Moloch

[Et in Arcadia ego]

And again, I ask:

WHAT THE FUCK DOES CAESERIAN OCCUPATIONAL PROPAGANDA HAVE TO DO WITH ANCIENT MEDITERRANEAN RELIGIOUS BELIEFS?

Re-read the thread, genius.

Baal-Molech worship and Goddess worship spread from the Middle East to England, as mentioned by a poster early on.

I don't need to re-read the thread, I started the thread.

From page 1:

Yeah, I know all about the B.G. thing. Sorry, I should have clarified I was after the origins of the entity. I'm trying to pin down where it originated and particulars of its cult.

How hard is this to understand, Christian Cultist?

[Occult Means Hidden]

A picture drawn in the, maybe, 18th century is supposed to illustrate how "pagans" sacrificed innocents a millenia earlier? 1,000 years earlier? Maybe more?

Actually, the custom of burning victims alive in the wicker man was described by Caesar in "The Gallic Wars". There's a fair amount of contemporary documentation for the practice.

Thanks for saving me the trouble of having to post that.
It gets tiring teaching REAL history to those brainwashed by Revisionists.

I think the source for the Wicker Man thing was Julius Caesar's works on his Gallic campaigns, not exactly an unbiased source.

And that's the thing. Supporting the evidence for wicker man burning is like saying a thousand years from now that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction and America invaded to protect itself. The overall victors write the history. That is LAW.

The equivalent back then of accusing other countries of developing weapons of mass destruction is accusing them of human sacrifice. You can't exactly get away with false flags back then. And what do you know? Seems every outpost and nation except Greece and Egypt around Rome was and is accused of human sacrifice. Carthage, Pheonicia, Druidic Ireland, Gaulish France, Hunns, Slavic Baltic regions, Iberia, etc, etc. Coincidence?

And Rome hasn't been out of power since the Gallic wars. Today they are know as the Roman Catholic Church...

[John E. Nemo]

There is archeologoical evidence from the entire globe that pagans performed human sacrifice





I'm sorry that it's reality and not some politically correct, pretty lie.

Truth is always ugly and never popular.

[Et in Arcadia ego]

John E Nemo, will you please take your bag of shit elsewhere? The only people who deny that cultures in the past made sacrifices are the TV people living in your head. I don't give a rat's ass who else made sacrifices where, that has nothing to do with my fucking thread. This thread is about the origins of a specific entity, not a white-wash clearing house for 'justified' Christian/Catholic atrocity against pagan cultures.

Now kindly FUCK OFF ALREADY..If you're that bored you have to troll my thread that you are most definitely NOT welcome in, go find a registry somewhere and do a hand count of the Inquisition's death toll, asshole.

[John E. Nemo]

John E Nemo, will you please take your bag of shit elsewhere? The only people who deny that cultures in the past made sacrifices are the TV people living in your head.

Almost every poster in this thread has tried to deny that pagans performed human sacrifice.
Since that pretty lie doesn't stand up to the light of truth, you have been forced to rescind it and replace it with expletives, (the absolute brilliance of which, BTW, have dazzled us all, he said sarcastically).

I don't give a rat's ass who else made sacrifices where, that has nothing to do with my fucking thread. This thread is about the origins of a specific entity, not a white-wash clearing house for 'justified' Christian/Catholic atrocity against pagan cultures.

You care very deeply about Catholics killing people, you just don't care about the ritual sacrifice of your fellow pagans.
That is known to us adults as bias.

The true purpose of this thread was simple.
It was an attempt to deny that an entity named Molech was ever worshipped, because you believed, falsely, that there was no archeological evidence of it.
Since Molech is mentioned in the Bible, you found a "crafty" way to attempt to discredit the Christians you hate, by "proving" that their holy book is wrong.

I provided archeological evidence of Molech and you became unhinged, as evidenced below.

Now kindly FUCK OFF ALREADY..If you're that bored you have to troll my thread that you are most definitely NOT welcome in, go find a registry somewhere and do a hand count of the Inquisition's death toll, asshole.

It's not "your" thread, Arcade Game ego-maniac.
It's an RI thread.

I have started plenty of them that you have felt the need to come in and attempt to derail or destroy.
Now you cry foul, because you feel that someone has done it to you.

Cry me a river.

You, in fact, have done what I consider to be the most offensive thing that anyone has ever done on this site, when you made a page about RI on MySpace.

What you did, in reality, was make it so that Rupert Murdoch, who owns MySpace, will get more money from advertisers, partly because of the RI page that you created and the traffic that it draws.

So you get to help a rich, evil scumbag get richer and you are chosen as a mod for it.
I would have banned you, but the will of Jeff is supreme, if somewhat capricious.

(By that I mean that he asked me in a PM to "re-consider my conduct", which I have done, but a godlike mod like you, is apparently given carte blanche to misbehave however he wishes.)

So be it.

Before I forget, the Ras Shamra tablets discovered in Syria in 1930, also mention Molech as a god, if anyone is interested in reading them.

[Et in Arcadia ego]

lol.

You, in fact, have done what I consider to be the most offensive thing that anyone has ever done on this site, when you made a page about RI on MySpace.

What you did, in reality, was make it so that Rupert Murdoch, who owns MySpace, will get more money from advertisers, partly because of the RI page that you created and the traffic that it draws.

So you get to help a rich, evil scumbag get richer and you are chosen as a mod for it.
I would have banned you, but the will of Jeff is supreme, if somewhat capricious.

(By that I mean that he asked me in a PM to "re-consider my conduct", which I have done, but a godlike mod like you, is apparently given carte blanche to misbehave however he wishes.)

Where do I even start with this bullshit..

First, I made the myspace page to bring new readers to Jeff's blog, which I think is a very good thing. I have no idea how much Murdoch has directly profited from my actions, but I doubt its much. Inversely, I've had many MANY people thank for me and cite that page as their door to RI and the things we discuss.

That equals success to me, and worth the effort that I applied with Jeff's good will. My only regret is that I haven't been able to maintain it and its fallen behind.

Or is exposing these things we discuss here something you don't want to see happen?

Next, I'm not a mod and I haven't been in almost a year. You're being called out for your shit behavior because your behavior is shit.

Third, I'm not rescinding jack shit and you can't show one instance of my doing so in this thread. Pagan and Christinsanity both have spilled more blood than could ever be measured, but THATS NOT WHAT THIS GODDAMNED THREAD IS ABOUT, NEMO..

Lastly, I'm sorry if I poo-pooed in any of your threads. I don't remember doing so, but if I did, it must have been because they were lame to begin with.

[orz]

Almost every poster in this thread has tried to deny that pagans performed human sacrifice.

I didn't; I just posted an exerpt of a mind-bogglingly clever poem.

[geogeo]

What strikes me as ironic is that "Nemo" is a central concept in Thelema, as in Nemo ("No Man"), a pile of dust in the City of the Pyramids.

Darn, you got this one first. I was itching to read through the rest of this thread and post it.

BTW the "assclown" stuff is over the top--why isn't this guy banned? But anyway, this thread is one of the most unreal, or surreal, texts I've read since grad school (but more entertaining). Sort of like that long-sought -after Freud/Derrida synthesis...

[orz]

I don't need to re-read the thread, I started the thread.

[Doodad]

Almost every poster in this thread has tried to deny that pagans performed human sacrifice.

I didn't; I just posted an exerpt of a mind-bogglingly clever poem.

Yeah but you were THINKING it! We know your type.

[yathrib]

Ummmm.... As far as Christianity goes, Catholicism--or its close cousin Orthodoxy--were the only games in town from about the fourth century onward, w/ the possible exception of splinters of splinters like the Waldensians, etc., and it's not clear that they were the prototype of nice Christian American Evangelicals either. And fierceness--even bloodthirstiness--were considered admirable and even required attitudes ttoward non- or misbelievers in many periods of Christian history. Just sayin'...

BTW, that goes double for you, et in Arcade Games, you useless ocultist assclown.

Onward, Christian Soldier.

I know you're not very bright, Arcade Game, but I thought you knew the difference between a Catholic and a Christian.
Then again, since it's not mentioned in Harry Potter books, and that seems to be all you know, how could you?

[b]That soldier has a rosary which identifies him with a mind control cult known as Catholicism.
A Catholic is a Pagan who, like the pagans of old, worships a pantheon of Gods known as Saints.
Like the pagans of old, he worships the Queen of Heaven, but instead of calling her Ishtar, he calls her Mary.
Like the pagans of old, he chants incantations to the Goddess called "Hail Marys".
Like the pagans of old, he participates in human sacrifice that he calls "Holy Wars".

It all started with a guy named Constantine, a pagan who "converted" to Catholicism, but never bothered to go to church or get baptized, (symbols of true faith) and introduced the heresy of "holy wars".

When a pagan, such as a Viking, burned a village and raped the village's women, he was doing the will of his god, Odin.

If a Christian burned a village and raped it's women, he is violating the law of the Most High.

Rapists and child murdering pagans used to be fair game for Hebrews, but J.C. changed the rules, in the name of peace and love (which is intersting, since that's what pagans claim to be for, although their actions are the opposite of that).

That's why Christians known as "missionaries" go to Third World countries and feed the poor and provide healthcare to the sick.

[theeKultleeder]

Ummmm.... As far as Christianity goes, Catholicism--or its close cousin Orthodoxy--were the only games in town from about the fourth century onward...

Except for the bold philosophers and seekers of wisdom who were forced underground by brutal regimes... And who Christians and other "Religions of the Book" still fear. If they had the power to stone us in the public square - they most definitely would.

So much for "civilization."

[theeKultleeder]

That's why Christians known as "missionaries" go to Third World countries and feed the poor and provide healthcare to the sick. [/b][/i]

I really thought you were more aware of human behavior than this, John. Christians do not feed and care for the sick to help them, they do it for one selfish purpose: to convert them.

[Joe Hillshoist]

... the Ras Shamra tablets discovered in Syria in 1930, ....

Ha thats so nearly my old man's name.

The true purpose of this thread was simple.
It was an attempt to deny that an entity named Molech was ever worshipped, because you believed, falsely, that there was no archeological evidence of it.

Bullshit, re read the thread.

EIAE said

So does the first appearance trace further than Babylon or does Moloch go back to Sumerian tradition?

How does that = "deny an entity named molech was ever worshipped".

???

Catholic is a Pagan who, like the pagans of old, worships a pantheon of Gods known as Saints.

How many Catholics do you know dickhead? And WTF is calling south americans Pagan? Pagans were pre Christian European people. Child sacrificers or not.

The way you use it is no different to saying:

"All blacks and asians look the same."

"All non Christians (Luciferian pagan heathens) look the same."

[Sepka]

I really thought you were more aware of human behavior than this, John. Christians do not feed and care for the sick to help them, they do it for one selfish purpose: to convert them.

If you grant the premise of the missionaries, though, converting people *does* help them. Conversely, if we don't grant that premise, then coverting them is a pointless actrivity, of no benefit to the missionaries. Whether one feels that religion, conversion, etc., are good or bad things in themselves, it's difficult to avoid the conclusion that the missionaries are sincerely trying to help others.