Art with girls and birds. NSFW, at all.

[brainpanhandler]

Nice one.

I don't think they're real though. See the scar underneath?

[freemason9]

Okay, I'll admit it. I don't know how to post an image on this thing.[/img]

[brainpanhandler]

Okay, I'll admit it. I don't know how to post an image on this thing.

Check out this thread.

http://rigorousintuition.ca/board/viewtopic.php?t=9167

I use imageshack and have had very few problems.

[compared2what?]

[Seamus OBlimey]

[compared2what?]

Les filles, ou sont elles, Seamus?

Though I'd kind of like it if their absence were the answer to that question, actually.

[Seamus OBlimey]

That last pic shows a pair of magpies. I don't which was the girl but the one on the right was making all the noise.

[compared2what?]

Okey-doke.

And just to continue keeping it unsafe for work:

[Seamus OBlimey]

And there may be some in the planes.

[Seamus OBlimey]

Art?

[compared2what?]

[brainpanhandler]

[OP ED]

Oh. I thought maybe you didn't get that the 1919 Public Health poster was part of a series for boys, and the 1922 Public Health poster that recycles the same image was part of a series for girls. And I was wondering if you had suddenly become severely impaired.

The NSFW thing makes perfect sense, along the following lines:

(a) This thread arose out of the "Great Tits Cope Well With Warming" thread;

(b) it therefore entails a de facto presumption that all girl/bird art is pornographic, because I say so; and

(c) I say so because it's amusing me to regard it that way. Why are you trying to rain on my parade?

I very much hope this clears up any unnecessary confusion.
Sincerely yours,

c2w

Oh no, I got that one darlin'. Even the numerology of the pieces indicated their target gender.

(okay, so i'm a little odd)

i prefer the one on the right, actually. although i find the idea that marriage is the cause of the spread of gonhorrea to be fascinating. i am often severely impaired, but normally only temporarily. and not in this case.

I just literally didn't know what NSFW stood for. This likely a result of my not ever having worked a job wherein it would be relevant to know this sort of netslang. I prefer manual labor to box work.

(which means you didn't clear anything up with your reply btw though it was cleared up by another immediately afterward, so no worries)

I had all sorts of inappropriate things in mind re: NSFW. I can make that into at least nine dirty phrases.

(more if I reuse the words "Swans" and "Women")

but i digress.

to your other points, because i'm waiting on my brownies to finish baking.

a. I remember it.
b. close enough it isn't worth debating.
c. the rain falls on the good and the bad alike.

Having reflected on the purpose of this thread, I lament having not joined in sooner, as the liscense to post pictures of girls as long as there are birds in the pictures as well seems right up my alley. On second thinking, I realize that the best bird on girl action is already taken, and a brief once over with a google attempt reveals little that isn't one of the following:
1. not possessing either birds and/or girls
2. already taken
3. actual porn
4. this thread. see number 2.
Which means I may have waited too long. The only bird/girl art I can think of now would have religious overtones.
Now I am sad. While I have done some "art" of my own for non-commercial (mostly propoganda) purposes, I do not believe that I have ever crafted anything that contains both bird(s) and girl(s). This is unfortunate, but it does save me from being teased for the quality of my technique.

oh well.

Love is Law,
SHCR

[OP ED]

[OP ED]