by marykmusic » Sun Oct 30, 2005 2:35 pm
The public is being conditioned to accept as probable reality, that the Next Flu WILL be a really bad one. From this article <!--EZCODE LINK START--><a href="http://www.azcentral.com/arizonarepublic/news/articles/1030superflu30.html" target="top">in the Arizona Republic</a><!--EZCODE LINK END--> comes all kinds of warnings, that panicking people will have to be forced to undergo a vaccination program, that sick people be quarentined by force if necessary, and that total chaos will ensue. Thsy think. Of course, they're not absloutely sure yet:<!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>Although it is impossible to say when the next super-flu will strike, there have been three pandemics in the past century, and influenza experts say the world is overdue. Concern is growing that the bird flu could trigger one if it mutates to start spreading easily among people, something that hasn't yet happened.<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><br>So what DID happen in the 1918 flu epidemic? My grandfather told me years ago that he and his family, including 10 siblings, didn't get shots because their father was a religious man who didn't believe in it. Nobody got sick. Here's a take on that: <br><br>FEBRUARY 7, 2004. You may have noticed that researchers are now <br>saying they have analyzed the virus that caused the 1918 global <br>pandemic of flu. They are linking it to a bird virus, which stirs the <br>pot on the current flap about avian flu in Asia. <br><br>The PR goes this way: If this current bird virus mutates just a <br>little bit in the wrong direction, we could see a replay of the 1918 <br>disaster. <br><br>Here is another analysis, written about 25 years ago by Eleanor <br>McBean. This excerpt, from chapter two of her book, Vaccination <br>Condemned, makes a quite different observation: <br><br>I WAS AN ON-THE-SPOT OBSERVER OF THE 1918 INFLUENZA EPIDEMIC <br><br>All the doctors and people who were living at the time of the 1918 <br>Spanish Influenza epidemic say it was the most terrible disease the <br>world has ever had. Strong men, hale and hearty, one day would be <br>dead the next. The disease had the characteristics of the black death <br>added to typhoid, diphtheria, pneumonia, smallpox, paralysis and all <br>the diseases the people had been vaccinated with immediately <br>following World War 1. Practically the entire population had been <br>injected "seeded" with a dozen or more diseases - or toxic serums. <br>When all those doctor-made diseases started breaking out all at once <br>it was tragic. <br><br>That pandemic dragged on for two years, kept alive with the addition <br>of more poison drugs administered by the doctors who tried to <br>suppress the symptoms. As far as I could find out, the flu hit only <br>the vaccinated. Those who had refused the shots escaped the flu. My <br>family had refused all the vaccinations so we remained well all the <br>time. We knew from the health teachings of Graham, Trail, Tilden and <br>others, that people cannot contaminate the body with poisons without <br>causing disease. <br><br>When the flu was at its peak, all the stores were closed as well as <br>the schools, businesses - even the hospital, as the doctors and <br>nurses had been vaccinated too and were down with the flu. No one was <br>on the streets. It was like a ghost town. We [who didn't taken any <br>vaccines] seemed to be the only family which didn't get the flu; so <br>my parents went from house to house doing what they could to look <br>after the sick, as it was impossible to get a doctor then. If it were <br>possible for germs, bacteria, virus, or bacilli to cause disease, <br>they had plenty of opportunity to attack my parents when they were <br>spending many hours a day in the sick rooms. But they didn't get the <br>flu and they didn't bring any germs home to attack us children and <br>cause anything. None of our family had the flu - not even a sniffle- <br>and it was in the winter with deep snow on the ground. <br><br>It has been said that the 1918 flu epidemic killed 20,000,000 people <br>throughout the world. But, actually, the doctors killed them with <br>their crude and deadly treatments and drugs. This is a harsh <br>accusation but it is nevertheless true, judging by the success of the <br>drugless doctors in comparison with that of the medical doctors. <br><br>While the medical men and medical hospitals were losing 33% of their <br>flu cases, the non-medical hospitals such as BATTLE CREEK, KELLOGG <br>and MACFADDEN'S HEALTH-RESTORIUM were getting almost 100% healings <br>with their water cure, baths, enemas, etc., fasting and certain other <br>simple healing methods, followed by carefully worked out diets of <br>natural foods. One health doctor didn't lose a patient in eight <br>years. The very successful health treatment of one of those drugless <br>doctors who didn't lose any patients will be given in the other part <br>of this book, titled VACCINATION CONDEMNED, to be published a little <br>later. <br><br>If the medical doctors had been as advanced as the drugless doctors, <br>there would not have been those 20 million deaths from the medical <br>flu treatment. <br><br>There was seven times more disease among the vaccinated soldiers than <br>among the unvaccinated civilians, and the diseases were those they <br>had been vaccinated against. One soldier who had returned from <br>overseas in 1912 told me that the army hospitals were filled with <br>cases of infantile paralysis and he wondered why grown men should <br>have an infant disease. Now, we know that paralysis is a common after-<br>effect of vaccine poisoning. Those at home didn't get the paralysis <br>until after the world-wide vaccination campaign in 1918. <br><br>End of excerpt <br> The whole article is at <!--EZCODE LINK START--><a href="http://www.nomorefakenews.com/archives/archiveview.php?key=1851" target="top">THE FLU: 1918 AND NOW </a><!--EZCODE LINK END--><br><br>We've discussed this before... --MaryK <p></p><i></i>