Poztron wrote:8bit,
I salute your research and the timeline you traced for all those covert elements. I'm not especially won over by the "woo" stuff at the end, but that doesn't negate for me the value of the info set out up to that point.
One thing did strike me, though, after reading through the timeline. And that was that there seemed to be an enormous number of working parts to herd along for whoever might have been directing this. Which leads me to wonder whether a good chunk of this was not the product of intricate planning, but rather the convergence of forces separately set in motion coming together like iron filings drawn together by a powerful magnet.
You touch on some of the 9/11 team almost laughably making efforts to draw attention to themselves and of the curious components of one of the hijackers' luggage that didn't make it on the plane. I suspect that if we could explain these seemingly inexplicable elements, much else would fall into place.
Thank you!
Again, to really study 9/11...one truly has to put aside what they assume, what they believe, what they have concluded.
You cannot go into 9/11 with the pre-assumed-no-matter-what notion that
Osama and al Qaeda" or "Bush and Cheney" orchestrated 9/11. Youll be disappointed, and shocked.
You cant go into this thinking Osama and al Qaeda werent intimately involved. You will be disappointed. You will see footage of the hijackers hanging with Osama in Afghanistan. You will see hardcore proof that al Qaeda and global Islamic terrorism was intimately involved at every step of 9/11. You will also see however, that things are not always as they appear...and the very idea of the WTC Towers being a potential target and planes-into-buildings did not come from a Muslim or someone from the middle east. People's ego's...there "we know 9/11 was a US inside job, end of story"...or "9/11 was merely Osama, all blowback and incompetence"...just gets in the way. You have to be willing to wipe that etch a sketch clean and see where it all fits. a Unified theory that makes sense.
Too many people slant it to be incompetence(Peter Lance), total US orchestrated inside job(David Ray Griffin), or an "Israel Job"(Chris Bollyn)
This just is not the case. I see way too much bias against al Qaeda and hijacker research from the 9/11 truth community
IMAGINE, if there was a JFK oliver stone film about 9/11...it wouldnt all be focused on the day itself. It'd be like if JFK only was about the day itself...and not the intricate layers of CIA, Cubans, Mafia, dupes, criminals, etc involved
We must make no mistake...deep vast level criminal networks from the Ukraine to Peru exist. This arms-narco-kidnapping-legit business post BCCI structure reaches into terrorism, but it's only part of the story as Loretta Napoliani seems to sidestep.
You said
One thing did strike me, though, after reading through the timeline. And that was that there seemed to be an enormous number of working parts to herd along for whoever might have been directing this. Which leads me to wonder whether a good chunk of this was not the product of intricate planning, but rather the convergence of forces separately set in motion coming together like iron filings drawn together by a powerful magnet.
You got it. It wasnt as if some Bilderberg roundtable of elites in their Reptillian Illuminati cloaks and cigars said "Ok were going to create Islamic terror jihadists in 1979, then tell the world its to fight the Soviets...then make the jihadists think they are really going to be fighting in Bosnia and attack Western interests, but really..."
It's a converging of layers, a mandala of sorts. A meta-play where each actor does not know the other's script, and they themselves might not consciously "be in on it" and certainly does not see the grand scope of it all. We know Pakistani ISI, Saudi diplomats-royals-GID intel was in on it, as were elements of Israeli spy networks, British MI6 assets, Qatar,
Dubai, and of course elements within the US government. This doesnt mean they all knew of eachothers roles, or even knew they were being used for a grand scheme. Its possible, for example, Omar Saeed(the MI6/ISI/al Qaeda agent) was used to get Pakistani ISI general Mahmoud Ahmed compromised and linked to Atta.
Anyways, you're right...converging of divergent layers, yet they get interwined in what i call the "post BCCI octopus" for lack of a better word. The transnational corporate beast.
Last but not least, the "hijackers set off to intentionally lead big giant bread crumbs" theory seems pretty solid the more and more you look at all the crazy antics the hijackers were up to...not including the Saudi diplomats showing up in limos at their apartments and houses.
Was Atta a psychotic double mole, used to lead the brainwashed young jihadi pack into a suicide mission for his handlers? Was John Oneil intentionally sent to the WTC on 9/11 to die? Again, speculation...but interesting speculation, nonetheless
I just wish there were more 'truth' researchers interested in putting together all this stuff instead of arguing endlessly about melting points and
pentagon holes
"Do you know who I am? I am the arm, and I sound like this..."-man from another place, twin peaks fire walk with me