by compared2what? » Thu Mar 13, 2008 2:10 pm
(1) I think the piggyback, branding-by-association implication for Camel No. 9 is primarily Chanel (and possibly other products/entities not occurring to me now).
(2) The Times does not know what its talking about when it comes to the mass-cultural matrix of which it is part. That's always worth bearing in mind.
(3) "Love Potion Number Nine" is not applicable, imo. But if applicable, and if we must read the subtext of pop songs for their subliminal conditioning content, connotes LSD, not post-coital smoking. ("I didn't know if it was day or night/I started kissing everything in sight/But then I met a cop down at 34th and Vine/He broke my little bottle of Love Potion Number Nine.")
It's a Leiber-Stoller song, and an obvious repurposing of an R&B narrative best known in the form of the much-covered "Fortuneteller," which was written by New Orleans native Allen Toussaint, who had a local reason to think along such story lines, though that song is really just a love song, a la: Boy meets girl, girl casts spell of love that dimwit boy is slow to recognize, boy marries girl, boy is happy fella, married to the fortune-tella.
(4) "Revolution 9" doesn't and never has suggested political revolution for better or worse. It is a scary-sounding song whether played backward or forward, but it's about medium, not message -- ie, avant aural bricolage.
"Revolution," the single, is a commentary on current events that does not take an explicit precise position wrt political revolution, although it seems to reject violent revolution. ("But when you talk about destruction, don't you know that you can count me out.") Also, it rocks the electric guitar.
Speaking only for myself, at the time of its release, I definitely understood "Revolution," the album track ("Don't you know that you can count me out/in") as authorization from John Lennon, whom I revered, to consider armed overthrow of the state as a legitimate option, though not an a priori endorsement of which way to opt. However, I was then only eight years old. In the present, owing to the psuedo-doo-wop back-up vocals and overall presentation, delivery, etc., I understand it more as an ironic commentary on current events that, in itself, neither endorses nor opposes any position.
Close reading. I love it.
“If someone comes out of a liquor store with a weapon and 50 dollars in cash I don’t care if a Drone kills him or a policeman kills him.” -- Rand Paul