Judith Miller and David Kelly

by **antiaristo** » Wed Aug 31, 2005 9:04 am

A new wrinkle in the Plame affair? Published: August 30 2005 03:00 | Last updated: August 30 2005 03:00 Financial Times An intriguing new theory has emerged in the case of Valerie Plame, the outed CIA operative. The mainstream media has focused on Karl Rove, President Bush's chief political guru, as the source of the original story identifying Plame. The alleged motive was revenge against former ambassador Joseph Wilson, Plame's husband, an outspoken critic of the Iraq war. Observer now hears a new angle on the story is circulating inside the Justice Department. It involves Judith Miller, the veteran New York Times reporter currently languishing in a Virginia jail for refusing to reveal her source(s) in the Plame affair. Many have assumed that Miller - who never actually wrote a story identifying Plame as an operative - is protecting Rove and/or other administration officials. But the missing link is that Miller is not a political reporter, but rather an investigative journalist who co-wrote a book on America's secret war against biological weapons and later published controversial articles on Iraq's effort to acquire weapons of mass destruction. Now here's the twist: Plame herself is a CIA operative who also specialised in weapons of mass destruction and bio-terrorism. So did Miller get to know Plame while she was writing her book or even use her as a source for other WMD stories? Despite 56 days' imprisonment and a vociferous campaign to release her - Miller is staying mum. But at some point, surely, the truth will come out. <a href="http://news.ft.com/cms/s/0494cc76-18f3-11da-8fe9-00000e2511c8.html">news.ft.com/cms/s/0494cc7...511c8.html</a> Correct me if I'm wrong (I don't doubt it!), but Miller's infamous meeting was on or about 8 July 2003. I always say, it's in the timing. What else was going on at the time? Have we all forgotten Dr David Kelly so soon? The poor man was "done" (Operation Mason in the TVP logbook) on 17 July 2003, having dominated the news for most of that month. Any connections between Miller and Kelly? Too bloody right. It was to Miller that Kelly sent one of his last e-mails. In it was the quote about "Dark actors playing games". Kelly was the primary source for Miller's book. Any other connections? Does anybody remember what Wilson's op-ed was about? It was about challenging "those sixteen words" in the SOTU. Does anybody remember what those sixteen words were? "The BRITISH GOVERNMENT has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa" The BRITISH GOVERNMENT It's pretty clear why she's keeping her mouth shut. I've been warning you Americans for years about what the British Crown is doing to your government and your country. About how they are using the Treason Felony Act to take you over. About how Cheney, the top Freemason, is Her top agent. But it's much more important to talk about "antisemitism", isn't it?

by **Dreams End** » Wed Aug 31, 2005 9:14 am

Yeah, that's an interesting theory, but besides the "anti-Semitism" angle, I simply think theories that need some country outside of the US to blame for what's going on IN the US is unneeded. One of the tricks after Kennedy was shot was setting up all kinds of "hints" so people would look elsewhere for the villains: mafia, cuba, ussr etc. Diversion.

by **antiaristo** » Wed Aug 31, 2005 9:16 am

Let me just throw this into the equation. It is a source document (I have the acknowledgement from the Lord Chancellor's Office to prove it) from EXACTLY that period about EXACTLY that subject. C/ Eusebio Navarro, 12 Lord “Charlie” Falconer 35003 Las Palmas de Gran House of Lords Spain Canaria Correos Certificado 17629ES 18 June 2003 Queens Bench 1994-c-2024 JP Cleary v Anglia Television Dear Sir, So, the august and ancient office of Lord Chancellor is no more, eh? A rose by any other name would smell as sweet. Let’s see now. Take yourself: appointed by the Queen as… President of the Second Chamber [LEGISLATIVE], with a Seat in Cabinet with the “Justice” portfolio [EXECUTIVE], and Queens Counsel, able to deputise as a High Court judge. What was it they said about the George Bush (41) tax increase? If it looks like a Lord Chancellor, acts like a Lord Chancellor, defecates on ordinary people and answers to no one like a Lord Chancellor…it’s a Lord Chancellor. Congratulations, Queens Counsel. Irvine was disposed of. You are the latest foreigner selected by the Harlot to serve as senior law officer of England. Your brief: “Words mean exactly what she wants them to mean, only force matters (the Law of Thelema). A thousand years of English common law; the Treaty of Maastricht; Human Rights Act; Resolution 1441. It’s all a load of old rubbish to Her Majesty. Just plumbing to be fixed by disposable servants like Blair and Irvine.” The Enemy Within Now that we’ve cleared up that little deception, let’s get down to the matter at hand. The forged Court documents issued under Lord Mackay of Clashfern (JP Cleary v Anglia Television) and by Lord Irvine of Lairg (Wandsworth Council v JP Cleary), in both cases acting on the orders of Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth. I’m sure you know the high significance of the American President’s annual address to Congress, known as the State of the Union. On 28 January this year President Bush cited documentation he claimed “proved” Saddam Hussein had purchased large quantities of uranium oxide ore from Niger. The documentation was “authenticated by the British”, according to the President himself. Your chum Bomber Blair, at it again, waving around his enormous “God-given” Royal Prerogative. BLAIR LIED AND THOUSANDS DIED BUT THE WINDSORS THRIVE. So we have forged Court documents issued by the British Crown in February 1995. We have forged Court documents issued by the British Crown in April, June and August 2000. We have forged Government of Niger documents laundered by the British, according to President Bush. That’s quite a record for the “fount of all justice and honour”. So why should anybody believe a word that comes out of the British Junta while the Windsors are in charge? On what grounds do you seek judicial parity with the 24 democracies that comprise the European Union? What has changed in the three years since I warned Jospin and Reno against recognizing that obscenity as a legitimate and trustworthy jurisdiction? Exactly when did the thieving old slag in Buckingham Palace give up her “God-given” right to defecate on whomsoever she wishes by means of the English Court? And who, exactly, will enforce that prohibition against the Sadist Sovereign when that Sadist Sovereign really doesn’t want it enforced? R.S.V.P. Yours faithfully, John Cleary BScMAMBA Cc Jacques Chirac Jean-Pierre Raffarin 97375 Lady Hillary Clinton Henry Waxman 97376 Kofi Annan Hans Blix Iain Duncan Smith Charles Kennedy 97377 Enc. Cleary to Peat 16 Nov, 26 Nov, 11 Dec, 14 Dec 2002 Cleary to Reno 29 May 2000 The Enemy Within 25 March 2003

by **Qutb** » Wed Aug 31, 2005 9:20 am

Anti, I think you're on the right track here. I don't know about the queen and Cheney being her agent and all that, but Kelley's murder is most probably connected to the outing of Plame. Kelley had been talking to the BBC about the "sexed-up" British dossier, right? Wasn't the Nigerian yellowcake mentioned in that dossier before it was used by Cheney/Bush et al? Qutb means "axis," "pole," "the center," which contains the periphery or is present in it. The qutb is a spiritual being, or function, which can reside in a human being or several human beings or a moment. It is the elusive mystery of how the divine gets delegated into the manifest world and obviously cannot be defined.

by **dbeach** » Wed Aug 31, 2005 11:02 am

miller shows up and kelly ends up in the morgue maybe miller should be changed to .iller. lots of coincidences,plane crashes,suicides,diseases since 11/22/63 buy hey her nibs is happy and her cousin georgie is on the american throne as her viceroy...oops ..I mean is the american president except he never got elected and therefore is the WH occupunk. Anti rides again!! peace from da beach.

by **rain** » Wed Aug 31, 2005 11:46 am

for you John - <a href="http://www.cloakanddagger.de/home_copy(11).htm">www.cloakanddagger.de/home_copy(11).htm</a> don't choke on your coffee !

by **antiaristo** » Wed Aug 31, 2005 12:22 pm

rain, Nice to see you back. Someone should tell Sherman this is not the crowned heads of Europe. It is the Order of the Garter, photographed on the Day of St John. Look at their outfits: this is a priesthood. The Scottish Rite priesthood. Note the prominence given to the Duke of Kent, titular head of the York Rite. Up at the back there is Sir Timothy Colman (of the mustard family) who was one of the Directors of Anglia Television at the time of the fraud. THESE are the people that direct Cheney.

by **antiaristo** » Wed Aug 31, 2005 6:08 pm

Yeah, that's an interesting theory, but besides the "anti-Semitism" angle, I simply think theories that need some country outside of the US to blame for what's going on IN the US is unneeded. DreamsEnd, Thanks for the instantaneous faint praise. I've been wondering for a while whether your blind spot is of the Nelsonian variety. I really cannot let this pass. Did you READ your President's words? Again: "The BRITISH GOVERNMENT has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa" See those words BRITISH GOVERNMENT? That's "some country outside of the US". What the hell are you talking about?

by **antiaristo** » Wed Aug 31, 2005 6:49 pm

Kelley had been talking to the BBC about the "sexed-up" British dossier, right? Wasn't the Nigerian yellowcake mentioned in that dossier before it was used by Cheney/Bush et al? Qutb, Sorry to bypass you. Yes, you are partway there. The September 24 Dossier can be traced directly to Alastair Campbell (holder of royal prerogative powers). It did indeed allude to this uranium. But the critical point is not that the information appeared there first, before being used by Cheney, Bush AND POWELL. The critical point is this. The information was debunked IN THE US. The FALLBACK POSITION was to use "The British Government" as the source of authority. The British Government was used to launder forgeries. That happened because the Queen knows she can control the actions of the British Government by authority of the Treason Felony Act. And Bush knows that. Don't you remember the "negotiations" about the wording between the CIA guy and Stephen Hadley? When Hadley said it was "not untrue to state that the British Government has learned..."? The CIA guy was undercut because he could not speak the truth. British perfidy. The British Government was used to launder forgeries. That's why the letter to Falconer is so important. This perfidy is systematic. The roots of your problems lie on this side of the Atlantic.

by **Dreams End** » Wed Aug 31, 2005 7:00 pm

<blockquote>Quote:<hr>"The BRITISH GOVERNMENT has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa"<hr></blockquote> This proves the British started the war? Colin Powell got in front of the UN and said a LOT more blatantly false stuff. The forgery was traced to Italy. (P-2?) The Pakistani's brought in the money for 9-11. The Saudi's were involved. Mossad probably involved.

by **antiaristo** » Wed Aug 31, 2005 7:14 pm

DreamsEnd, Thanks. Now I know it's Nelsonian.

by **Dreams End** » Wed Aug 31, 2005 7:21 pm

I can't wait till your lawsuit is done and you can explain what you are talking about.

by **rain** » Wed Aug 31, 2005 9:34 pm

in the land of the blind the one-eyed man is king. can't wait .... alas too late. ps - not sure about 'back', just drifting. finding the mud a wee bit strenuous. I'm thinking maybe I don't want to see this again. beam me up Scotty ... ice, ice, baby... doh.

by **dbeach** » Wed Aug 31, 2005 9:49 pm

Anti her nibs cousin georgie is doing a splendid job as her specially appointed viceroy.. How much is in their joint bank account?? the USA is under a nazi type occupation directed from within the london bankers and her royal majesty.. until bush is useless to her ..she will stick with this loser..reptoids eat loosh

by **Col Quisp** » Wed Aug 31, 2005 10:49 pm

If Bush and his ilk feed on loosh, then we should stop getting so upset and emotional about all this stuff so they'll starve. Banish with laughter!

Judith Miller and David Kelly

Judith Miller and David Kelly

interesting, but...

Re: Judith Miller and David Kelly

Re: Judith Miller and David Kelly

Re: Judith Miller and David Kelly

happy snaps

Re: happy snaps

Re: interesting, but

Re: Judith Miller and David Kelly

Re: Judith Miller and David Kelly

Re: Judith Miller and David Kelly

Re: Judith Miller and David Kelly

anti

Re: anti

Bush eats loosh

Who is online