wrongdoing that evades accountability -- the public must have a zero-tolerance about unspeakably-horrible crimes. How can anybody ever be so deluded to think that torture and manipulating people, using them for experiemtns and subjecting them to foul depravities can EVER be justified? If EVER there is such a 'thing' as pure EVIL, there it is, within our midst, an unacknowledged secret.<br>Starman<br><br>Pardon me for reposting this link, but if anyone missed it in other threads it's especially apt for this one:<br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.thewatcherfiles.com/mind_control_slavery.html">www.thewatcherfiles.com/m...avery.html</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><br>According to this extremely disturbing report, Monarch Program mind-control survivors claim to have been used as high-tech slaves by certain intelligence agencies and top-ranking politicians. Extracted from Nexus Magazine, Volume 6, Number 2 (February-March 1999).<br>From our web page at: <!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.nexusmagazine.com//MindControlNWO.html">www.nexusmagazine.com//Mi...olNWO.html</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><br>****<br>I've always felt it was important, as people of a 'free' republic, as one of our duties as autonomous spiritual beings, to force ourselves even against our casual wants, to seek to better informed, at least moderately-capably well-read, about issues and events that are troubling, disturbing, difficult -- Such as the horrors of the Khymer Rouge and the Soviet Gulag and the Holocaust/Concentration camps and the Phoenix program. The issue of Mind Control and RA is a similiarly important, vital subject that we, as individuals and the public, need to be informed about -- actually, being informed is the key if we're ever to effectively promote liberty, or social-justice and human rights. I've seen first-hand how resistant to the topic of RA people are when I try to talk about it -- they are like repelled and turn-away. Good GaWD, how much like German citizens who didn't want to acknowledge Death Camps -- and like much of US public today won't acknowledge deliberate US policies that facilitated the death and suffering of hundreds of thousands of German POWS following the 2nd war.<br>-S <p></p><i></i>
Starman
 
Posts: 410
Joined: Sun May 15, 2005 3:57 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Video

Postby quioxte » Thu Jul 07, 2005 5:13 am

The video's are the crux of my argument on the issue.<br><br>I say if possible, watch them <br><br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://web.archive.org/web/20040324023818/http://www.guerrillanews.com/tmdg_trailer/">web.archive.org/web/20040...g_trailer/</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><br>The interviews they give, and the footage makes thier story more credible. At least in my eyes, but who knows..<br> <p></p><i></i>
quioxte
 
Posts: 21
Joined: Thu May 05, 2005 5:42 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

O'Brien

Postby Dreams End » Thu Jul 07, 2005 11:36 am

This quote was probably posted elsewhere, but I'll post it again here.<br><br>From Hunter S. Thompson's last book:<br><br> The autumn months are never a calm time in America. . . . There is always a rash of kidnapping and abductions of schoolchildren in the football months. Preteens of both sexes are traditionally seized and grabbed off the streets by gangs of organized perverts who traditionally give them as Christmas gifts to each other to be personal sex slaves and playthings. (from Hey, Rube, p. 3) <br><br>I have a question, though. If these folks are victims of mind control, why can they remember these events. I know O'Brien was allegedly "deprogrammed" but what about others? And how can we say they haven't been "reprogrammed" rather than deprogrammed? <br><br>I'm not asking to say these things don't happen, but I never see accounts of how we have people remembering these things despite the very elaborate programming.<br><br>One other slightly off topic question. There is a drug that is used for certain surgeries that simply erases the memories during that time. I'm pretty sure I have this right. The person is conscious but loses their short term memory. Does anyone know what this drug is called or if I'm wrong about it? <p></p><i></i>
Dreams End
 

drug which gives short term memory loss...

Postby sw » Thu Jul 07, 2005 1:22 pm

edit
Last edited by sw on Mon Jan 22, 2007 12:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.
sw
 
Posts: 764
Joined: Mon May 09, 2005 2:08 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

scopolamine?

Postby Avalon » Thu Jul 07, 2005 1:45 pm

As far as I know, the medical world is not entirely sure how anesthesia works. You generally wouldn't be expected to remember anything during the period you were under, although these days medical teams are supposed to speak as though the anesthetised patient is there awake with them, as there seems to be a mechanism where some patients have reported conversations they've heard.<br><br>A mixture of Scopolamine and morphine, called "Twilight Sleep," was often used in childbirth from 1902 through the sixties. It was said to give amnesia about the birthing process, thus totally dissociating the mother from the birth experience. It was discontinued when it became evident that it depressed the baby's central nervous sytem, as also happens with modern anesthetics used in birthing.<br><br> <p></p><i></i>
User avatar
Avalon
 
Posts: 1529
Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2005 2:53 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Next

Return to Mind Control

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest