The Big Con at Dealey Plaza

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

The Big Con at Dealey Plaza

Postby Et in Arcadia ego » Sat Dec 15, 2007 9:29 pm

I decided to post this to a new thread for two reasons; the first, Fourthbase commented on receiving a virus hit at the source page I linked to. I did not receive a hit myself, but I'd be disappointed if people missed this due to virus concerns, so I've lifted the text. The second reason is obviously it's lengthy size. The author's name is included for reference at the end of the text.

While I'm no expert on the JFK assassination, I'm pretty familiar with Mr Linebarger and his excellent Science Fiction work published under the pseudonym Cordwainer Smith. Paul Linebarger was a pivitol element in the establishment of US Counter Intelligence, but to date, only Hugh Manatee Wins and myself seem to be aware of this person here at RI. I think some people are missing an opportunity to learn about one of the more interesting persons(to me) in the 20th century. "Psychological Warfare" was conceived through him using a fusion of Sun Tzu's Art of War and a thorough understanding of large scale confidence scams.

I'd also be interested in feedback from Hugh and others who are more steeped in the JFK data.

Arcadia
_____________________

THE BIG CON at DEALEY PLAZA - Paul Linebarger and David Maurer

President Kennedy's assassination was the work of magicians," said Hevve Lemarr of French Intelligence. "It was a stage trick complete with actor's accessories and props. And when the curtain fell the actors and even the scenery, disappeared. But the magicians were not illusionists, but professionals, artists in their own way." 1.

Whatever you believe happened at Dealey Plaza, President Kennedy was killed there, and regardless of who was ultimately responsible, it is important, at least to the security of the United States, to determine how the assassination occurred.

It's natural that a well planned and executed covert operation seems like a unnatural miracle or a magic trick. That's why covert operators are often called "spooks," their talents are said to be black arts, and they are participants in what they call "the Great Game" of espionage.

The "spooks" we've come to know sometimes compare the Great Game to chess and rank their power as knights, bishops and rooks. E. Howard Hunt was known as "Knight," and David Atlee Phillips, who was born on Oct. 31 – Halloween, was known to some as Mister "Bishop." 2.

Then there's Ed Lansdale, Frank Wisner and William Harvey, all legends, each with covert aliases and code names to conceal their true identities, or as the Cubans called them, "war names." The use of aliases is only one attribute all covert intelligence operatives have in common. Other similar attributes include the use of post boxes, dead drops, safe houses, microdots, codes and ciphers, as well as the standard trade crafts by all intelligence agencies, as outlined in Allen Dulles' book "The Crafts of Intelligence." 3.

Like most trades, "the crafts of intelligence" are taught and passed on by those who were previously taught the arts through a teacher-student, master-apprentice relationship, as they have for generations and over centuries since the days of Sun Tzu. 4.

Some of those individuals who standout in the history of espionage during he Cold War – E. Howard Hunt, David Atlee Phillips and Ed Lansdale, all had one thing in common - they were trained in the black arts of psychological warfare by a man they considered a legend among legends – Paul Linebarger.

That you wouldn't recognize him is a testament to Linebarger's success, as both a teacher and a player in the Great Game.

PAUL M. A. LINEBARGER

Paul Myron Anthony Linebarger was born in Milwaukee, Wisconsin in July 1913. The grandson of a preacher and the son of an American Judge in the Philippines and advisor to Chinese revolutionary Sun Yat sen, Linebarger's godfather. 5.

Well traveled and a student visitor to Japan, China, France and Germany, Linebarger earned his Ph.D. in political science at John Hopkins University at the age of 21.

Linebarger enlisted in the Army during World War II and served in the Pacific Theater. One report notes, "As a Far East specialist he was involved in the formation of the Office of War Information and of the Operation Planning and Intelligence Board. He also helped organize the Army's first psychological warfare section. Linebarger was sent to China and put in charge of psychological warfare and of coordinating Anglo- American and Chinese military activities. By the end of the war, he had risen to the rank of major."

Based primarily on manuals he produced for the Army during the war, Linebarger's book Psychological Warfare and Propaganda (Combat Forces Press, 1948; 1954) is the classic textbook on the subject, still used today. Taking Sun Tzu's The Art of War, Linebarger updated its principals and applied them to today's international circumstances. 6.

When the CIA produced terrorist and political assassination handbooks for the Contras in Nicaragua and Panamanian dissidents, which were later discovered and published, parts were found to have come from one of Linebarger's psychological warfare manuals. 7. [See: http://www.socialconscience.com/article ... guatemala/]

Although Linebarger also taught at Duke, after the war he became professor of Asiatic Studies at John Hopkins University in Baltimore, Maryland, where he was also a part time professor at the School of Advanced International Studies (SAIS), a CIA think tank. 8.

It wasn't until after his death that Linebarger was exposed as also being science fiction writer Cordwainer Smith [See: Notes below]. It was then also revealed that he was not only the foremost authority on psychological warfare in the Training Division of the CIA, but that he had also worked on operations with E. Howard Hunt in Mexico City. 9.

Those CIA recruits who were invited to take Linebarger's SAIS classes, which he taught at his Washington D.C. home at night, were required to get there by using trade-craft to avoid detection. 10.

Among Linebarger's most famous, if not successful students, were E. Howard Hunt, Edward Lansdale and David Atlee Phillips, three of the most prolific covert operators during the Cold War. Like Linebarger himself, if they had been truly successful we would never have heard of them.

As explained by Linebarger in his book and classes, propaganda is only one of the tools of the psychological warrior, whose primary goal is defeat the enemy before a battle is fought, using psychological principals that have been used for centuries and outlined by Sun Tzu.

In his studies of psychological warfare, Linebarger breaks propaganda into different categories – white, grey and black propaganda, with black propaganda specifically designed to appear to originate with the opposition. Linebarger devised the STASUM formula for the study of propaganda, and ways by which the opposition's propaganda can be analyzed to determine their intentions and predict their actions. 11.

In his classes Linebarger however, didn't just use his own book Psychological Warfare, but for examples of how successful covert operations are planned and executed he had his students read The Big Con, by David Maurer. 12.

In the introduction to his book Intelligence Wars – American Secret History From Hitler to Al Qaeda, Thomas Powers relates an interesting conversation he once had with General William Odom at a party hosted by former CIA intelligence officer Haviland Smith. 13.

While mingling and sipping cocktails at the party, Powers asked General Odom how the CIA could have uncovered and infiltrated Al Qaeda before 9/11.

General Odom, the former Army Chief of Staff and director of the National Security Agency, looked at Powers, smiled and said simply - "Like the Sting."

Like The Sting.

Odom was, of course, referring to the popular, award winning film staring Robert Redford and Paul Newman, but he was also giving away the secrets behind the magic, the secrets of the Big Con confidence games. 15.


DAVID MAURER'S THE BIG CON.

The movie the Sting is based in part on Professor David Maurer's The Big Con, a study of street slang of the American confidence men of the early part of the last century.

Maurer's The Big Con was first published in 1940 and updated and republished later as The American Confidence Man. The book began as a linguistic textbook on the slang of street grifters, but became a manual on how the big time confidence scams are actually played out.

A professor of linguistics at the University of Louisville, Kentucky, Maurer explained that, "My approach is simple. I determine who the good professionals are, secure their assistance, and work with them much the same as an anthropologist might work with an American Indian tribe he is studying."

"I have scrupulously refrained from passing any judgments with a moral bias," Maurer said. "My only aim is to tell for the general reader, the story of American confidence men and confidence games, stripped of the romantic aura which commonly hovers over literature of the modern big-time criminal." 17.

After the book was published Maurer continued teaching English classes for the next few decades, until the movie "The Sting" came out in the early 1970s. When he saw the film Maurer felt like he was stung.

Maurer recognized that the movie "The Sting" was based on his story of The Big Con, and eventually got a court to agree that his book was the basis for the screenplay, and used without credit, authorization or restitution.

However reluctantly the movie studio had to recognized and compensate Maurer because they could produce no other published work that mentions one of the movie's main protagonists Henry Gondorf (Played by Paul Newman). 18.

Gondorf was not a fictional character, but a real life person and subject of Maurer's book. Gondorf, according to Maurer, was a bartender and Big Con artist who operated big con jobs in the 1920s in Chicago, Atlantic City and New York, running the type of Big Con "stings" portrayed in the film. 19.

Unlike small con swindles, which usually take a sucker for whatever he has on him, the Big Con games bilked greedy and ripe victims for much larger sums, and the proper execution of the con depends upon a controlled theater, actors performing complicated schemes and the cooperation (pay off) of the local law enforcement.

The controlled theater is called the Big Store, which developed from the Dollar Stores, where back rooms promoted small time short cons (ala Three Card Monte). Maurer defines a Big Store as "An establishment against which big-con men play their victims. For the wire and the pay-off, it is set up like a poolroom which takes race bets. For the rag, it is set up to resemble a broker's office. Stores are set up with a careful attention to detail because they must seem bona fide. After each play, the store is taken down and all equipment stored away in charge of the manager."

The "Sting" is point that the Mark is separated from his money.

Maurer, who interviewed many of Gondorf's friends and fellow con-artists, explained that the purpose of the Big Con is to convince the Mark to deliver cash in a scheme that goes astray, with the Mark separated from his money but none the wiser to the real scheme. Big Con artists didn't consider themselves thieves because their greedy targets really give them the money.

Everyone in the con, except the Mark, is an actor, each having a name and a role to play. There is the Manager who sets up the store, the Roper, who is also known as the Outside Man, who identifies the Mark, brings him to the store, and assists in fleecing him. The Mark is a victim, or intended victim, someone with money from out of town. The local Dicks (Cops) are on the Take when the Fix is in, and paid off under the stipulation that local citizens wouldn't be taken as Marks.
The Roper identifies and brings the Mark to the Inside Man, who Maurer identifies as "The member of a con mob who stays near the Big Store and receives the Mark whom the Roper brings. Inside men are highly specialized workers; they must have a superb knowledge of psychology to keep the mark under perfect control during the days or weeks while he is being fleeced."

As Maurer puts it, "Big-time confidence games are in reality only carefully rehearsed plays in which every member of the cast except the mark knows his part perfectly. The inside man is the star of the cast; while the minor participants are competent actors and can learn their lines perfectly, they must look to the inside man for their cues; he must be not only a fine actor, but a playwright extempore as well…"

[Please note that David Atlee Phillips, one of Linebarger's star students, was also an amateur thespian who was a member of an acting troup in Havana that also included Wayne Smith, who spoke at COPA conferences and organized the meetings between COPA members and Cuban intelligence in Rio and the Bahamas.] 20.

When the deal goes down, everyone in the Store is part of the Sting except the Mark, who is given the convincer, then separated from his money in the sting, and then given the shut out, made to feel like its good that he got out without getting arrested or killed. After the best Stings, the Mark doesn't even realize what really happened.

When General Odom told Powers that counter-intelligence agents operate "like the Sting," he meant that the best covert operations are conducted very much like the Big Con confidence schemes, as Paul Linebarger taught them.

In looking at what happened at Dealey Plaza as a Big Con job, it seems that both Kennedy and Oswald, the accused assassin, were set up as Marks. The Texas School Book Depository (TSBD), owned by D.H. Byrd, an avid Cold Warrior, was set up like a Big Store, totally under control of the confidence men who ran the operation. 21.

JFK was the Mark who was hooked and brought to the Big Store by the Outside Man. Whoever the Inside Man was, he was very good, and like Gondorf and Linebarger, has remained behind the scenes, so far. We can be sure however, that whoever was behind the Dealey Plaza operation, he was a student of Linebarger.

When Paul Linebarger gave his lectures to young CIA officers, he warned them that these techniques should never be used domestically, or it would totally destroy our form of democracy.

"On the other side of the coin, it is very hopeful to note that the many and dangerous techniques developed by the OSS (Precursor to the CIA) for covert propaganda, some of which were applied with considerable success in Europe, have not been introduced into domestic U.S. politics, commercial competition or other forms of private life." 23. [See: http://the-open-mind.blogspot.com/2005/ ... rfare.html]

Well those techniques were used domestically in the assassination of President Kennedy, and are still being used today to conceal the truth and postpone justice, and democracy has never been the same.

Among those who have studied the assassination of President Kennedy, Noel Twyman wrote the book Bloody Treason and a pamphlet "Illusion and Denial in the John F. Kennedy Assassination," (October 16, 2000). [Laurel Publishing, P.O.Box 67-5128, Rancho Santa Fe, CA 92067, laurelpubl@home.com (858)- 756-3504]. 24.

In "Illusion and Denial" Twyman writes, "My studies of this subject have led me to believe that the master planners of the JFK assassination were experts in the use of illusion and denial to control entire populations. Evidence of this is found in documents revealing CIA psychological operations (psy-ops) utilized to overthrow foreign governments. A notable example is the successful 1954 overthrow of Guatemala, using population control techniques, in which President Jacobo was deposed by the CIA and replaced with a government that had the blessings of the United Fruit Company. This coup involved David Atlee Phillips, psy-ops specialist in the CIA. Phillips is linked to the JFK assassination in that he was seen meeting with Lee Harvey Oswald in Dallas in late August, 1963, only three months before the assassination." 25.

Indeed, the 1954 overthrow of the government of Guatemala, achieved without a major battle and little violence, was the prime example of the proper application of Linebarger's psychological warfare techniques to contemporary political situations. What became the ill fated Bay of Pigs invasion of Cuba was originally planned to be based on "the Guatemala operation," and is an example of the failure to apply the same principals. 26.

There are many connections to the Guatemalan "Operation Success" and what happened at Dealey Plaza, including the facts that accused assassin's principal sponsor Michael Paine was a beneficiary of his family who served on the Board of Directors of the United Fruit Company, the shells discovered at the sniper's nest came from a batch delivered to the United States Marine Corps (USMC) in 1954 when the USMC had no weapons that could use such ammunition, and most of the primary suspects in the Dealey Plaza operation had been a part of Operation Success – including David Atlee Phillips, David Morales, Jacob Easterline, E. Howard Hunt and most of those involved in the Bay of Pigs. 27.

As for the chief beneficiary of the Dealey Plaza Con Job, as Twyman points out, "Lyndon Johnson himself was renown for his mastery of the art of deception. An anecdotal example was reported in the Dallas Times Herald in 1989, quoting Harry Blackstone, Jr. (son of the illusionist "The Great Blackstone") who worked for Johnson. Blackstone, Jr. said: 'I worked quite some time for Lyndon Johnson as broadcast personnel, and I think I learned more about the art of deception from him than I did from my father. I don't mean that in a negative way, but he was a man who understood the art of misdirection – of making the eye watch 'A' when the dirty work was going on at 'B'…'"

"Johnson brought the magician's skills to full bear in his direction of the JFK assassination cover-up," writes Twyman. "The devices used almost suspend belief: massive alterations of autopsy evidence; removal of incriminating frames from the famous Zapruder film; whole suppression of a plethora of other evidence. Perhaps most significant is that he master plan of the JFK assassination was based on psy-ops methods revealed in CIA documents showing handwritten notes of CIA's master assassination planner William Harvey. The JFK assassination plan for covert operations in New Orleans, Dallas and Mexico City was carefully designed to create the illusion that Oswald was a communist hired by Fidel Castro to kill JFK. A large body of CIA documents support this conclusion to the point of historical fact." 28.

In 1977, Jeff Cohn and Donald Freed wrote "Fidel on the Grassy Knoll" in Liberation Magazine that at the time of the assassination in Dallas, "…back in Miami, a high powered propaganda machine was cranking out stories that Oswald was a Cuban agent. It was largely the work of two Miami-based reporters, brothers Jerry and James Buchanan, who were at the same time propaganda officers for the CIA-supported International Anti-Communist Brigade (IAB). The brigade had mob support, too, as explained by IAB attorney: "(The Brigade) was financed by disposed hotel and gambling room operators who operated under Batista." 29.

So the murder of the President at Dealey Plaza was entwined with a black-propaganda operation designed to blame the assassination on Castro, a scenario also outlined by others, including Mathew Smith, who wrote a book about it, The Second Plot. 30.

That the accused assassin worked at the scene of murder should not be surprising, especially if the Big Con techniques were used, and other accomplices probably worked there too. That the Texas School Book Depository (TSBD) was owned by D.H. Byrd, the founder of the Civil Air Patrol (CAP), defense contractor and a close associate of many of those associated with the Dealey Plaza Sting – General Curtis LeMay, Gen. Charles Cabel and Art Collins, founder of Collins Radio.

Besides the Big Con that was pulled off at Dealey Plaza and the "Big Store" that was the TSBD, there were other "Big Store" theater environments established at the Fort Worth Hotel on the night before the assassination and Zenith Technical Enterprises, the false front for JM/WAVE in Florida.
The Presidential Suite at the Fort Worth hotel, where Kennedy stayed the night before the assassination, was decorated with exquisite, original works of original art supplied by a friend of Ruth Paine from Philadelphia, the accused assassin's benefactor. This coincidental fact would never have become known had the President's not called to thank her, his last phone call on this earth. 31. [See: Mrs. Paine's Garage]

Decorating the walls of the Presidential Suite with paintings also provided an exceptional acoustics listening post to those who wanted to hear the President's personal conversations, and an example of the type of control exercised by those about to kill him.

JM/WAVE was an even more dynamic Big Store operation. As described by former Army officer Bradley E. Ayers [See: The Zenith Secret], assigned there to train the Cuban commandos, JM/WAVE was set up exactly like a con-artists' Big Store. "…The Miami headquarters was covered under a civilian corporation known as Zenith Technical Enterprises. The station, or 'company,' was located on the University of Miami's South Campus, adjacent to the abandoned Richmond Naval Air Station, which had been developed by the Navy during World War II as a dirigible base….They had missed no detail in setting up the false front of Zenith Technical Enterprises…a firm doing classified government research....There were phony sales and production charts on the walls and business licenses from the state and federal governments. A notice to salesmen, pinned near the door, advised them of the calling hours for various departments. The crowning touch was a certificate of award from the United Givers' Fund to Zenith for outstanding participation in its annual fund drive." 32.

Zenith Technical Services was set up like a fake Hollywood Wild West town, complete with a front office, secretaries, photos and awards on the wall and a CEO, though in reality it was nothing more than a façade.

"I was totally amazed that the cover branch was able to create new people, to change identities, appearances, credentials, passports, or whatever might be necessary for a specific mission," says Ayers. "Some agents had as many as three or four identities, each used for a different task. Characters and personalities materialized and disappeared as if by magic. I came away from the cover branch with a disconcerting awareness. I had always assumed that people were who and what they said they were. Suddenly it seemed apparent that, at least in the CIA, any person could simply be playing a cover role. I resolved that I'd never again accept anyone at face value. I did not know then that my resolve would return to haunt me."

Nor is it a coincidence that Gordon Campbell, identified as the head of JM/WAVE's maritime operations, introduced Ayers to "Karl" as his "Outside Man," using the same slang and terminology as the con-men described by Maurer in his book.

Gordon Campbell was the "Inside Man" at JM/WAVE, the master of psychology and the one everyone else looked to for their cue.

And Gordon Campbell is the JM/WAVE operator whose death certificate says he died in 1962, two years before Ayers remembers having dinner with him at the Black Forge restaurant in Miami when Campbell explained the deactivation of JM/WAVE, the disassembling of Zenith Technical Service so no trace of it would be left, and disbursement of the Cuban players in the drama. And "Karl," Campbell's Outside Man, supposedly died mysteriously in a helicopter accident witnessed by Ayers.

The JM/WAVE Big Store totally disappeared before the end of 1964, while the Texas School Book Depository (TSBD) is now a museum dedicated to the murder of the president, where you can learn anything about the assassination except the tricks behind the magic of the Big Con.

One thing is for certain however. Those who take up a study of the assassination of President Kennedy, the Bay of Pigs, the Guatemalan Coup of 1954 or any covert operation of the Cold War must have an understanding of psychological warfare and the Big Con in order to understand how those operations were planned and executed.

As for the continued domestic use of such covert operations and assassinations in domestic politics, David Maurer warns in his book The American Confidence Man, that the Big Con schemes can only succeed when graft is accepted and those responsible for the enforcement of the law are bought off and "on the take."

"As long as the political boss (whether he be local, state, national, foreign or of the home-grown variety) fosters a machine wherein graft and bribery are looked upon as a normal phase of government, and as long as juries, judges, and key enforcement officers can be had for a price, the confidence man will continue to live and thrive." 35.

And so will political assassination.

[The Big Con at Dealey Plaza, as updated, was originally the second part of my report to the Fund for Constitutional Government – Investigative Project, (circa 1994), updated 2007.

William Kelly – October, 2007 Bkjfk3@yahoo.com ] 36.


MORE ON PAUL LINEBARGER:

The Open Mind – The Application of Paul Linebarger's psychological warfare to current day U.S. policy [http://the-open-mind.blogspot.com/2005/02/paul-linebargers-psychological-warfare.html]
"but I do know that you should remove my full name from your sig. Dig?" - Unnamed, Super Scary Persun, bbrrrrr....
User avatar
Et in Arcadia ego
 
Posts: 4104
Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2005 5:06 pm
Location: The Void
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby sunny » Sat Dec 15, 2007 11:55 pm

This was posted earlier but the discussion didn't get very far:

http://rigorousintuition.ca/board/viewt ... aley+plaza

I too would like to get Hugh's take on this. Many of us who have steeped ourselves in assassination minutae tended to focus on such things as trajectories, ballistics, autopsy etc and forget the shock and awe inspiring spectacle of the murder and the why and how of the spectacle. It is embarrassing really how we Americans are so gullible and naive that we can't spot a con job from a mile away, or that it took some of us forty years to figure it out. Those crooks were probably toasting each other that day over what a fine job they had done and they probably did so every year on 11/22 until the day they died.
Choose love
sunny
 
Posts: 5220
Joined: Mon May 16, 2005 10:18 pm
Location: Alabama
Blog: View Blog (1)

Postby Et in Arcadia ego » Sun Dec 16, 2007 12:06 am

Hmph; I missed that one.

Yeah, it's the same writing. I came across it looking for info on Linebarger's book some time back and hadn't seen it brought up here.

8)

Discuss!
"but I do know that you should remove my full name from your sig. Dig?" - Unnamed, Super Scary Persun, bbrrrrr....
User avatar
Et in Arcadia ego
 
Posts: 4104
Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2005 5:06 pm
Location: The Void
Blog: View Blog (0)

Good article folks

Postby slow_dazzle » Sun Dec 16, 2007 5:14 am

I'm no expert on the JFK assassination. Nevertheless, the article is applicable to more than the psychology of 11/22. And I read sunny's comments in that wider context too:

Many of us who have steeped ourselves in assassination minutae tended to focus on such things as trajectories, ballistics, autopsy etc and forget the shock and awe inspiring spectacle of the murder and the why and how of the spectacle. It is embarrassing really how we Americans are so gullible and naive that we can't spot a con job from a mile away, or that it took some of us forty years to figure it out. Those crooks were probably toasting each other that day over what a fine job they had done and they probably did so every year on 11/22 until the day they died.


That is one of the clearest elucidations I have read of how psyops work.

Now fast forward to September 11, 2001 and use the same narrative but make a few changes:

Many of us who have steeped ourselves in CD theory, it must have been a missile, minutae tend to focus on such things as commerical aircraft speeds, flight paths, thermate evidence etc and forget the shock and awe inspiring spectacle of the buildings coming down and the why and how of the spectacle. It is embarrassing really how we Americans are so gullible and naive that we can't spot a con job from a mile away, or that it took some of us six years to figure it out. Those crooks were probably toasting each other that day over what a fine job they had done and they probably will do so every year on 9/11 until the day they die.

Whoever pulled off 9/11 knew the human mindset so well. They knew the truth would never come out about 9/11 and it probably never will.

Most of the trooferati research is still one big yap fest about the technicalities, in true adolescent male style. Hardly anyone is looking a few steps ahead to see where we are going and what is going to happen next.

One of the first serious analyses of WHY 9/11 happened included a chilling prediction of a totalitarian state in response to increasingly scarce energy resources. Well, that particular analysis was uncannily prescient; it is almost here but people just keep on yapping about the technicalities.

Those of you who recognise the parallels with what happened in Germany in the 1930's will know where we are heading.
On behalf of the future, I ask you of the past to leave us alone. You are not welcome among us. You have no sovereignty where we gather.

John Perry Barlow - A Declaration of the Independence of Cyberspace
slow_dazzle
 
Posts: 1132
Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2006 3:19 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby 8bitagent » Sun Dec 16, 2007 6:38 pm

sunny wrote:This was posted earlier but the discussion didn't get very far:

http://rigorousintuition.ca/board/viewt ... aley+plaza

I too would like to get Hugh's take on this. Many of us who have steeped ourselves in assassination minutae tended to focus on such things as trajectories, ballistics, autopsy etc and forget the shock and awe inspiring spectacle of the murder and the why and how of the spectacle.


Ive been saying the SAME thing about 9/11.

Very few truthers actually research the hijackers, and flow of money. If they did that, they'd get to the real dark truth of 9/11 and not the official or "truther" version.

Focusing all on back and to the left, or melting steel points may win you points with the lay person who can be easily swayed, but not in a court of law.

JFK researchers sometimes have a tendency to overlook or pass off any mafia or Cuban connection...much like a 9/11 researcher might poo poo Pakistani, Saudi, Israeli, British, or Qatari connections in favor of focusing on Western WASP Whodunits.
"Do you know who I am? I am the arm, and I sound like this..."-man from another place, twin peaks fire walk with me
User avatar
8bitagent
 
Posts: 12243
Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2007 6:49 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Good article folks

Postby 8bitagent » Sun Dec 16, 2007 6:50 pm

slow_dazzle wrote:Most of the trooferati research is still one big yap fest about the technicalities, in true adolescent male style. Hardly anyone is looking a few steps ahead to see where we are going and what is going to happen next.


...or how it REALLY came about.

Ask the average "truther" who Yassin al Qadi, Ali Mohamed, Mamoun Darkazanli, Anwar Aulaqi, Omar al-Bayoumi, etc and they'd be all "huh?"

Truthers can have their Larry Silversteins, Marvin Bushes, and George Bushes. But I tend to focus on what is provable...and aside from my views of the "esoteric" elements of 9/11 that I realize doesnt win me any points,
I stick to what is absolutely provable when it comes to the actual 9/11 investigation

Heres a big clue most truthers miss:

The beginning of that relationship takes us to California where Aulaqi first made contact with two al-Qaeda operatives, Nawaf al-Hazmi and Khalid al-Mihdhar, who would one day crash American Airlines Flight 77 into the Pentagon. On February 4, 2000, four phone calls were placed between Aulaqi's phone and the phone of a man named Omar al-Bayoumi who spent that day securing the financial and living arrangements of the two would be hijackers. The 9/11 Commission Report details al-Bayoumi's claim that he met the 9/11 hijackers--by chance--in a restaurant on February 1. Only a few days later on February 4, he wrote the hijackers a $9,900 certified check (in exchange for cash) that they needed to open a bank account and place a deposit on an apartment in San Diego.

Although the 9/11 Commission regards al-Bayoumi as a devout Muslim unaware of the hijackers' plans, the New York Times has noted that the separate 9/11 Congressional intelligence report reveals that "one of the F.B.I.'s best sources in San Diego informed the F.B.I. that he thought that al-Bayoumi must be an intelligence officer" for the Saudis. It further states that al-Bayoumi "had access to seemingly unlimited funding from Saudi Arabia" and that the money flow "increased significantly after Mr. al-Bayoumi came in contact with the two hijackers in early 2000."


http://media.www.thegwpatriot.com/media ... 7398.shtml

and

A Saudi named Omar al-Bayoumi housed and opened bank accounts for two of the 9/11 hijackers. About two weeks after the assistance began, al-Bayoumi's wife began receiving monthly payments totaling tens of thousands of dollars from Princess Haifa bint Faisal, the wife of Saudi ambassador and Bush confidant Prince Bandar bin Sultan, through a Riggs bank account.[1] Upon discovery of these transactions, the FBI began investigating the bank for possible money-laundering and terrorist financing.

Although the FBI and later the 9/11 Commission ultimately stated that the money was not intentionally being routed to fund terrorists, investigators were surprised to see how lax the safeguards at Riggs Bank were. Several Saudi accounts were discovered to have financial improprieties, including a lack of required background checks and a consistent failure to alert regulators of large transactions, in violation of the law. Many of these transactions involved Prince Bandar personally, often transferring over $1 million at a time.

Following British investigations on the Al Yamamah deal, reported by The Guardian Prince Bandar would have received over $ 1.5 billion in bribery from BAE Systems through the Riggs Bank

Jonathan Bush, uncle of President George W. Bush, was an executive at Riggs Bank during this period.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Riggs_Bank ... _transfers

I can exhaustively prove deep deep Saudi government/intelligence involvement, massive Pakistani ISI involvement, and involvement from the governments of Dubai and Qatar.

Its FROM there I can then show which Western/WASP/US shell companies, elites, etc were clearly involved, and what channels were used(like say, Balkans drug running jihadists, or Ptech, or shell companies)
"Do you know who I am? I am the arm, and I sound like this..."-man from another place, twin peaks fire walk with me
User avatar
8bitagent
 
Posts: 12243
Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2007 6:49 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

8bitagent - you get it...

Postby slow_dazzle » Sun Dec 16, 2007 7:01 pm

...most people don't get it but you do.

Glad to be with you my friend.

s_d
On behalf of the future, I ask you of the past to leave us alone. You are not welcome among us. You have no sovereignty where we gather.

John Perry Barlow - A Declaration of the Independence of Cyberspace
slow_dazzle
 
Posts: 1132
Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2006 3:19 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby FourthBase » Sun Dec 16, 2007 10:08 pm

Besides the Big Con that was pulled off at Dealey Plaza and the "Big Store" that was the TSBD, there were other "Big Store" theater environments established at the Fort Worth Hotel on the night before the assassination and Zenith Technical Enterprises, the false front for JM/WAVE in Florida.
The Presidential Suite at the Fort Worth hotel, where Kennedy stayed the night before the assassination, was decorated with exquisite, original works of original art supplied by a friend of Ruth Paine from Philadelphia, the accused assassin's benefactor. This coincidental fact would never have become known had the President's not called to thank her, his last phone call on this earth. 31. [See: Mrs. Paine's Garage]


:shock:

Holy freaking shit.
I had never heard that before.

Only a few days later on February 4, he wrote the hijackers a $9,900 certified check (in exchange for cash) that they needed to open a bank account and place a deposit on an apartment in San Diego.


Just under the $10,000 alert limit. Yeah right, just a devout Muslim.
“Joy is a current of energy in your body, like chlorophyll or sunlight,
that fills you up and makes you naturally want to do your best.” - Bill Russell
User avatar
FourthBase
 
Posts: 7057
Joined: Thu May 05, 2005 4:41 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby 8bitagent » Sun Dec 16, 2007 11:06 pm

FourthBase wrote:
Besides the Big Con that was pulled off at Dealey Plaza and the "Big Store" that was the TSBD, there were other "Big Store" theater environments established at the Fort Worth Hotel on the night before the assassination and Zenith Technical Enterprises, the false front for JM/WAVE in Florida.
The Presidential Suite at the Fort Worth hotel, where Kennedy stayed the night before the assassination, was decorated with exquisite, original works of original art supplied by a friend of Ruth Paine from Philadelphia, the accused assassin's benefactor. This coincidental fact would never have become known had the President's not called to thank her, his last phone call on this earth. 31. [See: Mrs. Paine's Garage]


:shock:

Holy freaking shit.
I had never heard that before.

Only a few days later on February 4, he wrote the hijackers a $9,900 certified check (in exchange for cash) that they needed to open a bank account and place a deposit on an apartment in San Diego.


Just under the $10,000 alert limit. Yeah right, just a devout Muslim.


See, now isn't it funny how most 9/11 and JFK researchers never knew of these rather "WTF?" large facts in their respective research?

I'm telling ya, the diablo is in the smallest of details, not the big arm waving bullhorning "truther" circus
"Do you know who I am? I am the arm, and I sound like this..."-man from another place, twin peaks fire walk with me
User avatar
8bitagent
 
Posts: 12243
Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2007 6:49 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Scripts. Redford. Theatrical murder in Guatemala.

Postby Hugh Manatee Wins » Mon Dec 17, 2007 3:38 am

Linebarger was brilliant.

Paul Linebarger also used the first instance of keyword hijacking I've found, in his 1945 sci-fi short story about a man named Henry Haber who had found a way to travel to other galaxies. The people who do so are known as "Habermans."

Henry in German is 'Heinz.' Heinz Haber was one of the Project Paperclip Nazi rocket scientists smuggled to the US and he ended up writing nuclear technology propaganda for Disney called 'Our Friend the Atom.'

Note in the op article that there was a lawsuit over ripping off the Big Con book in the Robert Redford film , 'The Sting,' which was itself yet another CIA scenario mirror, just like 'Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid' (Che Guevara's death in Bolivia) and 'Three Days of the Condor' (Operation Condor counter-insurgency against latin American leftists) and 'All the President's Men (CIA and ONI Bob Woodward coup).

'The Sting' portrayed covert ops as a Robin Hood-populist all-American tradition complete with Scott Joplin music played till we couldn't take it anymore from FM radio.
It was like living in a Ken Burns propaganda film with slow pans across sepia-tinted photos of loveable rascals doing what they had to to get by using good old American know how, Judy Garland and Mickey Rooney putting on a show with the whole gang!

The Con and JFK-
The CIA's psy-ops and ambush experts, Edward Lansdale and Lucien Conein, were photographed in Dealey Plaza on 11/22/63.

Both men had been carrying out counter-insurgency and psychological operations in Southeast Asia since WWII. Lucien Conein was such an assassination expert that he was called back from retirement in 1971 when Nixon, as a reelection move, formed what would become the Drug Enforcement Agency and a multi-million dollar campaign to assassinate drug king-pins was proposed. This was really cover for Operation Condor although I'll bet that Nixon was relieved to find some money to keep Conein busy.
I don't recall Nixon riding in any open car motorcades during his presidency...

The same skills go into planning covert ops and writing fiction, the ability to foresee people's expectations and reactions and play into them.
And this is why I find the Hollywood scripts used to cloak 'hostile information' like those theatrical covert ops so fascinating to detect and deconstruct. This is where mind control and fascism intersect, in media scripts.

There's a version of Dealey Plaza constructed every day to murder the truth in Operation Mockingbird 'news' and the Hollywood decoy movies are often truly stunning constructions meant to dismember the truth and hide its grave while we applaud.

Interview with the author of '“The Art of Political Murder: Who Killed the Bishop?”

Here's another theatrical murder in Guatemala in 1998 used to murder someone with evidence of the decades-long dirty war by the military. At the scene of the crime someone pretended to be a homosexual lover fleeing the scene.
One of the murder scene's planners ran for president this year-


http://www.democracynow.org/2007/10/31/new_evidence_suggests_guatemalan_presidential_candidate
FRANCISCO GOLDMAN: When the ‘96 peace accords, which ended the thirty-six-year war, were signed between—the UN-sponsored accords between the Guatemalan guerrillas, who were in a quiescent role, and the victorious Guatemalan army, the army was able to dictate, among other things, a blanket amnesty for all human rights crimes that had occurred during that war, in which 200,000 civilians were slaughtered. It also allowed for a UN sort of truth commission that would be allowed to look into the past, but wouldn’t be able to name names, name military units who were responsible, and so forth.

And Bishop Gerardi thought that this kind of covering-up of the truth was not going to be healthy or good for Guatemala, and he sponsored his own—the Catholic Church, through the Archdiocese Office of Human Rights, sponsored their own human rights report. And as the Church, they were the only organization in the country, through the parishes, that could reach into every community. And he trained 700, you know, pretty humble people, people from local churches, to go out into these communities, into these highland villages that were so shielded off by speaking, you know, sixteen different Mayan languages and traumatized by years of violence, massacres. There is such a thick taboo against speaking out and such fear of outsiders, but the Church, they’re not seen as outsiders. So they went in there for years and collected testimonies.

And on April 24th, two days before his death, he released the most unprecedented, extraordinary four-volume report, in which he managed to identify, for example, 400-plus of the 600 massacres we now know occurred in the war. He managed to list—that’s the whole fourth volume—53,000 of the dead by name, of the 200,000 people we know that died. And he found the army responsible of 80% of the crimes, the guerrillas only 5%. He made it—he did name names and military units and made it clear that if the amnesty could ever be breached, he would make this documentation available to prosecutors and to families seeking justice. Now, this was an unbelievable impertinence. When the army had signed the peace accords, they had never expected to have to put up with something like this. And so, they obviously decided they had to do something.

Now, the real question, why it’s the art of political murder, is the question everybody asks, is why do they kill him two days after the report comes out, not, say, days before? And the answer to that, right, gets to the whole institution of impunity in Guatemala. When you know you don’t have to face justice, when you’ve never faced justice before, that gives you sort of, you know, the equivalent of what Virginia Woolf said to a fiction writer was “a room of one’s own,” you know, that freedom of imagination to dream up an extraordinary crime.

And what this crime was, was pure theater. They rigged up a theatrical event that involved a man with no shirt stepping out of the garage after Bishop Gerardi had been murdered; the vagrant planted there to see him, who had probably taken part in the murder; immediately, in all different sophisticated ways, rumors coming out that it had been a homosexual crime of passion, which resulted—

AMY GOODMAN: By a priest.

FRANCISCO GOLDMAN: By a priest. A corrupt prosecutor, corrupt judges, corrupt media, everybody contributing to this farce. And the story of the book is how this was—what should have been, for the government, a slam-dunk case to pin the whole case on this poor, pathetic priest who shared Bishop Gerardi’s parish house. You know, they claim that he had sicked his dog, and they claim they found signs of dog bites in Bishop Gerardi’s skull, and it was ridiculous.

But in Guatemala, this kind of theatrical crime would ordinarily succeed, and would have if not for the efforts really of the young people portrayed in this book, young secular people in their twenties within the Church, who formed their own investigative unit, named themselves “the untouchables.” And it’s just extraordinary. If it hadn’t been for the efforts of these four young guys and the small team of lawyers at the Church, who, through their own detective work, brought in the first important witnesses in the case and miraculously succeeded in derailing this phony prosecution.

And then, after that, finally—this is a case that saw more than ten people related to the case murdered, two prosecutors chased into exile, judges chased into exile, countless witnesses in exile. But finally, through the most extraordinary bravery of a handful of people, the convictions managed to go through. There was a historic trial. It was the first time Guatemalan military officers had ever been found guilty of taking part in a state-sponsored politically motivated execution.

AMY GOODMAN: And yet, General Otto Perez Molina is running for president.

FRANCISCO GOLDMAN: He’s running for president, and when these accusations emerged in the press, because this is just a few paragraphs, but back in June a Guatemalan newspaper ran them. And he immediately began to get himself in trouble with all kinds of, well, lies, right? First, he said I had written my book because I was in the pay of another politician. Later he accused me of being part of a narco campaign of defamation and political assassinations directed against him.


Then he said—for instance, he tried to say, “I have no knowledge.” You know, when he responded to what had appeared in the paper, he said, “I don’t know Captain Lima,” one of the imprisoned military men. Well, we knew from the UN that he and Captain Lima were constantly having cell phone calls when Lima was in prison. And the funny thing is, people in Guatemala immediately started to email the newspaper, giving details of the thirty-year relationship between Captain Lima and Perez Molina. So why did he lie about this?

And even more importantly, the UN mission investigator told me that—because Perez Molina claimed that he was in Washington, D.C. the week the murder happened and that he had a passport that showed this. But the UN investigator told me, pay no attention to his passports. He is a military intelligence person. He uses multiple passports, and we know that three nights after the murder, he had dinner—Perez Molina had dinner with the UN mission chief, Jean Arnault,, who wanted to sound him out about his theories about the murder, because he’s an intelligence chief. And he thought this would never come out. And he thought he had an alibi. But then, even after this came out, a Guatemalan paper went and investigated, and they found that he had seven passports registered in his name, confirming the UN’s skepticism about his claims, and so forth. And since then, since these kinds of allegations came out, he has ducked his last three debates with his opponent, because they think he’s afraid of answering questions about this case and other crimes, and his poll numbers have started to dip.

And just yesterday—this is very important—just yesterday, it came out and broke, and it’s already been picked up by international wire services, two reporters from El Periodico, the same newspaper, have discovered that Perez Molina’s campaign has links to narcos. And they wanted to publish this information, and they immediately began to get death threats, and the paper was under a lot of pressure. And they’ve had to go to the Office of Human Rights basically to ask for help and protection, and want to get this story out. So this just broke yesterday.
CIA runs mainstream media since WWII:
news rooms, movies/TV, publishing
...
Disney is CIA for kidz!
User avatar
Hugh Manatee Wins
 
Posts: 9869
Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2005 6:51 pm
Location: in context
Blog: View Blog (0)


Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests